Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 41
Filtrar
1.
Arch Pediatr ; 30(8): 525-529, 2023 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37798217

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The predominance of the psychodynamic approach is often put forward to explain the delay in diagnosis and treatment of attention-deficit disorder with hyperactivity (ADHD) reported in France. OBJECTIVE: A bibliometric study of abstracts, articles, or letters authored by French researchers may provide objective insight into this issue. METHODS: Online electronic databases were searched without any date limits for documents related to ADHD, and allocated to the AllFR group when all authors had an affiliation in France or to the notAllFR group when at least one author had an affiliation in France. Publications expressing any psychodynamic point of view on the causes and/or treatment of ADHD were identified. RESULTS: A total of 747 documents were analyzed: 417 were exclusively indexed in SCOPUS, and 418 were allocated to the AllFR group. Compared with documents in the notAllFR group, documents in the AllFR group were written by a smaller number of authors (median 3 vs. 6, p<0.002), more frequently evoked psychodynamic concepts (10.45% vs. 1.67%, p<0.001), and less frequently acknowledged the persistence of ADHD in adulthood (29.10% vs. 42.14%). The psychodynamic approach was likely to rely on case reports of fewer than three children. CONCLUSIONS: Any serious review of the literature should pool documents from several online databases, especially SCOPUS. In publications by only French authors, the psychodynamic approach seems predominant and the persistence of ADHD in adulthood is overlooked. This may concur with the excessive delay observed in the diagnosis and treatment of children and adults in France compared to other European countries.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad , Niño , Adulto , Humanos , Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad/diagnóstico , Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad/terapia , Francia , Bibliometría , Europa (Continente)
2.
Encephale ; 49(6): 624-631, 2023 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37612161

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is a frequent neurodevelopmental disorder whose first clinical description was published more than two centuries ago. Prevalence rates have been evaluated in many countries and meta-analyses conducted, but the data collected in France are scarce. METHODS: A review of the literature was conducted by retrieving the references from four electronic databases leading to the selection of four studies in children and four in adults. Meta-analyses of prevalence rates were performed on this published data as well as unpublished results from the ChiP-ARD study (Children and Parents with ADHD and Related Disorders), separately for children and adults. RESULTS: While the quality of most studies is questionable, the prevalence rates are close to those reported in international meta-analytic studies for children (3.68%), but are higher in adults (5.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Well-conducted studies in both general and special populations are needed (e.g., in patients with depression, anxiety, bipolar disorder, developmental disorders including autism spectrum disorder, behavioural or substance abuse, and incarcerated). Nevertheless, healthcare stakeholders can conservatively consider that .8 million children and 1.4 million adults in the metropolitan French general population are likely to have ADHD and suffer from its multiple consequences.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad , Trastorno del Espectro Autista , Niño , Adulto , Humanos , Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad/epidemiología , Prevalencia , Francia/epidemiología , Padres
3.
Front Public Health ; 11: 1185565, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37325324

RESUMEN

Introduction: Neurodevelopment and related mental disorders (NDDs) are one of the most frequent disabilities among young people. They have complex clinical phenotypes often associated with transnosographic dimensions, such as emotion dysregulation and executive dysfunction, that lead to adverse impacts in personal, social, academic, and occupational functioning. Strong overlap exists then across NDDs phenotypes that are challenging for diagnosis and therapeutic intervention. Recently, digital epidemiology uses the rapidly growing data streams from various devices to advance our understanding of health's and disorders' dynamics, both in individuals and the general population, once coupled with computational science. An alternative transdiagnostic approach using digital epidemiology may thus better help understanding brain functioning and hereby NDDs in the general population. Objective: The EPIDIA4Kids study aims to propose and evaluate in children, a new transdiagnostic approach for brain functioning examination, combining AI-based multimodality biometry and clinical e-assessments on an unmodified tablet. We will examine this digital epidemiology approach in an ecological context through data-driven methods to characterize cognition, emotion, and behavior, and ultimately the potential of transdiagnostic models of NDDs for children in real-life practice. Methods and analysis: The EPIDIA4Kids is an uncontrolled open-label study. 786 participants will be recruited and enrolled if eligible: they are (1) aged 7 to 12 years and (2) are French speaker/reader; (3) have no severe intellectual deficiencies. Legal representative and children will complete online demographic, psychosocial and health assessments. During the same visit, children will perform additionally a paper/pencil neuro-assessments followed by a 30-min gamified assessment on a touch-screen tablet. Multi-stream data including questionnaires, video, audio, digit-tracking, will be collected, and the resulting multimodality biometrics will be generated using machine- and deep-learning algorithms. The trial will start in March 2023 and is expected to end by December 2024. Discussion: We hypothesize that the biometrics and digital biomarkers will be capable of detecting early onset symptoms of neurodevelopment compared to paper-based screening while as or more accessible in real-life practice.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos Mentales , Humanos , Niño , Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagen , Biometría
4.
BMC Pediatr ; 22(1): 741, 2022 12 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36578007

