Targets for De-implementation of Unnecessary Testing Before Low-Risk Surgery: A Qualitative Study.

INTRODUCTION: Despite multispecialty recommendations to avoid routine preoperative testing before low-risk surgery, the practice remains common and de-implementation has proven difficult. The goal of this study as to elicit determinants of unnecessary testing before low-risk surgery to inform de-implementation efforts. METHODS: We conducted focused ethnography at a large academic institution, including semi-structured interviews and direct observations at two preoperative evaluation clinics and one outpatient surgery center. Themes were identified through narrative thematic analysis and mapped to a comprehensive and integrated checklist of determinants of practice, the Tailored Implementation for Chronic Diseases framework (TICD). RESULTS: Thirty individuals participated (surgeons, anesthesiologists, primary care physicians, physician assistants, nurses, and medical assistants). Three themes were identified: (1) Shared Values (TICD Social, Political, and Legal Factors), (2) Gaps in Knowledge (TICD Individual Health Professional Factors, Guideline Factors), and (3) Communication Breakdown (TICD Professional Interactions, Incentives and Resources, Capacity for Organizational Change). Shared Values describe core tenets expressed by all groups of clinicians, namely prioritizing patient safety and utilizing evidence-based medicine. Clinicians had Gaps in Knowledge related to existing data and preoperative testing recommendations. Communication Breakdowns within interdisciplinary teams resulted in unnecessary testing ordered to meet perceived expectations of other providers. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians have knowledge gaps related to preoperative testing recommendations and may be amenable to de-implementation efforts and educational interventions. Consensus guidelines may streamline interdisciplinary communication by clarifying interdisciplinary needs and reducing testing ordered to meet perceived expectations of other clinicians.

Optimizing care delivery in expanding health systems: Views from clinical leaders.

INTRODUCTION: In response to intense market pressures, many hospitals have consolidated into systems. However, evidence suggests that consolidation has not led to the improvements in clinical quality promised by proponents of mergers. The challenges to delivering care within expanding health systems and the opportunities posed to surgical leaders remains largely unexplored. METHODS: Semistructured interviews with 30 surgical leaders at teaching hospitals affiliated with health systems from August-December 2019. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and coded in an iterative process using MaxQDA software. Attitudes and strategies toward redesigning health care delivery across expanding systems were analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Leaders reported challenges to redesigning care delivery across the system ranging from resource constraints (e.g. hospital beds and operating rooms) to evolving market demands (e.g., patient preferences to receive care close to home). However, participants also highlighted that system expansion provided multiple opportunities to increase access (e.g. decant low-complexity care to affiliated centers) and improve quality of care (e.g. standardize best practices) for diverse populations including the potential to leverage their health system to expand access and improve quality. CONCLUSIONS: Though evidence suggests that hospital consolidation has not led to redesigned care delivery or improved clinical quality at a national level, leaders are pursuing varying sets of strategies aimed at leveraging system expansion in order to improve access and quality of care.

Barriers to rural health care from the provider perspective.

INTRODUCTION: Rural populations routinely rank poorly on common health indicators. While it is understood that rural residents face barriers to health care, the exact nature of these barriers remains unclear. To further define these barriers, a qualitative study of primary care physicians practicing in rural communities was performed. METHODS: Semistructured interviews were conducted with primary care physicians practicing in rural areas within western Pennsylvania, the third largest rural population within the USA, using purposively sampling. Data were then transcribed, coded, and analyzed by thematic analysis. RESULTS: Three key themes emerged from the analysis addressing barriers to rural health care: (1) cost and insurance, (2) geographic dispersion, and (3) provider shortage and burnout. Providers mentioned strategies that they either employed or thought would be beneficial for their rural communities: (1) subsidize services, (2) establish mobile and satellite clinics (particularly for specialty care), (3) increase utilization of telehealth, (4) improve infrastructure for ancillary patient support (ie social work services), and (5) increase utilization of advanced practice providers. CONCLUSION: There are numerous barriers to providing rural communities with quality health care. Barriers that are encountered are multidimensional. Patients are unable to obtain the care they need because of cost-related barriers. More providers need to be recruited to rural areas to combat the shortage and burnout. Advanced care-delivery methods such as telehealth, satellite clinics, or advanced practice providers can help bridge the gaps caused by geographic dispersion. Policy efforts should target all these aspects in order to appropriately address rural healthcare needs.

