Effectiveness and safety of filgotinib in rheumatoid arthritis patients: data from the GISEA registry.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety profile of filgotinib, a JAK1 preferential inhibitor, in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients included in Italian GISEA (Group for the Study of Early Arthritis) registry. METHODS: Data from RA patients treated with filgotinib, recorded in the GISEA registry, were analysed. Disease activity scores and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were assessed at baseline, as well as during 12-month follow-up. A difficult-to-treat (D2T) RA patient was defined according with EULAR criteria. Retention rate of filgotinib was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and factors influencing drug discontinuation were estimated by Cox regression models. RESULTS: 246 RA patients (female 89%, 57.6±12.2 years old) started filgotinib, mostly as second (22%) or further (43.9%) b/tsDMARDs line of treatment. At 3 and 12 months, 18.8% and 27.5% of patients achieved Clinical Diseases Activity Index based remission and 30.1% and 37.7% obtained a visual analogue scale of pain ≤20 (all p<0.01 vs. baseline). Filgotinib survival rate was 84.5% at the 6-month and 75.8% at 12-month follow-up, and was comparable either in monotherapy or combination therapy, and irrespective of glucocorticoid intake. b/tsDMARD naive patients had the lowest hazard ratio (HR) of filgotinib discontinuation (HR 0.29, 95%CI 0.14-0.64), while D2T-RA the highest (HR 1.82, 95%CI 1.01-3.3). Eight patients (3.3%) discontinued filgotinib due to adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: In an Italian real-life setting, filgotinib is confirmed to be safe and with a good effectiveness profile both in monotherapy and without glucocorticoids.

The Systemic Score May Identify Life-Threatening Evolution in Still Disease: Data from the GIRRCS AOSD-Study Group and the AIDA Network Still Disease Registry.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the clinical usefulness of the systemic score in the prediction of life-threatening evolution in Still disease. We also aimed to assess the clinical relevance of each component of the systemic score in predicting life-threatening evolution and to derive patient subsets accordingly. METHODS: A multicenter, observational, prospective study was designed including patients included in the Gruppo Italiano Di Ricerca in Reumatologia Clinica e Sperimentale Adult-Onset Still Disease Study Group and the Autoinflammatory Disease Alliance Network Still Disease Registry. Patients were assessed to see if the variables to derive the systemic score were available. The life-threatening evolution was defined as mortality, whatever the clinical course, and/or macrophage activation syndrome, a secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis associated with a poor prognosis. RESULTS: A total of 597 patients with Still disease were assessed (mean ± SD age 36.6 ± 17.3 years; male 44.4%). The systemic score, assessed as a continuous variable, significantly predicted the life-threatening evolution (odds ratio [OR] 1.24; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07-1.42; P = 0.004). A systemic score ≥7 also significantly predicted the likelihood of a patient experiencing life-threatening evolution (OR 3.36; 95% CI 1.81-6.25; P < 0.001). Assessing the clinical relevance of each component of the systemic score, liver involvement (OR 1.68; 95% CI 1.48-2.67; P = 0.031) and lung disease (OR 2.12; 95% CI 1.14-4.49; P = 0.042) both significantly predicted life-threatening evolution. The clinical characteristics of patients with liver involvement and lung disease were derived, highlighting their relevance in multiorgan disease manifestations. CONCLUSION: The clinical utility of the systemic score was shown in identifying Still disease at a higher risk of life-threatening evolution in a large cohort. Furthermore, the clinical relevance of liver involvement and lung disease was highlighted.

Retention rate of biologic and targeted synthetic anti-rheumatic drugs in elderly rheumatoid arthritis patients: data from GISEA registry.

