Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 15 de 15
1.
Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh ; 21(1)2024 Jan 01.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38534055

OBJECTIVES: Ineffective nurse-to-nurse handoff communication is associated with information omissions, diagnostic errors, treatment errors, and delays. New nurses report a lack of confidence and ability in handoff communication, which may stem from inadequate training in prelicensure nursing programs. Our objective was to introduce prelicensure nursing students to a standardized, theory-based method for handoff, including behavioral strategies employed by nurses during interrupted handoff. METHODS: A handoff education bundle (HEB) was developed. Kern's six-step curriculum model was utilized to design, implement, and evaluate the handoff curriculum. RESULTS: Student feedback highlighted the importance of integrating multiple, varying distractors during learning cycles and recognition of the impact of distractors on handoff. CONCLUSIONS: Implementing a HEB at the prelicensure nursing level could promote competency in handoff communication for new graduate nurses. IMPLICATIONS FOR INTERNATIONAL AUDIENCE: Handoff is an international patient safety priority, as inadequate communication has been linked to adverse patient events.


Patient Handoff , Humans , Curriculum , Communication , Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Transcription Factors
2.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38377385

ABSTRACT: Preclinical simulation is an evidence-based method for nurse practitioner (NP) students to improve clinical communication and disease management competency. During simulation, students may receive feedback from multiple sources, including standardized patients (SPs), faculty, peers, and themselves. Although evidence supports simulation with multisource feedback, its impact on clinical knowledge and communication has yet to be evaluated among NP students. We designed, implemented, and evaluated a preclinical simulation program with structured multisource feedback integrated into a disease management course within a Doctor of Nursing Practice curriculum. Differences in communication self-efficacy and disease management knowledge before and after participation, as well as perceptions of learning and importance of varying feedback sources, were evaluated using a single group pre-post mixed-methods design. On average, clinical communication self-efficacy was significantly higher, and disease management knowledge scores were significantly higher after participation. Learners rated feedback sources as important or very important and described varying feedback sources as complementary. Feedback from SPs, peers, learners themselves, and faculty was complementary and important to learning. This preclinical simulation program with purposeful integration of multisource feedback provides an evidence-based foundation for scaffolding multidomain competency development into curriculums to meet updated standards of advanced nursing education.

3.
J Interprof Care ; 38(1): 95-103, 2024 Jan 02.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37422861

Patient death is a common experience that may be traumatic for health care providers. Although current rates of burnout are high, evidence supports that interprofessional coping can improve clinician mental health. While health care simulation affords learners freedom of safety to participate in a variety of educational experiences, current application of simulation during patient death is limited to professional duties, without explicitly addressing learner emotional well-being. We designed a patient death simulation scenario within a supportive and reflective interprofessional environment to teach foundational coping and well-being strategies to preclinical nursing, medical, and pharmacy students. Sixty-one students participated in this team-based, First Death simulation experience. Debriefings were analyzed using qualitative inductive content analysis methodology. Students reacted to being part of an interprofessional team after having participated in simulation about the death of a patient as described by five categories: emotional awareness, communication insight, feeling stronger together, with role curiosity, and through reflections on support. Findings suggested that simulation is an effective teaching modality for mentoring interprofessional students on humanistic well-being strategies. Furthermore, the experience fostered reactions transcending interprofessional competencies, which are transferrable to future clinical practice.


Delivery of Health Care , Interprofessional Relations , Humans , Patient Simulation , Health Personnel , Students , Patient Care Team
4.
Nurse Educ ; 49(3): 147-151, 2024.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38108376

BACKGROUND: Self-reflection is a valuable method that nurse educators can use to develop clinical judgment skills among prelicensure nursing students. Little research exists on improving clinical judgment in second-degree nursing students in the clinical setting. PURPOSE: To determine the implications of increasing clinical judgment skills in prelicensure nursing students using a shared structured reflection teaching innovation within a required baccalaureate clinical course. METHODS: This educational innovation used qualitative descriptive methods to evaluate its effectiveness in the clinical setting among students in the final semester of an accelerated prelicensure nursing program. RESULTS: Students reported increased accountability for their learning, a sense of intentionality with their nursing practice, and a deeper sense of community with their peers. CONCLUSIONS: Shared reflective practices in the clinical setting show promise for increasing clinical judgment and supporting a competency-based curriculum.


