Targeted temperature management in patients with intracerebral haemorrhage, subarachnoid haemorrhage, or acute ischaemic stroke: consensus recommendations.

BACKGROUND: A modified Delphi approach was used to identify a consensus on practical recommendations for the use of non-pharmacological targeted temperature management in patients with intracerebral haemorrhage, subarachnoid haemorrhage, or acute ischaemic stroke with non-infectious fever (assumed neurogenic fever). METHODS: Nine experts in the management of neurogenic fever participated in the process, involving the completion of online questionnaires, face-to-face discussions, and summary reviews, to consolidate a consensus on targeted temperature management. RESULTS: The panel's recommendations are based on a balance of existing evidence and practical considerations. With this in mind, they highlight the importance of managing neurogenic fever using a single protocol for targeted temperature management. Targeted temperature management should be initiated if the patient temperature increases above 37.5°C, once an appropriate workup for infection has been undertaken. This helps prevent prophylactic targeted temperature management use and ensures infection is addressed appropriately. When neurogenic fever is detected, targeted temperature management should be initiated rapidly if antipyretic agents fail to control the temperature within 1 h, and should then be maintained for as long as there is potential for secondary brain damage. The recommended target temperature for targeted temperature management is 36.5-37.5°C. The use of advanced targeted temperature management methods that enable continuous, or near continuous, temperature measurement and precise temperature control is recommended. CONCLUSIONS: Given the limited heterogeneous evidence currently available on targeted temperature management use in patients with neurogenic fever and intracerebral haemorrhage, subarachnoid haemorrhage, or acute ischaemic stroke, a Delphi approach was appropriate to gather an expert consensus. To aid in the development of future investigations, the panel provides recommendations for data gathering.

Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound (ECEUS) for the differentiation of pancreatic lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: To evaluate CEUS for the diagnosis of pancreatic diseases and its application in the clinical routine with a focus on the value of CEUS in ductal pancreatic carcinoma and its use for the differentiation of neoplastic and non-neoplastic lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All prospective and retrospective studies published in any language by March 6, 2014 were included based on the following criteria: use of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound (ECEUS) as the imaging methods, use of histology as the reference method and availability of a complete translation. Two authors analyzed the titles and abstracts of the search results to identify all relevant publications. Two independent readers then analyzed the full articles to identify those meeting the inclusion criteria. Details regarding study design, patient characteristics, interventions, and results were then independently extracted by two radiologists and one reviewer with methodological expertise. Sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were used to obtain overall estimates. RESULTS: 1293 articles were initially identified. 27 studies met the inclusion criteria. CEUS was the index test in 23 studies while ECEUS was the index test in 4 studies. The primary study objective was met by 20 studies with respect to ductal adenocarcinoma. CEUS sensitivity was evaluated in all studies. The pooled estimate of CEUS sensitivity for the diagnosis of ductal adenocarcinoma was 0.89 (95 % CI, 0.85 - 0.92). 15 out of 20 studies examined CEUS specificity. The average specificity was 0.84 (95 % CI, 0.77 - 0.89). The pooled estimate for DOR was 61.12 (95 % CI, 34.81 - 107.32). With regard to the secondary study objective, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.95 (95 % CI, 0.93 - 0.96) from 14 studies and 0.72 (95 % CI, 0.58 - 0.83) from 13 studies, respectively. The pooled DOR was 57.63 (95 % CI, 33.62 - 98.78). CONCLUSION: The sensitivity, specificity, and DOR results show the high value of CEUS for the characterization and differentiation of ductal adenocarinomas from other pancreatic diseases and for cystic pancreatic lesions. For this reason and due to their noninvasive nature, CEUS and ECEUS should be used as the first methods for characterizing neoplastic pancreatic lesions, especially since these are often incidental findings. The methods improve the quality of ultrasound diagnostics and result in faster diagnosis and better disease management.

Malignant focal liver lesions at contrast-enhanced ultrasonography and magnetic resonance with hepatospecific contrast agent.

The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of the late phase of CEUS and the hepatobiliary phase of CE-MR with Gd-BOPTA in the characterization of focal liver lesions in terms of benignity and malignancy. A total of 147 solid focal liver lesions (38 focal nodular hyperplasias, 1 area of focal steatosis, 3 regenerative nodules, 8 adenomas, 11 cholangiocarcinomas, 36 hepatocellular carcinomas and 49 metastases) were retrospectively evaluated in a multicentre study, both with CEUS, using sulphur hexafluoride microbubbles (SonoVue, Bracco, Milan, Italy) and CE-MR, performed with Gd-BOPTA (Multihance, Bracco, Milan, Italy). All lesions thought to be malignant were cytohistologically proven, while all lesions thought to be benign were followed up. Sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values and accuracy were calculated for the late phase of CEUS and the hepatobiliary phase of CE-MRI, respectively, and in combination. Analysis of data revealed 42 benign and 105 malignant focal liver lesions. We postulated that all hypoechoic/hypointense lesions on the two phases were malignant. The diagnostic errors were 13/147 (8.8%) by CEUS and 12/147 (8.2%) by CE-MR. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy of the late phase of CEUS were 90%, 93%, 97%, 80% and 91%, 93%, 97%, 81% and 92% for the hepatobiliary phase of CE-MRI, respectively. If we considered both techniques, the misdiagnosis diminished to 3/147 (2%) and sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy were 98%, 98%, 99%, 95% and 98%. The combination of the late phase of CEUS and the hepatobiliary phase of CE-MR in the characterization of solid focal liver lesions in terms of benignity and malignancy is more accurate than the two techniques used separately.