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Developmental dyslexia, a specific and long-lasting learning disorder that prevents children from becoming efficient and fluent readers, has a severe impact on academic learning and behavior and may compromise professional and social development. Most remediation studies are based on the explicit or implicit assumption that dyslexia results from a single cause related to either impaired phonological or visual-attentional processing or impaired cross-modal integration. Yet, recent studies show that dyslexia is multifactorial and that many dyslexics have underlying deficits in several domains. The originality of the current study is to test a remediation approach that trains skills in all three domains using different training methods that are tailored to an individual's cognitive profile as part of a longitudinal intervention study. METHODS: This multicenter randomized crossover study will be conducted in three phases and will involve 120 dyslexic children between the ages of 8 and 13 years. The first phase serves as within-subject baseline period that lasts for 2 months. In this phase, all children undergo weekly speech-language therapy sessions without additional training at home (business-as-usual). During the second phase, all dyslexics receive three types of intensive interventions that last 2 month each: Phonological, visual-attentional, and cross-modal. The order of the first two interventions (phonological and visual-attentional) is swapped in two randomly assigned groups of 60 dyslexics each. This allows one to test the efficacy and additivity of each intervention (against baseline) and find out whether the order of delivery matters. During the third phase, the follow-up period, the intensive interventions are stopped, and all dyslexics will be tested after 2 months. Implementation fidelity will be assessed from the user data of the computerized intervention program and an "intention-to-treat" analysis will be performed on the children who quit the trial before the end. DISCUSSION: The main objective of this study is to assess whether the three types of intensive intervention (phase 2) improve reading skills compared to baseline (i.e., non-intensive intervention, phase 1). The secondary objectives are to evaluate the effectiveness of each intervention and to test the effects of order of delivery on reading intervention outcomes. Reading comprehension, spelling performance and reading disorder impact of dyslexic readers are assessed immediately before and after the multimodal intervention and 2 months post-intervention. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT04028310. Registered on July 18, 2019.


Asunto(s)
Dislexia , Niño , Humanos , Adolescente , Estudios Cruzados , Dislexia/terapia , Dislexia/psicología , Lenguaje , Atención , Estudios Longitudinales , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto
5.
J Pediatr Hematol Oncol ; 44(2): e381-e385, 2022 Mar 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34224519

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of patient's position on pain and anxiety during lumbar puncture (LP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A randomized controlled trial included children between 2 and 18 years old receiving at least 2 therapeutic LPs. They were randomly assigned to undergo lateral decubitus position or sitting position LP. Primary outcome was the maximum LP-induced pain, secondary endpoint the maximum LP-induced anxiety score. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients were randomized. For patients under 6 years old, mean of Face, Leg, Activity, Cry, and Consolability were 2.8/10±3.0 (median=1) at first time and 1.5±1.7 (median=1) at second time. For patients 6 to 18 years old, mean of visual analog scale were 2.2±2.2 (median=1.5) at first time and 3.2±2.8 (median=3) at second time. There was no significant differences according to position on anxiety among children. CONCLUSIONS: Results did not demonstrate whether lateral decubitus position could generate less pain and anxiety than sitting position.


