HLA class II-like antiidiotypic antibodies from highly sensitized patients inhibit T-cell alloresponses.

The purpose of this study is to identify factors in the sera of highly sensitized (HS) patients (pts) that inhibit T-cell alloresponses. An in vitro assay was used to measure HLA class I and class II-like antiidiotypic antibodies (anti-ids). The stimulation index (SI) was used to measure PBL and T-cell responses to alloantigens. All HS sera (32 pts) and the IgG fraction inhibited PBL and CD4(+) T-cell responses to alloantigens. The SI with HS IgG was 7.9 +/- 1.7 as compared to 31.5 +/- 5.9 with normal IgG (p = 0.0003). In a subset of pts who were transiently sensitized, the SI was 6.6 +/- 1.0 with a high panel reactive antibody (PRA), but when their PRA was zero, the SI was 17.8 +/- 1.3 (p = 0.0000001). Anti-ids were found in 100% of 17 pts with a high PRA. The T-cell inhibitory factors reduced CD4(+) T-cell responses of HS pts to alloantigens in the presence of autologous anti-ids, were MHC restricted and were inactivated by in vitro generated antibodies to HLA class II-like anti-ids. The HLA class II-like anti-id IgG molecules bind to the TCR of CD4(+) T cells and may impair their ability to help in the downregulating antibody response to anti-ids.

ABO-incompatible heart transplantation in infants.

BACKGROUND: Transplantation of hearts from ABO-incompatible donors is contraindicated because of the risk of hyperacute rejection mediated by preformed antibodies in the recipient to blood-group antigens of the donor. This contraindication may not apply to newborn infants, who do not yet produce antibodies to T-cell-independent antigens, including the major blood-group antigens. METHODS: We studied 10 infants 4 hours to 14 months old (median, 2 months) who had congenital heart disease or cardiomyopathy and who received heart transplants from donors of incompatible blood type between 1996 and 2000. Serum isohemagglutinin titers were measured before and after transplantation. Plasma exchange was performed during cardiopulmonary bypass; no other procedures for the removal of antibodies were used. Standard immunosuppressive therapy was given, and rejection was monitored by means of endomyocardial biopsy. The results were compared with those in 10 infants who received heart transplants from ABO-compatible donors. RESULTS: The overall survival rate among the 10 recipients with ABO-incompatible donors was 80 percent, with 2 early deaths due to causes presumed to be unrelated to ABO incompatibility. The duration of follow-up ranged from 11 months to 4.6 years. Two infants had serum antibodies to antigens of the donor's blood group before transplantation. No hyperacute rejection occurred; mild humoral rejection was noted at autopsy in one of the infants with antibodies. No morbidity attributable to ABO incompatibility has been observed. Despite the eventual development of antibodies to antigens of the donor's blood group in two infants, no damage to the graft has occurred. Because of the use of ABO-incompatible donors, the mortality rate among infants on the waiting list declined from 58 percent to 7 percent. CONCLUSIONS: ABO-incompatible heart transplantation can be performed safely during infancy before the onset of isohemagglutinin production; this technique thus contributes to a marked reduction in mortality among infants on the waiting list.

Clinical practice guidelines: prevention of cytomegalovirus disease after renal transplantation.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a set of comprehensive, standardized, evidence-based guidelines for the use of antiviral therapy to prevent cytomegalovirus disease in adult patients having undergone renal transplantation. OPTIONS: The use of medication, at the time of induction therapy or at the earliest sign of viremia. Treatments were evaluated by patient and donor serologic groups and the induction regimen used. OUTCOMES: The control of symptoms and features of cytomegalovirus disease over the first 6 mo to 1 yr after transplantation. EVIDENCE: Articles, compiled using a MEDLINE search from 1976 to July 1997, were reviewed by representatives of nephrology, microbiology, pharmacy, and epidemiology. Additional information was obtained from recent review articles and conference abstracts, and from experts in the field. VALUES: The evidence-based methods and values of the Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examinations were used. High value was placed on studies with a randomized controlled design and blinded outcome observers. Study quality was classified as poor when cointervention was present (especially with regard to immunosuppressive regimens), when more than 20% of patients were lost to follow-up, and when intention to treat analysis was not performed. Recommendations were made with a graded system (grades A and B: Use of the intervention advised, based on high or fair quality evidence, respectively; grades D and E: Use of the intervention not advised, based on high or fair quality evidence, respectively: grade C: No recommendation made because of insufficient or conflicting evidence). RECOMMENDATIONS: (1) Seropositive recipient; donor seropositive or seronegative; immunosuppression with antilymphocyte products. Prophylaxis with antiviral therapy recommended (grade A recommendation). (2) Seronegative recipient; seropositive donor; immunosuppression with antilymphocyte products. Prophylaxis with antiviral therapy recommended (grade A recommendation) (3) Seronegative recipient; seropositive donor; conventional immunosuppression. Prophylaxis with antiviral therapy recommended (grade B recommendation). (4) Seronegative recipient; seronegative donor; any immunosuppressive regimen. No prophylaxis with antiviral therapy required (grade D/E recommendation). (5) Seropositive recipient: donor seropositive or seronegative; conventional immunosuppression. Prophylaxis left to the discrimination of the physician in charge (grade C recommendation).

