Transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect using intracardiac echocardiography: a two-center, retrospective study.

AIMS: We present the experience and long-term results of intracardiac echocardiography (ICE)-guided closure of ostium secundum atrial septal defects (ASDs) in two Italian centers and investigate its systematic applicability as the gold standard in routine clinical practice. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated all consecutive patients who underwent an ASD percutaneous closure procedure from March 2008 to February 2020. All patients underwent a preprocedural transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) evaluation. The closures were carried out under fluoroscopic and ICE guidance. A follow-up visit was performed at 1, 3 and 12 months, followed by telephone evaluations approximately every 2 years. RESULTS: Sixty-six patients (29% male individuals), mean age 43 ±â€Š16 years, were treated. In 15 cases, the TEE defect diameter was less than 10 mm, and in 8 of these patients, the ICE intraprocedural sizing increased the maximum diameter by more than 5 mm. Sizing balloon of the defect was performed in 51 cases; 2 patients received an ASD 38 mm device. Eight patients had multiple defects; in three of these, it was necessary to apply two devices. Four patients showed nonsignificant residual shunt; no complications related to the use of ICE were observed. One patient presented the migration of the ASD device into the abdominal aorta, percutaneously retrieved with a snare. No major complications were recorded during the entire follow-up period. CONCLUSION: This study confirms that ICE monitoring during ASD percutaneous closure is well tolerated and effective; it might be achievable as a routine gold standard by operators willing to use ICE systematically in all transcatheter closure interventions of interatrial communications.

Estimating multimodal brain variability in schizophrenia spectrum disorders: A worldwide ENIGMA study.

Objective: Schizophrenia is a multifaceted disorder associated with structural brain heterogeneity. Despite its relevance for identifying illness subtypes and informative biomarkers, structural brain heterogeneity in schizophrenia remains incompletely understood. Therefore, the objective of this study was to provide a comprehensive insight into the structural brain heterogeneity associated with schizophrenia. Methods: This meta- and mega-analysis investigated the variability of multimodal structural brain measures of white and gray matter in individuals with schizophrenia versus healthy controls. Using the ENIGMA dataset of MRI-based brain measures from 22 international sites with up to 6139 individuals for a given brain measure, we examined variability in cortical thickness, surface area, folding index, subcortical volume and fractional anisotropy. Results: We found that individuals with schizophrenia are distinguished by higher heterogeneity in the frontotemporal network with regard to multimodal structural measures. Moreover, individuals with schizophrenia showed higher homogeneity of the folding index, especially in the left parahippocampal region. Conclusions: Higher multimodal heterogeneity in frontotemporal regions potentially implies different subtypes of schizophrenia that converge on impaired frontotemporal interaction as a core feature of the disorder. Conversely, more homogeneous folding patterns in the left parahippocampal region might signify a consistent characteristic of schizophrenia shared across subtypes. These findings underscore the importance of structural brain variability in advancing our neurobiological understanding of schizophrenia, and aid in identifying illness subtypes as well as informative biomarkers.

Zero Fluoroscopy Arrhythmias Catheter Ablation: A Trend Toward More Frequent Practice in a High-Volume Center.

Background: Awareness of radiation exposure risks associated to interventional cardiology procedures is growing. The availability of new technologies in electrophysiology laboratories has reduced fluoroscopy usage during arrhythmias ablations. The aim of this study was to describe procedures with and without X-Rays and to assess feasibility, safety, and short-term efficacy of zero fluoroscopy intervention in a high-volume center oriented to keep exposure to ionizing radiation as low as reasonably achievable. Methods: Cardiac catheter ablations performed in our hospital since January 2017 to June 2021. Results: A total of 1,853 procedures were performed with 1,957 arrhythmias treated. Rate of fluoroless procedures was 15.4% (285 interventions) with an increasing trend from 8.5% in 2017 to 22.9% of first semester 2021. The most frequent arrhythmia treated was atrial fibrillation (646; 3.6% fluoroless) followed by atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (644; 16.9% fluoroless), atrial flutter (215; 8.8% fluoroless), ventricular tachycardia (178; 17.4% fluoroless), premature ventricular contraction (162; 48.1% fluoroless), and accessory pathways (112; 31.3% fluoroless). Although characteristics of patients and operative details were heterogeneous among treated arrhythmias, use of fluoroscopy did not influence procedure duration. Moreover, feasibility and efficacy were 100% in fluoroless ablations while the rate of major complications was very low and no different with or without fluoroscopy (0.45 vs. 0.35%). Conclusion: Limiting the use of X-Rays is necessary, especially when the available technologies allow a zero-use approach. A lower radiation exposure may be reached, reducing fluoroscopy usage whenever possible during cardiac ablation procedures with high safety, full feasibility, and efficacy.

