Prospective Observational Study of COVID-19 Vaccination in Patients with Thoracic Malignancies: Adverse Events, Breakthrough Infections and Survival Outcomes.

Due to the devastating COVID-19 pandemic, a preventive tool in the form of vaccination was introduced. Thoracic cancer patients had one of the highest rates of morbidity and mortality due to COVID-19 disease, but the lack of data about the safety and effectiveness of vaccines in this population triggered studies like ours to explore these parameters in a cancer population. Out of 98 patients with thoracic malignancies vaccinated per protocol, 60-75% experienced some adverse events (AE) after their first or second vaccination, most of them were mild and did not interfere with their daily activities. Out of 17 severe AEs reported, all but one were resolved shortly after vaccination. No significant differences were noted considering AE occurrence between different cancer therapies received after the first or second vaccination dose, p = 0.767 and p = 0.441, respectively. There were 37 breakthrough infections either after the first (1), second (13) or third (23) vaccine dose. One patient died as a direct consequence of COVID-19 infection and respiratory failure, and another after disease progression with simultaneous severe infection. Eight patients had moderate disease courses, received antiviral therapies and survived without consequences. Vaccination did not affect the time to disease progression or death from underlying cancer.

A Three-Dose mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine Regime Produces Both Suitable Immunogenicity and Satisfactory Efficacy in Patients with Solid Cancers.

BACKGROUND: The recommended booster third dose of vaccination against COVID-19 in cancer patients seems reasonable to protect them against a severe disease course. A prospective study was designed to assess the immunogenicity, efficacy, and safety of COVID-19 vaccination in this cohort. METHODS: Patients with solid malignancies on active treatment were followed up after the primary course and booster third dose of vaccination to assess their anti-SARS-CoV-2 S1 IgG levels, efficacy in the case of SARS-CoV-2 infection, and safety. RESULTS: Out of 125 patients receiving the primary course of vaccination, 66 patients received a booster third dose of mRNA vaccine, with a 20-fold increase in median anti-SARS-CoV-2 S1 IgG levels compared to Ab levels six months post-primary course of vaccination (p < 0.0001). After the booster third dose, anti-SARS-CoV-2 S1 IgG levels were comparable to healthy controls (p = 0.113). There was a decline in Ab levels 3 (p = 0.0003) and 6 months (p < 0.0001) post-third booster dose. No patients had either a severe disease course or a lethal outcome in the case of SARS-CoV-2 infection after the third booster dose. CONCLUSION: The third booster vaccination dose against COVID-19 in solid cancer patients triggers substantial immunogenicity and is safe and effective for preventing a severe COVID-19 disease course.

Solid cancer patients achieve adequate immunogenicity and low rate of severe adverse events after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination.

Background: SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in cancer patients is crucial to prevent severe COVID-19 disease course. Methods: This study assessed immunogenicity of cancer patients on active treatment receiving mRNA-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccine by detection of anti-SARS-CoV-2 S1 IgG antibodies in serum, before, after the first and second doses and 3 months after a complete primary course of vaccination. Results were compared with healthy controls. Results: Of 112 patients, the seroconversion rate was 96%. A significant reduction in antibody levels was observed 3 months after vaccination in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors versus control participants (p < 0.001). Adverse events were mostly mild. Conclusion: Immunogenicity after mRNA-based vaccine in cancer patients is adequate but influenced by the type of anticancer therapy. Antibody levels decline after 3 months, and thus a third vaccination is warranted.

Because cancer patients are especially endangered by SARS-CoV-2 infection and have worse disease course and outcomes, it is crucial to protect them from this infection. This study was aimed at assessing protective antibodies after patients received mRNA-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. Protective antibodies (e.g., anti-SARS-CoV-2 S1 IgG antibodies) were assessed in patients' blood before vaccination, after the first and second doses and 3 months after a complete primary course vaccination. Patients' oncological treatment was unaffected by the vaccination received. The results of protective antibodies were also compared with healthy control subjects who were vaccinated in the same manner. More than 110 cancer patients participated and agreed to have their blood samples analyzed. The rate of antibody production was 96% after a complete primary course of vaccination and was similar with that of healthy control subjects. However, there were some differences noted regarding the oncological treatment that the patients were receiving, with patients who were treated with targeted therapy achieving the highest levels of protective antibodies. Adverse events after vaccination were mostly mild and did not interfere with patients' general performance. The rate of antibody production for cancer patients after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination is high and similar to that in healthy control subjects but varies with regard to the oncological treatment that patients are receiving. However, antibodies decline substantially after 3 months, and thus a third vaccination is desirable. There were no new safety concerns after vaccination, and most adverse events were mild and short-lived.

Efficacy and safety of selective cyclin-dependent kinases 4/6 inhibitors in hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer - results from a real-world setting.

BACKGROUND: Selective cyclin-dependent kinases 4/6 inhibitors (CDKi) have become the standard of care in patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer (ABC). We performed retrospective analysis in patients treated with CDKi in the first year of their routine clinical use in Slovenia. METHODS: The primary goals were time-to-treatment failure (TTF) and overall survival (OS), analysed via Kaplan-Meier method, the secondary goals were clinical benefit rate (CBR) and safety. RESULTS: Overall, 218 patients' data were evaluated. The median age was 61.8 years (30.6-84.6). The median number of previous ET lines for ABC was 2 (range 0-5). At the time of inclusion, 128 patients (58.7%) had visceral metastases, 45 patients (20.6%) had bone-only disease. At the median follow-up of 15.2 months, disease progressed in 74 patients and 60 patients died. The median TTF was 8.3 months for the whole group, 19.3, 10.3 and 5.5 months for patients treated in the first-, second- and further lines of systemic therapy, respectively. The median OS from the start of CDKi treatment was not reached in any of the groups. CBR was 59.6% for the whole group, 42.7% for further lines of therapy. The most common grade 3/4 adverse event was neutropaenia in 108 patients (49.5%), followed by an increase of hepatic aminotransferases in 13 patients (6.0%). CONCLUSIONS: Even in the diverse real-world population treatment with CDKi in combination with ET showed clinical benefit, most prominently in the first- and second lines of systemic therapy.