Comparing safety and efficacy of acoustic subcision at two different rapid acoustic pulse rates to improve the appearance of cellulite.

BACKGROUND: A recent study showed the safety and efficacy of a noninvasive acoustic subcision device to improve the appearance of cellulite via delivery of rapid acoustic pulses in a single treatment visit. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare the safety and efficacy of a single rapid acoustic pulse treatment visit using an equivalent number of rapid acoustic pulses at a pulse rate of 100 or 50 Hz. METHODS: This single-center, prospective study enrolled 15 adult women with moderate to severe cellulite according to the Cellulite Dimple-At Rest Scale. Each participant would receive nominally 72,000 rapid acoustic pulses at a pulse rate of 50 Hz on the left buttock and thigh, and nominally 72,000 rapid acoustic pulses at a pulse rate of 100 Hz on the right buttock and thigh within one treatment visit. Efficacy was assessed by the ability of blinded, independent reviewers to correctly distinguish the pre- and post-treatment photos, participant satisfaction, and the change in Cellulite Dimple-At Rest scores for each treatment side. Safety was monitored throughout the conduct of the study. RESULTS: For both 100 and 50 Hz pulse rate treated areas, the majority (two out of three) of blinded reviewers correctly identified 100% of the pre/post-treatment photos. For both the 100 and 50 Hz treated areas, 80% of participants agreed/strongly agreed that their cellulite appeared improved at the 12-week follow-up visit. Significant improvements in Cellulite Dimple-At Rest scores were seen for both the 100 and 50 Hz treated areas. All participants thought both the 100 and 50 Hz pulse rate treatments were tolerable, and the pain (mean score ± SD; 2.2 ± 1.2) associated with each was identical. No unexpected or serious adverse events occurred. CONCLUSION: Acoustic subcision delivered via rapid acoustic pulses at 100 Hz, compared to 50 Hz, provides equivalent improvement in the appearance of cellulite while maintaining a similar safety and efficacy profile. For both pulse rates, treatment pain was minimal, and participant satisfaction was high.

Improvement in Cellulite Appearance After a Single Treatment Visit With Acoustic Subcision: Long-Term Findings From a Multicenter Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Cellulite is an aesthetically displeasing rippling or dimpling of the skin, primarily on the buttocks/thighs. A recent study showed a novel acoustic subcision device produced significant short-term (12-week) improvement in the appearance of cellulite after a single rapid acoustic pulse (RAP) treatment. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term (>52-weeks) efficacy and safety of RAP treatment for improvement in the appearance of cellulite. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective, multicenter trial, female participants ( n = 42) with severe cellulite were treated with the acoustic subcision device in a single visit. At >52 weeks, blinded board-certified dermatologists assessed efficacy by correctly identifying post-treatment photographs and using a 6-point simplified Cellulite Severity Scale (CSS). Participant satisfaction was also collected. Safety was assessed throughout. RESULTS: The blinded panel correctly identified post-treatment photographs at a rate of 95.2%; 70.4% of participants had a >1-point reduction in the CSS score from baseline (mean reduction of 1.09). All participants (100%) reported improved cellulite appearance. Overall pain during treatment was rated as 2.4 and 0.3 post-treatment (pain scale 0-10). No device or treatment-related adverse events were reported at the >52-week follow-up. CONCLUSION: Rapid acoustic pulse treatment significantly improved the long-term appearance of cellulite and was well-tolerated.

Long-term improvement in the appearance of hypertrophic scars following a single treatment with acoustic subcision-A single center proof-of-concept study.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Fibrosis, including hypertrophic scar formation, is a pathological condition characterized by excessive production and accumulation of collagen, and loss of tissue architecture, in response to wound healing. Alterations in the extracellular matrix (ECM) biomechanical properties may be important in modulating myofibroblasts and fibrosis formation. The acoustic subcision device uses rapid acoustic pulse technology to noninvasively improve the appearance of hypertrophic scars through both microdisruption of scar tissue matrix and downregulation of fibrotic fibroblasts leading to scar remodeling. The objective of this single-site proof-of-concept IRB-approved human clinical study was to evaluate the efficacy of acoustic subcision device for the improvement in the appearance of hypertrophic scars. METHOD: Eleven hypertrophic scars in 10 participants were treated with a single 6-minute acoustic subcision application without anesthesia. Posttreatment adverse events (AEs) and tolerability were recorded. At 12 and 89 weeks posttreatment, scar heights and volumes were measured, and participant satisfaction questionnaires were completed. Finally, at the last visit the scar appearance was assessed by the Principal Investigator (PI) using the Mecott Modified Scar Scale (MMSS). RESULTS: Immediately following the acoustic subcision treatment, only mild, moderate erythema or pinpoint bleeding were noted. The treatment sessions were considered tolerable by all participants with an average pain score of 2.2 (on a 0-10 pain score with 10 being the worse possible pain). The 12- and 89-week assessments demonstrated mean height reductions of 46.3% and 56.8%, respectively from baseline. The differences in scar height were statistically significant (p < 0.01). The 12- and 89-week assessments demonstrated a mean volume reduction of 63.2% and 58.1% respectively from baseline. The differences in the scar volume were statistically significant (p < 0.001). The PI graded an average improvement of 33.7% in scar appearance using the MMSS, a statistically significant change (p < 0.001). Finally, >90% of participants reported satisfaction with the improvement in their scar. CONCLUSION: This proof-of-concept study showed that a single noninvasive acoustic subcision treatment session can safely provide statistically significant improvement in the appearance of hypertrophic scars with minimal treatment pain and meaningful participant satisfaction. More work is needed on a larger number of scars to verify this finding. Further improvement in appearance is expected with multiple acoustic subcision treatments and/or treatments in combination with currently available options. Additional trials to verify this are planned.

