Surgery versus Endoscopy for the Management of Painful Chronic Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.

BACKGROUND: Debate exists regarding the optimal treatment for painful chronic pancreatitis (CP). This meta-analysis aims to determine the outcomes of surgical intervention as compared to endoscopy in patients with painful CP. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis including studies from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Databases (1995 onwards) was done by two independent reviewers using PRISMA guidelines. Primary outcome was pain relief. RESULTS: Among 8,479 studies, three were randomized trials, comprising a total of 199 patients. Compared with endoscopy, surgery was associated with a lower Izbicki score, both at medium term (mean difference (MD) 21.46, 95% confidence interval (CI) 13.48-29.43, p < 0.00001) and long term (MD: 17.80, 95% CI: 8.36-27.23, p = 0.0002). A higher proportion of surgical patients had some sort of pain relief compared with those who had endoscopy, both at medium term (72% vs. 46%, RR: 1.51, 95% CI: 1.19-1.90, p = 0.0006) and long term (73% vs. 47%, RR: 1.50, 95% CI: 1.19-1.89, p = 0.0007). Complete pain relief was more common in the surgical group compared to the endoscopy group, both at medium term (33% vs. 17%, RR: 1.97, 95% CI: 1.16-3.36, p = 0.01) and long term (35% vs. 18%, RR: 1.92, 95% CI: 1.15-3.20, p = 0.01). The pooled crossover rate from endoscopy to surgery was 22% (22/99). CONCLUSIONS: Surgical treatment in patients with painful CP leads to better pain control, requiring fewer interventions as compared to endoscopic treatment.

Undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma of the spleen: a case report and literature review.

BACKGROUND: Undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma is an uncommon sarcoma and its presence in the spleen is even rarer, with only a handful of cases reported in English literature. It is typically only diagnosed following histological analysis. Its rarity also means that there is little consensus over ideal management. CASE PRESENTATION: This report presents a case of a 40-year-old Caucasian male who was found to have a splenic mass after presenting with non-specific abdominal pain and generalized malaise. Numerous imaging modalities were used which demonstrated a large partially solid and partially cystic lesion in spleen with no evidence of metastasis. As core biopsies were undiagnostic, he was planned for a diagnostic and therapeutic splenectomy. However, despite magnetic resonance imaging 11 days prior to his operation showed no evidence of liver metastasis, a massive splenic tumour with hepatic metastases was identified intraoperatively. An open splenectomy, distal pancreatectomy and liver metastasectomy was hence carried out. Histological analysis confirmed liver metastasis secondary to a splenic undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma. The patient recovered well and was discharged home. He presented again three weeks after his operation with lower back pain, abdominal pain and fever. Computed tomography demonstrated extensive recurrent disease burden in the peritoneum and liver. The patient passed away a month after surgery. CONCLUSION: Splenic undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma is a rare tumour which may pose a significant diagnostic challenge on both clinical and histopathological grounds. Following diagnosis and treatment, its aggressive nature often results in a poor prognosis. Current literature fails to delineate any superior management strategy to increase survival.

Shifting concepts in the management of colorectal liver metastases.

Management of patients with colorectal liver metastases has evolved considerably due to a better understanding of the biology of the disease with concurrent improvements in surgical techniques, oncological strategies and radiological interventions. This review article examines the factors that have contributed to this radical change. Management will be discussed in relation to chemotherapy, surgery and interventional radiology. The addition of chemotherapy and biological agents has greatly extended the reach and scope of surgery. Parenchymal sparing resections, repeat resections, two stage hepatectomy and Associating Liver Partition and Portal Vein ligation are all available to the hepatobiliary surgeon who deals with colorectal liver metastases. Interventional radiology techniques like liver venous deprivation may also replace established surgical practice. Whilst traditionally it was thought that only a few liver metastases could be treated effectively, nowadays tumour number is no longer a limiting factor provided enough functioning liver can be spared and the patient can tolerate the operation.

