RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To compare examination quality and acceptability of three different low-volume bowel preparation regimens differing in scheduling of the oral administration of a Macrogol-based solution, in patients undergoing computed tomographic colonography (CTC). The secondary aim was to compare CTC quality according to anatomical and patient variables (dolichocolon, colonic diverticulosis, functional and secondary constipation). METHODS: One-hundred-eighty patients were randomized into one of three regimens where PEG was administered, respectively: in a single dose the day prior to (A), or in a fractionated dose 2 (B) and 3 days (C) before the examination. Two experienced radiologists evaluated fecal tagging (FT) density and homogeneity both qualitatively and quantitatively by assessing mean segment density (MSD) and relative standard deviation (RSD). Tolerance to the regimens and patient variables were also recorded. RESULTS: Compared to B and C, regimen A showed a lower percentage of segments with inadequate FT and a significantly higher median FT density and/or homogeneity scores as well as significantly higher MSD values in some colonic segments. No statistically significant differences were found in tolerance of the preparations. A higher number of inadequate segments were observed in patients with dolichocolon (p < 0.01) and secondary constipation (p < 0.01). Interobserver agreement was high for the assessment of both FT density (k = 0.887) and homogeneity (k = 0.852). CONCLUSION: The best examination quality was obtained when PEG was administered the day before CTC in a single session. The presence of dolichocolon and secondary constipation represent a risk factor for the presence of inadequately tagged colonic segments.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades del Colon , Colonografía Tomográfica Computarizada , Catárticos , Estreñimiento/diagnóstico por imagen , Medios de Contraste , Heces , Humanos , PolietilenglicolesRESUMEN
Thoracic spine CTs are usually performed during free breathing and with a narrow field of view; this common practice systematically excludes the assessment of lungs and other extraspinal structures, even if these have been irradiated during the examination. At our institution we perform thoracic spine CT during breath hold with additional full FOV reconstructions; this allows us to also evaluate lungs and extraspinal pathologies in the same examination with no added costs or further radiation exposure. If this simple and costless technical change is routinely applied to thoracic spine CT many concomitant extraspinal pathologies can be ruled out, from neoplasms to pneumonia; the suggested modification also allows an early diagnosis and avoids recalling and re-irradiating the patient in case these findings are partially included in the study. This practice can be further useful during the current pandemic in order to screen any lung opacities suspicious for COVID-19.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral , Contencion de la Respiración , COVID-19/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Pulmón/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/diagnóstico por imagen , Tórax , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos XAsunto(s)
COVID-19 , Pulmón , Tamizaje Masivo , Vigilancia de la Población , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/epidemiología , Humanos , Pulmón/diagnóstico por imagen , Tamizaje Masivo/economía , Vigilancia de la Población/métodos , Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Radioterapia Guiada por ImagenRESUMEN
Cancer immunotherapy with immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has emerged as an effective treatment for different types of cancer. ICIs are monoclonal antibodies that inhibit the signaling pathway that suppress antitumor T-cell activity. Patients benefit from increased overall and progression-free survival, but the enhancement of normal immunity can result in autoimmune manifestations, called immune-related adverse events (IRAEs), which may lead to a discontinuation of cancer therapy and to severe also life-threating events. IRAEs may affect any organs or system in the human body, being the gastrointestinal (GI) tract one of the most involved districts. Imaging plays an important role in recognizing GI IRAEs and radiologist should be familiar with the main spectrum of radiological appearance. Indeed, early detection of GI IRAEs is crucial for proper patient management and reduces morbidity and mortality. The purpose of this review is to present the most relevant imaging manifestation of GI IRAEs.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To compare unassisted and CAD-assisted detection and time efficiency of radiologists in reporting lung nodules on CT scans taken from patients with extra-thoracic malignancies using a Cloud-based system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three radiologists searched for pulmonary nodules in patients with extra-thoracic malignancy who underwent CT (slice thickness/spacing 2 mm/1.7 mm) between September 2015 and March 2016. All nodules detected by unassisted reading were measured and coordinates were uploaded on a cloud-based system. CAD marks were then reviewed by the same readers using the cloud-based interface. To establish the reference standard all nodules ≥ 3 mm detected by at least one radiologist were validated by two additional experienced radiologists in consensus. Reader detection rate and reporting time with and without CAD were compared. The study was approved by the local ethics committee. All patients signed written informed consent. RESULTS: The series included 225 patients (age range 21-90 years, mean 62 years), including 75 patients having at least one nodule, for a total of 215 nodules. Stand-alone CAD sensitivity for lesions ≥ 3 mm was 85% (183/215, 95% CI: 82-91); mean false-positive rate per scan was 3.8. Sensitivity across readers in detecting lesions ≥ 3 mm was statistically higher using CAD: 65% (95% CI: 61-69) versus 88% (95% CI: 86-91, p<0.01). Reading time increased by 11% using CAD (296 s vs. 329 s; p<0.05). CONCLUSION: In patients with extra-thoracic malignancies, CAD-assisted reading improves detection of ≥ 3-mm lung nodules on CT, slightly increasing reading time. KEY POINTS: ⢠CAD-assisted reading improves the detection of lung nodules compared with unassisted reading on CT scans of patients with primary extra-thoracic tumour, slightly increasing reading time. ⢠Cloud-based CAD systems may represent a cost-effective solution since CAD results can be reviewed while a separated cloud back-end is taking care of computations. ⢠Early identification of lung nodules by CAD-assisted interpretation of CT scans in patients with extra-thoracic primary tumours is of paramount importance as it could anticipate surgery and extend patient life expectancy.
