D-Dimer and procalcitonin in patients with recurrent pericarditis: a prospective study.

Recurrent pericarditis, an inflammatory syndrome with a pathogenesis not fully elucidated, often presents diagnostic challenges. This study aims to assess the correlation of D-Dimer (D-D) and procalcitonin (PCT) levels with clinical, laboratory and imaging features in recurrent idiopathic pericarditis. We analyzed 412 patients with idiopathic recurrent pericarditis from 2019 to 2023 in our referral center. D-D and PCT values were obtained from emergency room in other Italian facilities. Among the cohort, PCT levels were assessed in 50 of 412 patients (12.1%), with only 4 showing marginal elevation. D-D levels were measured in 48 of 412 patients (11.6%), with 33 of them exhibiting elevated values. None of these patients had venous thromboembolism, and elevated D-D levels were significantly associated with pleural effusion, fever, higher CRP, increased white blood cell counts, higher neutrophil counts, reduced relative lymphocyte counts. Multivariate analysis revealed fever as the sole correlate of elevated D-D. PCT elevation was infrequent and unrelated to any variables. In idiopathic recurrent pericarditis unrelated to specific conditions, we observed a close association between elevated D-D levels and non-specific inflammation markers, including fever, increased CRP, and neutrophil leukocytosis. PCT levels were typically normal or mildly elevated.

Acute pericarditis with pleuropulmonary involvement, fever and elevated C-reactive protein: A systemic autoinflammatory disease? A cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: This cohort study describes a systemic phenotype of pericarditis, comparing this phenotype with other forms of pericarditis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients in our center were enrolled in a prospectively maintained registry from 2019 to 2022. 412 patients with idiopathic recurrent pericarditis were analyzed. "Systemic inflammatory" subset was defined as the presence of all the following criteria: fever ≥38C°, CRP ≥2 times normal values, pleural effusion detected with any imaging techniques. The absence of any of the 3 criteria was defined as "isolated" subset. RESULTS: We found that 211 (51.2%) of 412 patients (188 female) presented the systemic subset and the variables significantly associated with this subset in univariate analysis (p<0.001) were: higher mean age: 45.5 (±SD 17.2) vs 39.9 (±SD 16.4) years, higher mean CRP values: 128.8 vs 49.9 mg/L, higher proportion of pericardiocentesis: 19% vs 1.5%, higher mean leukocyte count: 13,143.3 vs 9910.3/mm3, higher mean neutrophils number: 10,402.5 vs 6779.8 /mm3 and lower mean lymphocyte count: 1693.9 vs 2079.3 /mm3. As results the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio was higher in systemic inflammatory phenotype: 6.6 vs 3.4 (p< 0.001). Anti-IL1 therapy was started more frequently in the systemic subgroup (26%) than in the isolated subset (7.5%) (p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis neutrophil count and lymphopenia were statistically associated with the systemic subset (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This results demonstrate the relevance of the systemic inflammatory phenotype, characterized by pleural effusions, confirming its analogy with autoinflammatory diseases, thus possibly requiring an eventual escalation of therapy to IL-1 inhibitors.

Prevalence and prognosis of pericardial effusion in patients affected by pectus excavatum: A case-control study.

BACKGROUND: The presence of pectus excavatum(PEX) has been occasionally associated with pericardial effusion. Aim of the present study was to compare incidence and prognosis of pericardial effusion in a group of unselected patients with PEX vs a control group. METHODS: From a prospective registry of consecutive patients who underwent chest CT for cardiovascular disease, subjects with a radiological diagnosis of PEX were retrospectively identified (cases); from the same registry patients (controls) without rib cage abnormalities were randomly selected, until a 1:2 ratio was reached. The presence of pericardial effusion at CT was quantified. Follow-up was obtained for a composite end-point: cardiac tamponade, need for pericardiocentesis, need for cardiac surgery for relapsing pericardial effusion. RESULTS: A total of 43 patients with PEX (20 females) and a control group of 86 cases (31 females) without rib cage abnormalities were identified. Pericardial effusion evaluated at CT was significatively more prevalent in patients with PEX vs control group, 37.2% vs 13.9% (p < 0.001), respectively; four patients with PEX (9.3%) had at least moderate pericardial effusion vs no subjects among the controls (p = 0.004). PEX diagnosis was significantly associated to pericardial effusion at multi-variate analysis (OR95%CI 10.91[3.47-34.29], p < 0.001). At a mean follow-up of 6.5 ± 3.4 years no pericardial events were recorded. CONCLUSION: Our findings support the higher prevalence of pericardial effusion in patients with PEX when compared to a control group. The absence of adverse pericardial events at follow-up suggest the good prognosis of these effusions, that in the appropriate clinical setting might not be considered "idiopathic".