Liver Transplantation for Biliary Atresia in Adulthood: Single-Centre Surgical Experience.

BACKGROUND: Biliary atresia (BA) is the most common indicator for liver transplant (LT) in children, however, approximately 22% will reach adulthood with their native liver, and of these, half will require transplantation later in life. The aim of this study was to analyse the surgical challenges and outcomes of patients with BA undergoing LT in adulthood. METHODS: Patients with BA requiring LT at the age of 16 or older in our unit between 1989 and 2020 were included. Pretransplant, perioperative variables and outcomes were analysed. Pretransplant imaging was reviewed to assess liver appearance, spontaneous visceral portosystemic shunting (SPSS), splenomegaly, splenic artery (SA) size, and aneurysms. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients who underwent LT for BA fulfilled the inclusion criteria, at a median age of 24 years. The main indicators for LT were synthetic failure and recurrent cholangitis. In total, 57.6% had significant enlargement of the SA, 21% had multiple SA aneurysm, and SPSS was present in 72.7% of the patients. Graft and patient survival at 1, 5, and 10 years was 97.1%, 91.2%, 91.2% and 100%, 94%, 94%, respectively Conclusions: Good outcomes after LT for BA in young patients can be achieved with careful donor selection and surgery to minimise the risk of complications. Identification of anatomical variants and shunting are helpful in guiding attitude at the time of transplant.

The difficult abdominal closure after paediatric intestinal transplantation: Use of abdominal rectus muscle fascia and literature review.

Primary abdominal wall closure after intestinal and multivisceral transplantation may not be possible because of loss of abdominal domain and/or graft size/abdominal cavity mismatch. Traditional closure techniques for the open abdomen may not be valid in these circumstances because of severe scarring of the abdominal wall from multiple previous surgeries in this particular group of patients. We present our initial experience with the use of non-vascularized abdominal rectus muscle fascia in two patients who underwent deceased donation and living-related combined liver and small bowel transplantation, respectively, and who could not be closed primarily. The donor fascia was attached to the recipient fascia in both patients. In either case, there was not enough skin cover for closure, the wound was left open, and a negative pressure dressing was applied. In both cases, over a period of 6 months after placement of the non-vascularized abdominal rectus muscle fascia, the wound contracted, granulation tissue gradually covered the wound, and healing occurred, giving an intact abdominal wall. The abdominal rectus muscle fascia from a deceased donor can be used in a definite procedure for closure of the abdominal wall either at the time of transplant or later when a suitable rectus muscle fascia graft becomes available.

Oligometastatic colorectal cancer: is single-site bony colorectal metastasis a treatable condition?

INTRODUCTION: A potentially resectable bony metastasis in the context of oligometastatic colorectal cancer is uncommon. Bony metastases are usually considered a late event with poor prognosis and generally associated with liver and/or lung metastases. INDEX CASE: A previously healthy 33-year-old gentleman, with no family history of colorectal cancer, presented with rectal bleeding and at colonoscopy had a biopsy-proven adenocarcinoma of the rectum, 7 cm from the anal verge. Imaging also showed an isolated bone metastasis in the left ischial tuberosity. Following recovery from an anterior resection and a segment 5 metastasectomy, he underwent resection of the bony metastasis with a left type 3 internal hemipelvectomy. Three years from the bony resection, there is no evidence of recurrence on imaging. DISCUSSION: Osseous metastases are usually treated with palliative intent with bisphosphonates or external radiation, with surgical fixation of pathological fractures in some cases. Median survival after diagnosis of bone metastases is less than 10 months. Surgery is perhaps the only way of potentially achieving cure in patients with single-site bony metastases from colorectal cancer. Reports of such surgery in the literature are however very scant. CONCLUSION: Our case is unusual and ongoing follow up is required. However, current disease-free status at conventional and functional imaging is encouraging. A multidisciplinary and indeed multicentre approach may be needed, and oligometastatic disease, even to a bone, may be amenable to curative surgical intervention in highly selected cases.