Objectives: An increased number of elderly individuals affected by rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has been reported, including both patients with RA onset in advanced age and patients aged with the disease. In this registry-based study, we aimed to analyze the retention rate and cause of discontinuation of biologic (b) and targeted synthetic (ts)-disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in RA patients over 65 year old. Methods: RA patients enrolled in the Italian GISEA registry and starting a b- or a ts-DMARD over 65 years of age were included. Demographic, clinical, serologic, and therapeutic features were collected. Results: A total of 1,221 elderly RA patients were analyzed (mean age 71.6 ± 5.2 years). RA was diagnosed before 65 years in 72.5% of cases, a 60.6% of patients experienced a previous b- or ts-DMARD. In patients older than 65 initiating a new b- or ts-DMARDS, tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitors (TNFi) were prescribed in 29.6% of patients, abatacept in 24.8%, anti-interleukin 6 receptor antagonists (anti-IL6R) in 16.3%, Janus kinases inhibitors (JAKi) in 24.9%, and rituximab in 4.4%. The main causes of discontinuation were primary or secondary inadequate responses (66.1%). The median retention rate for all treatments was 181.3 weeks. A statistically higher retention rate was observed for abatacept when compared to TNFi (p = 0.02), JAKi (p < 0.001), and anti-IL6R (p < 0.001), and for TNFi vs. JAKi (p = 0.013). Conclusion: We described, in a real-life setting, elderly RA patients treated with a biologic or a ts-DMARD in Italy. Loss of efficacy was the main cause of discontinuation, and the DMARD safety profile suggests that age does not contraindicate their use. Our study reinforced that the control of disease activity is mandatory.

Comorbidities in the Spondyloarthritis GISEA Cohort: an average treatment effect analysis on patients treated with bDMARDs.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to investigate the effectiveness of tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi), anti-interleukin-17 or interleukin-12/23 monoclonal antibodies (anti-IL) on comorbidities in a cohort of patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA), using an average treatment effect (ATE) analysis. METHODS: SpA patients from the multicentre Italian GISEA Registry were divided into groups according to pharmacological exposure: no treatment (G0), TNFi (G1) and non-responders to TNFi switched to anti-IL (G2). In each group, we recorded the prevalence and incidence of infectious, cardiopulmonary, endocrinological, gastrointestinal, oncologic, renal and neurologic comorbidities. Each comorbidity was then fitted for ATE and baseline features were evaluated for importance. RESULTS: The main findings of this study comprising 4458 SpA patients relate to cancer, other gastrointestinal diseases (OGID) and fibromyalgia. ATE showed no increased risk of solid cancer in G1 (0.42 95% CI 0.20-0.85) and G2 (0.26 95% CI 0.08-0.71) vs. G0, with significantly higher incidence in G0 (14.07/1000 patient-years, p=0.0001). Conversely, a significantly higher risk of OGID and fibromyalgia was found in G1 (1.56 95% CI 1.06-2.33; 1.69 95% CI 1.05-2.68, respectively) and G2 (1.91 95% CI 1.05-3.24; 2.13 95% CI 1.14-3.41, respectively) vs. G0. No treatment risk reduction was observed in haematological malignancies, cardiovascular events and endocrinological comorbidities. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, our study confirms the safety of TNFi and anti-IL in SpA patients, albeit with some caveats pertaining to solid cancers, OGID and fibromyalgia. Furthermore, taking into consideration causality with observational data may yield more reliable and relevant clinical information.

Derivation and validation of four patient clusters in Still's disease, results from GIRRCS AOSD-study group and AIDA Network Still Disease Registry.

BACKGROUND: Different patient clusters were preliminarily suggested to dissect the clinical heterogeneity in Still's disease. Thus, we aimed at deriving and validating disease clusters in a multicentre, observational, prospective study to stratify these patients. METHODS: Patients included in GIRRCS AOSD-study group and AIDA Network Still Disease Registry were assessed if variables for cluster analysis were available (age, systemic score, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C reactive protein (CRP) and ferritin). K-means algorithm with Euclidean metric and Elbow plot were used to derive an adequate number of clusters. RESULTS: K-means clustering assessment provided four clusters based on means standardised according to z-scores on 349 patients. All clusters mainly presented fever, skin rash and joint involvement. Cluster 1 was composed by 115 patients distinguished by lower values of age and characterised by skin rash myalgia, sore throat and splenomegaly. Cluster 2 included 128 patients identified by lower levels of ESR, ferritin and systemic score; multiorgan manifestations were less frequently observed. Cluster 3 comprised 31 patients categorised by higher levels of CRP and ferritin, they were characterised by fever and joint involvement. Cluster 4 contained 75 patients derived by higher values of age and systemic score. Myalgia, sore throat, liver involvement and life-threatening complications, leading to a high mortality rate, were observed in these patients. CONCLUSIONS: Four patient clusters in Still's disease may be recognised by a multidimensional characterisation ('Juvenile/Transitional', 'Uncomplicated', 'Hyperferritinemic' and 'Catastrophic'). Of interest, cluster 4 was burdened by an increased rate of life-threatening complications and mortality, suggesting a more severe patient group.

