Financial Outcomes of Managed Entry Agreements for Pharmaceuticals in Italy.

Importance: Most countries in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development apply managed entry agreements (MEAs), reimbursement arrangements between manufacturers and payers, to pharmaceuticals. Few data exist regarding their ability to lower expenditures. Objective: To analyze the financial outcomes of MEAs for pharmaceuticals from 2019 to 2021 in Italy. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this observational study of MEAs and pharmaceutical spending in Italy, medications that were monitored through individually collected data and generated paybacks from manufacturers during the 2019 to 2021 study period were included in the analysis. Payback data were collected through pharmaceutical spending monitoring activities conducted by the Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco (Italian Medicines Agency). Expenditure data were collected through the Italian Drug Traceability System. Products were categorized by type of MEA: financial-based, outcome-based, or mixed. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was median payback as a proportion of expenditure by category of MEA. Results were also provided by subtype: cost sharing or capping models for financial-based MEAs and risk-sharing or payment-by-result models for outcome-based MEAs. Mixed MEAs were considered when medications had multiple indications with different MEA types. Results: A total of 73 medications with MEAs generated a payback by manufacturers during the study period. Six were either not reimbursable or delivered within the Italian National Health Service, and 5 had incomplete data. Of the 62 medications analyzed, 24 (38.7%) had financial-based MEAs, 30 (48.4%) had outcome-based MEAs, and 8 (12.9%) had mixed MEAs. A total payback amount of €327.5 million was calculated during the 3 years, corresponding to 0.9% of the €41.1 billion of total expenditures for medications purchased by public health facilities in Italy. Financial-based MEAs returned the highest payback revenues, €158.1 million; the outcome-based MEAs and mixed MEAs generated smaller paybacks of €74.5 million and €94.9 million, respectively. Overall, the median proportion of payback to expenditure on the medications analyzed was 3.8%. For mixed MEAs, the payback-to-expenditure proportion was 6.7%; for outcome-based MEAs, 3.3%; and for financial-based MEAs, 3.7%. Conclusions and Relevance: This observational study found limited evidence that MEAs lower pharmaceutical expenditures. Determining criteria for prioritizing MEA use, identifying potential design changes, and improving implementation may be needed in the future.

Access and use of WHO essential medicines in Italy.

Background: Many countries use the WHO Essential Medicines List (EML) as a guide for health policy choices to promote the efficient use of healthcare resources or adopt the concept of essential medicines (EMs) to develop their own national list of essential medicines. The aim of this study is to analyse the availability and use of medicines included in the 22nd WHO EML in Italy. Methods: Using the ATC code (5th level), a comparison was made between the medicines included in the WHO EML and those retrieved from the Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA) database. The availability (regulatory and reimbursement status) of EMs, as well as the market share in expenditure (million euros) and consumption [measured in WHO-defined daily doses (DDDs)], compared to all reimbursed medicines in 2021, were analysed. Results: In 2021, approximately 85.2% (n = 414) of medicines included in the WHO EML were commonly marketed in Italy. Of these, 396 EMs were fully reimbursed by the Italian National Healthcare Service (INHS), corresponding to 81.5% (396/486) of the WHO EML, while the remaining 18.5% (90/486) were neither authorised (n = 72) nor reimbursed (n = 18). The study found a low coverage for anti-parasitic, insecticides, and repellent products (ATC P) in addition to medicines for the genitourinary system and sex hormones (ATC G). Even though medicines on the WHO EML, including therapeutic alternatives, accounted for ~48.5% of the expenditure for medicines reimbursed by INHS, the list covered 74% of all national drug consumed. Novel high-cost therapies indicated in high-prevalence diseases and rare conditions, mostly antineoplastic and immune-modulating agents (ATC L) not included in the WHO EML, were also guaranteed. Conclusions: In Italy, high coverage of EMs was found. It was largely reimbursed by the INHS, even when compared to other European countries. Essential medicines represented a high percentage of the overall expenditure and consumption in Italy. The WHO EML could be an important tool to guide the health policy choices of high-income countries, although a more frequent update and easier access to information on rejected medicines are needed.