Experiences of Filipino Americans with Type 2 Diabetes during COVID-19: A Qualitative Study.

Little is known about the experiences of Filipino Americans with type 2 diabetes regarding their self-management during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic. We conducted a qualitative research study using semistructured interviews. In total, 19 interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed by 4 independent coders. We situated our understanding of these results using three concepts from an indigenous Filipino knowledge system called Sikolohiyang Pilipino: Kapwa (shared identity), Bahala Na (determination), and Pakikibaka (spaces of resistance). The following three main themes emerged: (1) stressors of the pandemic, (2) coping behaviors (with two subthemes: emotional and lifestyle-focused responses), and (3) diabetes self-management outcomes. Participants experienced stresses, anxiety, and loneliness during the pandemic magnified by the complexities of self-management. Although many admitted the pandemic brought challenges, including burnout, they coped by using existing resources-support from family, friends, the use of technology, and various emotional coping mechanisms. Many said that they made few diabetes self-management changes.

Surgical Leadership Competencies for Navigating Hospital Network Expansion.

INTRODUCTION: Today, many hospitals are part of a multihospital network, which changes the context in which surgeons are asked to lead. This study explores key leadership competencies that surgical leaders use to navigate this hospital network expansion. METHODS: In this qualitative study, 30 surgical leaders were interviewed. Interviews were coded and analyzed via thematic analysis. RESULTS: We identified three key competencies that leaders felt were important leadership skills to successfully navigate expanding hospital networks. First, leaders must steer the departmental vision within the evolving hospital network landscape. Second, leaders must align the visions of the department and of the hospital network. Third, leaders must build a network-oriented culture within their department. CONCLUSIONS: As networks expand, leaders are tasked with unifying vision in their department. Leaders identified a unique opportunity to leverage their growing influence across the hospital network and invested in the people and culture of their department.

Characterizing patient-reported claudication treatment goals to support patient-centered treatment selection and measurement strategies.

OBJECTIVE: Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) have been increasingly emphasized for peripheral artery disease (PAD). Patient-defined treatment goals and expectations, however, are poorly understood and might not be achievable or aligned with guidelines or clinical outcomes. We evaluated the patient-reported treatment goals among patients with claudication and the associations between patient characteristics, goals, and PAD-specific PRO scores. METHODS: Patients with a diagnosis of claudication were prospectively recruited. Patient-defined treatment goals and outcomes related to walking distance, duration, and speed were quantified using multiple-choice survey items. Free-text items were used to identify activities other than walking distance, duration, or speed associated with symptoms and treatment goals. The peripheral artery disease quality of life and walking impairment questionnaire instruments were included as PRO. The treatment goal categories were compared with the PRO percentile scores using 95% confidence intervals (CIs), categorical tests, and logistic regression models. Associations between the patient characteristics and PRO were evaluated using linear and ordinal logistic regression models. RESULTS: A total of 150 patients meeting the inclusion criteria were included in the present study. Of these 150 patients, 144 (96%) viewed the entire survey. Their mean age was 70.0 ± 11.3 years, and 32.9% were women. Most of the respondents had self-reported their race as White (n = 135), followed by Black (n = 3), Asian (n = 2), Native American (n = 2), and other/unknown (n = 2). Two participants self-reported Hispanic ethnicity. The primary treatment goals were an increased walking distance or duration without stopping (62.0%), the ability to perform a specific activity or task (23.0%), an increased walking speed (8.0%), or other/none of the above (7.0%). The specific activities associated with symptoms or goals included outdoor recreation (38.5%), labor-related tasks (30.7%), sports (26.9%), climbing stairs (23.1%), uphill walking (19.2%), and shopping (6%). Among the patients choosing an increased walking distance and duration as the primary goals, 64% had indicated that a distance of ≥0.5 mile (2640 ft) and 59% had indicated a duration of ≥30 minutes would be a minimum increase consistent with meaningful improvement. Increasing age was associated with lower odds of a distance improvement goal of ≥0.5 mile (odds ratio [OR], 0.68 per 5 years; 95% CI, 0.51-0.92; P = .012) or duration improvement goal of ≥30 minutes (OR, 0.76 per 5 years; 95% CI, 0.58-0.99; P = .047). Patient characteristics associated with PAD Quality of Life percentile scores included age, ankle brachial index, and gender. Ankle brachial index was the only patient characteristic associated with the walking impairment questionnaire percentile scores. CONCLUSIONS: Patients define treatment goals according to their desired activities and expectations, which may influence their goals and perceived outcomes. Patients' expectations of minimum increases in walking distance and duration consistent with meaningful improvement exceeded reported minimum important difference criteria for many patients and would not be captured using common clinic-based walking tests. Patient age was associated with both treatment goals and PRO scores, and the related floor and ceiling effects could influence sensitivity to PRO changes for younger and older patients, respectively. Heterogeneity in treatment goals supports consideration of tailored decision-making and outcomes informed by patient characteristics and perspectives.