Factors influencing long-term primary cadaveric kidney transplantation--importance of functional renal mass versus avoidance of acute rejections--the Toronto Hospital experience 1985-1997.

1. The 5-year actuarial graft, patient and functional graft survival rates were analyzed in 743 consecutive primary cadaveric kidney transplants from The Toronto Hospital between January 1985-December 1997. 2. Recipient age > or = 55 years, male recipient sex, recipient diabetes mellitus, CIT > 36 hours and delayed graft function were found to significantly decrease patient survival. 3. Recipient age > or = 55 years, sensitization to HLA antigens (peak PRA > 50%), donor/recipient HLA antigen mismatches, CIT > 36 hours, delayed graft, function and 6-month SCr > 200 mumol/L were found to significantly decrease graft survival. 4. Acute rejection episodes had no significant impact on overall 5-year patient or graft survival. 5. The observation that serum creatinine > 200 mumol/L had a major adverse influence on long-term outcome reflects the importance of functional renal mass on graft survival.

Lack of enhanced T-helper cell function in uremic patients with circulating alloreactive antibodies.

Some uremic patients with a history of blood transfusion, pregnancy, and previous transplantation maintain high levels of alloreactive cytotoxic antibodies in the absence of continuous exogenous allogenic stimuli and are thus considered sensitized to the major histocompatibility proteins. To differentiate into antibody-producing cells, B lymphocytes must interact with T-helper (CD4+) cells. Whether ongoing help from these cells is necessary for the B cells to continue producing cytotoxic alloreactive antibodies in these sensitized uremic patients is unknown. To gain insight into the cellular mechanisms that are associated with sustained alloantibody production, T cell activation markers were measured and specific and nonspecific T-helper cell function was studied in three uremic groups with different levels of panel reactive antibodies: 10 patients whose sera reacted to more than 80% of a panel of normal lymphocytes for at least 6 months before the study were highly sensitized, 20 patients whose sera reacted to less than 80% of the panel were moderately sensitized, and 10 nonsensitized patients whose sera did not react to any cell on the panel. The number of total and activated T-helper cells was similar in the highly sensitized and nonsensitized patients. Peripheral blood lymphocyte proliferation in response to plant lectins, soluble OKT3, or alloantigens was similar in the three uremic groups. The spontaneous proliferation of pure T-helper cells and proliferative responses to immobilized OKT3 or alloantigens were also similar in highly sensitized and nonsensitized patients. Alloreactive interleukin-2-producing cell frequencies with pure CD4+ cells as responding cells were 771 +/- 77.9/10(6) cells in highly sensitized, 945 +/- 252/10(6) cells in nonsensitized, and 973 +/- 114/10(6) cells in controls (P = not significant). Panel reactive antibody levels did not correlate with any of the measures of T helper responses. There was a significant decrease of peripheral blood lymphocyte responses to alloantigens and anti-CD3 antibody in all uremic patients as compared with normals, suggesting a dysfunction in accessory cells that was quantitatively similar in sensitized and nonsensitized patients. In spite of the continuous production of alloantibodies by B cells, there is no evidence of either specific or nonspecific enhancement of T-helper cell function in sensitized patients. The absence of T cell immunity to alloantigens suggests that sustained activation of T-helper cells with subsequent interleukin-2 production is not necessary to maintain alloreactive B cell function.

A comparison of rabbit antithymocyte serum and OKT3 as prophylaxis against renal allograft rejection.

A total 166 first cadaveric renal allograft recipients were randomly assigned to receive either rabbit antithymocyte serum (RATS) (n = 83) or OKT3 (n = 83) for 10 to 14 days after transplant as prophylaxis against rejection. Both groups were similar with respect to age, sex, donor age, diabetes, time on dialysis, panel-reactive antibody, HLA matching, and transfusion before transplantation. All patients were followed for 1 year after transplantation. A comparison of the rejection rates between the 2 groups of patients showed that patients receiving OKT3 had a rate of first rejection 1.87 times higher than those receiving RATS (95% confidence interval 1.18-2.8, P = 0.007). Twenty-five steroid-resistant rejections occurred in OKT3-treated patients as compared with 12 in the RATS-treated group (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in early or late renal function between the 2 groups of patients. Actuarial 1-year graft survival for the RATS group was 78% and for the OKT3 group, 80.7% (P = NS). Actuarial 1-year patient survival was similar: 89.5% in the RATS group and 94.6% in the OKT3 group (P = NS). Total hospitalization time was 29.8 +/- 19.9 days for RATS vs. 39.5 +/- 22.1 days for those treated with OKT3 (P < 0.006). A number of infections were observed but there were no significant differences between the groups. We conclude that RATS provides better prophylaxis than OKT3 in first cadaveric renal transplants because it is associated with fewer rejection episodes, less hospitalization, and no additional morbidity or mortality.