[Parole chiave. Appropriatezza prescrittiva, consumi farmaceutici, emofilia, fattori della coagulazione, malattia di von Willebrand, malattie emorragiche congenite.] / Strategie terapeutiche per il trattamento delle malattie emorragiche congenite.

Therapeutic strategies for the treatment of congenital bleeding disorders. Congenital hemorrhagic diseases (CHDs) are a group of rare disorders caused by quantitative or qualitative deficiency of one or more coagulation factors. Haemophilia A, Haemophilia B, and von Willebrand disease are the most common congenital bleeding disorders. Over the past decades, the evolution of CHDs treatments has resulted in an increase in the average life expectancy of patients and in an improvement in their quality of life; it has also enabled the prevention of bleeding complications much more effectively than in the past. This has been possible, especially for haemophilia, mainly because of earlier diagnosis, introduction of recombinant factors, especially long-acting factors, and availability of new non-substitutive therapies. In 2021, there was an increase in the overall expenditure and consumption of coagulation factors in Italy; the increase concerned especially the long-acting recombinant factors used in the treatment of Haemophilia A and B and the monoclonal antibody emicizumab. Waiting for innovative therapies that can enable individually tailored therapies, special attention must be paid to prescriptive appropriateness and to identify the best diagnostic and therapeutic care pathways for patients.

[Pharmacotherapy of Hemophilia A: expenditure and consumption for the year 2022 and future expenditure scenarios.] / Terapia dell'emofilia A: spesa e consumo per l'anno 2022 e scenari di spesa futura.

In 2021, the national expenditure for blood coagulation factors was 541.4 million, growing steadily over the past decade. Hemophilia A is the congenital hemorrhagic disease with the highest drug consumption and expenditure. It has also the highest annual increase. Data from the OsMed report showed an increased use of long-acting recombinant factors and a concomitant reduction in consumption of short-acting ones and also an increasing trend of emicizumab. Based on these findings, two possible expenditure scenarios were described: 1) assuming a 25% of reduction in consumption of short-acting recombinant factors with proportional redistribution to the consumption observed in 2022 for long-acting recombinant factors; 2) assuming that all new patients with a moderate and severe form of the disease will start prophylaxis with emicizumab and also calculating different switch percentages (20%, 30%, 50% or 70%). The first hypothesis showed a potential increase in expenditure of 3.3% (approximately 10 million euros) switching from short- to long-acting factors. In the second one, based on estimated number of patients with Hemophilia A on treatment, a total expenditure of about 457.6 million euros was estimated. Based on these findings, different expenditure outlooks were hypothesized and that there should be a switch from the recombinant factors to emicizumab. Specifically, an expenditure increase of 8% in the case of 20% switch and 28.1% in the case of 70% switch were estimated.

[What is the real price of SOP and OTC drugs? Pilot study on paracetamol]. / Qual è il prezzo reale dei farmaci da banco (SOP) e non soggetti a prescrizione (OTC)? Studio pilota sul paracetamolo.

