PD-L1 expression complements CALGB prognostic scoring system in malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Background: Programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression is a predictive biomarker in patients with lung cancer, but its role in malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) remains unclear. Evidence suggests that higher PD-L1 expression is correlated with worse survival. CALGB is the main scoring system used to predict the benefit of chemotherapy treatment. This study aimed to determine the prognostic value of PD-L1 expression and its addition to CALGB scoring system in patients with MPM. Methods: In this retrospective analysis, we evaluated samples with confirmed locally advanced or metastatic MPM. PD-L1 Tumor Proportional Score (TPS) was determined by immunohistochemistry at diagnosis. Results: 73 patients were included in this study. A cutoff value of 15 was set for a high or low PD-L1 TPS. In total, 71.2% (n=52) and 28.8% (n=21) of individuals harbored low or high PD-L1 expression, respectively. PD-L1High was associated with worse median progression-free Survival (mPFS) [4.9 vs. 10.8 months; HR 2.724, 95% CI (1.44-5.14); p = 0.002] and Overall Survival (OS) [6.0 vs. 20.9 months; HR 6.87, 95% CI (3.4-8.7); p<0.001] compared to patients with PD-L1Low. Multivariate analysis confirmed that PD-L1 expression was an independent factor for PFS and OS in patients with MPM and CALGB score of 5-6. Conclusion: PD-L1 addition to CALGB scale improves its prognostic estimation of MPM survival and should be considered in future research.

Perilesional edema diameter associated with brain metastases as a predictive factor of response to radiotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer.

Background: Different prognostic scales exist in patients with brain metastasis, particularly in lung cancer. The Graded Prognostic Assessment for lung cancer using molecular markers (Lung-molGPA index) for brain metastases is a powerful prognostic tool that effectively identifies patients at different risks. However, these scales do not include perilesional edema diameter (PED) associated with brain metastasis. Current evidence suggests that PED might compromise the delivery and efficacy of radiotherapy to treat BM. This study explored the association between radiotherapy efficacy, PED extent, and gross tumor diameter (GTD). Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the intracranial response (iORR), intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS), and overall survival (OS) according to the extent of PED and GT. Methods: Out of 114 patients with BM at baseline or throughout the disease, 65 were eligible for the response assessment. The GTD and PED sum were measured at BM diagnosis and after radiotherapy treatment. According to a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, cutoff values were set at 27 mm and 17 mm for PED and GT, respectively. Results: Minor PED was independently associated with a better iORR [78.8% vs. 50%, OR 3.71 (95% CI 1.26-10.99); p = 0.018] to brain radiotherapy. Median iPFS was significantly shorter in patients with major PED [6.9 vs. 11.8 months, HR 2.9 (95% CI 1.7-4.4); p < 0.001] independently of other prognostic variables like the Lung-molGPA and GTD. A major PED also negatively impacted the median OS [18.4 vs. 7.9 months, HR 2.1 (95% CI 1.4-3.3); p = 0.001]. Conclusion: Higher PED was associated with an increased risk of intracranial progression and a lesser probability of responding to brain radiotherapy in patients with metastatic lung cancer. We encourage prospective studies to confirm our findings.

Targeted Therapies and Utility of the Lung-molGPA in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients with Brain Metastases.

