Predictors and characteristics of Rib fracture following SBRT for lung tumors.

BACKGROUND: The utilization of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is increasing for primary and secondary lung neoplasms. Despite encouraging results, SBRT is associated with an increased risk of osteoradionecrosis-induced rib fracture. We aimed to (1) evaluate potential clinical, demographic, and procedure-related risk factors for rib fractures and (2) describe the radiographic features of post-SBRT rib fractures. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 106 patients who received SBRT between 2015 and 2018 for a primary or metastatic lung tumor with at least 12 months of follow up. Exclusion criteria were incomplete records, previous ipsilateral thoracic radiation, or relevant prior trauma. Computed tomography (CT) images were reviewed to identify and characterize rib fractures. Multivariate logistic regression modeling was employed to determine clinical, demographic, and procedural risk factors (e.g., age, sex, race, medical comorbidities, dosage, and tumor location). RESULTS: A total of 106 patients with 111 treated tumors met the inclusion criteria, 35 (32%) of whom developed at least one fractured rib (60 total fractured ribs). The highest number of fractured ribs per patient was five. Multivariate regression identified posterolateral tumor location as the only independent risk factor for rib fracture. On CT, fractures showed discontinuity between healing edges in 77% of affected patients. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly one third of patients receiving SBRT for lung tumors experienced rib fractures, 34% of whom experienced pain. Many patients developed multiple fractures. Post-SBRT fractures demonstrated a unique discontinuity between the healing edges of the rib, a distinct feature of post-SBRT rib fractures. The only independent predictor of rib fracture was tumor location along the posterolateral chest wall. Given its increasing frequency of use, describing the risk profile of SBRT is vital to ensure patient safety and adequately inform patient expectations.

Reassessing the minimum two-year follow-up standard after total shoulder arthroplasty-Is one year sufficient?

BACKGROUND: US Food and Drug Administration Investigation Device Exemption studies and academic journals emphasize the importance of two-year follow-up data in reporting outcomes of total shoulder arthroplasty, but there is limited data evaluating appropriate follow-up length. We aim to evaluate change in postoperative outcomes and complications between one and two years following anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasties. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 250 patients who underwent anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasties between 2013 and 2016 from a single surgeon arthroplasty registry. Patients without both one- and two-year follow-up data were excluded. We compared American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Visual Analog Scale for pain, and goniometer-measured range of motion. RESULTS: Patient-reported outcome measurements (p > 0.05) did not change between one and two years postoperatively following both reverse (n = 146) and anatomic (n = 104) total shoulder arthroplasties. Range of motion increased slightly (p < 0.05), but this change was not clinically relevant. There were no additional complications. DISCUSSION: Minimum two-year clinical follow-up may not be necessary for future shoulder arthroplasty Investigation Device Exemption and other peer-reviewed investigations. Patient-reported outcomes (ASES and pain score) and range of motion plateau at one year postoperatively without additional complications. One-year follow-up is an acceptable minimum follow-up length. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-retrospective analysis.

Identifying surgeon and institutional drivers of cost in total shoulder arthroplasty: a multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Despite rapid increases in the demand for total shoulder arthroplasty, data describing cost trends are scarce. We aim to (1) describe variation in the cost of shoulder arthroplasty performed by different surgeons at multiple hospitals and (2) determine the driving factors of such variation. METHODS: A standardized, highly accurate cost accounting method, time-driven activity-based costing, was used to determine the cost of 1571 shoulder arthroplasties performed by 12 surgeons at 4 high-volume institutions between 2016 and 2018. Costs were broken down into supply costs (including implant price and consumables) and personnel costs, including physician fees. Cost parameters were compared with total cost for surgical episodes and case volume. RESULTS: Across 4 institutions and 12 surgeons, surgeon volume and hospital volume did not correlate with episode-of-care cost. Average cost per case of each institution varied by factors of 1.6 (P = .47) and 1.7 (P = .06) for anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA), respectively. Implant (56% and 62%, respectively) and personnel costs from check-in through the operating room (21% and 17%, respectively) represented the highest percentages of cost and highly correlated with the cost of the episode of care for TSA and RSA. CONCLUSIONS: Variation in episode-of-care total costs for both TSA and RSA had no association with hospital or surgeon case volume at 4 high-volume institutions but was driven primarily by variation in implant and personnel costs through the operating room. This analysis does not address medium- or long-term costs.

Lateralization and Decreased Neck-Shaft Angle Reduces Scapular Notching and Heterotopic Ossification.

