Impacto clínico da diferença entre os sexos e local de realização de procedimento no implante transcateter de válvula aórtica: dados do registro RIBAC-NT / Clinical impact of the difference between sexes and location of procedure in transcatheter aortic valve implantation: data from the RIBAC-NT registry

INTRODUÇÃO: Implante transcateter de válvula aórtica (TAVI) é o tratamento de escolha para pacientes com estenose aórtica acima de 70 anos de idade com anatomia favorável. No entanto, o impacto das diferenças de entre os sexos e local de realização do procedimento (público versus privado) nos desfechos de TAVI no Brasil permanecem ainda indefinidos. MÉTODOS: O banco de dados RIBAC-NT (Registro de Implante de Bioprotese Aórtica por Cateter) incluiu 3,194 pacientes submetidos a TAVI de 2009 a 2021. Esta análise retrospectiva explorou as características basais, de procedimento e dos desfechosintra-hospitalares, estratificando os pacientes porsexo e local da realização do procedimento. Tendênciastemporaistambém foram avaliadas. RESULTADOS: Foram incluídos 1551 (49%) mulheres e 1.643 (51%) homens. As mulheres eram mais velhas(83 [78-87] vs. 81 [75-85] anos; p<0,01), porém apresentavam menor prevalência de diabetes mellitus (30,2% vs. 36,3%, p<0,01) e doença arterial coronariana (39,0% vs. 52,2%, p<0,01). Com respeito às complicações periprocedimento, as mulheres apresentaram risco 3 vezes maior de sangramento com risco de vida (6,1% vs. 2,4%, p<0,01), bem como maiores taxas de mortalidade de procedimento e intra-hospitalar (4,4% vs. 2,5% e 7,7% vs. 4,5%, respectivamente; p<0,01). A maioria dos procedimentos foi realizada em hospitais privados (66,2%), sendo que pacientes de hospitais públicos apresentaram maistaxas de complicações vasculares maiores(7,2% vs. 3,3%), implante de marcapasso (12,3% vs. 8,9%), mortalidade do procedimento (5,0% vs. 2,7%) e intra-hospitalar (7,5% vs. 5,3%; todos com p<0,01) em relação aos hospitais privados. Ao longo do tempo, as taxas de mortalidade intra-hospitalar diminuíram tanto em hospitais públicos quanto privados, principalmente no grupo de mulheres(p<0,01). CONCLUSÕES: Mulheres apresentaram maiores taxas de mortalidade de procedimento e intra- -hospitalares após TAVI em comparação aos homens, assim como taxas mais altas de sangramento com risco de vida e eventos adversos. Hospitais públicos foram associados a maiores taxas de mortalidade do que centros privados. Nos últimos anos, as mulheres experimentaram reduções mais significativas nas taxas de mortalidade, tanto em hospitais públicos quanto privados.

Comparative analysis of different risk prediction tools after mitral Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) has become an established treatment for primary and secondary mitral regurgitation (PMR and SMR). The objective of this study was to compare the accuracy of different risk scores for predicting 1-year mortality and the composite endpoint of 1-year mortality and/or heart failure (HF) hospitalization after TEER. METHODS: We analyzed data from 206 patients treated for MR at a tertiary European center between 2011 and 2023 and compared the accuracy of different mitral and surgical risk scores: EuroSCORE II, GRASP, MITRALITY, MitraScore, TAPSE/PASP-MitraScore, and STS for predicting 1-year mortality and the composite of 1-year mortality and/or HF hospitalization in PMR and SMR. A subanalysis of SMR-only patients with the addition of COAPT Risk Score and baseline N-Terminal pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) list was also performed. RESULTS: MITRALITY had the best discriminative ability for 1-year mortality and the composite endpoint of 1-year mortality and/or HF hospitalization, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.74 and 0.74, respectively, in a composed group of PMR and SMR. In a SMR-only population, MITRALITY also presented the best AUC for 1-year mortality and the composite endpoint of 1-year mortality and/or HF hospitalization, with values of 0.72 and 0.72, respectively. CONCLUSION: MITRALITY was the best mitral TEER risk model for both 1-year mortality and the composite endpoint of 1-year mortality and/or HF hospitalization in a population of PMR and SMR patients, as well as in SMR patients only. Surgical risk scores, MitraScore, TAPSE/PASP-MitraScore and NT-proBNP alone showed poor predictive values.

