Establishing a health-based recommended occupational exposure limit for isoflurane using experimental animal data: a systematic review protocol.

BACKGROUND: Isoflurane is used as an inhalation anesthetic in medical, paramedical, and veterinary practice. Epidemiological studies suggest an increased risk of miscarriages and malformations at birth related to maternal exposure to isoflurane and other inhalation anesthetics. However, these studies cannot be used to derive an occupational exposure level (OEL), because exposure was not determined quantitatively and other risk factors such as co-exposures to other inhalation anesthetics and other work-related factors may also have contributed to the observed adverse outcomes. The aim of this systematic review project is to assess all available evidence on the effects of isoflurane in studies of controlled exposures in laboratory animals to derive a health-based recommended OEL. METHODS: A comprehensive search strategy was developed to retrieve all animal studies addressing isoflurane exposure from PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science. Title-abstract screening will be performed by machine learning, and full-text screening by one reviewer. Discrepancies will be resolved by discussion. We will include primary research in healthy, sexually mature (non human) vertebrates of single exposure to isoflurane. Studies describing combined exposure and treatments with > = 1 vol% isoflurane will be excluded. Subsequently, details regarding study identification, study design, animal model, and intervention will be summarized. All relevant exposure characteristics and outcomes will be extracted. The risk of bias will be assessed by two independent reviewers using an adapted version of the SYRCLE's risk of bias tool and an addition of the OHAT tool. For all outcomes for which dose-response curves can be derived, the benchmark dose (BMD) approach will be used to establish a point of departure for deriving a recommended health-based recommended OEL for 8 h (workshift exposure) and for 15 min (short-term exposure). DISCUSSION: Included studies should be sufficiently sensitive to detect the adverse health outcomes of interest. Uncertainties in the extrapolation from animals to humans will be addressed using assessment factor. These factors are justified in accordance with current practice in chemical risk assessment. A panel of experts will be involved to reach consensus decisions regarding significant steps in this project, such as determination of the critical effects and how to extrapolate from animals to humans. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42022308978.

Perceived Use Cases, Barriers, and Requirements for a Smart Health-Tracking Toilet Seat: Qualitative Focus Group Study.

BACKGROUND: Smart bathroom technology offers unrivaled opportunities for the automated measurement of a range of biomarkers and other data. Unfortunately, efforts in this area are mostly driven by a technology push rather than market pull approach, which decreases the chances of successful adoption. As yet, little is known about the use cases, barriers, and desires that potential users of smart bathrooms perceive. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate how participants from the general population experience using a smart sensor-equipped toilet seat installed in their home. The study contributes to answering the following questions: What use cases do citizens see for this innovation? and What are the limitations and barriers to its everyday use that they see, including concerns regarding privacy, the lack of fit with everyday practices, and unmet expectations for user experience? METHODS: Overall, 31 participants from 30 households participated in a study consisting of 3 (partially overlapping) stages: sensitizing, in which participants filled out questionnaires to trigger their thoughts about smart bathroom use and personal health; provotyping, in which participants received a gentle provocation in the form of a smart toilet seat, which they used for 2 weeks; and discussion, in which participants took part in a web-based focus group session to discuss their experiences. RESULTS: Participants mostly found the everyday use of the toilet, including installation and dismantling when necessary, to be relatively easy and free of complications. Where complications occurred, participants mentioned issues related to the design of the prototype, technology, or mismatches with normal practices in using toilets and hygiene. A broad range of use cases were mentioned, ranging from signaling potentially detrimental health conditions or exacerbations of existing conditions to documenting physical data to measuring biomarkers to inform a diagnosis and behavioral change. Participants differed greatly in whether they let others use, or even know about, the seat. Ownership and control over their own data were essential for most participants. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that participants felt that a smart toilet seat could be acceptable and effective, as long as it fits everyday practices concerning toilet use and hygiene. The range of potential uses for a smart toilet seat is broad, as long as privacy and control over disclosure and data are warranted.

Exposure to halogenated ethers causes neurodegeneration and behavioural changes in young healthy experimental animals: a systematic review and meta analyses.

The FDA issued a warning that repeated and prolonged use of inhalational anaesthetics in children younger than 3 years may increase the risk of neurological damage. Robust clinical evidence supporting this warning is however lacking. A systematic review of all preclinical evidence concerning isoflurane, sevoflurane, desflurane and enflurane exposure in young experimental animals on neurodegeneration and behaviour may elucidate how severe this risk actually is PubMed and Embase were comprehensively searched on November 23, 2022. Based on predefined selection criteria the obtained references were screened by two independent reviewers. Data regarding study design and outcome data (Caspase-3 and TUNEL for neurodegeneration, Morris water maze (MWM), Elevated plus maze (EPM), Open field (OF) and Fear conditioning (FC)) were extracted, and individual effect sizes were calculated and subsequently pooled using the random effects model. Subgroup analyses were predefined and conducted for species, sex, age at anesthesia, repeated or single exposure and on time of outcome measurement. Out of the 19.796 references screened 324 could be included in the review. For enflurane there were too few studies to conduct meta-analysis (n = 1). Exposure to sevoflurane, isoflurane and desflurane significantly increases Caspase-3 levels and TUNEL levels. Further, sevoflurane and isoflurane also cause learning and memory impairment, and increase anxiety. Desflurane showed little effect on learning and memory, and no effect on anxiety. Long term effects of sevoflurane and isoflurane on neurodegeneration could not be analysed due to too few studies. For behavioural outcomes, however, this was possible and revealed that sevoflurane caused impaired learning and memory in all three related outcomes and increased anxiety in the elevated plus maze. For isoflurane, impaired learning and memory was observed as well, but only sufficient data was available for two of the learning and memory related outcomes. Further, single exposure to either sevoflurane or isoflurane increased neurodegeneration and impaired learning and memory. In summary, we show evidence that exposure to halogenated ethers causes neurodegeneration and behavioural changes. These effects are most pronounced for sevoflurane and isoflurane and already present after single exposure. To date there are not sufficient studies to estimate the presence of long term neurodegenerative effects. Nevertheless, we provide evidence in this review of behavioral changes later in life, suggesting some permanent neurodegenerative changes. Altogether, In contrast to the warning issued by the FDA we show that already single exposure to isoflurane and sevoflurane negatively affects brain development. Based on the results of this review use of sevoflurane and isoflurane should be restrained as much as possible in this young vulnerable group, until more research on the long term permanent effects have been conducted.