Tolvaptan for hyponatremia with preserved sodium pool in critically ill patients.

BACKGROUND: Hyponatremia is the most common electrolyte disturbance in hospitalized patients, and it represents a well-established risk factor for ICU/hospital mortality. The majority of hyponatremic states are associated with elevated arginine vasopressin levels and a preserved sodium pool. Conventional treatment is either not pathophysiologically oriented or of limited effectiveness. The aim of the present study is to investigate the use of enteral Tolvaptan in critically ill hyponatremic patients. METHODS: This is a retrospective observational study in a general ICU. Patients with preserved sodium pool hyponatremia refractory to conventional therapy were enrolled. The hemodynamic, renal, and hepatic functions, together with sodium and water balance as close as possible to the drug administration and up to 72 h thereafter, were analyzed. The main outcome was a serum sodium increase of ≥ 4 mmol/L in 24 h; secondary endpoints were the ability to maintain serum sodium at 24 and 72 h, a decrease in urine sodium concentration and an increase in sodium-free diuresis. RESULTS: 38 patients were enrolled. The average dose of enteral Tolvaptan was 7.5 mg. 31 patients (81.6 %) increased their serum sodium >4 mmol/l/24 h; the average increase was 6.7 ± 3.4 mmol/l during the first 24 h (p < 0.001 vs baseline), and this was sustained at 72 h. No adverse effects were reported. Plasma sodium (R = -0.622, p < 0.001), urine sodium (R = -0.345, p < 0.001), central venous oxygen saturation (R = 0.401, p = 0.013), and BUN (R = -0.416, p = 0.031) before Tolvaptan were all significantly correlated with the absolute increase in serum sodium after the administration. CONCLUSIONS: Enteral administration of Tolvaptan seems effective in the treatment of hyponatremia with preserved sodium pool in critically ill patients. Even if the study was underpowered to detect significant side effects or complications of unwarranted fast corrections of hyponatremia, we report no complications.

Epidural analgesia does not influence anastomotic leakage incidence after open colorectal surgery for cancer: A retrospective study on 1,474 patients.

BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leakage is a major cause of morbidity after colorectal surgery. Epidural analgesia is the most effective method for postoperative pain relief after major abdominal surgery. Anyhow, its effect on anastomotic leakage rate is still controversial. This study aimed to compare epidural versus intravenous analgesia as risk factor for anastomotic leakage requiring reoperation in patients undergoing open colorectal surgery for cancer. METHODS: A retrospective study on 1,474 patients was performed. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to study the relation between primary and secondary factors of risk and anastomotic leakage occurrence within 30 days after elective operation. RESULTS: Overall 30-day anastomotic leakage requiring reoperation was 4.9% (95%CI: 3.8-6.0%). No difference in anastomotic leakage occurrence was observed between the epidural analgesia group and the intravenous analgesia group (Hazard ratio: 0.94; 95%CI: 0.53-1.67%; P = 0.8338). Females had a rate of anastomotic leakage 43% lower than males (P = 0.0301). The diverting stoma resulted to be protective for anastomotic leakage occurrence (P = 0.0052). AL significantly increased postoperative median length of stay but not in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Epidural analgesia does not influence the AL risk after open colorectal surgery for cancer.

Epidural analgesia for cytoreductive surgery with peritonectomy and heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: To evaluate epidural analgesia role after cytoreductive surgery with peritonectomy combined with heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy. METHODS: 101 patients were retrospectively studied (between 2008 and 2012) to evaluate epidural analgesia effectiveness, tolerability and safety in this surgical context through the assessment of pain, detection of adverse events (nausea, vomiting, itching), temporary motor block, respiratory failure and coagulation profile in the post-operative period. RESULTS: The median duration of epidural analgesia was 5 [range 1-10] days. As regards pain relief, the median verbal numerical scale scores at rest and on movement were below 2 and 5 until the fifth post-operative day, respectively. 13% of patients suffered nausea, 4% vomit, and 1% itching. No bradycardia or respiratory failure event was reported. 9.9% of patients had hypotension episodes. Coagulation reached normality only 3-4 days after surgery. 5 risky accidental dislodgments of epidural catheter occurred (prothrombine time INR > 1.5) without neurological complications. CONCLUSIONS: Epidural analgesia ensures adequate pain relief and is well tolerated by patients after cytoreductive surgery with peritonectomy combined with heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Hypotension is common in this context and careful monitoring of coagulation parameters, especially in the first 3 days after surgery, is advisable to reduce the risk of neuraxial complications.