The Inequitable Experiences of Left-Handed Medical Students in Surgical Education.

PURPOSE: Left-handed medical students contend with unique educational barriers within surgery, such as lack of educational resources, lack of left-handed-specific training, and widespread stigmatization of surgical left-handedness. This study aimed to highlight the surgical experiences of left-handed medical students so educators may be empowered to act with greater care and appreciation of these students' circumstances. METHOD: In this qualitative study, the authors conducted semistructured interviews on surgical experiences during medical school between January 31, 2021, and June 20, 2021, on 31 current surgical residents and fellows from 15 U.S. institutions and 6 surgical specialties. Left-handed trainees were included regardless of their surgical hand dominance. RESULTS: The authors identified 3 themes related to left-handed medical students' surgical experience: (1) disorienting advice from faculty or residents, (2) discouraging right-handed pressures and left-handed stigmatization, and (3) educational wishes of left-handed medical students. Trainees describe dialogues during medical school in which their handedness was directly addressed by residents and faculty with disorienting and nonbeneficial advice. Often trainees were explicitly told which hand to use, neglecting any preferences of the left-handed student. Participants also described possible changes in future surgical clerkships, including normalization of left-handedness, tangible mentorship, or granular and meaningful instruction. CONCLUSIONS: Left-handed medical students encounter unique challenges during their surgical education. These students report being disoriented by the variability of advice provided by mentors, discouraged by how pressured they feel to operate right-handed, and burdened by the need to figure things out by themselves in the absence of adequate left-handed educational resources. Surgical education leadership should detail the unique problems left-handed learners face, impartially elicit the learner's current operative hand preference, take responsibility for their left-handed students, promote acceptance and accommodation strategies of left-handed surgical trainees, and endeavor to improve the breadth of left-handed surgical resources.

"Learn from each other": A qualitative exploration of collaborative quality improvement.

BACKGROUND: Collaborative quality improvement is an established method to conduct quality improvement in surgical care. Despite the success of this method, little is known about the experiences, perceptions, and attitudes of those who participate in collaborative quality improvement. The following study elicited common themes associated with the experiences and perceptions of surgeons participating in collaborative quality improvement. METHODS: We conducted an interpretive description qualitative study of surgeons participating in the Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative, which is a statewide collaborative quality improvement consortium in Michigan. Semi-structured interviews were conducted using an interview guide. RESULTS: A sample of 24 participants completed interviews with a mean (SD) age of 48.7 (11.5) years and 16 (80%) male participants. Two major themes were identified. First, the contextualization of individual performance was seen as key to identifying opportunities for improvement and creating motivation to improve. Contextualization of individual performance relative to peer performance was collaborative rather than punitive. Second, peer learning emerged as the primary way to inform practice change and overcome hesitancy to change. Rather than draw upon external evidence, practice change within the collaborative was informed by the practices of peer institutions. Both themes were strongly exemplified in one of the Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative's largest initiatives-reducing excessive postoperative opioid prescribing. CONCLUSION: In this qualitative study of surgeons participating in statewide collaborative quality improvement, contextualization of individual outcomes and peer learning were the most salient themes. Collaborative quality improvement relied upon comparing one's own performance to peer performance, motivating improvement using this comparison, deriving evidence from peers to inform improvement initiatives, and overcoming hesitancy to change by highlighting peer success.