Asunto(s)
Dolor , Punción Espinal , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Humanos , Dolor/etiología , Dimensión del Dolor , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios Prospectivos , Punción Espinal/efectos adversos
6.
J Atten Disord ; 24(1): 52-65, 2020 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26794670

RESUMEN

Objective: The objective of this study is to retrospectively describe the pathway toward ADHD diagnosis and treatment, and identify potential areas for improvement. Method: Parent-reported questionnaires were collected by a national sample of ADHD specialists. Results: In total, 473 complete questionnaires were analyzed. Initial onset of ADHD symptoms was reported at a mean age of 4.45 years. Mean age at diagnosis was 8.07 years, and half of the families had seen at least three health care professionals previously. Psychiatrists were most commonly consulted. A "combined" (89% boys) and inattentive (49% boys) profile was identified. Diagnosis was made 1 year later for the latter group. Two thirds of patients received pharmacological treatment. The delay in diagnosis was identified as the main source of concern for caregivers. Conclusion: The 4-year delay in diagnosis may represent a loss of opportunity. Training health care professionals in the core symptoms of ADHD may help reduce disparities and improve patient trajectory.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad , Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad/epidemiología , Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad/terapia , Niño , Preescolar , Cognición , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
7.
Cleft Palate Craniofac J ; 55(9): 1289-1295, 2018 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29489418

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare otologic outcomes in patients with cleft palate who underwent 2 different surgical protocols. DESIGN: Monocentric retrospective analysis of medical reports. PATIENTS, PARTICIPANTS: All consecutively treated patients affected by a cleft palate, born between January 1998 and December 2002 (group 1) and between January 2007 and December 2010 (group 2). INTERVENTIONS: Patients in group 1 underwent Veau-Wardill-Kilner palatoplasty at 10 months and had ventilation tubes inserted in case of otitis media with effusion (OME) during surgery. Patients in group 2 underwent Sommerlad intravelar veloplasty at 5 months. Ventilation tubes were inserted only in case of persistent OME. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The need for a second set of ventilation tubes to be inserted in case of persistent OME, the presence of OME at the age of 2 years, and tympanic abnormalities at the age of 5 years were analyzed. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference either for the presence of OME at the age of 2 years (27 [45%] vs 32 [57.14%], respectively, in groups 1 and 2; P = .191) or for tympanic abnormalities at the age of 5 years (20 [33.33%] vs 15 [26.79%]; P = .433). Statistically significant difference was found for the need to insert a second set of ventilation tubes in case of persistent OME (29 [48.33%] vs 12 [21.42%], respectively; P = .02). CONCLUSION: Early Sommerlad intravelar veloplasty may reduce persistent OME and consequently the need for ventilation tubes insertion, compared to later Veau-Wardill-Kilner palatoplasty.


Asunto(s)
Fisura del Paladar/cirugía , Ventilación del Oído Medio , Otitis Media con Derrame/terapia , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/métodos , Preescolar , Fisura del Paladar/fisiopatología , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Otitis Media con Derrame/fisiopatología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento
8.
Clin Spine Surg ; 31(2): E140-E145, 2018 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29088010

RESUMEN

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective study. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether rib hump is a prognostic factor of final thoracic Cobb angle. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Correction of thoracolumbar/lumbar curve, preoperative thoracic curves angle, thoracic curves angle on bending, the thoracolumbar-lumbar angle/thoracic curves angle ratio, thoracic kyphosis, and growth stage influences spontaneous correction of uninstrumented thoracic curves angle above selective fusion for Lenke 5 Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis. Indeed, preoperative rib hump has never been expressly evaluated as a prognostic factor of final thoracic curves angle. METHODS: In total, 50 patients with Lenke 5 Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis, selectively instrumented with posterior construct were included. Two patients were lost to follow-up and 48 had follow-up ≥2 years. Demographic data, preoperative thoracic rib hump (measured in millimeter in trunk anteflexion), and radiologic spinal parameters were recorded preoperatively and at last consultation. T test was used to compare mean values, linear and logistic regressions to assess predictability of final thoracic curve angle. RESULTS: Main thoracolumbar-lumbar curve angle decreased from 47 degrees (range, 36-72 degrees) to 12 degrees at the final consultation (range, 1-28 degrees). Thoracic curves angle decreased from 26 degrees (range, 2-40 degrees) preoperatively to 16 degrees (range, 2-41 degrees) at the final consultation (P=0.001) (correction=37%). Preoperative rib hump was present in 10 patients. Final thoracic Cobb angle was 27 degrees (8-41 degrees) in patients with rib hump and 14 degrees (0-32 degrees) in patients without rib hump (P<0.001).Multiregression highlighted thoracic curves angle on bending (P=0.001), preoperative thoracic curves angle (P=0.011) and rib hump (P=0.012) as prognostic factors of higher final thoracic curves angle. CONCLUSION: Rib hump significantly influenced final thoracic curves angle. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-prospective study.