Clinical Competence , Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate , Judgment , Nursing Education Research , Nursing Evaluation Research , Students, Nursing , Humans , Students, Nursing/psychology , Students, Nursing/statistics & numerical data , Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate/methods , Curriculum , Female , Male , Qualitative Research , Adult , Competency-Based Education/methods , Young Adult , Cognitive Reflection
5.
J Am Assoc Nurse Pract ; 35(8): 461-467, 2023 Aug 01.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37159462

ABSTRACT: Nurse practitioner (NP) educators have been tasked with incorporating simulation into preclinical curricula while pivoting to competency-based education. Despite evidence supporting simulation's role in preclinical health care education, limited scholarship has evaluated this educational method among NP students. We sought to evaluate student perceptions, learning satisfaction, and confidence after participation in an experientially designed, preclinical, simulation program and to compare levels of clinical communication self-efficacy and self-rated, clinical rotation preparedness before and after participation. The preclinical simulation program was designed, implemented, and evaluated within a disease management course. Students reported high levels of satisfaction and confidence with learning. Clinical communication self-efficacy ( t [17] = 3.73, p < .01) and self-rated levels of clinical rotation preparedness ( t [17] = -2.97, p < .01) were significantly higher after program participation. Simulation may be successfully implemented in preclinical disease management courses. Positive program evaluations create a foundation for further competency-based NP educational design using simulation. Faculty should consider implementing experientially designed preclinical simulation in NP programs to promote progression toward competency within the NP role and to encourage clinical readiness.


Competency-Based Education , Learning , Nurse Practitioners , Simulation Training , Humans , Clinical Competence , Curriculum , Disease Management , Nurse Practitioners/education , Students
6.
J Prof Nurs ; 45: 51-59, 2023.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36889893

BACKGROUND: Despite diagnostic errors impacting an estimated 12 million people yearly in the United States, educational strategies that foster diagnostic performance among nurse practitioner (NP) students remain elusive. One possible solution is to focus explicitly on competencies fundamental for diagnostic excellence. Currently, no educational tools were found that comprehensively address individual diagnostic reasoning competencies during simulated-based learning experiences. PURPOSE: Our research team developed and explored psychometric properties of the "Diagnostic Competency During Simulation-based (DCDS) Learning Tool." METHOD: Items and domains were developed based on existing frameworks. Content validity was determined by a convenience sample of eight experts. Inter-rater reliability was determined by four faculty rating eight simulation scenarios. RESULTS: Final individual competency domain scale content validity index (CVI) scores ranged between 0.9175 and 1.0; total scale CVI score was 0.98. The intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) for the tool was 0.548 (p < 0.0001, 95 % confidence interval CI [0.482-0.612]). CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that the DCDS Learning Tool is relevant to diagnostic reasoning competencies and may be implemented with moderate reliability across varied simulation scenarios and performance levels. The DCDS tool expands the landscape of diagnostic reasoning assessment by providing NP educators with granular, actionable, competency-specific assessment measures to foster improvement.


Educational Measurement , Learning , Humans , United States , Psychometrics , Reproducibility of Results , Educational Measurement/methods , Clinical Competence
7.
Nurse Educ ; 48(1): 33-36, 2023.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35881988

BACKGROUND: Seventy percent of serious medical errors are the result of ineffective communication, including handoff errors. PROBLEM: Nursing students have cited a need for more experience on how to give handoff; yet, handoff education remains variable. APPROACH: Two innovative curricular approaches were implemented on the basis of Bloom's taxonomy to teach handoff education: experiential and virtual. The outcomes of the 2 curricular innovations were evaluated for handoff completion, handoff accuracy, and handoff quality, based on context. OUTCOMES: During the experiential approach, students demonstrated average handoff completion rates of 84%. During the virtual approach, students' handoff completion rates rose from 25% to 63% and accuracy handoff rates rose from 13% to 31%. CONCLUSIONS: Evaluations support that varying educational methods successfully teach nursing students how to give handoffs. Complementary innovations grant educators flexibility to tailor innovations to curriculum and course context, as supported by Bloom's taxonomy.


Education, Nursing , Patient Handoff , Humans , Nursing Education Research , Curriculum
8.
J Nurs Educ ; 61(9): 528-532, 2022 Sep.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36098544

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic demonstrated educators must consider students' future practice will involve patient communication via telehealth, including breaking bad news. METHOD: This mixed-methods analysis was conducted among 33 nurse practitioner (NP) students at two universities. Questionnaires were analyzed before and after a simulation training session with standardized patients to determine students' perceptions, learning satisfaction, confidence, and self-rated preparedness for delivering bad news via telehealth. RESULTS: Students' self-rated levels of preparedness for delivering bad news were higher after participating in the simulation. Students found the teaching methods to be effective, enjoyable, motivating, and suitable to individual learning styles. Two themes emerged that described students' perceptions of the experience: valuable simulation processes and multifaceted learning applicable to future NP practice. CONCLUSION: Breaking bad news via virtual platforms is new and challenging. Findings suggest this simulation experience provided a valuable tool for augmenting didactic training for NP students. [J Nurs Educ. 2022;61(9):528-532.].