Focus group study of factors relevant to treatment decisions and experiences among patients with symptomatic peripheral artery disease.

BACKGROUND: Clinical guidelines recommend shared decision-making for treatment of peripheral artery disease (PAD), which requires understanding of patient perspectives and preferences. We conducted a focus group study of patients with symptomatic PAD to identify factors important and relevant to treatment choices, and to characterize aspects of the health care process that contribute to positive vs negative experiences apart from the specific treatment(s) received. METHODS: Participants were recruited from an academic medical center over 2 years using a purposeful sampling approach based on a clinical diagnosis of symptomatic PAD (either claudication or chronic limb-threatening ischemia [CLTI]) confirmed by the abnormal ankle or toe brachial index. Focus groups were led by a nonphysician moderator, consisted of 5 to 12 participants, and were conducted separately for patients with CLTI and claudication. Audio recordings converted to verbatim transcripts were used for qualitative analysis. RESULTS: A total of 51 patients (26 with CLTI and 25 with claudication) were enrolled and participated in focus groups. Major themes identified related to treatment preferences and decisions included specific interventions under consideration, the chance of technical success versus failure, anticipated degree of symptom improvement, outcome durability, and risk. Major themes related to the process of care included decision-making input, provider communication and trust, the timeline from diagnosis to definitive treatment, and compartmentalized care (including different venues of care). CONCLUSIONS: The results provide insights into patient preferences, perspectives, and experiences related to PAD treatment. These observations can be used to inform patient-centered approaches to shared decision-making, communication, and assessment of PAD treatment outcomes.

"Why would you want to do that?"Surgical Interns Reflect on Discouragement From Entering Surgical Fields.

INTRODUCTION: Decreasing numbers of medical students are choosing to pursue surgical careers. This study highlights individual experiences of surgical interns receiving discouragement from pursuing surgery as a career. METHODS: We interviewed 24 incoming surgical interns from 7 institutions and 7 surgical subspecialties about their experiences with discouragement from surgery. RESULTS: All surgical interns discussed experiencing discouragement from pursuing surgery as a career. Family, friends, the general public, and medical professionals, including surgeons, served as sources of discouragement. Reasons for discouragement fell into 3 main themes: The Surgeon and Surgical Culture, The Sacrifices, and The Sexism. Despite its pervasiveness, participants reconciled the discouragement received. DISCUSSION: Discouragement from surgery is pervasive and centered around surgeon stereotypes and perceptions of surgical culture, significant personal sacrifices required, and traditional gender-related expectations. These results highlight the importance of individual surgeons' comments on student experience and can be used to improve the perception of surgery amongst prospective interns.

A national qualitative study of surgical coaching: Opportunities and barriers for colorectal surgeons.

BACKGROUND: Surgical coaching interventions have been recommended as a method of technological skills improvement for individual surgeons and lifelong occupational learning. Patient outcomes for laparoscopic colectomy vary significantly based on surgeon experience and case volume. As surgical coaching is an emerging area, little is known about how surgeons view coaching interventions. METHODS: Semistructured interviews with 68 colorectal surgeons from across the country who were e-mail recruited from the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons focused on exploring the attitudes surrounding surgical coaching programs among colorectal surgeons. Interviews were performed via telephone, audio-recorded, and transcribed verbatim with redaction of identifying information. Interviews were analyzed by iterative steps informed by thematic analysis. RESULTS: Surgeons reported the desire to participate in coaching programs to improve patient outcomes through technical skill advancement, to keep pace with surgical innovation, and to fulfill a desire for lifelong learning. However, surgeons varied in their beliefs over who should be coached, who should coach, the format of coaching, and the topics addressed in coaching. Obstacles identified included time, financial and medicolegal concerns, balance with resident education, and vulnerability. CONCLUSION: Widespread enthusiasm for surgical coaching programs exists among colorectal surgeons. However, there is variability in what surgeons believe an ideal surgical coaching program would look like. Therefore, in alignment with adult learning theory, we recommend the creation of several different models of surgical coaching to allow each surgeon to benefit from this advancement in continuous professional development.

