Adipose-derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells are Ideal for the Cell-based Treatment of Refractory Wounds: Strong Potential for Angiogenesis.

Although Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSCs)-based therapy has been proposed as a promising strategy for the treatment of chronic lower-extremity ulcers, their optimal sources, amounts, and delivery methods are urgently needed to be determined. In this study, we compared the heterogeneity of the human MSCs derived from bone marrow (BMSCs), umbilical cord (UCMSCs), and adipose tissue (ADSCs) in accelerating wound healing and promoting angiogenesis and explored the underlying mechanism. Briefly, a diabetic rat model with a full-thickness cutaneous wound on the dorsal foot was developed. The wound was topically administered with three types of MSCs. Additionally, we carried out in vitro and in vivo analysis of the angiogenic properties of the MSCs. Moreover, the molecular mechanism of the heterogeneity of the MSCs derived from the three tissues was explored by transcriptome sequencing. When compared with the BMSCs- and UCMSCs-treated groups, the ADSCs-treated group exhibited markedly accelerated healing efficiency, characterized by increased wound closure rates, enhanced angiogenesis, and collagen deposition at the wound site. The three types of MSCs formed three-dimensional capillary-like structures and promoted angiogenesis in vitro and in vivo, with ADSCs exhibiting the highest capacity for tube formation and pro-angiogenesis. Furthermore, transcriptome sequencing revealed that ADSCs had higher expression levels of angiogenesis-associated genes. Our findings indicate that MSCs-based therapy accelerates the healing of ischemia- and diabetes-induced lower-extremity ulcers and that adipose tissue-derived MSCs might be ideal for therapeutic angiogenesis and treatment of chronic ischemic wounds.

Efficacy of topical and systemic transplantation of mesenchymal stem cells in a rat model of diabetic ischemic wounds.

BACKGROUND: Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) exert positive effects in chronic wounds. However, critical parameters, such as the most effective administration routes, remain unclear. Accordingly, the purpose of this study was to compare the effects of topical and systemic transplantation MSCs on diabetic ischemic wound healing and explored the underlying mechanisms. METHOD: A diabetic ischemic wound model was created on the dorsal foot of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) rat. Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSCs) were administered via two routes: topical injection and intravenous (IV) infusion. Wound healing outcomes and blood glucose level were assessed dynamically. Meanwhile, blood flow recovery was evaluated in ischemic gastrocnemius muscles. The homing and transdifferentiation of mKate2-labeled BM-MSCs were assessed by fluorescence imaging and immunohistochemistry (IHC) analysis. RESULT: Both topical and systemic treatments had a positive effect on the diabetic ischemic wound showing a significant reduction in wound area at day 14. Histological results showed an increase in the length of epithelial edges, collagen content, microvessel density in the wound bed, and a higher expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Meanwhile, systemic administration can ameliorate hyperglycemia and improve the blood perfusion of the ischemic hindlimb. BM-MSCs administered systemically were found distributed in wounded tissue and transdifferentiated into endothelial cells. Furthermore, BM-MSCs stimulated angiogenesis at wound sites by downregulating phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) and activation of AKT signaling pathway. CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrated that both transplantation delivery method (topical and systemic) of BM-MSCs accelerated wound healing remarkably under pathological conditions. Nevertheless, systemic administration has the potential to ameliorate hyperglycemia and repair the damaged tissue.

[Clinical research progress of mesenchymal stem cells in treatment of chronic wounds].

OBJECTIVE: To review the clinical research progress of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in the treatment of chronic wounds. METHODS: The literature related to the chronic wound repair with MSCs at home and abroad in recent years was extensively reviewed, and the possible mechanism of MSCs in the treatment of chronic wounds, as well as its application and existing problems were summarized. RESULTS: MSCs can participate in all aspects of chronic wound healing to promote wound healing, and has shown broad application prospects in clinical trials. MSCs commonly used in clinical research include bone marrow-derived MSCs, adipose-derived tissue MSCs, and umbilical cord-derived MSCs. CONCLUSION: MSCs treatment is a promising strategy for the chronic wounds, but there are still many problems in its widespread clinical application that require further research.