Measurement of muscle quantity/quality has additional predictive value for postoperative complications and long-term survival after gastrectomy for gastric cancer in patients with probable sarcopenia as defined by the new EWGSOP2 consensus: Analysis from a large-scale prospective study.

OBJECTIVES: We investigated whether measurement of muscle quantity/quality has additional predictive value for postoperative complications and long-term survival after gastrectomy for gastric cancer in patients with probable sarcopenia, as defined by the new European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People 2 consensus. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study of patients who underwent a radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer between August 2014 and June 2019. Muscle strength was measured using a handgrip dynamometer. Computed tomography images at the third lumbar vertebra level were used to assess muscle quantity and quality by the measuring cross-sectional muscle area and mean muscle attenuation, respectively. Probable sarcopenia was defined by low muscle strength. Sarcopenia was diagnosed by additional low muscle quantity or quality. Clinical outcomes were obtained by prospective data collection and follow up. RESULTS: Probable sarcopenia was identified in 419 patients, including 285 patients with sarcopenia. Patients with sarcopenia had a higher incidence of postoperative complications, higher costs, longer length of postoperative hospital stay, and worse overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) compared with patients with low muscle strength only. The multivariate logistic analysis showed that sarcopenia and hypoproteinemia were independent risk factors for postoperative complications in patients with probable sarcopenia. Moreover, multivariate Cox analyses showed that sarcopenia remained an independent risk factor for OS and DFS in patients with probable sarcopenia. CONCLUSIONS: The measurement of muscle quantity/quality has additional predictive value for postoperative complications, OS, and DFS after gastrectomy for gastric cancer in patients with probable sarcopenia.

Impact of Body Composition and Physical Function on Quality of Life After Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer.

PURPOSE: Patients with gastric cancer after gastrectomy often suffer from a decline in their quality of life (QoL), but the relationship between body composition (BC) and physical function on QoL has rarely been studied. This study aims to evaluate and determine the changes in QoL after gastrectomy and the impact of BC and physical function on QoL. METHODS: A total of 311 gastric cancer patients completed EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-STO22 questionnaires before and 1, 3, 6 months post-surgery. Data including BC, handgrip strength (HGS) and 6-m gait speed (GS) were collected prospectively. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to determine the correlation between QoL and BC, HGS and GS. RESULTS: Patients had significantly worse scores after surgery on most function and symptom scales (p < 0.001), but most of these scales recovered within 6 months after surgery. A higher subcutaneous fat area (SFA)was associated with increased symptom scores 1 month after surgery. A higher GS is associated with a better global health status symptom. CONCLUSION: Patients suffer from a decline in their QoL after gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Intervention strategies aiming at reducing SFA and improving GS may improve the QoL in patients underwent gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Laparoscopic versus open resection for elderly patients with gastric cancer: a double-center study with propensity score matching method.

PURPOSE: The applicability of laparoscopic-assisted radical gastrectomy for elderly patients with gastric cancer is still not well clarified. The aim of this double-center study was to explore the feasibility and effectiveness of laparoscopic-assisted radical gastrectomy on elderly patients with gastric cancer. METHODS: We prospectively collected data of patients who underwent gastrectomy for cancer in two centers from June 2016 to December 2019. Propensity score matching was performed at a ratio of 1:1 to compare the laparoscopic-assisted radical gastrectomy group and open radical gastrectomy group. Univariate analyses and multivariate logistic regression analyses evaluating the risk factors for total, surgical, and medical complications were performed. RESULTS: A total of 481 patients with gastric cancer met the inclusion criteria and were included in this study. After propensity score analysis, 258 patients were matched each other (laparoscopic-assisted radical gastrectomy (LAG) group, n = 129; open radical gastrectomy (OG) group, n = 129). LAG group had lower rate of surgical complications (P = 0.009), lower rate of severe complications (P = 0.046), shorter postoperative hospital stay (P = 0.001), and lower readmission rate (P = 0.039). Multivariate analyses revealed that anemia, Charlson comorbidity index, and combined resection were independent risk factors in the LAG group, whereas body mass index and American Society of Anesthesiology grade in the OG group. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic-assisted radical gastrectomy was relative safe even effective in elderly gastric cancer patients. We should pay attention to the different risk factors when performing different surgical procedures for gastric cancer in elderly patients.

Influence of body composition, muscle strength, and physical performance on the postoperative complications and survival after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A comprehensive analysis from a large-scale prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have comprehensively analyzed the correlations among body composition parameters, muscle strength, and physical performance, as well as the influence of these factors on the postoperative complications and survival after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer. METHODS: A prospective study was conducted including patients who underwent radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer from August 2014 to June 2019. Skeletal muscle index (SMI), skeletal muscle density (SMD), visceral fat area (VFA), subcutaneous fat area (SFA) was obtained by measurement of preoperative computed tomography (CT) images. Grip strength and 6-m gait speed were measured to assess muscle strength and physical performance before surgery. RESULTS: There was a positive correlation between SMI and SMD, as well as between SFA and VFA. SMD negatively correlated with SFA and VFA. SMI had a positive correlation with VFA, but showed minimal correlation with SFA and visceral to subcutaneous fat ratio (VSR). Grip strength and gait speed were both positively correlated with SMI and SMD, but showed minimal correlation with SFA, VFA and VSR. SMI and grip strength independently predicted postoperative complications, rather than SMD or gait speed. Whereas SMD and gait speed had independent predictive value for overall survival (OS) and/or disease-free survival (DFS), rather than SMI or grip strength. VSR independently predicted postoperative complications, rather than VFA or SFA alone. Low SFA was an independent risk factor for OS and DFS. High VFA was associated with worse survival in overweight patients (body mass index, BMI ≥25), but was associated with better survival in non-overweight patients (BMI <25). High SFA did not significantly influence survival in overweight patients, but was associated with better survival in non-overweight patients. CONCLUSION: There is an extensive and complex correlation among body composition parameters, grip strength, and gait speed in patients with operable gastric cancer. A comprehensive analysis of these parameters has significant predictive value for postoperative complications and survival.

