RESUMEN
The aim of this study was to assess the reporting quality of abstracts in systematic reviews (SRs) related to implant dentistry and to assess the possible factors associated with the reporting quality. Abstracts of SRs in the field of implant dentistry, published in the last 5 years, were searched. The reporting quality was assessed and scored using the PRISMA for Abstracts checklist (PRISMA-A). The overall PRISMA-A score (OPS) and relative score (OPS%) per review were calculated according to adherence to the criteria presented in the checklist. Multivariable linear regression was performed to identify possible factors associated with reporting quality. Overall, 310 SRs were eligible for this study. Based on the maximum PRISMA-A score (score of 12), the mean OPS was 6.5 and OPS% was 54.2%. The items 'title', 'objectives', and 'number of included studies' were those most frequently reported in the abstracts, while the items 'registration' and 'funding' were the least reported. According to multivariable linear regression, the geographical origin of the articles was the only factor associated with better quality of abstract reporting, with higher OPS for SRs from Europe when compared to North America (coefficient 0.73; P = 0.049). The reporting quality of abstracts in SRs related to implant dentistry is suboptimal and needs to be improved. Journals should encourage adherence to reporting checklists in SRs.
Asunto(s)
Implantes Dentales , Humanos , Lista de Verificación , Europa (Continente)RESUMEN
Osteonecrosis of the jaw is a severe adverse condition affecting patients exposed to specific types of medications. Previous studies have highlighted that osteonecrosis of the jaw is triggered by invasive dental procedures and can be very challenging to manage, especially in patients with cancer. The primary aim of this review was to analyse all available evidence on the management (surgical and/or conservative) of medication related osteonecrosis of the jaws (MRONJ) in patients with a history of antiangiogenic drugs therapy and who had not been previously exposed to any antiresorptive drug treatments. A multi-database search (PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL) was performed to identify related multi-language papers published from January 2003 until November 2020. Data were extracted from relevant papers and analysed according to the outcomes selected in this review. The search generated 28 studies eligible for the analysis. The total number of patients included in the analysis was 36. Sixteen patients were treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor drugs (anti-VEGF) while the remaining patients were administered a combination of antiangiogenic drugs. The most common MRONJ site was the mandible in 29 patients. MRONJ recurrence after treatment was only reported in six patients, the majority of which were treated conservatively. The data reviewed confirmed that an invasive procedure was the most common trigger of MRONJ with relatively high frequency of postoperative recurrence following treatment. However, due to the low quality of available research in the literature, it is difficult to draw a definitive conclusion on the validity of the presented treatment to manage patients affected by MRONJ associated with angiogenic therapy.
Asunto(s)
Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea , Osteonecrosis , Tratamiento Conservador , Humanos , Inmunoterapia , Mandíbula , Osteonecrosis/inducido químicamente , Osteonecrosis/cirugíaRESUMEN
Evidence shows that an increased width and thickness of the keratinized mucosa favours peri-implant health. The aim of this network meta-analysis was to compare the clinical effects of alternative biomaterials for peri-implant soft tissue phenotype modification (PSPM) in patients with dental implants when compared to autologous tissue grafts. An electronic search without language or date limitations was performed in four databases and the grey literature for articles published until November 2020. The eligibility criteria included randomized clinical trials (RCTs) evaluating the clinical outcomes of biomaterials for PSPM. A pairwise and network meta-analysis was conducted for each parameter to assess and compare the outcomes between the different treatment arms for the primary and secondary outcomes. A total of 11 RCTs were included in this review. The free gingival graft (FGG) showed the best clinical effect for increasing keratinized mucosa width (KMW). When compared in a network, the FGG demonstrated the best treatment ranking of probability results, followed by connective tissue graft (CTG), acellular dermal matrix (ADM), and xenogeneic collagen matrix (XCM). For the parameters 'mucosa thickness' and 'participant satisfaction with aesthetics', the results were CTG > ADM > XCM and XCM > ADM > CTG, respectively. Autogenous tissue grafts (FGG/CTG) demonstrate the best results in increasing KMW and mucosa thickness when compared to the other biomaterials.