Asunto(s)
Costillas/cirugía , Escoliosis/cirugía , Fusión Vertebral , Vértebras Torácicas/cirugía , Adolescente , Humanos , Pronóstico
9.
PLoS One ; 12(11): e0188187, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29176864

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The first year of university is a particularly stressful period and can impact academic performance and students' health. The aim of this study was to evaluate the health and lifestyle of undergraduates and assess risk factors associated with psychiatric symptoms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between September 2012 and June 2013, we included all undergraduate students who underwent compulsory a medical visit at the university medical service in Nice (France) during which they were screened for potential diseases during a diagnostic interview. Data were collected prospectively in the CALCIUM database (Consultations Assistés par Logiciel pour les Centres Inter-Universitaire de Médecine) and included information about the students' lifestyle (living conditions, dietary behavior, physical activity, use of recreational drugs). The prevalence of psychiatric symptoms related to depression, anxiety and panic attacks was assessed and risk factors for these symptoms were analyzed using logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 4,184 undergraduates were included. Prevalence for depression, anxiety and panic attacks were 12.6%, 7.6% and 1.0%, respectively. During the 30 days preceding the evaluation, 0.6% of the students regularly drank alcohol, 6.3% were frequent-to-heavy tobacco smokers, and 10.0% smoked marijuana. Dealing with financial difficulties and having learning disabilities were associated with psychiatric symptoms. Students who were dissatisfied with their living conditions and those with poor dietary behavior were at risk of depression. Being a woman and living alone were associated with anxiety. Students who screened positively for any psychiatric disorder assessed were at a higher risk of having another psychiatric disorder concomitantly. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of psychiatric disorders in undergraduate students is low but the rate of students at risk of developing chronic disease is far from being negligible. Understanding predictors for these symptoms may improve students' health by implementing targeted prevention campaigns. Further research in other French universities is necessary to confirm our results.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos Mentales/diagnóstico , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Salud Mental , Universidades , Adolescente , Conducta , Demografía , Dieta , Ejercicio Físico , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Factores de Riesgo , Estudiantes , Adulto Joven
10.
J Pediatr ; 188: 252-257.e6, 2017 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28456389

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To develop a reliable and validated tool to evaluate technical resuscitation skills in a pediatric simulation setting. STUDY DESIGN: Four Resuscitation and Emergency Simulation Checklist for Assessment in Pediatrics (RESCAPE) evaluation tools were created, following international guidelines: intraosseous needle insertion, bag mask ventilation, endotracheal intubation, and cardiac massage. We applied a modified Delphi methodology evaluation to binary rating items. Reliability was assessed comparing the ratings of 2 observers (1 in real time and 1 after a video-recorded review). The tools were assessed for content, construct, and criterion validity, and for sensitivity to change. RESULTS: Inter-rater reliability, evaluated with Cohen kappa coefficients, was perfect or near-perfect (>0.8) for 92.5% of items and each Cronbach alpha coefficient was ≥0.91. Principal component analyses showed that all 4 tools were unidimensional. Significant increases in median scores with increasing levels of medical expertise were demonstrated for RESCAPE-intraosseous needle insertion (P = .0002), RESCAPE-bag mask ventilation (P = .0002), RESCAPE-endotracheal intubation (P = .0001), and RESCAPE-cardiac massage (P = .0037). Significantly increased median scores over time were also demonstrated during a simulation-based educational program. CONCLUSIONS: RESCAPE tools are reliable and validated tools for the evaluation of technical resuscitation skills in pediatric settings during simulation-based educational programs. They might also be used for medical practice performance evaluations.


Asunto(s)
Lista de Verificación , Pediatría/educación , Resucitación/educación , Entrenamiento Simulado , Adulto , Competencia Clínica , Técnica Delphi , Evaluación Educacional , Femenino , Francia , Humanos , Internado y Residencia , Intubación Intratraqueal , Masculino , Maniquíes , Pediatras , Análisis de Componente Principal , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estudiantes de Medicina , Adulto Joven
11.
PLoS One ; 11(3): e0152598, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27031953