"The captain of the ship." A qualitative investigation of surgeon identity formation.

BACKGROUND: Professional identity formation is essential to medical trainee education. Surgeons are expected to guide trainees through this process but may be unprepared as they may not understand their own professional identity. METHODS: We purposively selected 46 surgeons across Michigan to participate in semi-structured qualitative interviews intended to explore surgical decision-making in 2019. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the transcripts. RESULTS: Surgeon identity formation is a complex process influenced by factors from four domains: individual factors, interpersonal relationships, external influences, and professional experience. We found surgeon identity formation commences prior to residency training and continues to remodel long into practice. CONCLUSIONS: By understanding surgeon identity, surgeons will be prepared to help form trainees' professional identities and recognize opportunities for improvement. We believe changes, especially within the environment and community, will encourage medical students to enter surgical fields, decrease resident attrition, and promote surgeon well-being.

Questioning the legitimacy of bariatric surgery: a qualitative analysis of individuals from the community who qualify for bariatric surgery.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about how individuals in the community who qualify for bariatric surgery perceive it and how this affects their likelihood to consider it for themselves. This study is the first qualitative study of a racially and ethnically diverse cohort to understand perceptions of bariatric surgery. METHODS: We designed a descriptive study to understand attitudes about bariatric surgery. We interviewed 32 individuals who met NIH criteria for bariatric surgery but have never considered bariatric surgery. We purposively sampled to ensure the majority of participants were non-white. Using an Interpretive Description framework, an exploratory, iterative method was used to code interviews and arrive at final themes. RESULTS: Participants self-identified as 88% female, 75% Black, 3% Hispanic, 3% Pacific Islander, and 19% white. Three major themes emerged from our data regarding legitimacy of bariatric surgery. First, participants perceived bariatric surgery to be something commercialized rather than needed treatment. They equated bariatric surgery with "botulism of the lips" or "cool sculpting." Second, an important contributor to the lack of legitimacy as a medical treatment was that many had not heard about bariatric surgery before from their doctors. Doctors were trusted sources for legitimate information about health. Lastly, conflicting information over bariatric surgery-related diet and weight loss further diminished the legitimacy of bariatric surgery. As one participant reflected about pre-operative weight loss requirements, "[If] I'm going to do that, I might as well just keep losing the weight. Why even go do the surgery?". CONCLUSION: Though bariatric surgery is a safe, effective, and durable therapy for patients with obesity, the majority of individuals we interviewed had concerns over the legitimacy of bariatric surgery as a medical treatment. Moving forward in reaching out to communities about bariatric surgery, healthcare providers and systems should consider the presentation of information to attenuate these concerns.

Surgical quality assurance at expanding health networks: A qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Even after decades of network expansion and increased care being delivered within health networks, health network expansion has not led to uniform improvements in patient outcomes and satisfaction. The reasons for the lack of universal surgical quality improvement are unclear. This study used qualitative methods to understand the nuances that affect the variation in network-level surgical quality assurance and provides strategies that surgical leaders use to improve surgical quality at expanding health networks. METHODS: This qualitative study obtained information through 30 semistructured interviews conducted from August to December 2019 with surgical leaders whose institutions were associated with health networks. The topic of surgical quality assurance was an emergent theme that was informed by thematic analysis. RESULTS: Interviews with leaders revealed 3 themes with regard to surgical quality assurance. First, participants wanted standardized tools for quality measurement. Leaders frequently referred to the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program registry and shared electronic health records, but some networks did not have these available at all sites. Second, participants wanted an organizational structure that provides clear oversight over quality. Some leaders appointed executives or created committees to help manage quality improvement initiatives. Third, participants wanted a culture shift toward quality improvement. Many leaders faced resistance to quality initiatives from frontline clinicians; some implemented events and retreats to help garner support and a culture of quality. CONCLUSION: These interviews offer critical insights into 3 domains that can be leveraged for sustained improvement and detail strategies that leaders used for surgical quality assurance at hospital networks.