INTRODUCTION: Therapeutic advances have increased the survival of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients as well as the lifetime risk of being diagnosed with brain metastases (BM). Although BM have historically been associated with poor prognosis, it is unclear whether they remain a strong predictor of reduced survival. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of BM and the utility of the Lung-molGPA. METHODS: This single-center retrospective database analysis included 1,393 NSCLC patients with newly diagnosed BM who registered at the Instituto Nacional de Cancerología of Mexico (INCan) from 2010 to 2020. The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used for the survival analysis. Survival times were calculated from the date of NSCLC diagnosis (OS), or BM diagnosis, to the date of death or last follow-up. Cox proportional-hazards models were used to calculate the hazard ratio (HR) for death and the significance of the parameters evaluated. RESULTS: Out of 1,058 patients who underwent genetic testing for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations and/or anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangements, 650 had a positive tumor mutational/rearrangement status (543 had EGFR mutations, 104 had ALK rearrangements, and 3 had both EGFR and ALK alterations). Median OS did not differ between patients with BM and without BM (17.7 months [95% CI, 15.4-19.0] vs. 16.6 months [95% CI, 14.3-19.0]; p = 0.362). In contrast, the presence of BM was associated with worse OS in patients with a negative tumor mutational status (HR: 1.225 [95% CI, 1.041-1.443]; p = 0.015), who did not receive TKI therapy (HR: 1.269 [95% CI, 1.082-1.488]; p = 0.003), or with non-adenocarcinoma histology (HR: 1.582 [95% CI, 1.118-2.238]; p = 0.01). The median survival after BM diagnosis was 4.27, 6.96, 14.68, and 18.89 months for adenocarcinoma patients with Lung-molGPA scores 0-1, 1.5-2, 2.5-3, and 3.5-4, respectively (p < 0.0001). For non-adenocarcinoma patients with Lung-molGPA scores 0-1, 1.5-2, and 2.5-3, the corresponding estimates were 0.95, 2.89, and 9.39 months, respectively (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: These results show that the prognosis of NSCLC patients with BM is no longer uniformly poor and should be individually assessed. Furthermore, the validity of the Lung-molGPA was confirmed in an independent population from a different geographical region.

Clinical Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Mexican Patients with Thoracic Malignancies.

BACKGROUND: Accumulated evidence indicates that patients with lung cancer are a vulnerable population throughout the pandemic. Limited information is available in Latin America regarding the impact of the pandemic on medical care. The goal of this study was to describe the clinical and social effect of COVID-19 on patients with thoracic cancer and to ascertain outcomes in those with a confirmed diagnosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This cohort study included patients with thoracic neoplasms within a single institution between March 1, 2020, and February 28, 2021. All variables of interest were extracted from electronic medical records. During this period, the Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale 21 (DASS-2) was applied to evaluate and identify more common psychological disorders. RESULTS: The mean age for the total cohort (n = 548) was 61.5 ± 12.9 years; non-small cell lung cancer was the most frequent neoplasm (86.9%), advanced stages predominated (80%), and most patients were under active therapy (82.8%). Any change in treatment was reported in 23.9% of patients, of which 78.6% were due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Treatment delays (≥7 days) were the most frequent modifications in 41.9% of cases, followed by treatment suspension at 37.4%. Patients without treatment changes had a more prolonged progression-free survival and overall survival (hazard ratio [HR] 0.21, p < .001 and HR 0.28, p < .001, respectively). The mean DASS-21 score was 10.45 in 144 evaluated patients, with women being more affected than men (11.41 vs. 9.08, p < .001). Anxiety was reported in 30.5% of cases, followed by depression and distress in equal proportions (18%). Depressed and stressed patients had higher odds of experiencing delays in treatment than patients without depression (odds ratio [OR] 4.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.53-13.23, p = .006 and OR 3.18, 95% CI 1.2-10.06, p = .006, respectively). CONCLUSION: Treatment adjustments in patients with thoracic malignancies often occurred to avoid COVID-19 contagion with detrimental effects on survival. Psychological disorders could have a role in adherence to the original treatment regimen. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The pandemic has placed an enormous strain on health care systems globally. Patients with thoracic cancers represent a vulnerable population, with increased morbidity and mortality rates. In Mexico, treatment modifications were common during the pandemic, and those who experienced delays had worse survival outcomes. Most treatment modifications were related to a patient decision rather than a lockdown of health care facilities in which mental health impairment plays an essential role. Moreover, the high case fatality rate highlights the importance of improving medical care access. Likewise, to develop strategies facing future threats that may compromise health care systems in non-developed countries.

Association of Lung Adenocarcinoma Subtypes According to the IASLC/ATS/ERS Classification and Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Expression in Tumor Cells.