Comparison of partial-breast irradiation and intraoperative radiation to whole-breast irradiation in early-stage breast cancer patients: a Kaplan-Meier-derived patient data meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Partial breast irradiation (PBI) and intraoperative radiation (IORT) represent alternatives to whole breast irradiation (WBI) following breast conserving surgery. However, data is mixed regarding outcomes. We therefore performed a pooled analysis of Kaplan-Meier-derived patient data from randomized trials to evaluate the hypothesis that PBI and IORT have comparable long-term rates of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence as WBI. METHODS: In February, 2023, PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Central were systematically searched for randomized phase 3 trials of early-stage breast cancer patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery with PBI or IORT as compared to WBI. Time-to-event outcomes of interest included ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR), overall survival (OS) and distant disease-free survival (DDFS). Statistical analysis was performed with R Statistical Software. RESULTS: Eleven randomized trials comprising 15,460 patients were included; 7,675 (49.6%) patients were treated with standard or moderately hypofractionated WBI, 5,413 (35%) with PBI and 2,372 (15.3%) with IORT. Median follow-up was 9 years. PBI demonstrated comparable IBTR risk compared with WBI (HR 1.20; 95% CI 0.95-1.52; p = 0.12) with no differences in OS (HR 1.02; 95% CI 0.90-1.16; p = 0.70) or DDFS (HR 1.15; 95% CI 0.81-1.64; p = 0.43). In contrast, patients treated with IORT had a higher IBTR risk (HR 1.46; 95% CI 1.23-1.72; p < 0.01) compared with WBI with no difference in OS (HR 0.98; 95% CI 0.84-1.14; p = 0.81) or DDFS (HR 0.91; 95% CI 0.76-1.09; p = 0.31). CONCLUSION: For patients with early-stage breast cancer following breast-conserving surgery, PBI demonstrated no difference in IBTR as compared to WBI while IORT was inferior to WBI with respect to IBTR.

Impact of periprocedural myocardial injury after transcatheter aortic valve implantation on long-term mortality: a meta-analysis of Kaplan-Meier derived individual patient data.

Background: Periprocedural myocardial injury (PPMI) frequently occurs after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), although its impact on long-term mortality is uncertain. Methods: We performed a pooled analysis of Kaplan-Meier-derived individual patient data to compare survival in patients with and without PPMI after TAVI. Flexible parametric models with B-splines and landmark analyses were used to determine PPMI prognostic value. Subgroup analyses for VARC-2, troponin, and creatine kinase-MB (CK-MB)-defined PPMI were also performed. Results: Eighteen observational studies comprising 10,094 subjects were included. PPMI was associated with lower overall survival (OS) after two years (HR = 1.46, 95% CI 1.30-1.65, p < 0.01). This was also observed when restricting the analysis to overall VARC-2-defined PPMI (HR = 1.23, 95% CI 1.07-1.40, p < 0.01). For VARC-2 PPMI criteria and VARC-2 troponin-only, higher mortality was restricted to the first 2 months after TAVI (HR = 1.64, 95% CI 1.31-2.07, p < 0.01; and HR = 1.32, 95% CI 1.05-1.67, p = 0.02, respectively), while for VARC-2 defined CK-MB-only the increase in mortality was confined to the first 30 days (HR = 7.44, 95% CI 4.76-11.66, p < 0.01). Conclusion: PPMI following TAVI was associated with lower overall survival compared with patients without PPMI. PPMI prognostic impact is restricted to the initial months after the procedure. The analyses were consistent for VARC-2 criteria and for both biomarkers, yet CK-MB was a stronger prognostic marker of mortality than troponin.