Sapovirus: an emerging pathogen in kidney transplant recipients?

PURPOSE: Diarrhea is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised patients. After including sapovirus to the viral gastroenteritis screening of our institution's laboratory, we noticed an increase in sapovirus infections among kidney transplant recipients. Therefore, we assumed former gastrointestinal tract infections with unidentified pathogens could have been caused by sapovirus. To better understand the characteristics of a sapovirus infection in a high-risk group we initiated this study. METHODS: Over a period of 6 months, all transplant recipients with diarrhea and later identified viral/unknown pathogens were included. Kidney function, levels of immunosuppressants and  c-reactive protein, acid-base balance, onset of symptoms and time of hospitalization were analyzed. RESULTS: Among 13 hospitalized kidney transplant recipients sapovirus was detected in four patients, while in the remaining nine, three were diagnosed with norovirus, one with cytomegalovirus, one with inflammatory bowel disease and in four patients no pathogen was identified. Even though statistically not significant, creatinine levels at admission tended to be higher in sapovirus patients (median: sapovirus: 3.3 mg/dl (1.3; 5.0), non-sapovirus: 2.5 mg/dl (1.1; 4.9), p = 0.710). Also, Tacrolimus levels showed the same trend (sapovirus: 13.6 ng/ml (12.9; 13.6), non-sapovirus: 7.1 ng/ml (2.6; 22.6), p = 0.279). On discharge creatinine levels improved equally in both groups (sapovirus: 1.7 mg/dl (1.4; 3.2), non-sapovirus: 2 mg/dl (1.0; 3.6), p = 0.825). CONCLUSION: In high-risk patients, early symptomatic treatment remains crucial to protect the transplant`s function. In our cohort all patients recovered well. Larger cohorts and longer follow-up times are needed to detect the long-term consequences and a potential need for further research regarding specific treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study has been registered on DRKS (trialsearch.who.int), Reg. Nr. DRKS00033311 (December 28th 2023).

[Current therapeutic standards in advanced soft tissue sarcomas]. / Neues zu Weichteilsarkomen.

Soft tissue sarcomas account for less than 1% of tumors in adults. With more than 80 different subtypes and often dismal prognosis, treatment of patients with soft tissue sarcomas is diagnostically and therapeutically complex. In patients with localized disease, surgery remains the mainstay of therapy. A multimodal approach consisting of neoadjuvant chemotherapy +/- regional hyperthermia may be suitable in patients with high-risk disease to maximize tumor shrinkage before surgery and to treat micrometastases. In patients with oligometastatic disease, local treatment options should be discussed within a specialized tumor board. In patients with disseminated metastatic disease, chemotherapy with anthracyclines remains the backbone of therapy. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have proven to be effective for patients with alveolar soft part sarcoma and targeted therapies with NTRK-inhibitors should be evaluated in patients with NTRK-fusions. This article focuses on current standards and developments in the treatment of soft tissue sarcomas.

Differentiation of benign and metastatic lymph nodes in soft tissue sarcoma.

Lymph node metastasis (LNM) occurs in less than 5% of soft tissue sarcoma (STS) patients and indicates an aggressive course of disease. Suspicious lymph nodes (LN) in staging imaging are a frequent topic of discussion in multidisciplinary tumor boards. Predictive markers are needed to facilitate stratification and improve treatment of STS patients. In this study, 56 STS patients with radiologically suspicious and subsequently histologically examined LN were reviewed. Patients with benign (n = 26) and metastatic (n = 30) LN were analyzed with regard to clinical, laboratory and imaging parameters. Patients with LNM exhibited significantly larger short axis diameter (SAD) and long axis diameter (LAD) vs. patients with benign LN (median 22.5 vs. 14 mm, p < 0.001 and median 29.5 vs. 21 mm, p = 0.003, respectively). Furthermore, the presence of central necrosis and high maximal standardized uptake value (SUVmax) in FDG-PET-CT scans were significantly associated with LNM (60 vs. 11.5% of patients, p < 0.001 and median 8.59 vs. 3.96, p = 0.013, respectively). With systemic therapy, a slight median size regression over time was observed in both metastatic and benign LN. Serum LDH and CRP levels were significantly higher in patients with LNM (median 247 vs. 187.5U/L, p = 0.005 and 1.5 vs. 0.55 mg/dL, p = 0.039, respectively). This study shows significant associations between LNM and imaging features as well as laboratory parameters of STS patients. The largest SAD, SUVmax in FDG-PET-CT scan, the presence of central necrosis, and high serum LDH level are the most important parameters to distinguish benign from metastatic LNs.

Implementing precision oncology for sarcoma patients: the CCCLMUmolecular tumor board experience.

