Impact of comorbidities and treatment burden on general well-being among women's cancer survivors.

BACKGROUND: Gains in cancer detection and treatment have meant that more patients are now living with both cancer and other chronic health conditions, which may become burdensome. We used the Patient Experience with Treatment and Self-Management (PETS) framework to study challenges in self-management and its impact on health among survivors of women's cancers who are caring for other chronic health conditions. METHODS: Applicability of the PETS domains among survivors of women's cancers with comorbidities was assessed in focus groups to create the study survey. Women surviving primary breast, cervical, ovarian, or endometrial/uterine cancer treated between 6 months and 3 years prior at two large healthcare systems in Virginia were mailed study invitation letters to complete a telephone-based survey. The survey included questions on cancer treatment history, comorbid conditions prior to cancer, treatment and self-management experiences, health literacy, financial security, and items on self-management activities, self-management difficulties and self-management impact (i.e., role/social activity limitations and physical/mental exhaustion). Additionally, general health was assessed with items from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). Hierarchical regression models and path analysis were used to examine correlates of self-management impact on general physical health (GPH) and mental health (GMH). RESULTS: Of 1448 patients contacted by mail, 274 (26%) returned an interest form providing their consent to be contacted. Of these, 183 completed the survey. Reasons for non-completion included ineligibility (42), unable to be reached (33) and refusal (6). The majority were survivors of breast (58%) or endometrial/uterine cancer (28%), and 45% resided in non-urban locations. After adjusting for age, race, and cancer type, survivors with higher self-management difficulty reported higher self-management impact, which was associated with lower perceived general health. Reports of higher self-management impact was associated with being single or unmarried, white race, fulltime employed, higher financial insecurity, lower health literacy and more comorbidities. In path analysis, self-management impact was a significant mediator in the association of comorbidity and financial insecurity on GPH and GMH. CONCLUSIONS: Among survivors of women's cancer, pre-diagnosis comorbidity, health literacy, and financial security are associated with psychosocial impact of self-management and general physical and mental health in the 6 month to 3-year period after cancer treatment has ended. The impact of self-management on psychosocial functioning is an important factor among cancer survivors caring for multiple chronic health conditions. This study provides evidence on the importance of assessing cancer survivors' self-management difficulties such as in future interventions to promote health and wellness.

Better medication adherence results in greater improvement in severity of psoriasis.

BACKGROUND: Patients are commonly nonadherent to medication regimens. In dermatology, there has been little study of the effect of nonadherence on outcomes. OBJECTIVES: To test the association between adherence behaviour and changes in severity of psoriasis. METHODS: Twenty-four subjects with psoriasis were enrolled in an 8-week, left/right, controlled trial of salicylic acid plus topical tacrolimus ointment vs. salicylic acid plus placebo. Subjects were given salicylic acid to apply to all lesions. The salicylic acid was supplied in a bottle with a medication event monitoring system cap in order to assess adherence to the salicylic acid. The primary outcome for this study was the relationship between the change in the disease severity (change in sum score of erythema, scale and thickness scores for a target plaque) and medication adherence. RESULTS: The mean initial disease severity was 5.8 on a nine-point sum score scale. For the topical tacrolimus-treated side, a decrease in adherence rate of 10% was associated with a 1-point increase in severity (P < 0.05). For the placebo-treated side, adherence was not significantly correlated with changes in severity. CONCLUSIONS: Nonadherence may have a significant role in altering clinical trial data, skewing it towards ineffectiveness. Improved outcomes in psoriasis may be achievable through interventions that improve patients' adherence to treatment.

Development and validation of a health-related quality of life instrument for women with melasma.

BACKGROUND: Melasma can have significant emotional and psychological effects on those affected with the condition. In the past, the impact of melasma on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) has been assessed using general measures of skin disease that equally weigh both the physical and psychosocial distress arising from the presence of a dermatological condition. OBJECTIVES: Our purpose was to develop and validate a disease-specific HRQoL instrument to identify the areas of the patient's life most impaired by melasma as well as the effects of the condition on their level of functioning in correlation with disease severity: the Melasma Quality of Life scale (MELASQOL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A random sample of 102 women identified by an investigator as having melasma were evaluated by the investigator using the Melasma Area and Severity Index (MASI). The patients were then anonymously surveyed with the SKINDEX-16, the Fear of Negative Evaluation scale, the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), a skin discoloration evaluation questionnaire, and a measure of perceived life quality difference without melasma. The 10-item MELASQOL scale was devised from the comprehensive HRQoL assessment battery. RESULTS: The psychometric properties of the MELASQOL were comparable with the properties of the DLQI and the SKINDEX-16. The MELASQOL scores were highly correlated with the other HRQoL measures. The discriminatory ability of the MELASQOL is superior to the SKINDEX-16 and the DLQI for melasma. The three life domains most adversely affected by melasma (social life, recreation/leisure and emotional well-being) were highlighted by this instrument. These were the same three areas of life that patients believed would improve the most if they no longer were affected by the disease. CONCLUSIONS: The MELASQOL can be used to evaluate objectively the effect of melasma on a patient's HRQoL. The high correlation with the DLQI, the SKINDEX-16 and the skin discoloration questionnaire suggests that the new scale is a valid instrument, which can be used to monitor the level of impairment individuals suffer due to their melasma. The MELASQOL scores can help guide treatment methods as well as track the improvement of patients' HRQoL.

Effect of prescription benefit changes on medical care utilization in a Medicare HMO population.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the impact of 2 cost-containment efforts in prescription benefits in successive years that included changes in copayment and coverage levels, expanded generic coverage, and brand name prescription drug limit-of-coverage in a Medicare health maintenance organization (HMO). The benefit changes included moving to a drug benefit with increased total coverage and higher copayments in the first year (1998) and to one with brand name limit-of-coverage and unlimited generic availability in the second year (1999). STUDY DESIGN: A repeated-measures analytical design with enrollee follow-up before and after introduction of the 2 policies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A cohort of 2411 older adults continuously enrolled in a Medicare HMO since 1998 was followed up for 1 year pre-post for healthcare service utilization and costs; 259 patients enrolled since 1997 were available to test the effects of the first policy change. RESULTS: Bivariate and multivariate analyses found a significant decrease of 27% in prescription costs, a 4% decrease in physician visits, and a 6% decrease in total costs associated with the change in prescription benefit in the second year (1999). The policy change in the first year (1998) resulted in a 29% increase in prescription costs and 38% increased total costs for the HMO. CONCLUSIONS: Introduction of a prescription benefit that included substantial brand name limit-of-coverage and generic drug coverage expansion was associated with significantly reduced prescription costs. In addition, this change did not seem to increase nonprescription-related healthcare service use in the population.