Background: Programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) protein expression is one of the most extensively studied biomarkers in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, there is scarce information regarding its association with distinct adenocarcinoma subtypes. This study evaluated the frequency of PD-L1 expression according to the IASLC/ATS/ERS classification and other relevant histological and clinical features. Patients and Methods: PD-L1 expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC). According to its positivity in tumor cells membrane, we stratified patients in three different tumor proportions score (TPS) cut-off points: a) <1% (negative), b) between 1 and 49%, and c) ≥50%; afterward, we analyzed the association among PD-L1 expression and lung adenocarcinoma (LADC) predominant subtypes, as well as other clinical features. As an exploratory outcome we evaluated if a PD-L1 TPS score ≥15% was useful as a biomarker for determining survival. Results: A total of 240 patients were included to our final analysis. Median age at diagnosis was 65 years (range 23-94 years). A PD-L1 TPS ≥1% was observed in 52.5% of the entire cohort; regarding specific predominant histological patterns, a PD-L1 TPS ≥1 was documented in 31.2% of patients with predominant-lepidic pattern, 46.2% of patients with predominant-acinar pattern, 42.8% of patients with a predominant-papillary pattern, and 68.7% of patients with predominant-solid pattern (p = 0.002). On the other hand, proportion of tumors with PD-L1 TPS ≥50% was not significantly different among adenocarcinoma subtypes. At the univariate survival analysis, a PD-L1 TPS cut-off value of ≥15% was associated with a worse PFS and OS. Conclusion: According to IASLC/ATS/ERS lung adenocarcinoma classification, the predominant-solid pattern is associated with a higher proportion of PD-L1 positive samples, no subtype was identified to be associated with a high (≥50%) TPS PD-L1.

Efficacy, Safety, and Cost-Minimization Analysis of Continuous Infusion of Low-Dose Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin in Patients With Unresectable Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma.

BACKGROUND: Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is rare and aggressive neoplasia, with a poor prognosis; furthermore, the monetary cost of its treatment represents a major challenge for many patients. The economic burden this malignancy imposes is underscored by the fact that asbestos exposure, which is the most frequent risk factor, is much more prevalent in the lower socioeconomic population of developing countries. The aims of the present study were to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and cost of continuous infusion of low-dose Gemcitabine plus Cisplatin (CIGC) as a treatment strategy for patients with unresectable MPM. METHODS: We performed a prospective cohort study to determine efficacy and safety of continuous infusion gemcitabine at a dose of 250 mg/m2 in a 6-h continuous infusion plus cisplatin 35 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle in patients with unresectable MPM. We also performed a cost-minimization analysis to determine if this chemotherapy regimen is less expensive than other currently used regimens. RESULTS: The median number of chemotherapy cycles was six (range 1-11 cycles); objective response rate was documented in 46.2%, and disease control rate was seen in 81.2%. Median PFS was 8.05 months (CI 95% 6.97-9.13); median OS was 16.16 months (CI 95% 12.5-19.9). The cost minimization analysis revealed savings of 66.4, 61.9, and 97.7% comparing CIGC with short-infusion gemcitabine plus cisplatin (SIGC), cisplatin plus pemetrexed (CP), and cisplatin plus pemetrexed and bevacizumab (CPB), respectively. Furthermore, this chemotherapy regimen proved to be safe at the administered dosage. CONCLUSION: CIGC is an effective and safe treatment option for patients with unresectable MPM; besides, this combination is a cost-saving option when compared with other frequently used chemotherapy schemes. Therefore, this treatment scheme should be strongly considered for patients with unresectable MPM and limited economic resources.

Association of Carcinoembryonic Antigen Reduction With Progression-free and Overall Survival Improvement in Advanced Non-small-cell Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Non-small cell lung cancer elevates serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). CEA determinations are not recommended currently. This study aims to identify the correlation between reducing serum CEA levels with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival. METHODS: This study assessed at baseline and in every scheduled visit serum CEA levels throughout first-line therapy. A sensitivity and specificity analysis identified the best cut-off point and correlated it with progression-free survival and overall survival. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were conducted. RESULTS: We assessed 748 patients with elevated serum CEA levels at diagnosis. A ≥20% decrease from baseline was associated with a 2-fold median survival compared with patients with lower decreases (20.5 months vs 9.1 months; hazard ratio, 0.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.44 to -0.64; P < .001). CEA sensitivity and specificity to predict survival was 79.8% and 59.8%, respectively. A ≥10% decrease in CEA concentrations was associated with longer progression-free survival (7.7 months vs 5.9 months; hazard ratio, 0.71; 95% confidence interval, 0.57 to -0.88; P = .001) in those treated with chemotherapy, and in patients under tyrosine kinase inhibitors (11.9 months vs 7.3 months; hazard ratio, 0.63; 95% confidence interval, 0.47 to -0.83; P = .0001) and a ≥20% decrease. CONCLUSION: In patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer with an elevated baseline CEA level, the percentage decrease of CEA concentrations above the threshold during the first-line therapy was associated with more prolonged survival and progression-free intervals. Serum CEA determinations are a feasible, noninvasive option for monitoring and prognosis.

