First-Line Immune Combination Therapies for Nonclear Cell Versus Clear Cell Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: Real-World Multicenter Data From Germany.

INTRODUCTION: The aim was to compare treatment outcomes of clear cell metastatic renal cell carcinoma (ccmRCC) versus non-ccmRCC (nccmRCC) patients who received first-line immune combination therapies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Within our retrospective multi-institutional consecutive database of eight tertiary-care centers, we identified mRCC patients treated with first-line immune combination therapies between 11/2017 and 12/2022. Using log-rank analysis and multivariable Cox regression, we tested for differences in overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of nccmRCC versus ccmRCC patients. Covariables consisted of age at diagnosis, sex, International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium risk groups, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status, and sarcomatoid feature. RESULTS: Of 289 study patients, 39 (13%) patients harbored nccmRCC. Median OS was 37 months versus not reached for ccmRCC versus nccmRCC patients (P = .6). Median PFS was 13 versus 15 months (P = .9). Multivariable Cox regression models did not identify nccmRCC as an independent predictor of higher overall mortality in mRCC patients (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.23; P = .6) or a higher progression rate (HR: 1.0; P = 1.0). CONCLUSION: In our real-world multi-institutional study, no differences in OS and PFS between ccmRCC and nccmRCC patients receiving first-line immune combination treatment were observed, even after adjustment for important patient and tumor characteristics. More prospective trials in nccmRCC patients are needed.

Early kinetics of C-reactive protein as prognosticator for survival in a real-world cohort of patients with metastatic renal cell cancer under first-line therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

PURPOSE: This study investigated the prognostic potential of baseline C-reactive protein (CRP) levels and early CRP kinetics in a real-world cohort of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) under first-line (1L) therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPI). METHODS/PATIENTS: Analyses were performed retrospectively in a cohort of 61 mRCC patients under CPI-based 1L therapy. Patients were stratified based on baseline CRP (< 10 vs ≥ 10 mg/l) and CRP change within the initial three months of CPI therapy (normal: baseline < 10 mg/l, normalized: baseline ≥ 10 mg/l and nadir < 10 mg/l, non-normalized: baseline and nadir ≥ 10 mg/l). Finally, the association of baseline CRP and CRP change with progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was evaluated. RESULTS: Baseline CRP was not significantly associated with both PFS (p = 0.666) and OS (p = 0.143). Following stratification according to early CRP kinetics, 23, 25 and 13 patients exhibited normal, normalized and non-normalized CRP levels, respectively. Patients with normal and normalized CRP had a markedly prolonged PFS (p = 0.091) and OS (p = 0.008) compared to patients with non-normalized CRP. Consequently, significantly better PFS (p = 0.031) and OS (p = 0.002) were observed for the combined normal-normalized group. In multivariate analysis including ECOG and IMDC risk, normalized CRP kinetics alone or in combination with the normal group was identified as significant independent risk factor for OS, whereas a statistical trend was observed for PFS. CONCLUSIONS: The present study emphasizes the prognostic potential of early CRP kinetics in CPI-treated mRCC. As a standard laboratory parameter, CRP can be easily implemented into clinical routine to facilitate therapy monitoring.

Early CRP kinetics to predict long-term efficacy of first-line immune-checkpoint inhibition combination therapies in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: an updated multicentre real-world experience applying different CRP kinetics definitions.

Objectives: Although biomarkers predicting therapy response in first-line metastatic renal carcinoma (mRCC) therapy remain to be defined, C-reactive protein (CRP) kinetics have recently been associated with immunotherapy (IO) response. Here, we aimed to assess the predictive and prognostic power of two contemporary CRP kinetics definitions in a large, real-world first-line mRCC cohort. Methods: Metastatic renal carcinoma patients treated with IO-based first-line therapy within 5 years were retrospectively included in this multicentre study. According to Fukuda et al., patients were defined as 'CRP flare-responder', 'CRP responder' and 'non-CRP responder'; according to Ishihara et al., patients were defined as 'normal', 'normalised' and 'non-normalised' based on their early CRP kinetics. Patient and tumor characteristics were compared, and treatment outcome was measured by overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), including multivariable Cox regression analyses. Results: Out of 316 mRCC patients, 227 (72%) were assigned to CRP groups according to Fukuda. Both CRP flare- (HR [Hazard ratio]: 0.59) and CRP responders (HR: 0.52) had a longer PFS, but not OS, than non-CRP responders. According to Ishihara, 276 (87%) patients were assigned to the respective groups, and both normal and normalised patients had a significantly longer PFS and OS, compared with non-normalised group. Conclusion: Different early CRP kinetics may predict therapy response in first-line mRCC therapy in a large real-world cohort. However, further research regarding the optimal timing and frequency of measurement is needed.

Decision Regret and Quality of Life after Focal Therapy with Vascular-Targeted Photodynamic Therapy (TOOKAD®) for Localized Prostate Cancer.

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to assess quality of life (QoL), decision involvement, and decisional regret after treatment with vascular-targeted photodynamic therapy (VTP) (TOOKAD®) for unilateral low-risk prostate cancer. METHODS: Validated questionnaires (EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-PR25) capturing QoL post-treatment, involvement in decision-making (Control Preferences Scale) and decision regret (Decisional Regret Scale), were given to patients at the 12-month visit after undergoing VTP at our institution between May 2018 and February 2021. RESULTS: Out of 44 patients, 36 patients were included in this study and 31 (86.1%) responded to the questionnaires. Mean overall health score capturing QoL at 12 months was 79.3 (standard deviation: ±18.1). 70.9% of the patients (n = 22) had no decision regret, and 67.8% of men (n = 21) had an active role in decision-making. In control biopsy at 12 months post-treatment, 19.4% of patients (n = 7) presented with local recurrence and progression to higher Gleason score (GS) was found in 13.8% of patients (n = 5). Patients (n = 3) presenting with tumor recurrence or progression to higher GS in control biopsy showed a significantly higher level of decision regret (p < 0.009). CONCLUSION: Only 9.7% of men (n = 3) felt a strong emotion of regret at 12 months after VTP. Level of decision regret was significantly higher in patients with local recurrence or tumor progression detected in control biopsy. QoL was stable after VTP.