RESUMEN
Early development of the microbiome has been shown to affect general health and physical development of the infant and, although some studies have been undertaken in high-income countries, there are few studies from low- and middle-income countries. As part of the BARNARDS study, we examined the rectal microbiota of 2,931 neonates (term used up to 60 d) with clinical signs of sepsis and of 15,217 mothers screening for blaCTX-M-15, blaNDM, blaKPC and blaOXA-48-like genes, which were detected in 56.1%, 18.5%, 0% and 4.1% of neonates' rectal swabs and 47.1%, 4.6%, 0% and 1.6% of mothers' rectal swabs, respectively. Carbapenemase-positive bacteria were identified by MALDI-TOF MS and showed a high diversity of bacterial species (57 distinct species/genera) which exhibited resistance to most of the antibiotics tested. Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Enterobacter cloacae/E. cloacae complex, the most commonly found isolates, were subjected to whole-genome sequencing analysis and revealed close relationships between isolates from different samples, suggesting transmission of bacteria between neonates, and between neonates and mothers. Associations between the carriage of antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) and healthcare/environmental factors were identified, and the presence of ARGs was a predictor of neonatal sepsis and adverse birth outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Microbioma Gastrointestinal , Sepsis , Antibacterianos , Países en Desarrollo , Farmacorresistencia Microbiana , Escherichia coli , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , MadresRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Neonatal sepsis remains a leading cause of neonatal mortality. Maternal bacterial colonization plays a major role in transmission to the infant, with potential for subsequent development of neonatal sepsis with maternally derived strains. AIM: To review the molecular evidence supporting transmission of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (MDR-GNB) from colonized mothers to their infants and the risk factors for MDR-GNB transmission. METHODS: PubMed and Scopus were searched for studies investigating the mechanisms, risk factors for and/or scale of transmission of MDR-GNB from colonized mothers to their infants. Random effects meta-analyses were performed to determine pooled proportions of MDR-GNB transmission and the neonatal outcomes of transmission. FINDINGS: Eight studies were included in the narrative description and six in the meta-analysis. Five studies used pulsed-field gel electrophoresis to assess relatedness of isolates from colonized mothers and their infants. Pooled proportion of MDR-GNB transmission from colonized mothers to their infants was 27% (95% confidence interval (CI): 8-47%). Extended-spectrum ß-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae were the most frequently studied MDR-GNB pathogens transmitted between mother-infant pairs. Following mother-to-infant transmission of an MDR-GNB pathogen, the pooled proportion for the outcome of neonatal colonization was 19% (95% CI: 3-35%). CONCLUSION: This systematic review strongly supports MDR and/or ESBL Enterobacteriaceae transmission from colonized mothers to their infants, with subsequent infant colonization. The risk factors contributing to transmission of MDR-GNB between colonized mothers and their infants warrants further research.
Asunto(s)
Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple/genética , Bacterias Gramnegativas/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/transmisión , beta-Lactamasas/genética , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple/efectos de los fármacos , Electroforesis en Gel de Campo Pulsado/métodos , Enterobacteriaceae/efectos de los fármacos , Enterobacteriaceae/aislamiento & purificación , Femenino , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/epidemiología , Humanos , Lactante , Transmisión Vertical de Enfermedad Infecciosa/prevención & control , Madres/estadística & datos numéricos , Sepsis Neonatal/mortalidad , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There is growing recognition by national and international policymakers of the contribution nurses make towards antimicrobial stewardship. Although undergraduate education provides an ideal opportunity to prepare nurses for antimicrobial stewardship roles and activities, only two-thirds of undergraduate nursing programmes incorporate any antimicrobial stewardship teaching and only 12% cover all the recommended antimicrobial stewardship principles. Nurses also report that they do not have a good knowledge of antibiotics, and many have not heard of the term antimicrobial stewardship. AIM: To provide international consensus on the antimicrobial stewardship competency descriptors appropriate for undergraduate nurse education. METHODS: A modified Delphi approach comprising two online surveys delivered to an international panel of 15 individuals reflecting expertise in prescribing and medicines management in the education and practice of nurses; and antimicrobial stewardship. Data collection took place between February and March 2019. FINDINGS: A total of 15 participants agreed to become members of the expert panel, of whom 13 (86%) completed round 1 questionnaire, and 13 (100%) completed round 2. Consensus was achieved, with consistently high levels of agreement across panel members, on six overarching competency domains and 63 descriptors, essential for antimicrobial stewardship practice. CONCLUSION: The competency descriptors should be used to direct undergraduate nurse education and the antimicrobial stewardship practices of qualified nurses (including those working in new roles such as Nursing Associates) due to the high levels of agreement reached on competency descriptors.
Asunto(s)
Programas de Optimización del Uso de los Antimicrobianos/métodos , Consenso , Educación de Pregrado en Medicina/métodos , Educación en Enfermería/métodos , Humanos , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence and factors associated with optimal antiretroviral therapy (ART) adherence and virological failure (VLF) among HIV-infected adults enrolled in the national ART programme at the teaching hospital of Fann, Dakar, Senegal. METHODS: Cross-sectional study from 1 September 2013 to 30 January 2014. OUTCOMES: (1) optimal ART adherence by the Center for Adherence Support Evaluation (CASE) Index Score (>10) and (2) VLF (HIV RNA > 1000 copies/ml). Diagnostic accuracy of CASE Index Score assessed using sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent factors associated with optimal adherence and VLF. RESULTS: Of 98 HIV-infected patients on ART, 68% were female. The median (IQR) age was 42 (20-50) years. A total of 57 of 98 (60%) were on ART more than 3 years, and majority (88%) were on NNRTI-based first-line ART regimen. A total of 79 of 98 (80%) patients reported optimal ART adherence, and only five of 84 (5.9%) had documented VLF. Patients with VLF were significantly more likely to have suboptimal ART adherence (17.7% vs. 2.9%; P = 0.02). CASE Index Score showed the best trade-off in Se (78.9%, 95% CI: 54.4-93.9%), Sp (20.0%, 95% CI: 11.1-31.7), PPV (22.4, 95% CI: 13.1-34.2%) and NPV (76.5%, 95% CI: 50.1-93.2), when used VLF threshold of HIV RNA >50 copies/ml. Factors independently associated with VLF were CASE Index Score <10 ([aOR] = 13.0, 95% CI: 1.1-147.9; P = 0.04) and being a boosted PI-based ART regimen ([aOR] = 27.0, 95% CI: 2.4-309.4; P = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Optimal ART adherence is achievable in a high proportion of HIV-infected adults in this study population. CASE Index Score was independently associated with virological outcomes, supporting usefulness of this low-cost ART adherence monitoring tool in this setting.