Improving the accuracy of discharge medication documentation in people with kidney disease through pharmacist-led partnered prescribing.

BACKGROUND: Inaccurate medication documentation in prescriptions and discharge summaries produce poorer patient outcomes, are costly to healthcare systems and result in more readmissions to hospital. Errors in medication documentation are common in Australian hospitals. AIM: To determine whether pharmacist-led partnered prescribing (PPP) on discharge reduced errors and improved accuracy in documentation of medications in the discharge prescription and the discharge summary of people with kidney disease compared with medical prescribing (MP). METHODS: This interventional two-phase study compared current workflow (MP) with the subsequent implementation of the interventional workflow (PPP) in the renal unit of a tertiary referral hospital. Patients were included if they were discharged within pharmacy working hours and had a discharge prescription and discharge summary. The primary outcome was the percentage of discharge prescriptions with at least one error. The secondary outcome was the percentage of discharge summaries with at least one error. RESULTS: Data were collected from 185 discharged patients (95 in MP phase then 90 in PPP phase). Discharge prescriptions with at least one error reduced from 75.8% in the MP phase to 6.7% in PPP phase (P < 0.001). Discharge summaries with at least one error reduced from 53% in MP phase to 24% in the PPP phase (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: PPP improves the accuracy of the documentation of medications in both the discharge prescription and the discharge summary of patients with kidney disease.

Non-Touch Aseptic Technique Maintains Sterility of Antibiotic-Admixed Peritoneal Dialysis Fluid.

There is a paucity of data on the sterility of peritoneal dialysis fluid (PDF) after drug admixture. International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis (ISPD) guidelines suggest using sterile technique when admixing antibiotics; however, the degree of sterility remains unclear. This issue is most pertinent when preparing take-home PDF for outpatient treatment of peritonitis. This study compares the sterility of PDF admixed with antibiotics using a non-touch aseptic technique (NTAT) versus sterile technique.Groups of 8 PDF mixtures (1.5% Dianeal or Icodextrin [Baxter International Inc., Spring Grove, IL, USA]) were admixed with 1 g/L ceftazidime and vancomycin, or 20 mL saline, either by a pharmacist using sterile technique in a sterile suite, or a nurse in a clinical room using NTAT. Dianeal inoculated with 1 × 106 colony-forming units (CFU)/L of coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (CNS), with and without antibiotics, served as positive controls. Admixed PDFs were left at room temperature for 72 hours, then cultured using the BacT/ALERT system. A positive culture by day 5 constituted a contamination. Differences in proportion of contamination between groups were assessed using the Chi-squared test.Eighty PDF bags underwent microbiological testing. Sterility was maintained in all bags, independent of technique (NTAT versus sterile technique), type of PDF (Dianeal versus Icodextrin), or whether antibiotics were admixed. Of the positive controls, CNS-inoculated PDFs without antibiotics were all culture positive; however, when inoculated into antibiotic-admixed PDFs, only S. haemolyticus remained culture-positive (p < 0.0001).In conclusion, PDF sterility can be maintained using NTAT for up to 3 days at room temperature. Currently, there is insufficient evidence to adopt sterile technique in sterile suites when admixing take-home PDF.

Family and marital profiles of couples in which one partner has depression or anxiety.

Twenty-nine couples in which one partner was depressed, 21 couples in which one partner had an anxiety disorder, and 26 nondistressed control couples were compared on measures of (1) quality of life, stress, and social support; (2) family functioning; (3) marital functioning; and (4) relationship attributions. The depressed group had significant difficulties in all four domains. In contrast, the control group showed minimal difficulties. The profile of the anxious group occupied an intermediate position between those of the other two groups, with some difficulties in all four domains, although these were less severe and pervasive than those of the depressed group.