Comparison between CT and CEUS in the diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to compare CEUS and MDCT features of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in relation to tumor size. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients with pathological diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma and studied by means of CEUS and MDCT were enrolled in this study. Two radiologists evaluated tumor size, site and imaging appearance. Patients in which at least one method yielded a positive result were divided into 4 groups on the basis of lesion size. For each dimensional category, sensitivity of the two imaging methods was calculated and compared using McNemar test. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-three patients were included in this study. In 9 of 133 patients neither MDCT nor US/CEUS could identify the lesion, while in 9 of 133 patients only MDCT and in 13 of 133 only US/CEUS could identify the lesion. In the remaining 102 patients, both MDCT and US/CEUS yielded a positive result. US/CEUS sensitivity was 86.47% while MDCT sensitivity was 83.58%, with no statistically significant difference (p = 0.523). For lesions smaller than 2 cm US/CEUS had a 100% sensitivity, while MDCT had a 73.33% sensitivity with no statistically significant difference (p = 0.125). For lesions between 2.1 and 3 cm US/CEUS had a sensitivity of 95.35%, while MDCT had a sensitivity of 83.72% with no statistically significant difference (p = 0.180). For lesions between 3.1 and 4 cm, US/CEUS had a sensitivity of 87.88%, while MDCT had a sensitivity of 93.94% with no statistically significant difference (p = 0.688). For lesions larger than 4 cm US/CEUS, had a sensitivity of 90.91%, while MDCT had a sensitivity of 100% with no statistically significant difference (p = 0.250). CONCLUSION: US/CEUS sensitivity in diagnosing pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is adequate and does not statistically differ from that of MDCT. US/CEUS sensitivity seems to be higher for small and medium lesions, while MDCT sensitivity is higher for large lesions. By combining both the imaging methods a higher accuracy in diagnosing pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma can be expected.

Scleroderma patients nailfold videocapillaroscopic patterns are associated with disease subset and disease severity.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate in a large group of scleroderma patients, the association of nailfold videocapillaroscopic patterns with both demographic and clinical features. METHODS: One hundred and three Italian patients (91 women and 12 men, mean age 54.3 years, median disease duration 7 yrs, 68 with limited and 35 with diffuse subset of disease), consecutively enrolled for the study, underwent nailfold videocapillaroscopy; the microvascular alterations were classified into three different patterns, early, active and late. The nailfold videocapillaroscopic patterns were correlated with such numerous clinical features as sex, age, disease duration, disease subset, disease activity, haematochemical data, involvement of skin, heart, lung and peripheral vessels. RESULTS: Nailfold videocapillaroscopic patterns were significantly associated with disease subsets (P = 0.018). Severity of skin, lung, heart and peripheral vascular involvement progressively increased across nailfold videocapillaroscopic patterns, from early to late pattern (P < 0.001 for cutaneous and peripheral vascular involvement; P = 0.003 and 0.002 for lung and heart involvement, respectively) as well as homocysteine plasma levels (P = 0.02). Patients with late pattern showed an increased risk to have an active disease [OR (odds ratio) 3.50; 95% CI (confidence interval) 1.31-9.39], to present digital ulcers (OR 5.74; 95% CI 2.08-15.89) and moderate to severe skin (OR 5.28; 95% CI 1.93-14.19), heart (OR 5.75; 95% CI 2.04-16.21) and lung involvement (OR 4.41; 95% CI 1.63-11.92). CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that scleroderma microangiopathy correlates with disease subset and severity of peripheral vascular, skin, heart and lung involvement; patients with late pattern showed an increased risk to have an active disease and to show a moderate/severe skin or visceral involvement compared to patients with early and active patterns. Therefore nailfold videocapillaroscopy, a simple, non-invasive and non-expensive investigation, is useful in staging scleroderma patients and also provides prognostic information.

Levels of F2-isoprostanes in systemic sclerosis: correlation with clinical features.

OBJECTIVE: Oxidative stress may be one of the important complex pathogenetic mechanisms that lead to damage in scleroderma; free radicals may provoke endothelial injury, fibroblast proliferation and fragmentation of autoantigens favouring induction of autoantibodies. The present study investigates the oxidant status in scleroderma patients by measuring the urinary concentration of 8-isoprostaglandin-F2alpha, an F2-isoprostane, and a product of free radical-mediated peroxidation of arachidonic acid. METHODS: Forty-three scleroderma patients (42 women and 1 man, mean age 54.1 yr, mean disease duration 9.0 yr) underwent clinical evaluation and instrumental investigations in order to assess skin, vascular, lung and heart involvement. Von Willebrand factor was evaluated as marker of vascular dysfunction in 36 out of the 43 cases. The urinary level of 8-isoprostaglandin-F2alpha was measured in all scleroderma patients and in the 43 age- and sex-matched healthy controls. RESULTS: Urinary levels of 8-isoprostaglandin-F2alpha were higher in scleroderma patients than in the healthy control group (341.7 vs 147.6 pg/mg creatinine; P < 0.001). Values of 8-isoprostaglandin-F2alpha were strongly correlated with the nailfold videocapillaroscopy pattern and lung involvement (P = 0.002 and 0.003, respectively), showing increasing levels with the progression of pulmonary severity. Correlation between 8-isoprostaglandin-F2alpha level and von Willebrand factor narrowly failed to reach statistical significance (P = 0.05). There was no correlation between 8-isoprostaglandin-F2alpha concentration and disease activity, vascular, skin and heart involvement, disease pattern or autoantibody profile. CONCLUSIONS: Our study further supports the role of oxidant stress in the pathogenesis of scleroderma, showing a strong correlation between a marker of free radical damage with both the severity of lung involvement and the videocapillaroscopic patterns.