Nurse Practitioners , Simulation Training , Telemedicine , Truth Disclosure , COVID-19/epidemiology , Humans , Nurse Practitioners/education , Students, Nursing/psychology
9.
J Am Assoc Nurse Pract ; 34(2): 348-356, 2021 Jun 15.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34132220

BACKGROUND: Nurse practitioner (NP) preceptors encounter stress when balancing clinical responsibilities with mentoring. Support can decrease role stress and promote preceptor resilience. PURPOSE: Characterize NP preceptor resource needs and their perception of support for the clinical preceptor role. METHODS: A cross-sectional, mixed-methods study used a web-based survey to identify preceptor resource needs. A convenience sample from a large, academic Midwestern university was recruited by email, with reminder emails 1 and 2 weeks after initial invitation. Survey tools included researcher-designed questions about preceptor-desired resources, an adapted Preceptor's Perception of Support Scale, and qualitative questions of preceptor needs. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and qualitative thematic analysis. RESULTS: Two hundred thirty-nine of 784 surveys (30.48%) were returned. Preceptors valued free mentoring resources, desired access by "smartphone app," and identified mentoring topics of interest. They perceived adequate role preparation, clearly defined roles, supportive and knowledgeable colleagues, committed supervisors, and appropriate workload. Respondents noted the following insufficiencies: time for normal duties while precepting, preceptor resources, opportunities to share with colleagues, faculty-student time, and faculty assistance to identify student's performance problems. Qualitative data highlighted faculty-preceptor communication and compensation as preceptor concerns. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Preceptors feel a need for specific supports identified in this study. Preceptor insights inform strategies to build clinical preceptor resilience and well-being, strengthen the academic-practice partnership, and facilitate positive education outcomes. Faculty should increase communication-based support individualized to specific student needs. Resources should be developed that more fully support specific competencies and skills within NP student clinical education.


Nurse Practitioners , Preceptorship , Cross-Sectional Studies , Faculty , Humans , Mentors , Surveys and Questionnaires
10.
Nurse Educ ; 46(5): E122-E126, 2021.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33935267

BACKGROUND: Telemedicine facilitates access to care that is both efficacious and highly satisfactory to patients. As primary health care providers, nurse practitioners (NPs) need to be educated to deliver health care within various settings. With the rapid expansion of telemedicine, NP educational authorities have charged educators to address essential telemedicine-based competencies. PURPOSE: Innovative approaches to integrating telemedicine competencies into NP curricula have yet to be established in nursing education. METHODS: Multifocal curricular changes were integrated into an NP clinical course. Students engaged in self-directed learning modules and multiple simulation training sessions and rotated through telemedicine clinical practicums. RESULTS: Experiences were perceived as realistic and complementary, learning meaningful, and applicability broad and far-reaching. Telemedicine-focused simulation training sessions were viewed as highly satisfactory, and students were confident in simulation-derived learning. CONCLUSIONS: Nursing educators should integrate multimodal telemedicine experiences into curricula, addressing multiple learning phases through experientially designed simulation trainings.


Nurse Practitioners , Students, Nursing , Telemedicine , Clinical Competence , Curriculum , Humans , Nursing Education Research , Perception , Students
11.
Diagnosis (Berl) ; 9(1): 50-58, 2021 04 26.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33901388

OBJECTIVES: To improve diagnostic ability, educators should employ multifocal strategies. One promising strategy is self-explanation, the purposeful technique of generating self-directed explanations during problem-solving. Students self-explain information in ways that range from simple restatements to multidimensional thoughts. Successful problem-solvers frequently use specific, high-quality self-explanation types. In a previous phase of research, unique ways that family nurse practitioner (NP) students self-explain during diagnostic reasoning were identified and described. This study aims to (a) explore relationships between ways of self-explaining and diagnostic accuracy levels and (b) compare differences between students of varying expertise in terms of ways of self-explaining and diagnostic accuracy levels. Identifying high-quality diagnostic reasoning self-explanation types may facilitate development of more refined self-explanation educational strategies. METHODS: Thirty-seven family NP students enrolled in the Doctor of Nursing Practice program at a large, Midwestern university diagnosed three written case studies while self-explaining. During the quantitative phase of a content analysis, associational and comparative data analysis techniques were applied. RESULTS: Expert students voiced significantly more clinical and biological inference self-explanations than did novice students. Diagnostic accuracy scores were significantly associated with biological inference scores. Clinical and biological inference scores accounted for 27% of the variance in diagnostic accuracy scores, with biological inference scores significantly influencing diagnostic accuracy scores. CONCLUSIONS: Not only were biologically focused self-explanations associated with diagnostic accuracy, but also their spoken frequency influenced levels of diagnostic accuracy. Educational curricula should support students to view patient presentations in terms of underlying biology from the onset of their education.


