Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 3 de 3
2.
Radiology ; 303(1): 119-127, 2022 04.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35014904

Background Dark-field chest radiography allows for assessment of lung alveolar structure by exploiting wave optical properties of x-rays. Purpose To evaluate the qualitative and quantitative features of dark-field chest radiography in participants with pulmonary emphysema as compared with those in healthy control subjects. Materials and Methods In this prospective study conducted from October 2018 to October 2020, participants aged at least 18 years who underwent clinically indicated chest CT were screened for participation. Inclusion criteria were an ability to consent to the procedure and stand upright without help. Exclusion criteria were pregnancy, serious medical conditions, and any lung condition besides emphysema that was visible on CT images. Participants were examined with a clinical dark-field chest radiography prototype that simultaneously acquired both attenuation-based radiographs and dark-field chest radiographs. Dark-field coefficients were tested for correlation with each participant's CT-based emphysema index using the Spearman correlation test. Dark-field coefficients of adjacent groups in the semiquantitative Fleischner Society emphysema grading system were compared using a Wilcoxon Mann-Whitney U test. The capability of the dark-field coefficient to enable detection of emphysema was evaluated with receiver operating characteristics curve analysis. Results A total of 83 participants (mean age, 65 years ± 12 [standard deviation]; 52 men) were studied. When compared with images from healthy participants, dark-field chest radiographs in participants with emphysema had a lower and inhomogeneous dark-field signal intensity. The locations of focal signal intensity loss on dark-field images corresponded well with emphysematous areas found on CT images. The dark-field coefficient was negatively correlated with the quantitative CT-based emphysema index (r = -0.54, P < .001). Participants with Fleischner Society grades of mild, moderate, confluent, or advanced destructive emphysema exhibited a lower dark-field coefficient than those without emphysema (eg, 1.3 m-1 ± 0.6 for participants with confluent or advanced destructive emphysema vs 2.6 m-1 ± 0.4 for participants without emphysema; P < .001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for detection of mild emphysema was 0.79. Conclusion Pulmonary emphysema leads to reduced signal intensity on dark-field chest radiographs, showing the technique has potential as a diagnostic tool in the assessment of lung diseases. © RSNA, 2022 See also the editorial by Hatabu and Madore in this issue.


Emphysema , Pulmonary Emphysema , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Emphysema/diagnostic imaging , Female , Humans , Lung/diagnostic imaging , Male , Prospective Studies , Pulmonary Emphysema/diagnostic imaging , Radiography , Radiography, Thoracic/methods
3.
Radiology ; 301(2): 389-395, 2021 11.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34427464

Background X-ray dark-field radiography takes advantage of the wave properties of x-rays, with a relatively high signal in the lungs due to the many air-tissue interfaces in the alveoli. Purpose To describe the qualitative and quantitative characteristics of x-ray dark-field images in healthy human subjects. Materials and Methods Between October 2018 and January 2020, patients of legal age who underwent chest CT as part of their diagnostic work-up were screened for study participation. Inclusion criteria were a normal chest CT scan, the ability to consent, and the ability to stand upright without help. Exclusion criteria were pregnancy, serious medical conditions, and changes in the lung tissue, such as those due to cancer, pleural effusion, atelectasis, emphysema, infiltrates, ground-glass opacities, or pneumothorax. Images of study participants were obtained by using a clinical x-ray dark-field prototype, recently constructed and commissioned at the authors' institution, to simultaneously acquire both attenuation-based and dark-field thorax radiographs. Each subject's total dark-field signal was correlated with his or her lung volume, and the dark-field coefficient was correlated with age, sex, weight, and height. Results Overall, 40 subjects were included in this study (average age, 62 years ± 13 [standard deviation]; 26 men, 14 women). Normal human lungs have high signal, while the surrounding osseous structures and soft tissue have very low and no signal, respectively. The average dark-field signal was 2.5 m-1 ± 0.4 of examined lung tissue. There was a correlation between the total dark-field signal and the lung volume (r = 0.61, P < .001). No difference was found between men and women (P = .78). Also, age (r = -0.18, P = .26), weight (r = 0.24, P = .13), and height (r = 0.01, P = .96) did not influence dark-field signal. Conclusion This study introduces qualitative and quantitative values for x-ray dark-field imaging in healthy human subjects. The quantitative x-ray dark-field coefficient is independent from demographic subject parameters, emphasizing its potential in diagnostic assessment of the lung. ©RSNA, 2021 See also the editorial by Hatabu and Madore in this issue.


Lung/anatomy & histology , Radiography, Thoracic/methods , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Aged , Evaluation Studies as Topic , Female , Humans , Lung/diagnostic imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Qualitative Research , Reference Values
...