OBJECTIVES: to investigate the actual selling prices of over-the-counter or self-medication (OTC) and non-prescription (SOP) packages of band C medicines, which are freely set by individual pharmacies, para-pharmacies, and corners of the large-scale retail trade. Specifically, the prices charged for paracetamol 500 mg 20 tablets (20 CPR) and 30 tablets (30 CPR) in the online sale, carried out by different retail outlets authorized by the Italian Ministry of Health, were surveyed. DESIGN: cross-sectional observational descriptive study. The availability for online purchase of one or more packages of paracetamol 500 mg 20 CPR and 30 CPR was checked for each outlet considered; for sites with at least one package available for sale, the lowest real price of each of the two packages (20 and 30 CPR) was recorded, differentiating among: 1. type of outlet (pharmacy or retail outlet); 2. originator (branded) or generic (unbranded) drug; 3. city of residence of the outlet (provincial capital city or not). SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: the sample considered consists of 475 online retail sites (pharmacies, para-pharmacies, and large-scale retail stores) based in the 10 major Italian provincial capitals, including sites in the relevant provincial cities. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: the average real price, calculated as the average of all real prices recorded by packaging type; the minimum real price, i.e., or the lowest real price recorded by packaging type; the average discount, calculated as the difference between the average real price and the average value of the maximum recommended prices (set by the marketing authorization holder, AIC) for branded and unbranded packaging; the maximum discount, calculated as the difference between the minimum real price and the average value of the maximum recommended prices (set by the marketing authorization holder) for branded and unbranded packaging. RESULTS: a wide availability of paracetamol packages produced by multiple AIC holders (both branded and unbranded) was found in the country. The presence of several manufacturers of paracetamol 500 mg induces high price competition, as evident from the discounts given. However, discounts are very high on non-branded packs and lower on branded packs. However, analysis of consumption at the national level shows that price competitiveness does not reflect true market share competitiveness, as consumption is mainly concentrated on branded packs that have the highest prices. CONCLUSIONS: wide and homogeneous distribution of unbranded products from different holders is available throughout the country. These products have significantly lower prices than branded packages, and they also have heavy discounts applied (up to 70%, with minimum price per tablet going as low as 0.05 euros). However, contrary to what these premises might lead one to think, consumption is concentrated on the branded packages having the highest prices. For proper information to citizens and trade associations, it is important for the media to bring awareness of the real savings opportunities available nationwide for products of frequent and widespread use, such as the case of paracetamol 500 mg.

Hospital Antibiotic Use during COVID-19 Pandemic in Italy.

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) represents a major issue in healthcare being correlated to global inappropriate use of antibiotics. The aim of this study was to compare the data on hospital antibiotic consumption in 2020-2021 with those related to 2019 in order to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on antibiotic prescriptions and appropriate use at national level and in the different geographical areas. To estimate the consumption of antibiotics, two indicators were calculated: "number of DDD per 1000 inhabitants per day" and "number of DDD per 100 hospitalisation days". Consumption data on antibiotics dispensed in public health facilities were based on the Italian "traceability of medicines" information flow. Data on hospitalisation days were extracted from the Italian "hospital discharge form" flow. Pearson correlation analysis was performed between the number of patients hospitalised for COVID-19 and the consumption of antibiotics in public healthcare facilities. During 2020, about 1.7 DDD/1000 inhabitants per day (12.3% of the overall consumption of reimbursed antibiotics) were dispensed exclusively in Italian hospitals (+0.8% compared to 2019). Considering the number of DDD per 100 hospitalisation days, consumption increased by 19.3% in 2020 compared to 2019. Comparing the first semester of 2020 and 2019, a decrease of DDD/1000 inhabitants per day was observed (-1.6%) at national level, with opposite trends in the different geographical areas; an increase in the use of azithromycin and carbapenems was also observed, with a stable consumption of third-generation cephalosporins. The use of antibiotics in the second semester of 2020 compared to the same period of 2019 showed a clear reduction at national level (-8.5%), appreciable to a similar extent in all geographic areas. In the first semester of 2021 compared to the same period of 2020, there was a huge reduction (-31.4%) in consumption at national level. However, the variations were heterogeneous between different geographical areas. To our knowledge, this study represents the most comprehensive analysis performed on antibiotic consumption data in hospital settings in Italy during the COVID-19 pandemic to date. Despite international and national guideline recommendations, a substantial overall increase in antibiotic prescriptions was observed during the COVID-19 pandemic, with variability in terms of geographical distribution and prescription strategies. These findings may be related to the dichotomy between perceived and real significance of guidelines, expert panels, or consensus. Therefore, new approaches or strategies to antimicrobial stewardship should be proposed.

Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on medication use in the older Italian population.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to analyse the impact of the pandemic on the amount of use and new medication dispensation for chronic diseases in the Italian population aged 65 years and older (almost 14 million inhabitants). METHODS: The "Pharmaceutical Prescriptions database", which gathers data on medications, reimbursed by the National Health Service and dispensed by community pharmacies, was employed. Data were analysed as amount of use (defined daily dose-DDD per 1000 inhabitants); variation in DDD between 2020 and 2019 was calculated for the 30 categories with major consumption in 2020. Trends in prevalence and incidence of dispensations between 2020 and 2019 were calculated for four categories: antidiabetics, antihypertensives, antidepressants and drugs for respiratory diseases. RESULTS: All medications showed a negative variation in DDD/1000 inhabitants between 2020 and 2019 except for anticoagulants (+ 5%). The percentage variation ranged from - 27.7% for antibiotics to - 6.4% for antipsychotics in 85 + year-old persons, but increased for most classes in the youngest (65-69 years). On the other hand, a decrease of the dispensation incidence of antidiabetics, antihypertensives, antidepressants and drugs for pulmonary disease was high, especially in the two extreme age groups, the youngest and the oldest one. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Great variation in medication use between 2020 and 2019 was observed probably reflecting the low rate of infectious diseases due to the widespread use of protective devices and self-isolation, reduced healthcare access because of the lockdowns and the fear of going to hospital, and the reduction of screening and diagnostics due to health-care system overload.

Dynamics of price competition in Italian pharmaceutical off-patent market.

Introduction: The aim of the study was to evaluate, in a regulated generics market, the effect of the number of manufacturers of generic drugs on the amplitude of off-patent products price reduction and the price evolution of originators and generics after the patent expiry of pharmaceuticals dispensed by community pharmacies and reimbursed by the Italian National Health Service (INHS). Methods: The AIFA "transparency list" was utilized to select unbranded and branded off-patent drug dispensed by community pharmacies and reimbursed by the Italian National Health Service between 2012 and 2018. The unbranded drug entry in the transparency list database was considered as a proxy of its patent expiry. Results: A total of 42 different active ingredients were included in the analysis. The relative price per dose at time t of unbranded and branded drugs, considering as common denominator the price per dose a year before the patent expiry, (t-1) decreased with the increase of unbranded manufacturers. At the time of the patent expiry, the price of unbranded drugs was almost 50% less than that of branded drugs at t-1 and the price of branded drugs started to decrease before the first unbranded entry. Conclusion: An inverse relation between the number of generic drug entrants and the price of generics and originators was detected. The patent expiry determines a price decline, more concentrated in the first year of patent expiry.

[Direct and on behalf delivery of drugs for human use: opportunities and problems.] / Distribuzione dei medicinali diretta e per conto: opportunità e criticità.

The direct delivery of medicines by public healthcare facilities (Local health authorities, hospitals) is being discussed in Italy: the article considers opportunities and drawbacks of the different options (delivery through health facilities or through specific agreements with public and private community pharmacies) with respect to the characteristics of medicinal products and the needs of patients. The authors of the Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA) identify the main issues to be considered for a possible shift of some drugs from direct delivery to that on behalf, and which mainly concern drugs that must in any case be administered in hospital (see drugs for intravenous use or usable only in hospitals); drugs whose dispensing requires special precautions regarding confidentiality or for which dispensing by the staff of a health facility can improve patient adherence to therapy; innovative drugs monitored through registers.

Medication Use and Costs Among Older Adults Aged 90 Years and Older in Italy.

Older adults are often affected by multiple chronic conditions and experience geriatric syndromes that may affect the risk/benefit profile of medications. Little is known about the use of such medications in the older population. This article describes medication use and costs in Italian adults aged ≥90 years. Data from the 2019 Pharmaceutical Prescriptions database, concerning data on medications reimbursed by the Italian National Health Service, were analyzed in terms of prevalence and amount of use expressed as defined daily dose/1,000 users (DDD/1,000 users/day), accounting for different age-groups and sex. All individuals aged ≥90 years used at least one medication, with a mean number of 3128 DDD/1,000 users/day corresponding to an annual cost of 683 euros per user. Both use and costs linearly decreased with increasing age, with men accounting for a higher amount of DDD/1,000 users and costs than women across all age-groups. Antihypertensives (1330 DDD/1,000 inhabitants), antiplatelet agents (337 DDD/1,000 inhabitants), medications for peptic ulcer and gastroesophageal reflux (328 DDD/1,000 inhabitants), and lipid-lowering agents (166 DDD/1,000 inhabitants) were the most frequently used medications. We observed a progressive decrease in the usage of the majority of medications with increasing age, with the exception of antibiotics and antipsychotics. Individuals aged ≥90 years used a lower DDD/1,000 users, with an associated decrease in annual costs. The persistent use of preventive medications highlights the potential lack of awareness regarding medication rationalization and guidance for optimizing prescriptions. Our findings highlight the need for further initiatives to improve medications' appropriateness in these older age-groups.