Impact of csDMARDs adherence on clinical remission in patients with new-onset inflammatory arthritis: a prospective cohort study from the ELECTRA database.

Background: Major improvements in the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have made clinical remission an achievable and desirable goal but, despite the relevance gained by a profound disease suppression, many patients with RA still miss clinical remission due to several factors influencing disease activity, including treatment adherence. Objective: To evaluate the effect of adherence to conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) on the achievement of clinical remission in a cohort of patients with new-onset inflammatory arthritis. Study design: A prospective cohort study was conducted using the ELECTRA database, which consists of clinical data from patients followed at the IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo Foundation (Pavia, Italy), linked to regional administrative healthcare databases. Methods: We enrolled patients with new-onset active disease between January 2006 and December 2013 and followed them until their first clinical remission or end of follow-up (December 2015). To assess the association of csDMARD adherence with clinical remission, we estimated the csDMARD proportion of days covered (PDC) during follow-up. PDC was added to the main clinical adjustment covariates as a time-dependent variable in a proportional hazard Cox regression model. Results: The cohort included 324 patients with a mean (SD) age of 58 (13.9) and predominantly female (74.5%). A total of 219 patients (67.6%) achieved clinical remission during follow-up and 85 (26.2%) in the first 6 months (early clinical remission). Cox regression models showed that a 10% increment of PDC increased the probability of achieving clinical remission by 10% (p < 0.001) and the probability of early clinical remission by 21% (p = 0.03). Conclusion: Patients at disease onset with higher adherence to csDMARDs were more likely to achieve clinical remission and early clinical remission. Our study highlighted the importance of close monitoring of patients to increase their likelihood of following therapeutic indications and achieving favorable disease outcomes, such as lower disability.

Janus kinase inhibitors effectively improve pain across different disease activity states in rheumatoid arthritis.

Pain remains one of the most difficult-to-treat domains in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In clinical trials, the Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKis) have demonstrated good efficacy in pain relief. Aim of our study was to evaluate the real-life effectiveness of JAKis in improving pain in patients with RA in different states of baseline disease activity. A monocentric prospective cohort of 181 RA patients starting treatment with JAKis was studied. Pain was evaluated on a 0-100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS). Clinically meaningful improvements over 24 weeks were defined as follows: proportion of patients achieving ≥ 30%, ≥ 50%, and ≥ 70% pain relief, and remaining pain ≤ 20 or ≤ 10 mm. Results were analysed after stratification for baseline inflammatory activity; patients with swollen joints and C-reactive protein ≤ 1 at treatment start were considered pauci-inflammatory. Proportion of patients who achieved ≥ 30%, ≥ 50% and ≥ 70% pain improvement at 24 weeks was 61.4%, 49.3% and 32.9%. Furthermore, 40.6% and 28.5% of the patients achieved thresholds of remaining pain equivalent to mild pain or no/limited pain. Pain improvements were more evident in patients naive to previous biologics, although nearly 30% of multiple failures achieved VAS ≤ 20 mm. No significant differences were observed in relation to monotherapy. Pauci-inflammatory patients at treatment start achieved good outcomes, with 40.4% experiencing ≥ 70% pain improvement, and 35.7% VAS ≤ 10 mm. JAKis show efficacy in pain relief in real life. The improvement of painful symptoms also in those patients with limited objective inflammation may open new perspectives on the management of difficult-to-treat RA.

