Hypoxia-altitude simulation test to predict altitude-related adverse health effects in COPD patients.

Background/aims: Amongst numerous travellers to high altitude (HA) are many with the highly prevalent COPD, who are at particular risk for altitude-related adverse health effects (ARAHE). We then investigated the hypoxia-altitude simulation test (HAST) to predict ARAHE in COPD patients travelling to altitude. Methods: This prospective diagnostic accuracy study included 75 COPD patients: 40 women, age 58±9 years, forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) 40-80% pred, oxygen saturation measured by pulse oximetry (S pO2 ) ≥92% and arterial carbon dioxide tension (P aCO2 ) <6 kPa. Patients underwent baseline evaluation and HAST, breathing normobaric hypoxic air (inspiratory oxygen fraction (F IO2 ) of 15%) for 15 min, at low altitude (760 m). Cut-off values for a positive HAST were set according to British Thoracic Society (BTS) guidelines (arterial oxygen tension (P aO2 ) <6.6 kPa and/or S pO2 <85%). The following day, patients travelled to HA (3100 m) for two overnight stays where ARAHE development including acute mountain sickness (AMS), Lake Louise Score ≥4 and/or AMS score ≥0.7, severe hypoxaemia (S pO2 <80% for >30 min or 75% for >15 min) or intercurrent illness was observed. Results: ARAHE occurred in 50 (66%) patients and 23 out of 75 (31%) were positive on HAST according to S pO2 , and 11 out of 64 (17%) according to P aO2 . For S pO2 /P aO2 we report a sensitivity of 46/25%, specificity of 84/95%, positive predictive value of 85/92% and negative predictive value of 44/37%. Conclusion: In COPD patients ascending to HA, ARAHE are common. Despite an acceptable positive predictive value of the HAST to predict ARAHE, its clinical use is limited by its insufficient sensitivity and overall accuracy. Counselling COPD patients before altitude travel remains challenging and best focuses on early recognition and treatment of ARAHE with oxygen and descent.

Effect of altitude and acetazolamide on sleep and nocturnal breathing in healthy lowlanders 40 y of age or older. Data from a randomized trial.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To assess altitude-induced sleep and nocturnal breathing disturbances in healthy lowlanders 40 y of age or older and the effects of preventive acetazolamide treatment. METHODS: Clinical examinations and polysomnography were performed at 760 m and in the first night after ascent to 3100 m in a subsample of participants of a larger trial evaluating altitude illness. Participants were randomized 1:1 to treatment with acetazolamide (375 mg/day) or placebo, starting 24 h before and while staying at 3100 m. The main outcomes were indices of sleep structure, oxygenation, and apnea/hypopnea index (AHI). RESULTS: Per protocol analysis included 86 participants (mean ± SE 53 ± 7 y old, 66% female). In 43 individuals randomized to placebo, mean nocturnal pulse oximetry (SpO2) was 94.0 ± 0.4% at 760 m and 86.7 ± 0.4% at 3100 m, with mean change (95%CI) -7.3% (-8.0 to -6.5); oxygen desaturation index (ODI) was 5.0 ± 2.3 at 760 m and 29.2 ± 2.3 at 3100 m, change 24.2/h (18.8 to 24.5); AHI was 11.3 ± 2.4/h at 760 m and 23.5 ± 2.4/h at 3100 m, change 12.2/h (7.3 to 17.0). In 43 individuals randomized to acetazolamide, altitude-induced changes were mitigated. Mean differences (Δ, 95%CI) in altitude-induced changes were: ΔSpO2 2.3% (1.3 to 3.4), ΔODI -15.0/h (-22.6 to -7.4), ΔAHI -11.4/h (-18.3 to -4.6). Total sleep time, sleep efficiency, and N3-sleep fraction decreased with an ascent to 3100 m under placebo by 40 min (17 to 60), 5% (2 to 8), and 6% (2 to 11), respectively. Acetazolamide did not significantly change these outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: During a night at 3100 m, healthy lowlanders aged 40 y or older revealed hypoxemia, sleep apnea, and disturbed sleep. Preventive acetazolamide treatment improved oxygenation and nocturnal breathing but had no effect on sleep duration and structure. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial is registered at Clinical Trials, https://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03561675.