Calcium antagonists in heart transplant recipients: effects on cardiac and renal function and cyclosporine pharmacokinetics.

OBJECTIVE: Cyclosporine increases transmembrane calcium flux in mesangial and vascular smooth muscle cells, which may explain cyclosporine-induced decreases in renal bloodflow and glomerular filtration rate. Calcium antagonists, thus, may play a role in the prevention/reversal of cyclosporine nephrotoxicity. DESIGN: In a single-blind, randomized, cross-over study the authors evaluated the effects of a one-week treatment with nifedipine 20 mg bid, diltiazem 120 mg bid or placebo on cardiac and renal functions of six stable heart transplant recipients treated chronically with cyclosporine. RESULTS: Both calcium antagonists lowered blood pressure compared with placebo, but only nifedipine increased cardiac output and, therefore, decreased total peripheral resistance significantly more than diltiazem. Nifedipine induced a significant increase in effective renal plasma flow and an insignificant increase in glomerular filtration rate, whereas diltiazem caused a reduction in these parameters. Cyclosporine pharmacokinetics were not affected by either calcium antagonist to a clinically significant extent. CONCLUSIONS: Nifedipine and diltiazem exert distinctly different cardiac and renal hemodynamic effects in cardiac transplants, which may have clinical consequences.

Analyzing the number of "rejection episodes" in renal transplant studies.

Transplantation has become the treatment of choice for many chronic and debilitating diseases. Generally, the primary endpoints in evaluating therapy are graft and patient survival time. However, an important secondary outcome is the number of "rejection episodes" experienced by study patients. This response has a distinctive statistical character. That is, it is a categorical variable since it assumes only a small number of integer values, but it is measured on a ratio-level scale since the ratio of any two values is scientifically meaningful. Historical methods for analyzing this endpoint, for example, t tests, logistic regression and Kaplan-Meier analysis, have failed to take these characteristics into account. In this study, we investigated statistical procedures for analyzing the number of rejection episodes arising during the first three months posttransplant. Data compiled by the Multiple Organ Retrieval and Exchange (MORE) of the Province of Ontario were used for this purpose. It was found that assumptions underlying normal distributional techniques were not satisfied by these data. An alternative model based on Poisson regression models was considered and was shown to provide an adequate fit.

Blood pressure and left ventricular anatomy and function after heart transplantation.

To determine whether hypertension occurring after heart transplant causes the development of cardiac hypertrophy, changes in pressure load (N = 13) and left ventricular anatomy (N = 11) were evaluated up to 1 year after heart transplant in a prospective longitudinal study. Pressure load was evaluated by 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, and left ventricular anatomy and function were assessed by M-mode echocardiography under two-dimensional guidance. Body weight increased by 11 to 12 kg. Blood pressure showed a gradual increase during the first few months after transplant: diastolic pressure by 15 to 18 mm Hg and systolic pressure by 12 to 15 mm Hg, with hypertension persisting during the night. Nearly all patients required treatment with one or two antihypertensive drugs. The increase in blood pressure was related to increased total peripheral resistance with minor decreases in cardiac output. Both septal and posterior wall thickness and left ventricular mass (by 25 to 30 gm/m2) decreased during the initial months after transplant and subsequently remained at "normal" levels (100 gm/m2). The persistence of normal left ventricular mass may indicate either that the increases in daily pressure load and body weight were not sufficient to induce myocardial growth or that the latter was prevented by, for example, absence of cardiac sympathetic nerve activity.

Recycled heart valves from transplant patients.

Forty heart transplantations were performed at the Toronto Western Hospital, University of Toronto, from October 1987 to December 1989. Each heart extracted from a recipient was examined with the view of using the aortic valve as a homograft for another patient requiring aortic valve replacement. Of the 40 explanted hearts, 26 had normal aortic valves that were potentially suitable for homografting, and 14 had aortic valves judged as unsuitable. Of the potentially suitable valves, four were preserved for ex vivo arrhythmia studies requiring aortic root perfusion and four were damaged during harvesting. The remaining 18 usable valves were sized at the time of explantation and stored in an antibiotic solution at 4 degrees C. Thirteen valves were transplanted within 10 days of harvesting, and five were discarded because no suitable recipients were available within this period. There were no operative deaths or valve-related complications in the 13 homograft valve recipients. Mean follow-up was 13 months (range, 3 to 27 months). One patient required replacement of the homograft with a mechanical prosthesis because of insufficiency and stenosis. All patients are alive, are New York Heart Association functional class status I, and have insignificant valve gradients based on Doppler echocardiography. Although hearts removed from transplant recipients are severely diseased, the aortic valves are frequently normal and should be considered for use as homografts for other patients requiring aortic valve replacement.