Understanding Racially Diverse Community Member Views of Obesity Stigma and Bariatric Surgery.

PURPOSE: The obesity epidemic poses serious challenges to health equity. Despite bariatric surgery being one of the most effective obesity treatments, utilization remains low. In this context, we explored public perceptions of bariatric surgery, centering voices of Black individuals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Semi-structured interviews with individuals who have never considered bariatric surgery with purposive sampling to ensure the majority of participants were Black. Transcripts were iteratively analyzed. We employed an Interpretive Description framework to arrive at a collective description of perceptions of bariatric surgery. RESULTS: Thirty-two participants self-identified as 88% female, 72% Black, 3% Hispanic, 3% Pacific Islander, 3% Mixed Race, and 19% White. Participants reported a complex interplay of deeply held, stigmatized beliefs about identity. According to the stigma, persons with obesity lacked willpower and thus were considered devalued. Participants internalized this stigma, describing themselves with words like "glutton," "lazy," and "slack off." Because stigma caused participants to view obesity as resulting from personal failings alone, socially acceptable ways to lose weight were discipline through diet and exercise. Working for weight loss was "self-love, self-discipline, and determination." Thus, bariatric surgery was illegitimate, a "shortcut to weight loss" or "easy way out," since it was outside acceptable methods of effort. CONCLUSION: This qualitative study of community members who qualify for bariatric surgery shows obesity stigma was the main reason individuals rejected bariatric surgery. Obesity was stigmatizing, but undergoing bariatric surgery would further stigmatize individuals. Thus, healthcare providers may be instrumental in increasing bariatric surgery uptake by shifting social discourse from stigmatized notions of obesity towards one focusing on health.

Challenges and Opportunities for the Academic Mission Within Expanding Health Systems: A Qualitative Study.

OBJECTIVE: To explore challenges and opportunities for surgery departments' academic missions as they become increasingly affiliated with expanding health systems. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Academic medicine is in the midst of unprecedented change. In addition to facing intense competition, narrower margins, and decreased federal funding, medical schools are becoming increasingly involved with large, expanding health systems. The impact of these health system affiliations on surgical departments' academic missions is unknown. METHODS: Semistructured interviews with 30 surgical leaders at teaching hospitals affiliated with health systems from August - December 2019. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and coded in an iterative process using MaxQDA software. The topic of challenges and opportunities for the academic mission was an emergent theme, analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Academic health systems typically expanded to support their business goals, rather than their academic mission. Changes in governance sometimes disempowered departmental leadership, shifted traditional compensation models, redirected research programs, and led to cultural conflict. However, at many institutions, health system growth cross-subsidized surgical departments' research and training missions, expanded their clinical footprint, enabled them to improve standards of care, and enhanced opportunities for researchers and trainees. CONCLUSIONS: Although health system expansion generally intended to advance business goals, the accompanying academic and clinical opportunities were not always fully captured. Alignment between medical school and health system goals enabled some surgical department leaders to take advantage of their health systems' reach and resources to support their academic missions.

Exploring Emotional Responses After Postoperative Complications: A Qualitative Study of Practicing Surgeons.