Asunto(s)
Nube Computacional , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico por imagen , Nódulos Pulmonares Múltiples/diagnóstico por imagen , Interpretación de Imagen Radiográfica Asistida por Computador/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/secundario , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nódulos Pulmonares Múltiples/secundario , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Follow-up aims to precociously identify recurrences, metastases or treatment-related adverse events so as to undertake the appropriate therapy. Guidelines admit lack of knowledge on optimal surveillance schedule, but suggest follow-up based on experts' opinion and risk stratification. To identify the impact, if any, of regular follow-up, we interrogated our prospectively collected database whether early detection of recurrences affected both clinical management and, likely, the outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We required information to be available on primary surgery and ≥3°years of follow-up for non-recurring patients. We analysed recurrence characteristics (asymptomatic versus symptomatic, low- versus high tumour burden) and computed tomography (CT) scan counts to detect one recurrence. Kaplan-Meier method estimated recurrence-free survival (RFS), post-recurrence progression-free survival (PR-PFS), and disease-specific overall survival (OS). Comparisons used Hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Multivariate analyses employed the Cox proportional hazards model. All tests were two-sided. RESULTS: Between 01/2001 and 12/2012 we found 233 study-eligible patients. Estimated 5- and 10-year RFS were 61.8% and 50.4%, respectively. After a 68-month median follow-up, we observed 94 (40.3%) recurrences [73/94 (77.7%) asymptomatic versus 21/94 (22.3%) symptomatic and 45/94 (47.9%) low- versus 49/94 (52.1%) high tumour burden]. Multivariate analysis revealed that symptomatic and high tumour burden recurrences were highly predictive of both worse PR-PFS (HR:3.19, P < 0.001; HR:2.80, P = 0.003, respectively) and OS (HR:3.65, P < 0.001; HR:2.38, P = 0.026, respectively). Finally, 29 second (primary) cancers were detected during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Regular follow-up detects recurrences at an earlier stage and may be associated with a better PR-PFS and OS for these patients. In the absence of randomised trials, these evidences support follow-up effort and cost.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/cirugía , Tumores del Estroma Gastrointestinal/cirugía , Adulto , Cuidados Posteriores , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias del Colon/mortalidad , Neoplasias del Colon/cirugía , Neoplasias Duodenales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Duodenales/cirugía , Femenino , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/mortalidad , Tumores del Estroma Gastrointestinal/mortalidad , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/mortalidad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/cirugía , Estudios Prospectivos , Neoplasias del Recto/mortalidad , Neoplasias del Recto/cirugía , Factores de Riesgo , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Gemcitabine is currently the standard chemotherapy for the adjuvant treatment of pancreatic cancer. This chemotherapeutic agent is generally well-tolerated, myelosuppression and gastrointestinal toxicity being common side effects. Nevertheless, gemcitabine-induced pulmonary toxicity has been rarely reported. Despite its low incidence, the spectrum of pulmonary injury is wide, including potentially fatal conditions. We report a case of acute interstitial pneumonia related to gemcitabine, completely solved with Imatinib Mesylate (IM). CASE PRESENTATION: The patient was a 69-year-old man, who developed a hypoxemic respiratory distress during adjuvant treatment with gemcitabine for stage IIA pancreatic cancer. The nonspecific diffuse alveolar involvement found on computed tomography (CT), together with the negative tests for infectious aetiology and the continuing severe respiratory failure despite a long course of broad-spectrum therapy, suggested gemcitabine-induced acute pneumonia as the most likely diagnosis. Thus, after the failure of steroids and all other conventional therapies, the patient was treated with imatinib mesylate on the basis of its activity in the management of graft-versus-host-induced lung fibrosis. A follow-up CT scan of chest one month later showed complete resolution of pneumonia. CONCLUSION: Despite the low frequency of serious pulmonary toxicity, gemcitabine widespread use warns clinicians to consider this life-threatening toxicity. The favourable clinical outcome with IM treatment was remarkable, warranting additional study of IM in the treatment of lung fibrosis.