BACKGROUND: Lateralization of the glenosphere in reverse shoulder arthroplasty likely mitigates scapular notching; however, there is a paucity of data evaluating the effect of heterotopic ossification (HO) at the inferior aspect of the glenoid neck. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 107 consecutive reverse shoulder arthroplasty patients between April 2013 and April 2016. During the study period, the surgeon switched from a 2.5-mm lateral center of rotation and a 155° neck-shaft angle (NSA) to a 6- or 10-mm lateralized design with a 135° NSA. Preoperative and minimum 2-year postoperative patient-reported outcomes and range of motion were collected. Two-year postoperative radiographs were evaluated for scapular notching and HO. RESULTS: The lateralized center of rotation implant was 72% less likely to develop HO and 85% less likely to produce scapular notching than the medialized prosthesis. CONCLUSION: Implants with laterally offset glenospheres and 135° NSA may decrease postoperative HO and scapular notching. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Variation in the Cost of Care for Different Types of Joint Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Lower-extremity arthroplasty constitutes the largest burden on health-care spending of any Medicare diagnosis group. Demand for upper extremity arthroplasty also continues to rise. It is necessary to better understand costs as health care shifts toward a bundled-payment accounting approach. We aimed (1) to identify whether variation exists in total cost for different types of joint arthroplasty, and, if so, (2) to determine which cost parameters drive this variation. METHODS: The cost of the episode of inpatient care for 22,215 total joint arthroplasties was calculated by implementing time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) at a single orthopaedic specialty hospital from 2015 to 2018. Implant price, supply costs, personnel costs, and length of stay for total knee, total hip, anatomic total shoulder, reverse total shoulder, total elbow, and total ankle arthroplasty were analyzed. Individual cost parameters were compared with total cost and volume. RESULTS: Higher implant cost appeared to correlate with higher total costs and represented 53.8% of the total cost for an inpatient care cycle. Total knee arthroplasty was the least-expensive and highest-volume procedure, whereas total elbow arthroplasty had the lowest volume and highest cost (1.65 times more than that of total knee arthroplasty). Length of stay was correlated with increased personnel cost but did not have a significant effect on total cost. CONCLUSIONS: Total inpatient cost at our orthopaedic specialty hospital varied by up to a factor of 1.65 between different fields of arthroplasty. The highest-volume procedures-total knee and hip arthroplasty-were the least expensive, driven predominantly by lower implant purchase prices. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: We are not aware of any previous studies that have accurately compared cost structures across upper and lower-extremity arthroplasty with a uniform methodology. The present study, because of its uniform accounting process, provides reliable data that will allow clinicians to better understand cost relationships between different procedures.

Delayed hospital discharge after total shoulder arthroplasty: why, and who is at risk?

BACKGROUND: There is growing policy interest in reducing the length of stay (LOS) after discretionary orthopedic surgery but few data to guide improvement efforts. We characterized the primary reasons and predisposing factors associated with extended LOS after elective total shoulder arthroplasty. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 415 patients undergoing elective primary total shoulder arthroplasty between 2016 and 2017. Extended LOS was defined as a stay greater than the 75th percentile. Medical records were manually reviewed to ascertain the primary reason for extended LOS. Multivariable logistic regression modeling was used to determine preoperative characteristics associated with prolonged hospitalization. RESULTS: The most common reason for extended LOS was pain (41%), followed by medical problems (39%), limited social support (18%), and blood transfusions (2%). Only 41% of patients with delayed discharges had documented adverse events (any medical or surgical problem), all of which were minor. The top 4 medical issues were transient hypoxemia (42%), nausea and/or vomiting (13%), electrolyte abnormalities (12%), and altered mental status (10%). In decreasing order of magnitude, the predictors of prolonged LOS were greater number of self-reported allergies, female sex, unmarried patient, diabetes, lower American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, depression, reverse shoulder arthroplasty, and American Society of Anesthesiologists score of 3 or greater. Operative time did not correlate with LOS. CONCLUSIONS: Prolonged hospitalizations after shoulder arthroplasty are commonly related to pain and limited social support. Sociodemographic and psychological factors seem to have more influence than patient infirmity and technical issues. These findings support a comprehensive approach to care with attention to the physical, mental, and social determinants of health.

Predictors of unsatisfactory patient outcomes in primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Despite favorable clinical and functional results for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA), there remains a group of patients without postoperative complications who demonstrate poor improvement and overall outcome. METHODS: Using a single surgeon shoulder arthroplasty registry, we identified patients who underwent RSA from 2013 to 2016 with minimum of 2-year postoperative follow-up. Patients with intra- and postoperative complications were excluded. Poor postoperative clinical outcome was defined as those patients within the bottom 30th percentile for American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score. Poor postoperative improvement was defined as the bottom 30th percentile of ASES improvement, measured preoperatively to the 2-year postoperative mark. Multivariate logistic regression modeling was used to determine preoperative characteristics (e.g., demographics, comorbidities, preoperative ASES score) associated with poor outcome. RESULTS: A total of 137 patients met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Multivariable logistic regression modeling found that prior shoulder surgery, the majority (75%) of which were arthroscopic, was the only independent factor associated with both poor improvement (adjusted odds ratio, 2.46 [1.03-5.83]) and outcome (adjusted odds ratio, 4.92 [1.74-14.96]). Preoperative opioid use was associated with poor outcomes only, whereas the high preoperative ASES score was associated with poor postoperative improvement. CONCLUSIONS: Prior ipsilateral shoulder surgery was strongly associated with poor clinical improvement and outcome after RSA. No other factors correlated with both poor improvement and outcome. This association is important to decision making for any shoulder surgery, given the long-term implications.

The Effect of Level I Evidence on Surgical Decision Making in the United States Versus Canada.

BACKGROUND: In this study, we examined the difference that randomized trials favoring either surgery or nonsurgical treatment had on the surgical indications of American versus Canadian surgeons. METHODS: One randomized trial favoring surgical management of clavicle fractures and another one favoring nonsurgical management of Achilles tendon ruptures were used. American and Canadian orthopaedic surgeons were surveyed regarding their surgical indications for these injuries. RESULTS: More than 2000 US and 200 Canadian responses were received. For clavicles, 57% of US respondents indicated that the trial changed their practice, with 64% operating on more fractures, compared with Canadians at 78% and 68%, respectively. For Achilles, 37% of US respondents indicated that the trial changed their practice, with 29% operating on fewer ruptures, compared with Canadians at 72% and 67%, respectively. CONCLUSION: American surgeons seem more willing to alter their practice to "evidence-based" indications for a trial that favors surgery rather than one that does not.