OBJECTIVE: This qualitative study explored the impact of postoperative complications on surgeons and their well-being. BACKGROUND: Complications are an inherent component of surgical practice. Although there have been extensive efforts to reduce postoperative complications, the impact of complications on surgeons have not been well-studied. Surgeons are often left to process their own emotional responses to these complications, the effects of which are not well characterized. METHODS: We conducted 46 semi-structured interviews with a diverse range of surgeons practicing across Michigan to explore their responses to postoperative complications and the effect on overall well-being. The data were analyzed iteratively, through steps informed by thematic analysis. RESULTS: Participants described feelings of sadness, anxiety, frustration, grief, failure, and disappointment after postoperative complications. When asked to elaborate on these responses, participants described internal processes such as feelings of personal responsibility and failure, self-doubt, and failing the patient and family. Participants also described external pressures influencing the responses, which included potential impact to reputation and medicolegal issues. Experience level, type of complication, and the surgeon's individual personality were specific factors that influenced the intensity of these responses. CONCLUSION: Surgeons' emotional responses after postoperative complications may negatively impact individual well-being, and may represent a threat to the profession altogether if these issues remain inadequately recognized and addressed. Knowledge of the impact of unwanted or unexpected outcomes on surgeons is critical in developing and implementing strategies to cope with the challenges frequently encountered in the surgical profession.

Trust and Distrust in Opioid Decision-Making: A Qualitative Assessment of Patient-Doctor Relationship.

PURPOSE: Surgeons often prescribe opioid analgesics for pain management after surgery. However, we understand little about how patients perceive opioid prescribing and make decisions to use opioids for postoperative pain management. In this study, we aimed to gain an understanding of patients' decision-making process on postoperative opioid use. METHODS: We conducted semi-structured interviews with 30 adult patients undergoing elective surgery at our institution. The interviews were content-coded for thematic analysis. We used trust in the medical setting as a conceptual framework to interpret and find the inherent theory in the data. RESULTS: We found that participants based their opioid decisions on their trust or distrust toward various elements of their postoperative pain management. Participants believed that the surgeons "know," thereby, reinforcing their trust in surgeons' postoperative opioid prescribing to be in the participants' best interest. Moreover, the positive reputation of the institution strengthened the participants' trust. However, participants conveyed nuanced trust because of their distrust toward the opioid medications themselves, which were viewed as "suspicious," and the pharmaceutical companies, that were "despised." Despite this distrust, participants had confidence in their inherent ability to protect themselves from opioid use disorders. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding how patients perceive and form decisions on postoperative opioid use based on their trust and distrust toward various factors involved in their care highlights the importance of the patient-doctor relationship and building trust to effectively address postoperative pain and reduce opioid-related harms. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Through a strengthened therapeutic alliance between patients and surgeons, we can improve our strategies to overcome the ongoing opioid epidemic through patient-centered approaches.

A Qualitative Study of Patient Protection against Postoperative Opioid Addiction: A Thematic Analysis of Self-Agency.

BACKGROUND: Opioids are commonly used following outpatient surgery. However, we understand little about patients' perspectives and how patients decide on postoperative opioid use. This study seeks to investigate aspects of patients' thought processes that most impact their decisions. METHODS: The authors conducted semistructured interviews with 30 adults undergoing minor elective hand surgery at one tertiary hospital. Narratives were content-coded to arrive at the authors' thematic analysis. The authors incorporated Bandura's concept of self-agency to interpret the data and develop a conceptual framework that best explained the implicit theory within participants' responses. RESULTS: The authors found six themes under two domains of self-agency. Participants actively sought out protective mechanisms supporting their decision on opioid use, but sometimes did so unconsciously. They would avoid opioids postoperatively because they were "tough" and wanted to evade the risk of addiction as "good citizens." They conveyed a nuanced safety against addiction because they were "not the kind" to become addicted and because they trusted the surgeons' prescribing. However, participants felt discouraged by the stigma associated with opioids. Both intentionally and unintentionally, participants integrated a strong sense of self in their decision-making processes. CONCLUSIONS: A robust understanding of how patients choose to take opioids for postoperative pain control is imperative to develop patient-centered strategies to treat the opioid epidemic. Effective opioid-reduction policies should consider patients as active agents who negotiate various internal and external influences in their decision-making processes. Surgeons must incorporate patients' individual goals and perspectives regarding postoperative opioid use to minimize opioid-related harm after surgery.