RESUMEN
Patients of colorectal cancer (CRC) with BRAF V600E mutation obtain poor prognosis. This study aimed to explore the role and mechanism of BRAF V600E mutation in angiogenesis of tumor micro-environment (TME). It has been reported that CXCL16 expression in TME is closely related to BRAF mutation. Clinicopathological features of CRC with BRAF V600E mutant or wild type were collected in this study. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) assays were conducted to test the expressions of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), CD31 and CXCL16. ROC curve was used to determine the optimal cut off values of CXCL16. A total of 680 patients including 141 BRAF V600E type and 679 wild type were included. BRAF V600E mutant tumors were presented with significant worse clinicopathological features and a shorter overall survival (OS) than wild-type. Besides, chemokines CXCL16 was up-regulated in BRAF V600E mutant tissues and was associated with poorer prognosis. In addition, VEGF levels and vascular endothelial cell density was significantly increased in BRAF mutation. At last, CXCL16 was positively correlated with VEGF expression and vascular endothelial cell density. In conclusion, BRAF V600E mutations may promote metastasis of CRC by regulating CXCL16 expression and promoting angiogenesis in the TME.
RESUMEN
Background: KRAS/BRAF mutations (mutKRAS/mutBRAF) are unfavorable prognostic factors for colorectal cancer (CRC) metastases to the liver and lungs. However, their effects on the prognosis for patients with synchronous peritoneal metastasis (S-PM) of CRC after cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) are controversial. In the study, we aimed to determine the effects of mutKRAS/mutBRAF on the prognosis for patients with S-PM who received CRS. Methods: A total of 142 patients diagnosed with S-PM between July 2007 and July 2019 were included in this study. The demographics, mutKRAS/mutBRAF status, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) of the patients were evaluated. The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used to estimate the difference in survival between groups. Results: Among 142 patients, 68 (47.9%) showed mutKRAS and 42 (29.5%) showed mutBRAF. The median OS values were 8.4 and 34.3 months for patients with mutBRAF and BRAF wild-type, respectively (P < 0.01). However, KRAS status was not significantly associated with median OS (P = 0.76). Multivariate analysis revealed carcinoembryonic antigen, CRS, HIPEC, and mutBRAF as independent predictors for OS. Based on these findings, a nomogram was constructed. The C-index was 0.789 (95% confidence interval, 0.742-0.836), indicating good predictive ability of the model. Furthermore, the 1- and 2-year survival calibration plots showed good agreement between the predicted and actual OS rates. The area under curves of the 1- and 2-year survival predictions based on the nomogram were 0.807 and 0.682, respectively. Additionally, mutBRAF was significantly associated with lower PFS (P < 0.001). Conclusions: mutBRAF is an independent prognostic risk factor for S-PM. The established nomogram predicted the OS of patients with CRC having S-PM with high accuracy, indicating its usefulness as a valuable prognostic tool for the designated patient cohort.