Cardiopulmonary Support During Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias With Hemodynamic Instability: The Role of Inducibility.

Background: Catheter ablation is a treatment option for sustained ventricular tachycardias (VTs) that are refractory to pharmacological treatment; however, patients with fast VT and electrical storm (ES) are at risk for cardiogenic shock. We report our experience using cardiopulmonary support with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) during catheter ablation of VT. Methods: Sixty-two patients (mean age 68 ± 9 years; 94% male) were referred to our center for catheter ablation of repeated episodes of hemodynamically unstable ventricular arrhythmias. ES was defined as the occurrence of three or more VT/ventricular fibrillation episodes requiring electrical cardioversion or defibrillation in a 24-h period. All patients had hemodynamically unstable VTs. Results: Thirty-one patients (group 1) performed catheter ablation without ECMO support and 31 patients (group 2) with ECMO support. At the end of the procedure, ventricular inducibility was not performed in 16 patients of group 1 (52%) due to significant hemodynamic instability. Ventricular inducibility was performed in the other 15 patients (48%); polymorphic VTs were inducible in eight patients. In group 2, VTs were not inducible in 29 patients (93%); polymorphic VTs were inducible in two patients. The median follow-up duration was 24 months. Four patients of group 1 (13%) and five patients of group 2 (16%) died due to refractory heart failure. An implantable cardioverter-defibrillator intervention (shock or antitachycardia pacing) was documented in 13 patients of group 1 (42%) and six patients of group 2 (19%). Conclusions: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support during catheter ablation for hemodynamically unstable VTs is a useful tool to prevent acute procedural heart failure and to reduce arrhythmic burden.

Treatment effect variability in brain stimulation across psychiatric disorders: A meta-analysis of variance.

Noninvasive brain stimulation methods such as transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) are promising add-on treatments for a number of psychiatric conditions. Yet, some of the initial excitement is wearing off. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) have found inconsistent results. This inconsistency is suspected to be the consequence of variation in treatment effects and solvable by identifying responders in RCTs and individualizing treatment. However, is there enough evidence from RCTs that patients respond differently to treatment? This question can be addressed by comparing the variability in the active stimulation group with the variability in the sham group. We searched MEDLINE/PubMed and included all double-blinded, sham-controlled RCTs and crossover trials that used TMS or tDCS in adults with a unipolar or bipolar depression, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia spectrum disorder, or obsessive compulsive disorder. In accordance with the PRISMA guidelines to ensure data quality and validity, we extracted a measure of variability of the primary outcome. A total of 130 studies with 5748 patients were considered in the analysis. We calculated variance-weighted variability ratios for each comparison of active stimulation vs sham and entered them into a random-effects model. We hypothesized that treatment effect variability in TMS or tDCS would be reflected by increased variability after active compared with sham stimulation, or in other words, a variability ratio greater than one. Across diagnoses, we found only a minimal increase in variability after active stimulation compared with sham that did not reach statistical significance (variability ratio = 1.03; 95% CI, 0.97, 1.08, P = 0.358). In conclusion, this study found little evidence for treatment effect variability in brain stimulation, suggesting that the need for personalized or stratified medicine is still an open question.

Cardiopulmonary support in patients undergoing catheter ablation of poorly tolerated ventricular arrhythmias and electrical storm.