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Midstream clean-catch urine is an accepted method to diagnose urinary tract infection but is impracticable in infants before potty training. We tested the bladder stimulation technique to obtain a clean-catch urine sample in infants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included 142 infants under walking age who required a urine sample in a cross-sectional study carried out during a 3-months period, from September to November 2014, in the emergency department of the University Children's Hospital of Nice (France). A technique based on bladder stimulation and lumbar stimulation maneuvers, with at least two attempts, was tested by four trained physicians. The success rate and time to obtain urine sample within 3 minutes were evaluated. Discomfort (EVENDOL score ≥4/15) was measured. We estimated the risk factors in the failure of the technique. Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test were used to compare frequencies. T-test and Wilcoxon test were used to compare quantitative data according to the normality of the distribution. Risk factors for failure of the technique were evaluated using a multivariate logistic regression model. RESULTS: We obtained midstream clean-catch urine in 55.6% of infants with a median time of 52.0 s (10.0; 110.0). The success rate decreased with age from 88.9% (newborn) to 28.6% (>1 y) (p = 0.0001) and with weight, from 85.7% (<4 kg) to 28.6% (>10 kg) (p = 0.0004). The success rate was 60.8% for infants without discomfort (p<0.0001). Heavy weight and discomfort were associated with failure, with adjusted ORs of 1.47 [1.04-2.31] and 6.65 [2.85-15.54], respectively. CONCLUSION: Bladder stimulation seems to be efficient in obtaining midstream urine with a moderate success rate in our study sample. This could be an alternative technique for infants before potty training but further randomized multicenter studies are needed to validate this procedure.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Urinarias/diagnóstico , Toma de Muestras de Orina/métodos , Estudios Transversales , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Femenino , Francia , Hospitales Pediátricos , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Oportunidad Relativa , Factores de Riesgo , Vejiga Urinaria/fisiología
12.
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res ; 25(4): 277-288, 2016 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26265387

RESUMEN

This paper illustrates a psychometric approach of broad relevance to psychiatric research instruments. Many instruments include indicators related to more than one source of true-score variance due to the: (1) assessment of conceptually adjacent constructs; (2) the presence of a global construct underlying answers to items designed to assess multiple dimensions. Exploratory structural equation modelling (ESEM) is naturally suited to the investigation of the first source, whereas bifactor models are particularly suited to the investigation of the second source. When both sources are present, bifactor-ESEM becomes the model of choice. To illustrate this framework, we use the responses of 1159 adults [655 female, 504 male, mean age (Mage ) = 41.84] who completed the French Version of the Composite Scale of Morningness (CSM). We investigate the factor structure of the CSM, test the relations between CSM factors and body mass index, and verify the measurement invariance of the model across gender and age groups. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.


Asunto(s)
Modelos Estadísticos , Psiquiatría/métodos , Psicometría/métodos , Adulto , Ritmo Circadiano/fisiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino
13.
J Atten Disord ; 20(6): 530-41, 2016 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23729493

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Recent publications reported that a bifactor model better represented the underlying structure of ADHD than classical models, at least in youth. The Adult ADHD Symptoms Rating Scale (ASRS) has been translated into many languages, but a single study compared its structure in adults across Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed.; DSM-IV) and International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) classifications. METHOD: We investigated the factor structure, reliability, and measurement invariance of the ASRS among a community sample of 1,171 adults. RESULTS: Results support a bifactor model, including one general ADHD factor and three specific Inattention, Hyperactivity, and Impulsivity factors corresponding to ICD-10, albeit the Impulsivity specific factor was weakly defined. Results also support the complete measurement invariance of this model across gender and age groups, and that men have higher scores than women on the ADHD G-factor but lower scores on all three S-factors. CONCLUSION: Results suggest that a total ASRS-ADHD score is meaningful, reliable, and valid in adults. (J. of Att. Dis. 2016; 20(6) 530-541).


Asunto(s)
Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad/diagnóstico , Adulto , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Manual Diagnóstico y Estadístico de los Trastornos Mentales , Femenino , Francia , Humanos , Hipercinesia/diagnóstico , Conducta Impulsiva/fisiología , Masculino , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , Psicometría/métodos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
14.
J Atten Disord ; 20(5): 434-44, 2016 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23422236