Asunto(s)
Antimetabolitos Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Mesilato de Imatinib/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales/inducido químicamente , Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neumonía/inducido químicamente , Neumonía/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/uso terapéutico , Desoxicitidina/efectos adversos , Humanos , Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales/diagnóstico , Masculino , Neumonía/diagnóstico , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Resultado del Tratamiento , GemcitabinaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to prospectively compare diagnostic performance and time efficiency of a double-reading paradigm in which a first-reader computer-aided detection (CAD) is followed by a fast 2-dimensional review (DR FR-CAD) with those of a double reading with second-reader CAD (SR CAD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The local ethical committee approved this study. Consecutive immunological patients who have positive results for fecal immunological test who were scheduled for colonoscopy were enrolled for a 10-month period. Computed tomographic colonography studies were read with CAD (CAD COLON-1.20; im3D, Turin, Italy) by using both SR CAD (applied after unassisted interpretation primary 2-dimensional) and DR FR-CAD (CAD-prompts evaluation followed by a fast 2-dimensional review) in randomized order with the radiologist for each reading paradigm masked to the other reader's results.Per-patient sensitivity and specificity of unassisted and CAD-assisted readings for detecting 6-mm adenomas or larger were calculated by using unblinding colonoscopy as reference standard. Reporting times were also calculated. Pairwise comparisons were performed. RESULTS: A total of 182 participants (median age, 65 years; range, 58-76) were included in the final analysis. Of these, 93 (51%) had at least 1 cancer or a 6-mm adenoma or larger. At the 6-mm threshold, sensitivity of unassisted reading (79.6%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 69.9-87.2) increased significantly with the use of both SR CAD (86.0%; 95% CI, 77.3%-92.3%) and DR FR-CAD (89.2%; 95% CI, 81.1%-94.7%), without differences between CAD readings (P = 0.500). No significant differences in specificity among the 3 paradigms were observed. Double reading with first-reader CAD required less reading time than that for SR CAD (378 vs 496; Δ118 seconds; P < 0.001) and was 59 seconds longer than the unassisted reading (P = 0.058). CONCLUSIONS: When compared with unassisted reading, a double-reading paradigm in which first-reader CAD is followed by a fast 2-dimensional review improves the adenoma detection rate to the same level achieved by a second-reader CAD while decreasing reporting times.
Asunto(s)
Algoritmos , Colonografía Tomográfica Computarizada/métodos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico por imagen , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Reconocimiento de Normas Patrones Automatizadas/métodos , Intensificación de Imagen Radiográfica/métodos , Interpretación de Imagen Radiográfica Asistida por Computador/métodos , Anciano , Colonografía Tomográfica Computarizada/estadística & datos numéricos , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sensibilidad y EspecificidadRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To compare diagnostic performance and time efficiency of double-reading first-reader computer-aided detection (CAD) (DR FR CAD) followed by radiologist interpretation with that of an unassisted read using segmentally unblinded colonoscopy as reference standard. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The local ethical committee approved this study. Written consent to use examinations was obtained from patients. Three experienced radiologists searched for polyps 6 mm or larger in 155 computed tomographic (CT) colonographic studies (57 containing 10 masses and 79 polyps ≥ 6 mm). Reading was randomized to either unassisted read or DR FR CAD. Data sets were reread 6 weeks later by using the opposite paradigm. DR FR CAD consists of evaluation of CAD prompts, followed by fast two-dimensional review for mass detection. CAD sensitivity was calculated. Readers' diagnoses and reviewing times with and without CAD were compared by using McNemar and Student t tests, respectively. Association between missed polyps and lesion characteristics was explored with multiple regression analysis. RESULTS: With mean rate of 19 (standard deviation, 14; median, 15; range, 4-127) false-positive results per patient, CAD sensitivity was 90% for lesions 6 mm or larger. Readers' sensitivity and specificity for lesions 6 mm or larger were 74% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 65%, 84%) and 93% (95% CI: 89%, 97%), respectively, for the unassisted read and 77% (95% CI: 67%, 85%) and 90% (95% CI: 85%, 95%), respectively, for DR FR CAD (P = .343 and P = .189, respectively). Overall unassisted and DR FR CAD reviewing times were similar (243 vs 239 seconds; P = .623); DR FR CAD was faster when the number of CAD marks per patient was 20 or fewer (187 vs 220 seconds, P <01). Odds ratio of missing a polyp with CAD decreased as polyp size increased (0.6) and for polyps visible on both prone and supine scans (0.12); it increased for flat lesions (9.1). CONCLUSION: DR FR CAD paradigm had similar performance compared with unassisted interpretation but better time efficiency when 20 or fewer CAD prompts per patient were generated.