Asunto(s)
Implantes Dentales , Encía , Materiales Biocompatibles , Tejido Conectivo , Estética Dental , Encía/cirugía , Humanos , Metaanálisis en Red , FenotipoRESUMEN
AIM: This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of S. pneumoniae colonization in three different sites in healthy adults: nasopharynx, oropharynx and gingival sulcus. METHODS: Two-hundred and sixty five adults, aged 20-60 years, who attended dental clinics in one public university (n = 106) and one military institution (n = 159) were enrolled in this study. Pneumococcal detection was performed by direct culture (DC) and PCR for lytA gene after a broth enrichment step. Capsular types were determined by sequential multiplex PCR. RESULTS: We identified 18 (6.8%) pneumococcal carriers among 265 adults by PCR, but only one (0.4%) pneumococcal strain was isolated by DC method. Oropharynx (17; 6.4%) was the main source of S. pneumoniae. Colonization of gingival sulcus and nasopharynx was found in 4 (1.5%) and 2 (0.8%) adults, respectively. Nine distinct capsular types were detected from 9 adults and co-colonization with 2 serotypes was confirmed in 4 (1.5%) subjects. Factors associated with carriage were being females, low level of schooling, non-military and regular medication. We observed a low (6.8%) pneumococcal carriage prevalence, but oropharyngeal samples yielded more sensitive results, especially by the PCR-based detection methodology. CONCLUSION: Gingival sulcus was found to be a possible reservoir for S. pneumoniae independently of the oropharynx or nasopharynx colonization.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones Neumocócicas , Streptococcus pneumoniae , Adulto , Brasil/epidemiología , Portador Sano/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Nasofaringe , Orofaringe , Vacunas Neumococicas , Prevalencia , Streptococcus pneumoniae/genéticaRESUMEN
Medication related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is characterized by exposed necrotic bone in the maxillofacial region that persists for more than eight weeks in patients taking antiresorptive or antiangiogenic drugs for bone metastasis or osteoporosis. The management of such condition depends on several factors, among which the staging of MRONJ. Though, a specific gold standard treatment has not been established to date. The aim of this case series is to describe the outcome of surgical treatment of MRONJ with the adjunct of Platelet-rich Fibrin (PRF). Eleven patients under therapy with alendronate underwent surgical removal of necrotic bone and debridement, followed by placement of PRF membranes in the bone defect. The outcome of the surgical treatment was successful in all patients, in a follow-up range from 12 to 36 months. In the cases presented, the macroscopic evaluation showed excellent and fast soft tissue healing, with no recurrence of bone exposure and no signs of infections. PRF membranes were also effective for postsurgical pain control. The use of PRF may represent a valuable adjunct in the surgical management of MRONJ.
Asunto(s)
Osteonecrosis de los Maxilares Asociada a Difosfonatos , Fibrina Rica en Plaquetas , Humanos , Cicatrización de HeridasRESUMEN
The purpose of this overview was to assess the methods, quality, and outcomes of systematic reviews conducted to evaluate the impact of bisphosphonates on dental implants and the risk of developing bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw after dental implant surgery. An electronic search without date or language restriction was performed in the PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science, and LILACS databases (to January 2018). Eligibility criteria included systematic reviews that evaluated the impact of bisphosphonates on implant outcomes. The quality assessment of the included reviews was done using AMSTAR 2 guidelines. The protocol of this overview was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42018089617). The search and selection process yielded seven reviews, published between 2009 and 2017. None of the systematic reviews included in this study obtained the maximum score in the quality assessment. The scientific evidence available demonstrates that patients with a history of bisphosphonate use do not present a higher risk of dental implant failure or marginal bone loss compared to patients who have not used bisphosphonates. The literature also suggests that patients who undergo surgical trauma during the installation of dental implants may be more susceptible to bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw.
Asunto(s)
Osteonecrosis de los Maxilares Asociada a Difosfonatos , Implantación Dental Endoósea , Implantes Dentales , Difosfonatos , Humanos , Osteonecrosis de los Maxilares Asociada a Difosfonatos/complicaciones , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/efectos adversos , Fracaso de la Restauración Dental , Difosfonatos/efectos adversos , Revisiones Sistemáticas como AsuntoRESUMEN
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of counterclockwise (CCW) rotation and maxillomandibular advancement (MMA) on the upper airway space using three-dimensional images. An electronic search was performed in the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Virtual Health Library, Web of Science, and OpenGrey databases (end date July 2016); a hand-search of primary study reference lists was also conducted. The inclusion criteria encompassed computed tomography evaluations of the upper airway spaces of adult patients undergoing orthognathic surgery with CCW rotation and MMA. The articles were evaluated for risk of bias with a tool for before-and-after studies. A meta-analysis was performed with the mean differences using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed with the Q-test and the I2 index. The meta-analysis revealed significant (P<0.001) increases in both the total airway volume (effect size of 6832mm3 and confidence interval of 5554-8109mm3) and the minimum axial area (effect size of 92mm2 and confidence interval of 70-113mm2). The heterogeneity was low in both comparisons (I2=38% and 7%, respectively). The technique of mandibular advancement with CCW rotation produced significant increases in the volumes and areas of the upper airway spaces.
Asunto(s)
Imagenología Tridimensional , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ortognáticos , Faringe/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Humanos , RotaciónRESUMEN
The present study aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness of maxillary sinus floor elevation and immediate implant installation without the use of grafting material. An electronic search without date or language restriction ââwas performed in PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, Embase, and the grey literature, to May 2016. Eligibility criteria encompassed prospective and retrospective cohort studies, controlled clinical trials, and randomized clinical trials. The search and selection process yielded 18 studies, published between 2005 and 2016. A meta-analysis was conducted only for experimental studies comparing sinus floor elevation with and without grafting material; results were expressed as the standardized mean difference (SMD) or risk ratio (RR) with the 95% confidence interval (CI). An average gain in bone height of 4.7mm over an average 39.4 month period was observed in the sinus elevated without grafting material. Regarding implants, there was a cumulative average survival rate of 97%. On meta-analysis, bone gain (P=0.98) and implant survival (P=0.13) did not differ significantly between sinuses lifted with or without grafting material, with a SMD of 0.01 (95% CI -0.42 to 0.44) and with a RR of 0.55 (95% CI 0.26 to 1.19), respectively.