PURPOSE: Due to poor outcomes and limited treatment options, patients with advanced bone and soft tissue sarcomas (BS/STS) may undergo comprehensive molecular profiling of tumor samples to identify possible therapeutic targets. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of routine molecular profiling in the setting of a dedicated precision oncology program in patients with BS/STS in a German large-volume sarcoma center. METHODS: 92 BS/STS patients who received comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) and were subsequently discussed in our molecular tumor board (MTB) between 2016 and 2022 were included. Patient records were retrospectively reviewed, and the clinical impact of NGS-related findings was analyzed. RESULTS: 89.1% of patients had received at least one treatment line before NGS testing. At least one molecular alteration was found in 71 patients (82.6%). The most common alterations were mutations in TP53 (23.3% of patients), followed by PIK3CA and MDM2 mutations (9.3% each). Druggable alterations were identified, and treatment recommended in 32 patients (37.2%). Of those patients with actionable alterations, ten patients (31.2%) received personalized treatment and six patients did benefit from molecular-based therapy in terms of a progression-free survival ratio (PFSr) > 1.3. CONCLUSION: Our single-center experience shows an increasing uptake of next-generation sequencing (NGS) and highlights current challenges of implementing precision oncology in the management of patients with BS/STS. A relevant number of patients were diagnosed with clinically actionable alterations. Our results highlight the potential benefit of NGS in patients with rare cancers and currently limited therapeutic options.

TIM-3 Qualifies as a Potential Immunotherapeutic Target in Specific Subsets of Patients with High-Risk Soft Tissue Sarcomas (HR-STS).

(1) Background: The expression of T cell immunoglobulin and mucin domain-containing protein 3 (TIM-3), an immune checkpoint receptor on T cells, has been associated with dismal outcomes and advanced tumor stages in various solid tumors. The blockade of TIM-3 is currently under examination in several clinical trials. This study examines TIM-3 expression in high-risk soft tissue sarcomas (HR-STS). (2) Methods: Tumor cell expression of TIM-3 on protein level was analyzed in pre-treatment biopsies of patients with HR-STS. TIM-3 expression was correlated with clinicopathological parameters including tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) counts, programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death ligand 1 (PDL-1) expression in patients with HR-STS. Survival dependent on the expression of TIM-3 was analyzed. (3) Results: TIM-3 expression was observed in 101 (56%) out of 179 pre-treatment biopsies of patients with HR-STS. TIM-3 expression was significantly more often observed in undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcomas (UPS) compared to other histological subtypes (p < 0.001), high TIL counts (p < 0.001), and high PD-1 (p < 0.001) and PD-L1 expression (p < 0.001). TIM-3 expression did not have a prognostic impact on survival in patients with HR-STS. (4) Conclusions: This is the first study to demonstrate a significant tumor cell expression of TIM-3 in specific subsets of patients with HR-STS. TIM-3 qualifies as a potential immunotherapeutic target in HR-STS.

[Cannabis in oncology - much ado about nothing?] / Cannabis in der Onkologie ­ viel Rauch um nichts?

The medical use of Cannabis has gained popularity in Europe and Northern America in recent years. Cannabinoids are available as finished pharmaceuticals, flowers and extracts. This article focuses on supportive medicine for oncological patients. Possible indications are pain, chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting, loss of appetite and altered taste perception. Despite the enormous cannabis hype in medicine, the evidence for its use in oncology patients is insufficient. However, palliative patients with refractory symptoms could be candidates for a therapeutic trial. The key parameter for choosing a cannabis medicinal product is the THC/CBD ratio. Oral forms of administration are particularly suitable for cannabis-naive and older patients. Mental and cardiovascular side effects should not be underestimated.

Treatment of metastatic alveolar soft part sarcoma with axitinib and pembrolizumab in an 80-year-old patient with a history of autoimmune disorders.

Alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS) is a rare malignancy with low sensitivity to chemotherapy. While localized ASPS has a very good prognosis after resection, the 5-year overall survival rate drops substantially in metastatic disease. We report the case of an 80-year-old male patient with ASPS of the left elbow and metastasis to the lung, lymph nodes and peritoneum. After weighing the benefits and risks, systemic treatment with the anti-PD-1 checkpoint inhibitor pembrolizumab combined with the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosinkinase inhibitor axitinib was initiated in this patient with a history of psoriasis and Crohn's disease. After only two cycles of therapy, a significant size reduction of the nodal cervical metastasis became apparent. A partial response of all metastases was then confirmed in the first computed tomography restaging. So far, side effects have remained manageable, especially with regard to the development or worsening of autoimmune adverse events. The patient continued to have a high quality of life, while also remaining in ongoing partial response for 15 months at the time of submission. While sarcomas generally have low sensitivity to immunotherapies, ASPS is an exception, and checkpoint inhibition is an integral part of its systemic therapy.

[Cannabis in oncology - much ado about nothing?] / Cannabis in der Onkologie ­ viel Rauch um nichts?

The medical use of Cannabis has gained popularity in Europe and Northern America in recent years. Cannabinoids are available as finished pharmaceuticals, flowers and extracts. This article focuses on supportive medicine for oncological patients. Possible indications are pain, chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting, loss of appetite and altered taste perception. Despite the enormous cannabis hype in medicine, the evidence for its use in oncology patients is insufficient. However, palliative patients with refractory symptoms could be candidates for a therapeutic trial. The key parameter for choosing a cannabis medicinal product is the THC/CBD ratio. Oral forms of administration are particularly suitable for cannabis-naive and older patients. Mental and cardiovascular side effects should not be underestimated.