Orphan Drug Prices and Epidemiology of Rare Diseases: A Cross-Sectional Study in Italy in the Years 2014-2019.

INTRODUCTION: It is well acknowledged that the price of orphan drugs is normally higher than that resulting from the value-based pricing. A correlation between the cost of therapy for orphan drugs and the epidemiology (prevalence and incidence) of the related rare disease can be hypothesized. METHODS: This analysis includes all approved orphan drugs by European Medicines Agency whose reimbursement was granted for the first therapeutic indication in the years 2014-2019 in Italy. Regression and correlation analyses were performed to analyze the possible correlations between the logarithm of the annual therapy cost and the epidemiology of the rare diseases, between orphan drugs consumption and epidemiology of related rare disease and between therapy cost and the consumption. RESULTS: The regression analysis between the annual cost of therapy estimated on the published ex-factory price and the prevalence showed a slightly decreasing, not statistically significant, trend (coefficient: -0.10, p-value: 0.41). The results were similar when using the price resulting from the application of Managed Entry Agreements (coefficient: -0.11, p-value: 0.40). The regression analysis between sales volume and prevalence showed a positive slope without an acceptable level of significance (p-value: 0.04). The correlation analysis between the therapy cost and the sales volume highlighted again an absence of significant association, similarly if considering only ATC L orphan drugs, or the incidence. DISCUSSION: The definition of the price of an orphan drug seems not to depend on the rarity of the disease, and sales volumes do not correlate with the epidemiology of the rare disease and with the annual cost of therapy.

[Medicines use in older adults in Italy. The OsMed National Report 2019.] / Uso dei farmaci nella popolazione anziana in Italia. Il Rapporto Nazionale OsMed 2019.

The "National Report on Medicines use in older adults in Italy. Year 2019" provides a summary of data concerning the expenditure and consumption of medicines in individuals aged 65 or above in Italy. In addition to general characteristics and considerations, analyzes conducted on specific conditions, situations and settings are reported, such as the concomitant use in patients with chronic diseases, the use of medicines in hospitals and RSA and the impact of the covid-19 pandemic. Four local experiences related to deprescribing interventions are then reported, which highlight the feasibility and value of this approach.

[Social inequalities in the use of medicines for the treatment of the major chronic diseases. Evidence from the AIFA Atlas.] / Disuguaglianze sociali nell'uso dei farmaci per la cura delle malattie croniche. Le principali evidenze dall'Atlante AIFA.

The Atlas of social inequalities in the use of medicines for the treatment of the major chronic diseases is the first national report published on social inequalities in the context of pharmaceutical care in Italy. The results highlighted how the socioeconomic position was strongly correlated with the use of medicines: for many therapeutic categories, the highest per capita consumption rates were recorded in the areas with a higher socioeconomic deprivation index. On the other hand, no correlations emerged between the level of deprivation and adherence and persistence to pharmacological treatment.

[Medicines use in Italy. 2020 OsMed National Report.] / L'uso dei farmaci in Italia. Il Rapporto Nazionale OsMed 2020.

The 2020 National Report "Medicines use in Italy", produced by the National Observatory on the Use of Medicines (OsMed) of the Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA), describes the Italian pharmaceutical assistance through different available information flows that allow to recompose pharmaceutical territorial and hospital assistance, concerning both the national health service and private citizens. In the Report the results of numerous analyzes, both general and focused on specific therapeutic categories and classes, relating to pharmaceutical expenditure and consumption, are reported, but it is also present an in-depth analysis about monitoring registries and conditional reimbursement agreements, and a comparison between the most relevant Italian data and those of nine other European countries.