Synovial and serum B-cell signature of autoantibody-negative rheumatoid arthritis versus autoantibody-positive rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: Autoantibody-negative rheumatoid arthritis (RA) differs from autoantibody-positive RA in several clinical aspects, possibly underpinned by pathogenetic differences. At present, the role of adaptive immune responses in autoantibody-negative RA remains unclear. Here, we investigated the synovial and serum immunophenotype indicative of B-lymphocyte involvement across the spectrum of autoantibody-positive and -negative chronic arthritides. METHODS: Ultrasound-guided synovial biopsies were retrieved from 131 patients: 43 autoantibody-positive RA, 35 autoantibody-negative RA, 25 polyarticular psoriatic arthritis (PsA), 28 oligoarticular PsA. Samples were analysed for the degree of histological inflammation, B-lymphocyte infiltration and the distribution of different pathotypes (lympho-myeloid, myeloid, pauci-immune). Serum levels of the B-cell chemoattractant CXCL13 were compared among groups. RESULTS: Synovitis scores and CD68+ sublining macrophage infiltration were comparable irrespective of clinical diagnosis and disease subtype. In contrast, the degree of B-lymphocyte infiltration and the frequency of lympho-myeloid synovitis in autoantibody-negative RA were lower than those of autoantibody-positive RA (mean [SD] 1.8 [1] vs 2.4 [0.6], p = 0.03 and 38.2% vs 62.9%, p = 0.07, respectively), and similar to polyarticular PsA. Oligoarticular PsA had the lowest B-cell scores. Serum CXCL13 was associated with lympho-myeloid synovitis and followed a similar gradient, with the highest levels in autoantibody-positive RA, intermediate and comparable levels in autoantibody-negative RA and polyarticular PsA, and low levels in oligoarticular PsA. CONCLUSIONS: The synovial and serum immunophenotype indicative of B-lymphocyte involvement in autoantibody-negative RA differs from autoantibody-positive RA and more closely resembles that observed in polyarticular PsA. The pathobiological stratification of chronic inflammatory arthritides beyond clinical diagnosis may fuel personalised treatment strategies.

The access route through the anatomical snuffbox in ultrasound-guided synovial biopsy of the wrist allows for a safe and effective collection of tissue samples in inflammatory arthritis.

BACKGROUND: A proof-of-concept study to evaluate the feasibility and safety of minimally invasive ultrasound (US)-guided synovial biopsy of the radiocarpal (RC) joint using the anatomical snuffbox as an access route. METHODS: Twenty consecutive patients with active chronic arthritis of the wrist underwent minimally invasive US-guided synovial biopsy of the RC joint using the anatomical snuffbox as the access route. Samples were retrieved from 3 predetermined biopsy target sites of the RC synovia (proximal, vault, and distal site), aiming for a minimum of 12 samples. The procedure's feasibility was evaluated based on the number and histological quality of retrieved tissue fragments tested on pre-defined histometric parameters. The safety and tolerability of the procedure were assessed through 1-week and 1-month follow-up clinical evaluations. RESULTS: A median number of 17 fragments (≥ 1 mm diameter size at macroscopic evaluation) per procedure was processed for histopathology (range 9-24) and dedicated to the study. At the histopathologic evaluation, a gradable tissue (visible lining layer and ≥ 4 fragments with IST) was recognized in 19/20 biopsies (95%), and all pre-defined histometric parameters were judged applicable and successfully measured in 19/19 gradable biopsies. All three biopsy target sites showed sampling accessibility. The entire procedure was generally well tolerated. At the 1-month follow-up, no patients showed infectious complications. CONCLUSIONS: The access route through the anatomical snuff box in US-guided synovial biopsies of the RC joint allows for a safe and targeted collection of adequate tissue samples. This modification of the traditional access route may allow easier, repeatable, and safer sampling of anatomically distinct areas of the wrist in the course of arthritis.

Administrative Databases and Diagnostic Therapeutic and Assistance Paths -PDTA- in the Monitoring Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis: The Experience of ATS Pavia.

