Role of Dermatix in the Management of Eyelid Hypertrophic Scars After Facial Trauma.

Facial trauma can cause skin wounds with uneven and discoloured edges that require healing by secondary intention. These wounds often produce excess collagen fibres, leading to fibrosis and hypertrophic scars that can cause discomfort and negatively impact the patient's quality of life. A man suffered facial trauma due to a motor vehicle accident, resulting in a fracture of the left zygomatic-maxillary complex. He underwent surgery to fix the fracture and reconstruct his eyelid but developed a hypertrophic scar during recovery that caused eye dryness and discomfort. To treat the scar, Dermatix silicone gel (SG) (Viatris, Canonsburg, PA) was applied twice a day. After two months of treatment, the scar had improved significantly, and the patient's eyelid function had also improved. This case describes the use of Dermatix SG to treat a patient with a traumatic hypertrophic scar of the eyelid associated with eyelid malposition. Silicone gel is a non-invasive treatment for scars and has been shown to be effective in reducing scar elevation and erythema. However, there is a gap in the literature regarding the routine use of SG to preserve functionality and aesthetics in traumatic hypertrophic scars of complex anatomical structures. Further studies are needed to understand the principles of using SG for these types of scars to improve functional and aesthetic outcomes. Applying Dermatix SG twice a day for 60 days corrected a patient's functional and aesthetic issues. More studies should be conducted to investigate the product's effectiveness further.

Pharyngocutaneous Fistula in Salvage Laryngectomy: Use of the Stapler Versus Manual Suturing Technique.

A pharyngocutaneous fistula (PCF) is the most common complication after salvage total laryngectomy (STL) with an incidence ranging from 5 to 73%, causing an increase in morbidity and delaying the patient's recovery. A surgical technique to prevent PCF formation is the use of the stapler to suture the pharyngeal mucosa.  We have reviewed the medical files of 91 patients who had undergone STL, dividing the patients into two groups (manual suture vs. stapler), based on the type of pharyngeal suture performed during the STL. We found 12/49 (24.5%) cases of a PCF in group A (manual) and 5/42 (11.9%) cases of a PCF in group B (stapler). There is a statistically significant difference between the two groups with the patients in group B presenting better results in terms of the reduction of the surgical time, the length of the hospital stay and also in the restarting of oral feeding. The advantages of mechanical suturing with the stapler are reduced surgical times, a lower PCF formation rate, which involves an early removal of the nasogastric tube, and reduced hospitalization times. Further studies with a larger case series will be necessary to confirm the results obtained and to standardize the surgical technique.

Surgical management and side effects of parotid gland surgery for benign lesions: a retrospective analysis of our experience from 2012 to 2021.

Surgery is the treatment of choice for tumours in the parotid gland. We evaluated complications following parotid surgery. We conducted a retrospective study on 554 patients undergoing parotid surgery for benign parotid tumours from 2012 to 2021. We analysed complication rates between extracapsular dissection (ECD) and superficial parotidectomy (SP). We found 19 capsular ruptures in patients undergoing ECD (5.34%) and five among those undergoing SP (2.52%) [p < 0,05]; 16 cases of temporary facial paralysis among those undergoing ECD (4.49%) and 35 in patients undergoing SP (17.67%) [p < 0,05]; and eight instances of permanent facial nerve paralysis in patients undergoing ECD (2.25%) [p > 0,05] and 13 in patients undergoing SP (6.56%). Among the mid-term complications described were: 22 salivary fistulas among patients operated with ECD (6.18%) [p > 0,05] and 17 in patients with SP (8.58%) 17 sialoceles in those who underwent ECD (4.77%) and seven with SP (3.53%) [p > 0,05]. Regarding late complications, we found: surgical wound dehiscence, pathological scarring (keloid), Frey's syndrome, and recurrence, which affected 45 patients with ECD (12.64%) and 21 with SP for dehiscence (10.6%) [p < 0,05]; 28 keloids in patients with ECD (7.86%) and 15 in patients with SP (7.57%) [p > 0,05]; 12 cases of Frey's syndrome in patients with ECD (3.37%) and 36 with SP (18.18%) [p < 0,05]; and finally 22 recurrences in patients who underwent ECD (6.18%) and 13 in patients who underwent SP (6.56%) [p > 0,05], including 30 in the 273 patients with pleomorphic adenoma and five in the 214 patients with Warthin's tumour. We can conclude that the onset of the different complications after parotid gland surgery are related to the surgery performed. Our data confirm that there is a tight relationship between type of surgery performed and type of complication.

A comparison of a SARS-CoV-2 rapid-test and serological-test in a Public Health Hospital.

INTRODUCTION: Nowadays, with the start of the vaccination campaign is very important to assess the extent of exposure of the population and identifying rapid, sensitive and accurate test to quickly identify new cases of SARS-CoV-2. The rapid test, cheap and easy to perform, is therefore very useful in developing countries, where the vaccination campaign has not yet reached adequate coverage. METHODOLOGY: We compared the VivaDiag COVID-19 IgM/IgG Rapid Test (VivaCheck Biotech Co., Ltd) with the Roche Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 (Roche Diagnostics, Rotkreuz, Switzerland) to recognize past infections and to compare VivaDiag COVID-19 IgM/IgG Rapid Test (VivaCheck Biotech Co., Ltd) with Abbott Real Time PCR SARS-CoV-2 assay to recognize infection during its acute phase so that it's possible to evaluate the use of commercially available assays in clinical practice. RESULTS: Of the 1,100 patients tested with serological and rapid test, 1,085 were negative both to serological and rapid test, 4 patients were positive at rapid (2 for IgM and 2 for IgG) but negative serological test, 11 patients were positive at serological test but negative to rapid. Of the 300 tested with oropharyngeal swab and rapid test, 294 were negative both to swab and rapid test, 2 positives both to swab and rapid test, 3 positives at swab but negative at rapid test, 1 negative at swab but positive at rapid test. CONCLUSIONS: the combined use of these tests according to the specific needs of users, allows a reliable identification of infected patients in the acute phase, distinguishing them from subjects with an antibody response from a previous infection.