The use of the kidney with an historical positive, and current negative crossmatch.

Until recently, most transplant units required that a negative crossmatch using all available sera was an essential criterion which would ensure the best use of a donor kidney. This policy was accepted without clinical trial until 1982 when it was suggested that a donor kidney will function successfully in the majority of recipients with a negative crossmatch using current sera and a positive crossmatch with one or more non-current sera, i.e., sera taken 3 or more months prior to the time of the transplant. In the 14 reported series addressing this question, the average 1-year graft survival ranges between 53% and 100% in these highly sensitized patients who receive a primary graft, and between 0% and 100% in those who receive a secondary graft. Controversy does exist as to whether a positive crossmatch in non-current sera is an additional risk factor, i.e., that it decreases graft survival significantly when compared with a similar group of highly sensitized patients who were transplanted with a negative crossmatch on all available pre-transplant sera. Of the published studies on this subject, the majority, but not all, find that there is no difference between controls and positive crossmatch patients who receive a primary graft, but those that receive a secondary graft may be at increased risk. The reasons for the different results from these studies may be related to differences in the many variables which influence graft outcome between various study groups.

Relationship between preoperative pulmonary status and outcome after heart transplantation.

To determine whether routine preoperative pulmonary function tests provide useful prognostic information in orthotopic heart transplant candidates, we evaluated the pulmonary status of 33 patients who subsequently underwent transplantation. There was one perioperative death and five other fatalities within 9 months after operation. Mean age of the six patients who died (mean +/- SD 51.8 +/- 5.0 years) was significantly different (p less than 0.05) from that of the survivors (44.6 +/- 11.1 years). Mean preoperative pulmonary vascular resistance was significantly different (p less than 0.05) between those patients who had a fatal outcome (mean, 4.4 +/- 2.0 mm Hg/L/min) and those who survived (2.7 +/- 1.0 mm Hg/L/min). By contrast, we found that measures of forced vital capacity, forced expired volume in 1 second, diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide, and arterial blood gases bore no apparent relationship to outcome. We conclude that standard noninvasive measures of pulmonary function may be useful in preoperative preparation of heart transplant candidates, but they do not appear to be helpful in predicting eventual outcome.

The role of cold ischemia in a provincial organ-sharing program in the cyclosporine era.

Prolonged cold ischemia has been associated with impaired early cadaver renal allograft function. The role of CsA in potentiating these effects is not well understood, but CsA has been implicated in promoting delayed graft function and potentiating renal ischemic injury. In order to establish whether CsA is safely tolerated by kidneys subjected to protracted cold ischemia, we examined patient and graft outcome in a series of 1081 patients receiving cadaver-kidney transplants over an 8-year period (1981-1988). All patients received a standard immunosuppressive regimen that included CsA. Overall actuarial 1-year patient and graft survival rates were 96% and 80%, respectively. Renal preservation was achieved either by pulsatile perfusion (n = 261, 24%) or simple cold storage (n = 820, 76%). Results were analyzed according to total cold ischemic time as follows: 0-23 hr (n = 512; range, 0-23.9 hr); 24-35 hr (n = 380; range, 24.0-35.9 hr); 36-47 hr (n = 161; range, 36.0-47.7 hr); greater than or equal to 48 hr (n = 28; range, 48.0-70.6 hr). These groups did not differ significantly in recipient age, sex, incidence of diabetes, number of pretransplant blood transfusions, level of presensitization, or HLA match. There were no differences in overall actuarial 1-year patient or graft survival rates, incidence of rejection, or renal function at 1 year. There was a higher incidence of impaired early graft function for kidneys preserved greater than or equal to 48 hr, but eventual graft outcome, including serum creatinine at 1 year, was unchanged. Delayed introduction of CsA resulted in improved 1-year graft survival (84.4% vs. 74.7%, P less than 0.05) compared to CsA treatment begun at the time of transplantation ("initial CsA"). This improvement was present regardless of total cold ischemia time. The incidence of permanent graft nonfunction, which has been previously reported to increase with CsA therapy, was influenced by the timing of CsA therapy (initial: 12%; delayed: 3%, P less than 0.05) but was not affected by duration of cold ischemia. Thus, safe preservation of cadaver kidneys for up to 70 h can be achieved by standard techniques even when CsA is incorporated into the immunosuppressive regimen. The most important determinants of graft survival in these patients are the timing of CsA therapy and the presence of early graft function, not the duration of renal preservation.