Consolidative stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) to intrapulmonary lesions is associated with prolonged progression-free survival and overall survival in oligometastatic NSCLC patients: A prospective phase 2 study.

OBJECTIVES: Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy (SABR) has shown high rates of local control and prolonged survival in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), though its role in oligometastatic disease is undefined. This study aimed to evaluate SABR as a local consolidative therapy (LCT) in oligometastatic NSCLC patients. METHODS: In this prospective, single-arm phase 2 trial, we sought to evaluate SABR in patients with stage IV NSCLC, with ≤ five lesions, including the primary tumor. Patients received initial systemic therapy according to international guidelines. Patients without progression after front-line therapy (two months of targeted therapy and ≥ four cycles of chemotherapy) were evaluated by an 18F-FDG-PET/CT to receive consolidative SABR (45-60 Gy in 3-5 fractions) to the primary and all intrapulmonary metastatic sites. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and toxicity. RESULTS: A total of 47 patients were included. Mean age was 58.9 years, 59.6 % were female, 87.2 % had adenocarcinoma histology, and the contralateral lung was the main site of metastases in 42.6 %. All patients received systemic front-line therapy, chemotherapy in 61.7 %, and a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) in 38.3 %. Disease control rate (DCR) and complete metabolic response (CMR) to SABR were 93.6 % and 70.2 %. Median PFS was 34.3 months (95 %CI; 31.1-38.8) for the total cohort; patients with a CMR had a median PFS of 53.9 monthsvs.31.9 months in those without CMR (p = 0.011). Median OS was not reached.Grade 1, 2, and 3 pneumonitis were observed in 79.5 % (31/39), 12.8 % (5/39) and 7.7 % (3/39), respectively. No grade ≥4 toxicities were observed. CONCLUSION: The use of SABR as LCT in oligometastatic NSCLC patients was well tolerated and showed favorable results regarding PFS and OS compared with historical data. The benefit was significantly higher in patients who reached a CMR as assessed by 18F-FDG-PET/CT.

Association between CD47 expression, clinical characteristics and prognosis in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

OBJECTIVE: CD47 is an antiphagocytic molecule that contributes to tumor cell resistance in host immune surveillance. CD47 overexpression correlated with tumor progression and shorter survival in lung cancer. However, the expression and functional significance of CD47 in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) has not been completely understood. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, CD47 expression was immunohistochemically examined in tumor biopsies from 169 NSCLC patients. The association of CD47 levels (H-score) with clinicopathological characteristics and survival outcomes was evaluated. RESULTS: CD47 protein was detected in 84% of patients with a median expression of 80% (0-100). Tumor CD47 levels above 1% and 50% were found in 84% and 65.7% of patients, respectively. While, median CD47 staining index was 160 (0-300). Patients were divided into two groups according to CD47 expression (high or low), using a cutoff value of 150. High CD47 expression was associated with wood smoke exposure (71.1% vs 28.9%, P = .013) and presence of EGFR (+) mutations (66.7% vs 33.3%, P = .04). Survival analysis carried out in the whole population did not show any association of CD47 expression and survival outcome. However, in patients with EGFR (+) mutations, CD47 expression was associated with higher progression-free survival (PFS) (12.2 vs. 4.4 months, P = .032). When the survival analysis was performed according to CD47 levels (cut off value: 150), both, PFS and overall survival (OS) were shortened in patients with a high expression of CD47 (10.7 vs. NR, P = .156) and (29.2 vs. NR months P = .023), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: CD47 overexpression is not a prognostic factor for PFS and OS in NSCLC patients. However, the presence of EGFR mutations and high expression of CD47 were associated with shortened PFS and OS. Coexpression of these markers represents a potential biomarker and characterizes a therapeutic niche for lung cancer.

The importance of image guided radiotherapy in small cell lung cancer: Case report and review of literature.