Asunto(s)
Colonografía Tomográfica Computarizada/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Colorrectales/epidemiología , Reconocimiento de Normas Patrones Automatizadas/estadística & datos numéricos , Interpretación de Imagen Radiográfica Asistida por Computador/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Masculino , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Proyectos Piloto , Prevalencia , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Factores de Riesgo , Sensibilidad y EspecificidadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) may render curative resection feasible in patients with locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma (LAPC). The authors previously demonstrated the achievement of significant disease control and a median survival of 14 months by CRT in patients with LAPC. In this study, they evaluated the use of induction chemotherapy followed by a CRT neoadjuvant protocol. METHODS: Patients first received induction gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (GEMOX) (gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2), oxaliplatin 100 mg/m(2)). Patients without disease progression then received gemcitabine twice weekly (50 mg/m(2) daily) concurrent with radiotherapy (50.4 grays) and were re-evaluated for resectability. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients (15 with borderline resectable disease and 24 with unresectable disease) entered the study. The treatment was well tolerated. Disease control was obtained in 29 of 39 patients. Two patients progressed after GEMOX, and 7 progressed after CRT. After a median follow-up of 13 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 10.2 months. The median PFS of patients with borderline resectable and unresectable disease was 16.6 and 9.1 months, respectively (P = .056). For the whole group, the median overall survival (OS) was 16.7 months (27.8 months for patients with borderline resectable disease, 13.3 for patients with unresectable disease; P = .045). Eleven patients (9 with borderline resectable disease and 2 with unresectable disease at diagnosis) underwent successful resection. Patients who underwent resection had a significantly longer median PFS compared with nonresected patients (19.7 months vs 7.6 months, respectively). The median OS among resected and nonresected patients was 31.5 months and 12.3 months, respectively (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The current results indicated that induction GEMOX followed by CRT is feasible in patients with LAPC. Both those with borderline resectable disease and those with unresectable disease received clinical benefit, a chance to obtain resectability, and improved survival. The authors concluded that this protocol warrants further evaluation.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/terapia , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidad , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Adulto , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Quimioradioterapia Adyuvante , Desoxicitidina/administración & dosificación , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Quimioterapia de Inducción , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Compuestos Organoplatinos/administración & dosificación , Oxaliplatino , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , GemcitabinaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To assess the effect of computer-aided detection (CAD) as a second reader on the sensitivity and specificity of computed tomographic (CT) colonography in detecting 6-9-mm colorectal cancer (CRC) lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Individuals with clinical indications for colonoscopy--either for symptoms or as part of participating in a surveillance program or CRC screening--were prospectively enrolled at one of 10 academic centers between July 2007 and May 2009. Institutional review board approval was obtained at each clinical site, and all participants provided written informed consent. All participants underwent CT colonography and colonoscopy on the same day. Experienced readers interpreted the CT colonography images unassisted and then reviewed all colorectal lesion-like structures pinpointed by the CAD algorithm. Segmental unblinding of CT colonoscopy findings at colonoscopy was utilized. The sensitivity and specificity of unassisted and CAD-assisted reading in identifying individuals with 6-9-mm lesions were calculated and compared by means of pairwise analysis. RESULTS: A total of 618 participants (mean age, 57.9 years; 54.5% male) were included in the final analysis. Of these participants, 464 (75.1%) had no lesions 6 mm or larger, and 52 (8.4%) had 6-9-mm lesions. The sensitivity of CT colonography with unassisted reading and that with CAD-assisted reading in identifying individuals with 6-9-mm lesions was 65.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 50.9%, 78.0%) and 76.9% (95% CI: 63.2%, 87.5%; P = .016), respectively. No significant change in specificity was observed: The specificity of CT colonography with unassisted and that with CAD-assisted reading was 91.8% (95% CI: 88.9%, 94.1%) and 90.9% (95% CI: 88.0%, 93.4%; P = .063), respectively. Evaluation of CAD candidates required an additional 1.6 minutes (25th-75th percentile: 1.0 minute to 3.4 minutes). CONCLUSION: The addition of CAD to reading performed by experienced readers resulted in a significant benefit in the detection of 6-9-mm polyps at CT colonography in this cohort. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: http://radiology.rsna.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1148/radiol.12120376/-/DC1.
