Platform trial design for neurofibromatosis type 1, NF2-related schwannomatosis and non-NF2-related schwannomatosis: A potential model for rare diseases.

Background: Neurofibromatosis type 1, NF2-related schwannomatosis and non-NF2-related schwannomatosis (grouped under the abbreviation "NF") are rare hereditary tumor predisposition syndromes. Due to the low prevalence, variability in the range, and severity of manifestations, as well as limited treatment options, these conditions require innovative trial designs to accelerate the development of new treatments. Methods: Within European Patient-Centric Clinical Trial Platforms (EU-PEARL), we designed 2 platform-basket trials in NF. The trials were designed by a team of multidisciplinary NF experts and trial methodology experts. Results: The trial will consist of an observational and a treatment period. The observational period will serve as a longitudinal natural history study. The platform trial design and randomization to a sequence of available interventions allow for the addition of interventions during the trial. If a drug does not meet the predetermined efficacy endpoint or reveals unacceptable toxicities, participants may stop treatment on that arm and re-enter the observational period, where they can be re-randomized to a different treatment arm if eligible. Intervention-specific eligibility criteria and endpoints are listed in intervention-specific-appendices, allowing the flexibility and adaptability needed for highly variable and rare conditions like NF. Conclusions: These innovative platform-basket trials for NF may serve as a model for other rare diseases, as they will enhance the chance of identifying beneficial treatments through optimal learning from a small number of patients. The goal of these trials is to identify beneficial treatments for NF more rapidly and at a lower cost than traditional, single-agent clinical trials.

ERN GENTURIS tumour surveillance guidelines for individuals with neurofibromatosis type 1.

Background: Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is a multisystem genetic disorder, predisposing development of benign and malignant tumours. Given the oncogenic potential, long-term surveillance is important in patients with NF1. Proposals for NF1 care and its specific manifestations have been developed, but lack integration within routine care. This guideline aims to assimilate available information on NF1 associated tumours (based on evidence and/or expert opinion) to assist healthcare professionals in undertaking tumour surveillance of NF1 individuals. Methods: By comprehensive literature review, performed March 18th 2020, guidelines were developed by a NF1 expert group and patient representatives, conversant with clinical care of the wide NF1 disease spectrum. We used a modified Delphi procedure to overcome issues of variability in recommendations for specific (national) health care settings, and to deal with recommendations based on indirect (scarce) evidence. Findings: We defined proposals for personalised and targeted tumour management in NF1, ensuring appropriate care for those in need, whilst reducing unnecessary intervention. We also incorporated the tumour-related psychosocial and quality of life impact of NF1. Interpretation: The guideline reflects the current care for NF1 in Europe. They are not meant to be prescriptive and may be adjusted to local available resources at the treating centre, both within and outside EU countries. Funding: This guideline has been supported by the European Reference Network on Genetic Tumour Risk Syndromes (ERN GENTURIS). ERN GENTURIS is funded by the European Union. DGE is supported by the Manchester NIHRBiomedical Research Centre (IS-BRC-1215-20007).