AIM: Describe the anatomical changes and tumor displacement due to a rapid response of a patient's small cell lung cancer (SCLC) during definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT). BACKGROUND: The treatment for SCLC is based on CRT. If interfractional changes during RT are incorrectly assessed they might compromise adequate coverage of the tumor or increase dose to organs at risk. Image guided RT with cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) allows to identify daily treatment variations. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Describe a SCLC case with rapid changes in size, shape and location of the primary tumor during RT. CASE REPORT: A 62-year-old woman was diagnosed with SCLC with complete obstruction of the anterior and lingular bronchi and incomplete left thorax expansion due to a 12 × 15 cm mass. During CRT (45 Gy in 1.5 Gy per fraction, twice daily) the patient presented rapid tumor response, leading to resolution of bronchi obstruction and hemithorax expansion. Tumor shifted up to 4 cm from its original position. The identification of variations led to two new simulations and planning in a 3-week treatment course. CONCLUSIONS: The complete radiological response was possible due to systematic monitoring of the tumor during CRT. We recommend frequent on-site image verification. Daily CBCT should be considered with pretreatment tumor obstruction, pleural effusion, atelectasis, large volumes or radiosensitive histology that might resolve early and rapidly and could lead to a miss of the tumor or increased toxicity. Further research should be made in replanning effect in coverage of microscopic disease since it increases uncertainty in this scenario.

Comparación de la estimación de gasto cardiaco por ecocardiografía versus biorreactancia y monitor ultrasónico de gasto cardiaco / Comparison of cardiac output estimation by echocardiography, bioreactance and ultrasonic cardiac output monitor / Comparação da estimativa do debito cardíaco pela ecocardiografia versus biorreatância e monitor ultrassônico

Resumen: En terapia intensiva uno de los monitoreos más frecuentes fundamentales para la toma de decisiones clínicas en la reanimación del choque séptico es la estimación del gasto cardiaco. La ecocardiografía se ha posicionado como el estándar de oro en monitoreo no invasivo del gasto cardiaco; sin embargo, este tipo de monitoreo es operador dependiente y debe ser realizado por un experto. Otras técnicas, como la biorreactancia y USCOM, son 100% no invasivas, y estas mediciones no dependen del operador ni del experto. Objetivo: Analizar la concordancia del gasto cardiaco por ecocardiografía versus biorreactancia y USCOM. Material y métodos: Estudio observacional prospectivo en el que se midió en 26 pacientes diagnosticados con shock séptico ingresados en la Unidad de Cuidados el gasto cardiaco por ecocardiografía, biorreactancia y sistema USCOM. El método de Bland Altman se realizó para analizar el acuerdo entre las diferentes técnicas. También se calculó el coeficiente de Linn en los mismos grupos de mediciones. Resultados: La biorreactancia frente a la ecocardiografía informó un sesgo (media de las diferencias) de -0.08 con una desviación estándar (precisión) de 0.85 y un intervalo de confianza de 95% de 1.59 a -1.75, finalmente un error de 24% y un coeficiente de Linn de 0.78. USCOM versus ecocardiografía informó un sesgo (media de las diferencias) de 1.11 con una desviación estándar (precisión) de 0.95 y un intervalo de confianza de 95% de 2.98 a -0.75, finalmente un error de 41% y un coeficiente de Linn de 0.6. Conclusiones: La biorreactancia es un prometedor monitoreo continuo al parecer comparable a la ecocardiografía, por otro lado el monitoreo USCOM no es equiparable a ecocardiografía o biorreactancia. Se necesitan más estudios para comprobar esta observación.