Background: The current flows of the SSN represent the set of interest whose interconnection alone justifies the current study. These flows can be interconnected with other sources, institutional or otherwise, in order to answer well-defined questions. Objective: The objective of the study is to verify, through the analysis of administrative databases, any differences in the consumption of health resources between biological off-patent originator drugs and biosimilars in real clinical practice, with particular reference to the rheumatology area. Methods: Through the use of assisted databases (BDA) of ATS Pavia we evaluated the differences in terms of consumption of health resources related to the different drugs under analysis. Annual and daily costs were calculated by total patient cost, stratified for different treatments, considering the sum of total costs for the prescriptions of drugs subject to the analysis. Another objective was to evaluate the adherence of the drugs of interest, by utilizing specific indicators (MPR). Results: A total of 145 patients were analyzed. Among enrolled patients, 26.9% of users were treated with a biosimilar drug, while 73.1% with a biologic originator. Adherence is higher if it is considered the population treated with biosimilar drugs (82.1%). Total cost (including drug prescriptions, hospitalizations, outpatient services, tests for any cause) during the observation period of 1 year is 14,274.08. 87.7% of the total is attributable to drugs. Non-hospitalized patients are the least expensive, whether they were treated with biologics or biosimilars. Conclusion: In our sample, biosimilar drugs tend to be underused: the treatment of a patient with a chronic autoimmune disease is a clinical process that involves many health professionals, and a criticality could also derive from the difficult communication between the various professional figures who get involved with the whole patient treatment.

Tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitor-related autoimmune disorders.

Biotechnological monoclonal antibodies and receptor antagonists capable of targeting specific inflammatory actors, such as cytokines, cytokines receptors, co-stimulatory molecules or leukocyte populations, have emerged as an alternative to conventional therapies for treating systemic inflammatory diseases with immune pathogenesis. However, there is no doubt that, with a frequency that is not exceptionally high but also not negligible, immunotherapies can favour the development of systemic and organ-specific immune-mediated disorders. It has become increasingly evident that interference with a specific immune pathway may favour the activation of opposing compensatory signalling, which may exacerbate underlying subclinical disorders or cause immune-mediated diseases completely different from the underlying disease. The 'compensatory immunological switch' has emerged primarily in patients treated with tumor necrosis factor (TNF) -α inhibitors, the first biological drugs approved for treating systemic inflammatory diseases with immune pathogenesis. In this Review, we describe the clinical features and predisposing factors of the main TNF-α inhibitor-related autoimmune disorders, organising them into subclinical serological autoimmunity, autoimmune disorders other than those for which TNF-α inhibitors are indicated, and paradoxical reactions. We also discuss the underlying pathogenetic mechanisms and precautions for use in the therapeutic management of these patients. Better understanding of the complex phenomenon of the 'compensatory immunological switch', which TNF-α inhibitors and other biological drugs might trigger, can help not only appropriately managing immune-mediated disorders, but also better interpreting the heterogeneity of the pathogenetic mechanisms underlying certain chronic inflammatory conditions that, although different from each other, are arbitrarily placed in the context of overly generic nosological entities.

Seronegative rheumatoid arthritis: one year in review 2023.

In the past 20 years, earlier diagnosis and more intensive management have considerably improved the prognosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), with milder disease course achieved in particular in seropositive patients. In contrast, seronegative RA has remained largely neglected, and continues to be surrounded by uncertainties regarding its correct diagnosis, clinical phenotype, optimal treatment strategies and relevant outcomes.The purpose of this review is to summarise new insights about the pathogenic, clinical and prognostic peculiarities of seronegative RA that emerged during 2022, and that make this disease subset at least partially different from its seropositive counterpart.

Clinical Features of Diabetes Mellitus on Rheumatoid Arthritis: Data from the Cardiovascular Obesity and Rheumatic DISease (CORDIS) Study Group.