INTRODUCTION: Catheter ablation is an important treatment option for sustained ventricular arrhythmias (VA) that are refractory to pharmacological treatment; however, patients with fast VA or electrical storm (ES) are at risk for cardiogenic shock. We report our experience using cardiopulmonary support with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) during catheter ablation of VA. METHODS: Nineteen patients (mean age, 62 ± 10 years; 84% male) were referred to our center for CA of ES between January 2017 and April 2018. ES was defined as the occurrence of ≥3 ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation episodes requiring electrical cardioversion or defibrillation in a 24-hour period. ECMO support was implemented for all patients. RESULTS: CA of ES was completed in all patients. Activation mapping was performed for all VTs and substrate modification was performed by targeting sites identified by late/fragmented abnormal potentials. VTs were not inducible after ablation in 16 of 19 patients (84%). With regard to procedural complications, two patients underwent percutaneous angioplasty with stenting for a femoral artery dissection and one patient was treated for a dislodged ECMO arterial cannula and subsequent hemorrhagic shock. After a median follow-up of 10 months, three patients died from refractory heart failure and one patient died as a result of ES. Overall, the procedural success rate was 68% and the Kaplan-Meier mortality rate was 21%. CONCLUSIONS: ECMO support may be used for ablation procedures in patients with ES.

Bilateral left lateral ridge ablation increases the long-term success of patients ablated for atrial fibrillation.

AIMS: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is the cornerstone of catheter ablation in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). Studies reported that the PVI single procedure was able to achieve durable sinus rhythm without the need of antiarrhythmic drugs in 60-80% of patients with PAF. In this study, we report data regarding bilateral left lateral ridge ablation for PAF. METHODS: We retrospectively collected data of 120 consecutive patients (mean age 56 ±â€Š10 years; 62% male) referred to our center to perform PVI. In 60 patients we performed PVI (group 1) and in 60 patients performed PVI and bilateral left lateral ridge ablation (group 2). All patients performed a clinical follow-up after 24 months from the ablation procedure. RESULTS: PVI was achieved in all patients. The mean radiofrequency time to perform ablation on the left atrial appendage ostium was 216 ±â€Š49 s. In all patients of group 2 we obtained disappearance of local electrograms and the loss of local capture during pacing on posterior wall of left atrial appendage ridge. No significant differences were found between the two groups regarding mean contact force during ablation (14 ±â€Š4 vs. 15 ±â€Š4 g; groups 1 and 2, respectively, P = 0.34). At 24-month follow-up, single procedure success rate was significantly higher in group 2 compared with group 1 (88 vs. 74%, respectively; P = 0.03). No significant procedural complications were documented. CONCLUSION: Bilateral left lateral ridge ablation is a safe technique able to improve the success rate of PVI in patients with PAF.

Ablation of atrial fibrillation and esophageal injury: Role of bipolar and unipolar energy using a novel multipolar irrigated ablation catheter.

BACKGROUND: The circular nMARQ ablation catheter is a useful tool for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Some studies reported a high incidence of esophageal lesions by using this catheter. OBJECTIVE: The primary aim of this study was to compare the effects on the esophageal wall of bipolar and unipolar energy applied by the nMARQ ablation catheter during AF ablation. METHODS: Forty patients (mean age 53 ± 8 years; 26 [65%] men) were enrolled to perform PVI for symptomatic atrial fibrillation. Thirty patients underwent PVI with the nMARQ catheter (group 1) and 10 patients with the ThermoCool Surround Flow catheter (group 2). The procedures were performed with the CARTO3 system. All patients received an esophageal temperature probe. In group 1, we delivered unipolar energy on the left posterior wall with power between 15 and 18 W or bipolar energy with power at 15 W. In group 2, unipolar energy was delivered on the posterior atrial wall at 20-25 W power. All patients underwent esophagoscopy the day after the procedure. RESULTS: No patients had procedural complications. In group 1, bipolar energy was associated with a lower esophageal temperature increase as compared with unipolar energy (0.6°C [range 0-2.2°C] vs 2.1°C [range 0.8-2.9°C]; P < .001). Unipolar energy was associated with a similar temperature increase in the 2 groups (1.9°C [range 0.8-2.9°C] in group 1 vs 1.7°C [range 0.7-2.9°C] in group 2; P = .49). No patient had esophageal injury. CONCLUSION: The use of the nMARQ catheter for PVI is feasible and safe. The use of 15 W for bipolar energy or 15-18 W for unipolar energy is an optimal strategy to avoid esophageal injury with this new catheter.