Modified perineal stapled rectal resection with Contour Transtar for full-thickness rectal prolapse.

OBJECTIVE: We report a modified technique of perineal proctectomy using a new reloadable curved cutter stapler, the Contour Transtar (Ethicon Endo-Surgery), to treat full-thickness external rectal prolapse. METHOD: Between May and July 2008 three female patients were treated. All had a full-thickness external rectal prolapse up to 10 cm in length. The prolapse was initially divided by a linear cutter in anterior and posterior flaps, and resection of the prolapse was performed with a Contour Transtar stapler. RESULTS: There was no mortality or early or late morbidity. Follow-up was 2-4 months. All patients had a bowel movement within 3 days of the operation, oral feeding started immediately and the hospital stay was 5 days in all cases. All patients reported an improvement of constipation and continence. CONCLUSION: Our procedure may be indicated for full-thickness prolapse with a rectal protrusion up to 10 cm, as it allows a simple resection without any mobilization or dissection of the rectum. The technique is safe, easier and faster to perform than conventional perineal rectosigmoidectomy.

The finding of vascular and urinary anomalies in the harvested kidney for transplantation.

INTRODUCTION: In kidney transplantation, anatomical vascular and excretory anomalies may represent causes of failure. Today's surgical techniques have made the most of the organs with anatomic anomalies and iatrogenic injury successfully used for transplantation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2000 to June 2006, we harvested 230 kidneys, of including 88 kidneys (20%) with vascular, urinary, or vascular-urinary anomalies; 64 kidneys were implanted and 15 were sent to other transplantation centers. Only 9 kidneys were not appropriate for transplantation. RESULTS: All patients who received kidneys with the above-mentioned anomalies were carefully examined after the transplantation and short-term and long-term complications were evaluated with respect to controls without anomalies. DISCUSSION: Renal anatomic anomalies are frequently observed during kidney transplantation and may produce postsurgical complications. However, the presence of these anomalies does not necessarily imply the impossibility of using the kidney for a transplant, especially because of improved surgical techniques. Our experience in transplantation procedures showed that even if kidneys present the above-mentioned anomalies they can still be considered appropriate for transplantation when we perform a correct harvesting/back-table transplant surgery. So vascular and urinary anomalies have to be considered always an incentive to research new surgical solutions and to perform a careful surgical technique.

Difficult vascular conditions in kidney transplantation.

The new dialytic and medical therapies have improved the survival of uremic patients and their preservation of a efficacious clinical condition so as to warrant suitability for transplantation, even after a long period of dialysis. In addition, today the use of a "marginal donor" and "marginal kidney" are often used to increase the pool of available organs, so that the surgeon must face more technical difficulties than in the past; anomalies of the donor kidney, harvesting and bench surgery damages, as well as vascular pathologies in the recipient. A review of our 151 renal transplantations from January 1999 to May 2003 showed that it was often possible to overcome these technical difficulties yielding good results. This work sought to demonstrate that neither "marginal donor"/"marginal kidney" used to expand donor pool nor recipient vascular pathologies should be considered transplant contraindications. Knowledge of various technical options and the ability to put them rapidly into practice are necessary to use any organ.

Suboptimal kidney: the experience of a single transplant unit.

Not all kidneys are suitable for transplantation. In 2001 in Italy, only 1530 of 1748 organs were transplanted. This difference (-12.5%) not only represents organs harvested from marginal donors considered not suitable, but also kidneys that, although collected from standard donors, had a vascular, parenchymal, or urologic anomaly that made them unsuitable for transplantation. In our center, we established a procedure that defined the characteristics of suboptimal kidneys and allowed us to specifically select the appropriate recipient. We considered as suboptimal all organs with complex arterial anomalies (more than 2 arteries although on a single patch or separated such as to need a double anastomosis or a bench reconstruction); organs with noticeable parenchymal damage (macroscopic sclerosis areas or sutured polar branches accidentally damaged during removal), and organs with complex anomalies of the excretory tract (complete double district). The organs were not considered as suboptimal if they had venous anomalies revised on the bench or if they had a double artery with a single patch <2.5 cm. Such organs were transplanted to recipients who were between 55 and 60 years of age with a body weight of at least 20% less than the donor, and female.