Incidence, prevalence and long-term progression of Goh algorithm rated interstitial lung disease in systemic sclerosis in two independent cohorts in flanders: A retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: The epidemiology of interstitial lung disease (ILD) in systemic sclerosis (SSc) in Belgium is unknown. In literature, its prevalence varies between 19% and 52% in limited/diffuse cutaneous SSc (LcSSc/DcSSc). However, its prevalence in "early" SSc (pre-clinically overt SSc without [yet] skin involvement), nor its incidence rate in SSc (LcSSc/DcSSc/"early" SSc) has ever been described. Against this background, we aimed to determine the prevalence/incidence (rate) and progression of ILD in SSc. METHODS: 12-year follow-up data of consecutive SSc patients, included in two Flemish cohorts (University Hospitals Ghent and Leuven), were retrospectively analysed. ILD was classified according to the simplified Goh algorithm. Progression of ILD was defined as a relative decline of FVC ≥10%, a combined relative decline of FVC 5-10% and DLCO ≥15%, or as an increase in HRCT extent. RESULTS: 722 patients (60% LcSSc/ 20% DcSSc/ 20% "early" SSc, median (IQR) follow-up 39 [12-80] months) had baseline HRCT. 243 were rated to have ILD at baseline and 39 during follow-up (prevalence of 34%/ incidence rate of 20.3/1000PY, 95%CI:14.5-27.8). Amongst those with baseline ILD, 60% had lung functional progression at five years of follow-up. In the "early" SSc subgroup, eight patients were rated to have ILD at baseline and three during follow-up (prevalence of 6%/ incidence rate of 5.8/1000 PY, 95%CI:1.2-17.0). CONCLUSION: Both LcSSc and DcSSc patients should be monitored for ILD evolution. The low prevalence and incidence of ILD in the "early" SSc subgroup may instruct future decisions on the construction of uniform patient follow-up pathways in "early" SSc.

Lessons learned from drug trials in neurofibromatosis: A systematic review.

Neurofibromatosis (NF) is the umbrella term for neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) and schwannomatosis (SWN). EU-PEARL aims to create a framework for platform trials in NF. The aim of this systematic review is to create an overview of recent clinical drug trials in NF, to identify learning points to guide development of the framework. We searched Embase, Medline and Cochrane register of trials on October 1, 2020 for publications of clinical drug trials in NF patients. We excluded publications published before 2010, systematic reviews, secondary analyses and studies with <10 patients. Data was extracted on manifestations studied, study design, phase, number of participating centres and population size. Full-text review resulted in 42 articles: 31 for NF1, 11 for NF2, none for SWN. Most NF1 trials focused on plexiform neurofibromas (32%). Trials in NF2 solely studied vestibular schwannomas. In NF1, single-arm trials (58%) were most common, and the majority was phase II (74%). For NF2 most trials were single-arm (55%) and exclusively phase II. For both diseases, trials were predominantly single-country and included five centres or less. Study population sizes were small, with the majority including ≤50 patients (74%). In conclusion, NF research is dominated by studies on a limited number out of the wide range of manifestations. We need more trials for cutaneous manifestations and high-grade gliomas in NF1, manifestations other than vestibular schwannoma in NF2 and trials for SWN. Drug development in NF may profit from innovative trials on multiple interventions and increased international collaboration.

Ocular involvement in systemic sclerosis: A systematic literature review, it's not all scleroderma that meets the eye.

OBJECTIVES: Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a rare and complex autoimmune disorder characterized by microvascular damage and progressive fibrosis which affects the skin and multiple other organs. Much of the published data concerning SSc and the eye consists of single case reports or small case studies. This systematic review aims to provide an overview of the current level of evidence for SSc-related ocular changes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted using 3 electronic databases, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A combination of following keywords was used: "Systemic Sclerosis" and ophthalmology-related search terms, including the keywords "Eye", "Ocular" and "Ophthalmic". All articles were screened by 2 independent reviewers at title, abstract and full text level. We solely included case-control studies that investigated specific ocular findings in SSc patients compared to healthy controls. RESULTS: Nine of 270 articles were retained. Dry eye symptoms are associated with SSc, whereas objective signs (Schirmer I testing) show conflicting results. There is insufficient evidence of SSc-related changes to the central corneal thickness. In terms of posterior segment involvement, choroidal vasculature appears to be affected to greater extent than the retinal microcirculation. However, the limited number of patients included in the studies renders it hazardous to draw overall conclusions. CONCLUSIONS: There is a paucity of well-designed case-control studies investigating possible ocular involvement in SSc. Our systematic review demonstrates limited proven associations between SSc and ocular abnormalities, mainly in terms of dry eye symptoms and choroidal thickness. Future standardized prospective studies are needed to clarify the impact of the disease on the eye.