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Validated instruments to assess ADHD are still unavailable in many languages other than English for teachers, which constitutes a clear obstacle to screening, diagnosis, and treatment of ADHD in many European countries. METHOD: Teachers rated 892 youths using the ADHD Rating Scale (ADHD-RS). We investigated the factor structure, reliability, and measurement invariance based on confirmatory factor analyses. RESULTS: Results support a bifactor model, including one general ADHD factor and two specific Inattention and Hyperactivity-Impulsivity factors. But the latter is improperly defined calling into question the existence of a Predominantly Hyperactivity-Impulsivity subtype. The measurement invariance is fully supported across gender, age groups, and Gender × Age Groups. CONCLUSION: Results support the multiple-pathways hypothesis and suggest that a total ADHD score is meaningful, reliable, and valid, as well as specific assessments of Inattention. Some youths--especially older ones--may present a profile of ADHD particularly marked by Inattention symptoms.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad/diagnóstico , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica/normas , Psicometría/instrumentación , Encuestas y Cuestionarios/normas , Adolescente , Adulto , Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad/clasificación , Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad/psicología , Análisis Factorial , Docentes , Femenino , Humanos , Conducta Impulsiva , Lenguaje , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica/estadística & datos numéricos , Psicometría/métodos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
15.
Focus (Am Psychiatr Publ) ; 14(1): 90-102, 2016 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31997945

RESUMEN

(Reprinted with permission from PLOS One 2015; 10(2):1-19).

16.
PLoS One ; 10(2): e0116407, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25714373

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Evaluation of treatments for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) previously focused on symptom control, but attention has shifted to functional outcomes. The effect of different ADHD treatment periods and modalities (pharmacological, non-pharmacological, and combination) on long-term outcomes needs to be more comprehensively understood. METHODS: A systematic search of 12 literature databases using Cochrane's guidelines yielded 403 English-language peer-reviewed, primary studies reporting long-term outcomes (≥2 years). We evaluated relative effects of treatment modalities and durations and effect sizes of outcomes reported as statistically significantly improved with treatment. RESULTS: The highest proportion of improved outcomes was reported with combination treatment (83% of outcomes). Among significantly improved outcomes, the largest effect sizes were found for combination treatment. The greatest improvements were associated with academic, self-esteem, or social function outcomes. A majority of outcomes improved regardless of age of treatment initiation (60%-75%) or treatment duration (62%-72%). Studies with short treatment duration had shorter follow-up times (mean 3.2 years total study length) than those with longer treatment durations (mean 7.1 years total study length). Studies with follow-up times <3 years reported benefit with treatment for 93% of outcomes, whereas those with follow-up times ≥3 years reported treatment benefit for 57% of outcomes. Post-hoc analysis indicated that this result was related to the measurement of outcomes at longer periods (3.2 versus 0.4 years) after treatment cessation in studies with longer total study length. CONCLUSIONS: While the majority of long-term outcomes of ADHD improve with all treatment modalities, the combination of pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment was most consistently associated with improved long-term outcomes and large effect sizes. Older treatment initiation age or longer durations did not markedly affect proportion of improved outcomes reported, but measurement of outcomes long periods after treatment cessation may attenuate results.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad/terapia , Adolescente , Factores de Edad , Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad/diagnóstico , Niño , Preescolar , Terapia Combinada , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Factores Sexuales , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
17.
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry ; 24(10): 1291-301, 2015 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25631690

RESUMEN

The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) is used to measure psychopathological symptoms in children and adolescents from 4 to 17 years old, but its underlying structure is still a matter of debate. Indeed, on the basis of a systematic review of English and non-English articles conducted using multiple databases, 54 studies reporting on the factor structure of the SDQ were located. The original 5 first-order factor structure is generally supported by exploratory procedures, but support based on confirmatory factor analyses is not clear. We analysed data from 889 youths from the general French population, rated on the SDQ by their teachers. We tested the original model, hierarchical models and bifactor models. The best-fitting model is a bifactor model with the five a priori factors grouped in two global factors (Externalizing Disorders-Hyperactivity and Conduct-and Internalizing Disorders-Peer relationships and Emotions) and one Strength/Prosocial factor. However, we show that the Conduct-Specific factor should not be used in practice in its current state, that the Hyperactivity-Specific factor mainly covers hyperactivity rather than inattention, and that the Peer Problems-Specific factor mainly reflects a preference for solitude. Nevertheless, the measurement model proved to be fully invariant across gender and school levels (kindergarten, primary and secondary schools), with statistically significant differences in latent means between genders only. Beyond computing the five a priori scores when using the teacher ratings of the SDQ, our results prove the usefulness of computing Externalizing Disorders and Internalizing Disorders global scores.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad/diagnóstico , Trastornos de la Conducta Infantil/diagnóstico , Modelos Psicológicos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios/normas , Adolescente , Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad/psicología , Niño , Trastornos de la Conducta Infantil/psicología , Análisis Factorial , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Grupo Paritario , Psicometría , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
18.
CNS Spectr ; 20(2): 112-21, 2015 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24571924