Asunto(s)
Algoritmos , Colonografía Tomográfica Computarizada/métodos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico por imagen , Reconocimiento de Normas Patrones Automatizadas/métodos , Interpretación de Imagen Radiográfica Asistida por Computador/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Italia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Estudios Prospectivos , Intensificación de Imagen Radiográfica/métodos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sensibilidad y EspecificidadRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the computed tomographic colonography (CTC) image quality and patient acceptance of three iodine-based faecal tagging bowel preparations in 60 patients undergoing the following regimens: a 2-day regimen of meal-time administration of iodine and phospho-soda (GFPH); a 2-day regimen of meal-time mild laxative, followed by iodine administered 2 h before CTC (SD); and a 2-day regimen of meal-time administration of iodine (GF). METHODS: Two independent radiologists assessed tagging quality; quantitative measures included the tagged stool density, and computer-aided detection (CAD) false-positive rate. RESULTS: The GFPH and SD regimens provided better subjective quality than GF (p < 0.001). The latter regimen resulted in a higher proportion of insufficiently tagged segments: the measured average stool density was less than 200 HU in 10.7% in all segments vs 3.6% for SD and <0.5% for GFPH, respectively. Insufficient tagging occurred mostly in the ascending colon and the caecum. The CAD false-positive rate increased following the trend: GFPH < SD < GF (p = 0.00012). GFPH was worse tolerated than SD (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Considering preparation quality alone, GFPH was the best regimen, but SD provided the best balance between bowel preparation quality and patient acceptability.
Asunto(s)
Actitud Frente a la Salud , Colonografía Tomográfica Computarizada/métodos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico por imagen , Intestinos/diagnóstico por imagen , Yodo/administración & dosificación , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Medios de Contraste , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sensibilidad y EspecificidadRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To evaluate the correlation between white-to-white (WTW) distance as assessed by Orbscan II (Bausch & Lomb) and high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sulcus-sulcus (S-S) measures and to analyze the correlation between age and anterior chamber parameters. SETTING: Istituto per la Ricerca e la Cura del Cancro, Candiolo, Torino, Italy. METHODS: Eighty-eight patients had MRI with a 1.5 Tesla imager (GE Medical Systems) using a 3-inch circular coil. T1 weighted fast spin-echo scans were performed on the axial plane. Orbscan II was also used to measure WTW distance, K, anterior chamber depth (ACD), and lens curvature. One eye was randomly selected for analysis. Measures were compared using Spearman correlation, paired Student t test, and analysis of variance (ANOVA; post hoc: Scheffé). Intersession variability was performed in 10 patients. Ten MRI images were randomly selected and measured by 2 operators in a masked fashion (intrasession variability). RESULTS: Intersession and intrasession correlation was good for MRI (r = 0.89 and r = 0.92, respectively), and intersession was good for Orbscan (r = 0.91). When comparing Orbscan II and MRI results, the ACD was well correlated and not significantly different, whereas the S-S and the WTW measures were not correlated and significantly different. Lens thickness and lens diameter were directly correlated with age; S-S, WTW, lens curvature, and ACD were inversely correlated with age. CONCLUSIONS: Current methods of measuring the WTW were poorly correlated with anatomical measures. The S-S diameter and other anterior chamber structures significantly change with age, which could give rise to potential problems with posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens sizing position.