Acetazolamide to Prevent Adverse Altitude Effects in COPD and Healthy Adults.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the efficacy of acetazolamide in preventing adverse altitude effects in patients with moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and in healthy lowlanders 40 years of age or older. METHODS: Trial 1 was a randomized, double-blind, parallel-design trial in which 176 patients with COPD were treated with acetazolamide capsules (375 mg/day) or placebo, starting 24 hours before staying for 2 days at 3100 m. The mean (±SD) age of participants was 57±9 years, and 34% were women. At 760 m, COPD patients had oxygen saturation measured by pulse oximetry of 92% or greater, arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide less than 45 mm Hg, and mean forced expiratory volume in 1 second of 63±11% of predicted. The primary outcome in trial 1 was the incidence of the composite end point of altitude-related adverse health effects (ARAHE) at 3100 m. Criteria for ARAHE included acute mountain sickness (AMS) and symptoms or findings relevant to well-being and safety, such as severe hypoxemia, requiring intervention. Trial 2 comprised 345 healthy lowlanders. Their mean age was 53±7 years, and 69% were women. The participants in trial 2 underwent the same protocol as did the patients with COPD in trial 1. The primary outcome in trial 2 was the incidence of AMS assessed at 3100 m by the Lake Louise questionnaire score (the scale of self-assessed symptoms ranges from 0 to 15 points, indicating absent to severe, with 3 or more points including headache, indicating AMS). RESULTS: In trial 1 of patients with COPD, 68 of 90 (76%) receiving placebo and 42 of 86 (49%) receiving acetazolamide experienced ARAHE (hazard ratio, 0.54; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.37 to 0.79; P<0.001). The number needed to treat (NNT) to prevent one case of ARAHE was 4 (95% CI, 3 to 8). In trial 2 of healthy individuals, 54 of 170 (32%) receiving placebo and 38 of 175 (22%) receiving acetazolamide experienced AMS (hazard ratio, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.29 to 0.80; chi-square statistic P=0.035). The NNT to prevent one case of AMS was 10 (95% CI, 5 to 141). No serious adverse events occurred in these trials. CONCLUSIONS: Preventive treatment with acetazolamide reduced the incidence of adverse altitude effects requiring an intervention in patients with COPD and the incidence of AMS in healthy lowlanders 40 years of age or older during a high-altitude sojourn. (Funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation [Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung], Lunge Zürich, and the Swiss Lung Foundation; ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT03156231 and NCT03561675.)

Effect of High-Flow Oxygen on Exercise Performance in COPD Patients. Randomized Trial.

Background: High-flow oxygen therapy (HFOT) provides oxygen-enriched, humidified, and heated air at high flow rates via nasal cannula. It could be an alternative to low-flow oxygen therapy (LFOT) which is commonly used by patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) during exercise training. Research Question: We evaluated the hypothesis that HFOT improves exercise endurance in COPD patients compared to LFOT. Methods: Patients with stable COPD, FEV1 40-80% predicted, resting pulse oximetry (SpO2) ≥92%, performed two constant-load cycling exercise tests to exhaustion at 75% of maximal work rate on two different days, using LFOT (3 L/min) and HFOT (60 L/min, FiO2 0.45) in randomized order according to a crossover design. Primary outcome was exercise endurance time, further outcomes were SpO2, breath rate and dyspnea. Results: In 79 randomized patients, mean ± SD age 58 ± 9 y, FEV1 63 ± 9% predicted, GOLD grades 2-3, resting PaO2 9.4 ± 1.0 kPa, intention-to-treat analysis revealed an endurance time of 688 ± 463 s with LFOT and 773 ± 471 s with HFOT, mean difference 85 s (95% CI: 7 to 164, P = 0.034), relative increase of 13% (95% CI: 1 to 28). At isotime, patients had lower respiratory rate and higher SpO2 with HFOT. At end-exercise, SpO2 was higher by 2% (95% CI: 2 to 2), and Borg CR10 dyspnea scores were lower by 0.8 points (95% CI: 0.3 to 1.2) compared to LFOT. Interpretation: In mildly hypoxemic patients with COPD, HFOT improved endurance time in association with higher arterial oxygen saturation, reduced respiratory rate and less dyspnea compared to LFOT. Therefore, HFOT is promising for enhancing exercise performance in COPD. Clinical Trial Registration: www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT03955770.