Variables affecting pricing of orphan drugs: the Italian case.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Evidence on determinants of prices for orphan medicines is scarce and not available for Italy. The aim of this paper is to provide an evidence on variables affecting the annual treatment cost of orphan drugs in Italy, testing the hypothesis of a negative correlation with the dimension of the target population and a positive correlation with the added therapeutic value of the drug and the quality of the evidence of pivotal studies. METHODS: Drugs with a European orphan designation reimbursed in Italy in the last 6 years (2014-2019) were considered. Univariate, cluster analysis and multiple regression models were used to investigate the correlation between the annual treatment cost and, as explanatory variables, the dimension of the target population, the existence of Randomized Clinical Trials as a proxy of the quality of the pivotal studies, the added therapeutic value. RESULTS: In the univariate analysis prevalence and added therapeutic value, as expected, have a negative and positive correlation with cost respectively. The correlation with RCT is not significant. In the multivariate model, coefficients for prevalence and added value are confirmed but for the latter are not significant anymore. We also found, through an interaction analysis, that the existence of an RCT has a positive impact on annual treatment cost when the target population is very small. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that value arguments and sustainability (dimension of the target population and its impact on budget impact) issues are considered for orphan drugs pricing: the role played by sustainability is systematically supported by our results. A more transparent and reproducible price negotiation process for orphan drugs is needed in Italy. This paper has contributed to highlight the implicit drivers of this process.

[Biosimilar medicines: OsMed reports on monitoring consumption and spending in Italy.] / Farmaci biosimilari: i rapporti OsMed sul monitoraggio dei consumi e della spesa in Italia.

The results of the OsMed reports of the Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA) on consumption and expenditure related to biosimilar medicines show a high heterogeneity at the regional level, with great differences in terms of both consumption and price. In light of the potential savings and the growing number of biological medicines whose patents have expired or are about to expire, it is therefore desirable that the regions with the lowest levels of consumption take action to increase the awareness of health professionals on efficacy and safety of such treatments and the potential advantages in terms of sustainability of the national health system.

[The use of antibiotics in Italy. The national OsMed report 2019.] / L'uso degli antibiotici in Italia. Il rapporto nazionale OsMed 2019.

The OsMed report "The use of antibiotics in Italy - 2019", produced by the Italian Medicines Agency, shows how the prescriptions of these drugs are still too high in our country, albeit with high variability between different regions. A significant degree of inappropriate use of antibiotics also emerges, especially in respiratory infections. In general, the results highlight the need to implement prevention and control actions in order to counter antibiotic resistance.

Monitoring the community use of antibiotics in Italy within the National Action Plan on antimicrobial resistance.

BACKGROUND: In Italy both the consumption of antibiotics and the prevalence of bacterial resistance are higher than in other European countries. In 2017, the first National Action Plan on Antimicrobial Resistance (PNCAR) was adopted in Italy. In response to the PNCAR two national reports on antibiotic use in the human setting have been published. This article's aim is to describe the pattern of antibiotic consumption in the community setting in Italy from 2013 to 2018. METHODS: To analyse the consumption for reimbursed antibiotics dispensed by community pharmacies different data sources were used. Consumption was measured in terms of defined daily dose (DDD), prescriptions or prevalence of use. RESULTS: In 2018, the consumption of antibiotics in Italy amounted to 16.1 DDD per 1000 inhabitants per day. The rates of consumption by geographical area were: 12.7 DDD in the north, 16.9 in the centre and 20.4 in the south. The use was greater in the extreme age groups than in the population aged from 20 to 64 years. The consumption was higher in winter season, with high peaks in the incidence of flu syndromes. In the paediatric population, a utilization rate of 1010 prescriptions per 1000 children, with a prevalence of use of 40.8%, was found. CONCLUSION: The study provides useful information on the geographical variability of antibiotic use in Italy to guide decision makers in the introduction of tailored interventions, as suggested by PNCAR, aimed at promoting a more rational use of antibiotics for humans and reducing antimicrobial resistance.