Abstract: Cardiac output is the most frequent advanced monitoring in critical care units given its utility to guide resuscitation in septic shock. Echocardiography has been postulated has the gold standard for non-invasive cardiac output measurement, however this technique is operator-dependent and should be performed by an expert. Other techniques such as bioreactance and Doppler monitoring by semiautomatic USCOM system are 100% non-invasive techniques, also these measurements are not operator or expert dependent. Objective: To analyze the agreement of cardiac output by echocardiography vs Bioreactance and USCOM. Material and methods: Prospective observational study in which 26 patients diagnosed with septic shock admitted to the intensive care unit were cardiac output was measured by echocardiography, bioreactance and USCOM system. Bland Altman method was performed to analyze the agreement between the different techniques: echocardiography vs USCOM and echocardiography vs bioreactance. Also Linn coefficient was calculated in the same groups of measurements. Results: Bioreactance vs echocardiography reported a bias (mean of the differences) of -0.08 with a standard deviation (precision) of 0.85 and a 95% confidence interval of 1.59 to -1.75, finally an error of 24% and Linn coefficient of 0.78. USCOM vs echocardiography reported a bias (mean of the differences) of 1.11 with a standard deviation (precision) of 0.95 and a 95% confidence interval of 2.98 to -0.75, finally an error of 41% and Linn coefficient of 0.6. Conclusions: Bioreactance is a promising technique for cardiac output measurement given its good agreement with echocardiography, in the other hand USCOM did not showed a satisfactory agreement with echocardiography, more studies are needed to verify the clinical usefulness of these different techniques.

Resumo: Na unidade de terapia intensiva, um dos monitoramentos mais frequentes essenciais para a tomada de decisão clínica na ressuscitação do choque séptico é a estimativa do débito cardíaco. A ecocardiografia tem sido posicionada como o «padrão ouro¼ na monitorização não invasiva do débito cardíaco, no entanto esse tipo de monitoramento é dependente do operador e deve ser executado por um especialista. Outras técnicas como a biorreatância e o USCOM, são técnicas 100% não invasivas, e essas medidas não dependem do operador ou do especialista. Objetivo: Analisar a concordância do débito cardíaco pela ecocardiografia versus Biorreatância e USCOM. Material e métodos: Estudo observacional prospectivo em que 26 pacientes com diagnóstico de choque séptico admitidos na unidade de terapia intensiva, onde mediram-se o débito cardíaco por ecocardiografia, biorreatância e sistema USCOM. O método de Bland Altman foi utilizado para analisar a concordância entre as diferentes técnicas. O coeficiente de Linn também foi calculado nos mesmos grupos de medidas. Resultados: A biorreatância versus ecocardiografia relatou uma tendência (diferenças médias) de -0.08 com um desvio padrão (precisão) de 0.85 e um intervalo de confiança de 95% de 1.59 a -1.75, finalmente um erro de 24% e um coeficiente de Linn de 0.78. USCOM versus ecocardiografia relatou uma tendência (média de diferenças) de 1.11 com um desvio padrão (precisão) de 0.95 e um intervalo de confiança de 95% de 2.98 a -0.75, finalmente um erro de 41% e um coeficiente de Linn de 0.6. Conclusões: Biorreatância é um monitoramento contínuo promissor aparentemente comparável ao ecocardiograma; por outro lado, o monitoramento por USCOM não é comparável à ecocardiografia ou biorreactância. Mais estudos são necessários para verificar essa observação.

Correlation between levels of circulating adipokines and adiponectin/resistin index with carotid intima-media thickness in hypertensive type 2 diabetic patients.

BACKGROUND: Hypoadiponectinemia and hyperresistinemia are associated with cardiovascular disease. The increase in the carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) assessed by B-mode ultrasound has been directly associated with increased risk of myocardial infarction and stroke. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the correlation between adipokine levels with CIMT in hypertensive type 2 diabetic patients. METHODS: Serum levels of adiponectin and resistin levels were measured by ELISA in 30 type 2 diabetic patients with never-treated hypertension and in age-matched healthy controls. The CIMT (B-mode color imaging of extracranial carotid arteries using high-resolution ultrasound) was also obtained. The relationship between adipokine levels and the adiponectin/resistin index with the CIMT was assessed by the Pearson correlation coefficient test. RESULTS: Adiponectin was lower (p < 0.05), and resistin higher (p < 0.01) in patients than in controls, CIMT correlated positively with resistin (R = 0.45, p < 0.02) and the adiponectin/resistin index (R = 0.58, p < 0.001), but not with adiponectin levels (r = -0.11, p > 0.1) in patients. Whereas only adiponectin levels correlated - negatively - with CIMT (r = -0.39, p < 0.02) in controls. CONCLUSION: Our results shown that the adiponectin/resistin index seems to be more strongly associated with atherosclerosis than adipokine levels, and may be used as a reliable marker of cardiovascular risk in type 2 diabetic hypertensive patients.