Improvement in the appearance of cellulite and skin laxity resulting from a single treatment with acoustic subcision: Findings from a multicenter pivotal clinical trial.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Surface depressions and skin laxity together play a role in the appearance of cellulite. Cellulite depressions can be improved through disruption of the subcutaneous fibrous structures. Some currently utilized approaches accomplish this through invasive techniques requiring local anesthesia and potential down time. Skin laxity can exacerbate the appearance of cellulite, however current invasive approaches do little to improve skin laxity. The objective of this study was to evaluate a noninvasive approach to improving both cellulite depressions and skin laxity through the use of rapid acoustic pulses (acoustic subcision). Safety, efficacy, tolerability, and participant satisfaction results were measured. METHODS: Women (n = 56) with moderate to severe cellulite were treated in a single acoustic subcision treatment session without anesthesia. Posttreatment adverse events (AEs) and tolerability were recorded. At 12-weeks cellulite outcomes were assessed using a 6-point simplified Cellulite Severity Scale (CSS), Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS), and a participant satisfaction questionnaire. Additionally, laxity improvement was measured using a 4-point Laxity Score (LS) and GAIS. RESULTS: Improvement in cellulite appearance measured at 12-weeks showed that participants (n = 56) had a mean CSS reduction of 1.01 (a 29.5% reduction from baseline). The posttreatment photograph was correctly identified by blinded independent reviewers from randomized pairs of pre/posttreatment photographs for 96.4% of participants. Cellulite was graded as improved, much improved or very much improved using the GAIS at 90.9% of treated locations. Finally, 92.9% of participants reported positive satisfaction responses. Scoring for improvement in skin laxity appearance at 12-weeks showed a mean LS reduction of 0.57 (a 27.9% reduction from baseline). GAIS for laxity was graded as improved, much improved or very much improved in 67.3% of treated areas. No unexpected or serious AEs were noted at treatment or follow-up. Overall average pain score during treatment was 2.4 (0-10 pain scale) and 0.3 immediately posttreatment. CONCLUSION: A single noninvasive acoustic subcision session can safely provide meaningful improvement in the appearance of cellulite in terms of depressions, as well as skin laxity, with minimal treatment pain and no posttreatment down time. Further improvement in appearance is expected with multiple treatments over time. Additional trials to verify this are planned.

Increased Tattoo Fading in a Single Laser Tattoo Removal Session Enabled by a Rapid Acoustic Pulse Device: A Prospective Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The ability to provide improved tattoo fading using multiple laser passes in a single office laser tattoo removal session is limited. In part, this is due to the loss of laser effectiveness caused by epidermal and dermal vacuole "whitening" generated during the initial laser pass at the tattoo site. The Rapid Acoustic Pulse (RAP) device generates acoustic shock wave pulses that clear epidermal and dermal vacuoles to enable multiple laser passes in a single office laser tattoo removal session. The objectives of this study were to determine if the RAP device, when used as an accessory to the 1064 nm Nd:YAG Q-switched (QS) laser can enable delivery of multiple laser passes in a single office laser tattoo removal session, and therefore result in increased tattoo fading compared to the clinical standard single-pass QS laser tattoo removal session. STUDY DESIGN/MATERIALS AND METHODS: The RAP device was evaluated in a single-center (SkinCare Physicians), prospective, IRB approved study. A total of 32 black ink tattoos, from 21 participants, were divided into three zones and treated with either multiple QS laser passes, each followed by 1 minute of RAP device application (Laser + RAP) in zone one and single-pass QS laser treatment (Laser-Only) in zone two, separated by an untreated control zone. The treatment sites were assessed for the number of laser passes and adverse events immediately, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks following the treatment session. Photographs of the treatment sites were assessed for percent fading at 12 weeks post-treatment by three blinded reviewers. RESULTS: When the RAP device was applied as an accessory to the QS laser in a multi-pass laser tattoo removal treatment, an average of 4.2 laser passes were delivered in a single session, with no unexpected or serious RAP device-related adverse events. At the 12-week follow-up, tattoos treated with Laser + RAP showed a statistically significant increase in average fading (44.2%) compared with tattoos treated with Laser-Only (24.8%) (P < 0.01). Additionally, a significantly higher overall proportion of tattoos treated with Laser + RAP (37.5%) had a response of >50% fading compared with tattoos treated with QS Laser-Only (9.4%) (P < 0.01) as well as a response of >75% fading from Laser + RAP treatment (21.9%) compared with Laser-Only treatment (3.1%) (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The RAP device, applied as an accessory to the 1064 nm Nd:YAG QS laser, safely enables multiple QS laser treatments in a single office laser tattoo removal session by clearing the whitening caused by the previous QS laser pass. Enabling multiple QS laser passes results in a statistically significant increase in tattoo fading in a single office laser tattoo removal session compared to the clinical standard single-pass QS laser tattoo removal session. © 2019 The Authors. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.