Cariprazine in the management of emotionally unstable personality disorder in female patients: a case series.

Background: Emotionally unstable personality disorder (EUPD) is debilitating psychiatric disorder, particularly common in female and forensic populations. However, appropriate pharmacological treatment to effectively manage symptoms of EUPD remains an unmet clinical need. Dopamine receptor partial agonists (DRPAs), such as aripiprazole, have a favourable tolerability profile and have demonstrated some benefits in targeting symptoms of emotional dysregulation, although, evidence regarding the effects of novel D2/D3 DRPA cariprazine in EUPD patients has been limited. Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of cariprazine for EUPD in a case series of female forensic inpatients where the diagnosis is more prevalent. Methods: Demographic and clinical information of the patients were collected from patient electronic records during their admission in a specialized NHS forensic service. Treatment response was measured using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) at baseline, 3 and 6 months and Global Clinical Impression Scale (CGI-scores) at baseline and 6 months. Tolerability and BMI, ECG QTc interval and prolactin levels were recorded prior to initiation and at 6 months. Results: Eight female patients with EUPD (mean age 29.8 years, SD 5.3) were treated with cariprazine (range 3-6mg). Total CGI-scores modestly improved from 5.6 baseline to 5.0 at 6 months. There was a reduction in mean total PANSS scores from baseline to 6 months (92.5, SD 8.1 to 72.4, SD 15.8), general psychopathology (56.1 SD 6.7 to 42.5, SD9.7), positive (21.9 SD 4.6 to 17.1, SD4.8) and negative PANSS scores (14.5 SD 6.3 to 12.8, SD4.6), corresponding to a 21%, 23%, 20% and 3% mean score reduction, respectively. Cariprazine demonstrated a favourable metabolic and hormonal side effect profile with no treatment discontinuation at 6 months follow up. Conclusion: This is the first case series to evaluate the effectiveness of cariprazine in EUPD. Its efficacy in improving PANSS and CGI-S scores was overall modest and highly variable, reflective of an inherently heterogenous and comorbid patient sample but the benefits on treatment perseverance and tolerability were considerable. Cariprazine may be of particular benefit in EUPD where psychotic symptoms are co-morbid, as an augmentation strategy to clozapine, or where previous antipsychotics have caused metabolic or hormonal side effects.

Facilitation of ischaemia-induced ventricular fibrillation by catecholamines is mediated by ß1 and ß2 agonism in the rat heart in vitro.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Antiarrhythmic ß-blockers are used in patients at risk of myocardial ischaemia, but the survival benefit and mechanisms are unclear. We hypothesized that ß-blockers do not prevent ventricular fibrillation (VF) but instead inhibit the ability of catecholamines to facilitate ischaemia-induced VF, limiting the scope of their usefulness. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: ECGs were analysed from ischaemic Langendorff-perfused rat hearts perfused with adrenoceptor antagonists and/or exogenous catecholamines (CATs: 313 nM noradrenaline + 75 nM adrenaline) in a blinded and randomized study. Ischaemic zone (IZ) size was deliberately made small or large. KEY RESULTS: In rat hearts with large IZs, ischaemia-induced VF incidence was high in controls. Atenolol, butoxamine and trimazosin did not affect VF at concentrations with ß1 -, ß2 - or α1 - adrenoceptor specificity and selectivity (confirmed in separate rat aortae myography experiments). In hearts with small IZs and low baseline incidence of ischaemia-induced VF, CATs, delivered to the uninvolved zone (UZ), increased ischaemia-induced VF incidence. This effect was not mimicked by atrial pacing, hence, not due to sinus tachycardia. However, the CATs-facilitated increase in ischaemia-induced VF was inhibited by atenolol and butoxamine (but not trimazosin), indicative of ß1 - and ß2 - but not α1 -adrenoceptor involvement (confirmed by immunoblot analysis of downstream phosphoproteins). CATs did not facilitate VF in low-flow globally ischaemic hearts, which have no UZ. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Catecholamines facilitated ischaemia-induced VF when risk was low, acting via ß1 - and ß2 - adrenoceptors located in the UZ. There was no scope for facilitation when VF risk was high (large IZ), which may explain why ß-blockers have equivocal effectiveness in humans.