Clinical Competence , Nurse Practitioners , Data Collection , Humans , Problem Solving , Students
12.
Diagnosis (Berl) ; 9(1): 40-49, 2021 04 26.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33901390

OBJECTIVES: An important step in mitigating the burden of diagnostic errors is strengthening diagnostic reasoning among health care providers. A promising way forward is through self-explanation, the purposeful technique of generating self-directed explanations to process novel information while problem-solving. Self-explanation actively improves knowledge structures within learners' memories, facilitating problem-solving accuracy and acquisition of knowledge. When students self-explain, they make sense of information in a variety of unique ways, ranging from simple restatements to multidimensional thoughts. Successful problem-solvers frequently use specific, high-quality self-explanation types. The unique types of self-explanation present among nurse practitioner (NP) student diagnosticians have yet to be explored. This study explores the question: How do NP students self-explain during diagnostic reasoning? METHODS: Thirty-seven Family NP students enrolled in the Doctor of Nursing Practice program at a large, Midwestern U.S. university diagnosed three written case studies while self-explaining. Dual methodology content analyses facilitated both deductive and qualitative descriptive analysis. RESULTS: Categories emerged describing the unique ways that NP student diagnosticians self-explain. Nine categories of inference self-explanations included clinical and biological foci. Eight categories of non-inference self-explanations monitored students' understanding of clinical data and reflect shallow information processing. CONCLUSIONS: Findings extend the understanding of self-explanation use during diagnostic reasoning by affording a glimpse into fine-grained knowledge structures of NP students. NP students apply both clinical and biological knowledge, actively improving immature knowledge structures. Future research should examine relationships between categories of self-explanation and markers of diagnostic success, a step in developing prompted self-explanation learning interventions.


Clinical Competence , Nurse Practitioners , Humans , Learning , Problem Solving , Students
13.
Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh ; 15(1)2018 Nov 02.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30388079

Problem/Background: The ability to accurately diagnose patients based on symptom profiles is a vital yet challenging skill that Nurse Practitioners (NPs) undertake frequently. PURPOSE: This integrative literature review highlights a variety of evidence based, practical educational strategies that foster the development of diagnostic reasoning. METHODS: An integrative literature review was conducted in order to identify original research focusing on diagnostic reasoning educational interventions. RESULTS: Eighteen primary sources met inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results are synthesized in terms of sample and setting, methodological features, interventions, and outcomes. Interventions broadly fit into five educational themes: testing strategies, cognitive biases, simulation programs, course formats, and instructional approaches. DISCUSSION: Interventions are simple and can be implemented in multiple educational settings. Future research should occur in populations of NP students. Validated, easy-to-use measurement tools as well as more precise diagnostic reasoning concept development should occur.


Clinical Competence/standards , Education, Nursing/organization & administration , Nurse Practitioners/education , Nursing Diagnosis/organization & administration , Humans , Problem Solving , Students, Nursing/statistics & numerical data
14.
Am J Nurs ; 118(9): 36-47, 2018 Sep.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30113924

: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) affects as many as 16 million Americans and is expected to be the third leading cause of death worldwide by 2020. To increase awareness of COPD, encourage related research, and improve care of patients with this chronic disease, the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) was launched in 1998 and published an evidence-based report on COPD prevention and management strategies in 2001 that has been revised regularly. The fourth major revision, which was published in 2017 and revised in 2018, includes significant changes related to COPD classification, as well as to pharmacologic, nonpharmacologic, and comorbidity management. The authors discuss the changes to the GOLD recommendations and, using a patient scenario, explain their application to clinical practice.


Evidence-Based Medicine , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive , Disease Progression , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/diagnosis , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/drug therapy , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/nursing , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/physiopathology , Respiration, Artificial/methods , Risk Factors
15.
Am J Nurs ; 113(2): 34-43; quiz 44, 2013 Feb.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23334561

OVERVIEW: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the third leading cause of death in the United States. It's estimated that more than 13 million U.S. adults have COPD, and as many as 24 million have evidence of impaired lung function, suggesting that COPD is underdiagnosed. Even when patients receive optimal COPD therapy, they periodically experience exacerbations, which reduce lung function and quality of life, increase risk of death from COPD, and account for the majority of costs related to COPD treatment. This article, the second in a two-part series on COPD, outlines current guidelines and evidence-based recommendations for identifying, assessing, and managing COPD exacerbations (the first article in the series, "An Evidence-Based Approach to COPD," March 2012, focused on the management of stable COPD in the outpatient setting).


Evidence-Based Medicine , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive , Education, Continuing , Humans , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/diagnosis , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/physiopathology , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/therapy , Quality of Life , Severity of Illness Index
...