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and diabetes mellitus (DM) are linked by underlying inflammation influencing their development and progression. Nevertheless, the profile of diabetic RA patients and the impact of DM on RA need to be elucidated. This cross-sectional study includes 1523 patients with RA and no episodes of cardiovascular events, followed up in 10 Italian University Rheumatologic Centers between 1 January and 31 December 2019 belonging to the "Cardiovascular Obesity and Rheumatic DISease (CORDIS)" Study Group of the Italian Society of Rheumatology. The demographic and clinical features of DM RA patients were compared to non-diabetic ones evaluating factors associated with increased risk of DM. Overall, 9.3% of the RA patients had DM, and DM type 2 was more common (90.2%). DM patients were significantly older (p < 0.001), more frequently male (p = 0.017), with a significantly higher BMI and mean weight (p < 0.001) compared to non-diabetic patients. DM patients were less likely to be on glucocorticoids (p < 0.001), with a trend towards a more frequent use of b/ts DMARDs (p = 0.08), and demonstrated higher HAQ (p = 0.001). In around 42% of patients (n = 114), DM diagnosis preceded that of RA. Treatment lines were identical in diabetic and non-diabetic RA patients. DM is a comorbidity that may influence RA management and outcome. The association between DM and RA supports the theory of systemic inflammation as a condition underlying the development of both diseases. DM may not have a substantial impact on bDMARDs resistance, although further investigation is required to clarify the implications of biological therapy resistance in RA patients.

Cost-Effectiveness of the Early Arthritis Clinic Organizational Model.

OBJECTIVE: Early diagnosis and tight control improve outcomes of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, whether establishing an early arthritis clinic (EAC) is sustainable for national health systems is not known. This analysis aimed to compare effectiveness and costs of an EAC compared to patients followed by the current standard of care. METHODS: A retrospective study on administrative health databases of patients with a new diagnosis of RA was conducted: 430 patients followed in an EAC were enrolled, and 4 non-EAC controls were randomly matched for each. During 2 years of follow-up, the mean health care costs (outpatient, inpatient, pharmaceutical, and global) and 3 effectiveness measures (number and length of hospitalization and quality of care) of the EAC and non-EAC were estimated. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was calculated as well as the cost-effectiveness acceptability curve. RESULTS: The cohorts included patients with a mean age of 55.4 years, and 1,506 patients (70%) were female. The mean pharmaceutical (2,602 versus 1,945 euros) and outpatient (2,447 versus 1,778 euros) costs were higher in the EAC cohort. Conversely, a higher rate of non-EAC patients had a low adherence to quality-of-care indicators. The expected number of hospitalizations and the length of stay were statistically significantly higher in the non-EAC versus EAC. CONCLUSION: Despite an expected increase in outpatient costs (visits and diagnostic tests) and pharmaceutical costs, the reduction in terms of number and length of hospitalizations and the higher adherence to international quality-of-care guidelines support the effectiveness of the EAC model.

Reactogenicity, safety and disease flares following BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in patients with chronic immune-inflammatory arthritis treated with biological and targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs.

OBJECTIVES: The safety of COVID-19 vaccination in rheumatic patients treated with biological (b) and targeted synthetic (ts) disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) remains poorly explored. METHODS: Reactogenicity, safety and disease flares following each of the two doses of the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine was evaluated in 186 patients with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis and spondyloarthritis treated with b/tsDMARDs, who discontinued anti-rheumatic treatments around vaccination. A group of 53 healthy controls was used for comparison. RESULTS: The frequency and severity of systemic events was similar to that reported in the general population, and no particular safety concerns emerged. The use of methotrexate reduced systemic reactogenicity (adjORs [95% CI] 0.49 [0.25-0.94] and 0.63 [0.32-0.99] after each vaccine dose), whilst no specific effects of different b/tsDMARDs were seen. Flares around vaccination were reported by 24.5% of the patients. Factors associated with flares were active disease (adjORs [95% CI] 2.8 [1.01-8.09] and 1.86 [0.99-6.03] after each vaccine dose) and use of JAKi (adjORs [95% CI] 3.96 [1.39-11.27] and 3.10 [0.99-7.85]). The percentage of cases requiring change or increase in DMARD therapy due to persistent worsening of disease activity at follow-up visits was low (3.2%). CONCLUSIONS: The safety of mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in arthritis patients on treatment with b/tsDMARDs is reassuring. In a regimen of peri-vaccine drug interruption, transient flares of the disease more commonly occur in association with active arthritis and use of shorter half-life drugs. Most flares do not require treatment escalation or change.