Value of Sarcopenia defined by the new EWGSOP2 consensus for the prediction of Postoperative Complications and Long-term Survival after Radical Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A comparison with four common nutritional screening tools.

Background: Nutritional risk and sarcopenia are both associated with increased postoperative morbidity and mortality following elective surgery. This study aimed to investigate whether sarcopenia has additional predictive value for postoperative complications and long-term survival besides nutritional screening tools. Methods: Clinical data of patients underwent radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer was prospectively collected. Sarcopenia was diagnosed by grip strength plus muscle quanlity/quality based on preoperative abdominal CT scans. Nutritional screening was performed using 4 common nutritional screening tools, including Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST), Nutritional Risk Screening (NRS)-2002, Malnutrition Screening Tool (MST), and Short Nutritional Assessment Questionnaire (SNAQ). Results: A total of 880 patients were analyzed, in which 167 (18.98%) were diagnosed with sarcopenia. The incidence of nutritional risk identified by the 4 tools were 44.66% (MUST ≥1), 35.23% (NRS-2002 ≥3), 29.89% (MST ≥2), and 20.34% (SNAQ ≥2). Multivariate analyses showed that nutritional risk identified by the 4 nutritional screening tools were not independently associated with postoperative complications, overall survival (OS) or disease-free survival (DFS), except for NRS-2002 ≥3 as an independent risk factor of OS. Sarcopenia was always an independent risk factor for postoperative complications, OS, and DFS after adjusting for nutritional risk and the other covariates in the multivariate analyses. Conclusions: MUST, NRS-2002, MST, and SNAQ had low predictive power for postoperative complications and long-term survival in patients underwent radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Sarcopenia had additional predictive value for postoperative complications and long-term survival besides these nutritional screening tools and should be implemented in the preoperative assessments.

EWGSOP2 versus EWGSOP1 for sarcopenia to predict prognosis in patients with gastric cancer after radical gastrectomy: Analysis from a large-scale prospective study.

BACKGROUND: In 2010, the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP) reached a consensus on sarcopenia (EWGSOP1). In 2018, the EWGSOP met again (EWGSOP2) to update original definition of sarcopenia. This study aimed to investigate the association of sarcopenia and survival and compare the prognostic effects of sarcopenia as defined by EWGSOP1 and EWGSOP2 after gastrectomy. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study including patients who underwent curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer from August 2014 to February 2018. The sarcopenia elements, including skeletal muscle index, muscle attenuation, handgrip strength, and gait speed were measured before surgery. Patients were followed up after gastrectomy to gain the actual clinical outcomes. RESULTS: The prevalence of sarcopenia was 17.0% and 18.9% according to the EWGSOP1 and EWGSOP2 respectively. Sarcopenia was independent risk factor for postoperative complications. Compared with EWGSOP1-sarcopenia, EWGSOP2-sarcopenia and had a higher odds ratio (OR) (2.453 vs. 1.550) in multivariate model. Area under the ROC curve of model including EWGSOP2-sarcopenia was larger than that of the model including EWGSOP1-sarcopenia (AUC 0.653 vs. 0.634, P = 0.021). For both of EWGSOP1 and EWGSOP2, sarcopenia was an independent risk factor for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS), but EWGSOP2-sarcopenia seemed to have a higher hazard ratio (OS, 1.667 vs. 1.449; DFS, 1.603 vs. 1.563). In addition, severe sarcopenia, as defined by either EWGSOP2 or EWGSOP1, had a strong predictive power (OR 4.909 vs. 3.827) for postoperative complications. Both versions of severe sarcopenia were significantly predictive of OS and DFS in Cox analysis. CONCLUSION: Sarcopenia at uniform diagnosis standard was an independent risk factor for survival in patients undergoing radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Sarcopenia defined by EWGSOP2 criteria better predicts clinical outcomes than that defined by EWGSOP1 criteria in patients with gastric cancer after gastrectomy.

Laparoscopic-assisted colorectal surgery benefits visceral obesity patients: a propensity-matched analysis.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to determine the safety and effectiveness of laparoscopic-assisted surgery (LAS) in visceral obesity patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively collected the clinical data of consecutive patients who underwent colorectal surgery for CRC between August 2014 and July 2018. The third lumbar vertebra visceral fat area was measured to diagnose visceral obesity. One-to-one propensity score matching was performed to compare the short-term outcomes between the open surgery (OS) and LAS in visceral obesity patients. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate the risk factors of postoperative complications. RESULTS: A total of 280 visceral obesity patients were included in this study with 140 patients for each group. Compared with the OS group, the LAS group had more lymph nodes harvested, longer surgical duration, and shorter postoperative hospital stay. The overall incidence of complications in OS was significantly higher than LAS (32.1 vs. 20.0%, P=0.021). Multivariate analysis revealed that age of at least 65 years (odds ratio: 1.950, 95% confidence interval: 1.118-3.403; P=0.019) was an independent risk factor for postoperative complications, whereas LAS (odds ratio: 0.523, 95% confidence interval: 0.302-0.908; P=0.021) was a protective factor. CONCLUSION: LAS in visceral obesity patients with CRC was a safer and less invasive alternative than open surgery, with fewer complications within the first 30 days postoperatively.