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The Lifetime Impairment Survey, conducted in Europe, assessed impairment and symptoms of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in childhood, and experiences of ADHD diagnosis and treatment, as recalled by adults. METHODS: Adults with ADHD and without ADHD (control group) were invited to participate in an internet-based survey and report on their childhood experiences. History of ADHD diagnosis was self-reported. Groups were compared using impairment and symptom scales. RESULTS: Overall, 588 adults with ADHD and 736 without ADHD participated. Mean (standard deviation [SD]) age at diagnosis of ADHD was 20.0 (12.6) years (median 18.0) following consultation with 3.8 (5.1) doctors (median 2) over 44.6 (69.3) months (median 17.0). A total of 64.1% (377/588) of adults with ADHD reported frustration or difficulties during the diagnostic process. The ADHD group had a higher mean (SD) score versus control for general (3.3 [1.2] vs 2.1 [1.2]; p < 0.001) and school impairment (2.8 [0.7] vs 2.3 [0.6]; p < 0.001) but not home impairment (2.1 [0.5] for both groups). Discussion The survey demonstrated that ADHD had a negative impact on all aspects of childhood investigated, as recalled by adults. CONCLUSIONS: These data provide insights into childhood impairments and identify areas for improvement in the management and treatment of ADHD.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad/psicología , Actividades Cotidianas , Adulto , Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad/terapia , Niño , Trastornos de la Conducta Infantil/etiología , Trastornos de la Conducta Infantil/psicología , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Masculino , Autoinforme , Factores Socioeconómicos
19.
J Nerv Ment Dis ; 202(4): 324-32, 2014 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24647218

RESUMEN

Validated tools are lacking in languages such as French to diagnose attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in adults. The Adult ADHD Symptoms Self-Report (ASRS) was filled out by 1171 parents of 900 school-aged youths in the context of the Children and Parents With ADHD and Related Disorders study. Prevalence estimates based on three scoring methods are compared (6-item screener, all 18 items, or the screener followed by the 12 remaining items). On the basis of the recommended and more conservative scoring method, the overall prevalence of ADHD symptoms is estimated to be 2.99%, without significant group differences between sexes or between younger and older adults. Potential correlates of ADHD symptoms were also examined in their relatives (children, brothers/sisters, uncles/aunts, and parents) as follows: birth order, level of education, body mass index categories, enuresis, suicide attempts, depression, and learning disabilities. Adults can be screened for ADHD symptoms using the ASRS; negative long-term outcomes should be assessed in patients' relatives too.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad/diagnóstico , Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad/epidemiología , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica/normas , Adolescente , Adulto , Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad/genética , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Humanos , Masculino , Tamizaje Masivo/instrumentación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Psicometría/instrumentación , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Adulto Joven
20.
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci ; 264(2): 171-8, 2014 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23771406

RESUMEN

Anxiety in schizophrenia possesses specific features and is difficult to assess because no specific evaluating tool is currently available. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a hetero-assessment-based scale to specifically measure anxiety in schizophrenia. A literature review and a survey among psychiatrists allowed the selection of 29 items from 4 previous scales evaluating anxiety. Factor analysis allowed building up a final 22-item composite scale of anxiety evaluation in schizophrenia (SAES), which was then validated in 147 schizophrenic patients. One hundred and forty-seven (147) schizophrenic patients (70.8 % male, mean age = 36.9 years) were included in the study. Principal component analysis of the SAES revealed three factors, namely "expressed and perceived anxiety," "somatic anxiety," and "anxiety and environment". All total and factor scores of the SAES were significantly correlated (p < .001) with total and factor scores of the original scales. Finally, the SAES showed good inter-rater reliability [intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) = .82]. In conclusion, a specific tool for evaluating anxiety in schizophrenia (SAES) was developed and validated in a sample of schizophrenic patients. The SAES can be useful to investigate clinical, psychopathological, and therapeutic aspects of anxiety in schizophrenia.


Asunto(s)
Ansiedad/diagnóstico , Ansiedad/etiología , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , Psicometría/métodos , Esquizofrenia/complicaciones , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estadísticas no Paramétricas
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...