Autoantibody-negative rheumatoid arthritis: still a challenge for the rheumatologist.

Increased research over the past 30 years has greatly improved the understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms and clinical aspects of autoantibody-positive rheumatoid arthritis, resulting in improved management and outcomes. In contrast, the subset of rheumatoid arthritis that does not have autoantibodies (such as rheumatoid factor and anti-citrullinated protein autoantibodies) remains less well defined in its pathogenic mechanisms. Autoantibody-negative rheumatoid arthritis continues to pose diagnostic challenges, might respond differently to therapies, and appears to be burdened with different comorbidities and outcomes. The clear separation of rheumatoid arthritis according to serotypes is still a subject of uncertainty and controversy, and studies specifically focused on comparing rheumatoid arthritis and rheumatoid arthritis-like arthritides that do not have autoantibodies remain scarce. The purpose of this Review is to summarise the peculiarities that make autoantibody-negative rheumatoid arthritis different from its autoantibody-positive counterpart, with the aim of generating debate and stimulating further research on this challenging condition.

Seronegative autoimmune diseases: A challenging diagnosis.

Autoimmune diseases (AID) are increasingly prevalent conditions which comprise more than 100 distinct clinical entities that are responsible for a great disease burden worldwide. The early recognition of these diseases is key for preventing their complications and for tailoring proper management. In most cases, autoantibodies, regardless of their potential pathogenetic role, can be detected in the serum of patients with AID, helping clinicians in making a definitive diagnosis and allowing screening strategies for early -and sometimes pre-clinical- diagnosis. Despite their undoubted crucial role, in a minority of cases, patients with AID may not show any autoantibody, a condition that is referred to as seronegative AID. Suboptimal accuracy of the available laboratory tests, antibody absorption, immunosuppressive therapy, immunodeficiencies, antigen exhaustion, and immunosenescence are the main possible determinants of seronegative AID. Indeed, in seronegative AID, the diagnosis is more challenging and must rely on clinical features and on other available tests, often including histopathological evaluation and radiological diagnostic tests. In this review, we critically dissect, in a narrative fashion, the possible causes of seronegativity, as well as the diagnostic and management implications, in several AID including autoimmune gastritis, celiac disease, autoimmune liver disease, rheumatoid arthritis, autoimmune encephalitis, myasthenia gravis, Sjögren's syndrome, antiphospholipid syndrome, and autoimmune thyroid diseases.

Vitamin D 25OH Deficiency and Mortality in Moderate to Severe COVID-19: A Multi-Center Prospective Observational Study.

Introduction: Several studies and meta-analyses suggested the role of vitamin D 25OH in preventing severe forms of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, the evidence on the clinical benefits of vitamin D 25OH adequacy in patients hospitalized for COVID-19 remain conflicting and speculative. We aimed to investigate the association between vitamin D 25OH serum levels and mortality in hospitalized patients with moderate to severe COVID-19. Method: This prospective observational multicentre study included 361 consecutive patients with moderate to severe COVID-19 admitted to the Italian hospitals involved in the NUTRI-COVID19 trial from March to August 2020. For each patient, serum vitamin D 25OH levels were assessed 48 h since admission and classified as deficient (<20 ng/mL) or adequate (≥20 ng/mL). We built a propensity score for low/adequate vitamin D 25OH levels to balance the clinical and demographic properties of the cohort, which resulted in 261 patients with good common support used for the survival analysis. Results: Two Hundred-seventy-seven (77%) of the 361 enrolled patients (207 [57%] males, median age 73 ± 15.6 years) had vitamin D 25OH deficiency. Fifty-two (20%) of the 261 matched patients died during the hospital stay, corresponding to a hazard ratio of 1.18 for vitamin D 25OH deficiency (95% confidence interval: 0.86-1.62; p = 0.29). Discussion: The prevalence of vitamin D 25OH deficiency was confirmed to be very high in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. The use of a propensity score demonstrate an absence of significant association between vitamin D deficiency and mortality in hospitalized patients.