Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 7 de 7
1.
Neurol Sci ; 45(5): 2353-2363, 2024 May.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38424386

INTRODUCTION: In 2020, the Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA) approved the reimbursement of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), including fremanezumab, in patients with a Migraine Disability Assessment Scale (MIDAS) score ≥ 11, with prescription renewals for up to 12 months in patients with ≥ 50% reduction in MIDAS score at Months 3 and 6. In this sub-analysis of the Pan-European Real Life (PEARL) study, we provide real-world data on fremanezumab use in Italian routine clinical practice (EUPAS35111). METHODS: This first interim analysis for Italy was conducted when 300 enrolled adult patients with episodic or chronic migraine (EM, CM) completed 6 months of treatment with fremanezumab. The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients achieving ≥ 50% reduction in monthly migraine days (MMD) across the 6 months post-fremanezumab initiation. Secondary endpoints include: proportion of patients achieving ≥ 50% reduction in MIDAS score at Months 3 and 6, and mean change from baseline across Months 1-6 in MMD and headache-related disability. Safety was assessed through adverse events (AEs) reported. RESULTS: Of 354 patients enrolled at Italian centers, 318 (EM, 35.5%, CM, 64.5%) were included in the effectiveness analysis. Of patients with available data, 109 (61.2%) achieved the primary endpoint. 61.0% and 65.1% achieved ≥ 50% reduction in MMDs at Months 3 and 6, respectively; 79.9% and 81.0% experienced ≥ 50% reduction in MIDAS at the same timepoints. CONCLUSION: Fremanezumab was effective and well-tolerated over the first 6 months of treatment, with approximately 80% of patients meeting Italian criteria for treatment continuation at Months 3 and 6.


Antibodies, Monoclonal , Migraine Disorders , Adult , Humans , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Migraine Disorders/drug therapy , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
2.
Curr Med Res Opin ; 35(9): 1545-1554, 2019 09.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30924392

Objectives: Understanding migraine management using data from a sample of patients representative of the Italian general adult population.Methods: Retrospective analysis on IQVIA Italian Longitudinal Patient Database. Two cohorts were created. (a) The triptan user cohort included patients with triptan prescriptions between November 2015 and October 2016. Migraine days were estimated counting triptan and indometacin/caffeine/prochlorperazine (ICP) pills prescribed during the 6 months following first triptan prescription. Patients were categorized as having episodic (EM) or chronic (CM) migraine based on the number of migraine days following International Classification of Headache Disorders criteria. (b) The migraine preventive treatment (MPT) user cohort included patients with MPT prescriptions during the period June 2016-May 2017. MPTs considered included beta-blockers, calcium-channel blockers, antiepileptics, antidepressants and antiserotoninergics. Migraine days experienced by MPTs users were estimated counting triptan and ICP pills prescribed during the 6 months following the most recent MPT prescription, while the number of MPT switches was estimated based on MPT prescriptions during the previous two years.Results: There were 9461 patients with triptan prescriptions to treat migraine acute attacks, which accounted yearly for 0.8% of general adult population. CM patients accounted for 3% of triptan users. There were 2004 patients prescribed with MPTs, which accounted for 0.16% of general adult population. Overall, among MPT users, 291 (15%) were still experiencing at least four migraine days/month, with this proportion increasing with the increase in the number of MPT switches.Conclusions: Results from this study suggest an unmet need in the management of migraine: too many patients did not receive MPTs, with this potentially due to several reasons requiring further investigations. Furthermore, even among patients receiving MPTs, disease control level with now available drugs seems to be sub-optimal.


Migraine Disorders/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Caffeine/administration & dosage , Female , Humans , Indomethacin/administration & dosage , Italy , Male , Middle Aged , Migraine Disorders/prevention & control , Prochlorperazine/administration & dosage , Retrospective Studies , Tryptamines/therapeutic use
3.
Breast ; 32: 256-265, 2017 Apr.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28108072

OBJECTIVE: Despite the scientific evidence undoubtedly influencing current guidelines on the management of metastatic Breast cancer (mBC), marketing research data suggests this may not be reflected in EU prescribing behavior. Specifically we would like to understand the use of combination chemotherapy vs monotherapy in mBC patients. METHODOLOGY: This study is based on IMS Oncology Analyzer™, a web-based physician panel survey set-up by IMS Health, a global company which specializes in health care information including market research data. Analysis was carried out on prescribing behavior reflected in marketing research data from IMS source (from MAT Q42013 till MAT Q32014) and comparing the data with the current guidelines recommendation in mBC (ESO-ESMO 2nd international consensus guidelines). RESULTS: In 1st line mBC around 17% of patients are treated with combination chemotherapy drugs. The combination chemotherapy are essentially anthracycline based than taxane based. In 2nd+ line mBC a higher proportion of monotherapy (chemotherapy+/-biologics) is being used. CONCLUSION: Despite the recommendation provided by current ESMO guidelines on mBC treatments, indicating the sequential use of single cytotoxic agents is a considerable alternative to standard multidrug chemotherapy regimens, marketing research data suggests this may not be reflected in EU prescribing behavior.


Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Drug Prescriptions/statistics & numerical data , Marketing , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Anthracyclines/therapeutic use , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Bridged-Ring Compounds/therapeutic use , Europe , Female , Humans , Neoplasm Metastasis , Taxoids/therapeutic use
4.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ; 78(4): 429-36, 2014 Apr.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24440509

In the European component of the Regional Resistance Surveillance study for 2011, a total of 21 countries were monitored for antimicrobial resistance patterns including Belgium, Bulgaria (BU), Croatia, Czech Republic, France (F), Germany (GE), Greece (GR), Ireland (IR), Israel (IS), Italy (IT), Poland (PO), Portugal (PT), Romania (RO), Russia (RU), Slovakia (SK), Slovenia, Spain, Sweden (SW), Turkey (T), Ukraine, and United Kingdom. Results from testing 12,572 strains (100 [BU] to 1535 [F] per nation) were interpreted by contemporary published breakpoints. Samples from 47 hospitals were reference tested against agents such as amikacin (AMK), cefoperazone/sulbactam (C/S), colistin (COL), levofloxacin, linezolid (LZD), tigecycline (TIG), vancomycin (VAN), and 21 others. Among Staphylococcus aureus, LZD (MIC90, 2 µg/mL), TIG (MIC90, 0.12 µg/mL), and VAN (MIC90, 1 µg/mL) exhibited complete coverage and methicillin resistance rates among nations (average, 31%) ranged from 0.9% (SW) to 60.0-60.2% (PT, SK). Seven LZD-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci (only 1.1% resistance overall) were noted in 5 nations, and a Staphylococcus simulans strain (MIC, 8 µg/mL from RO) had L3 mutations (N130D, G152A, F147S, A157R); also 6 LZD-resistant enterococci were detected in 3 countries (GE, IR, T). VAN-resistant enterococci (10% overall; 84% VanA) were found in 14 countries, highest in GE and IR (23.0%). The ESBL phenotype rate for Escherichia coli was 20.1% (range, 0.9% [SW] to 70.0-89.7% [BU, RU]), best inhibited by COL (100.0% S), TIG (100.0%), AMK (83.3-94.1%), C/S (81.0%), and carbapenems (>99.0%; resistant strains in IS and T). Klebsiella spp. had greater ESBL rates (45.7% overall, range 2.5-100.0%), as well as carbapenem resistance (8.3% overall, greatest in BU, GR, IS, IT, PO, RO, RU, T). Non-fermentative Gram-negative bacilli (Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter [ACB]) were generally less susceptible, except against COL (99.2-99.6% S) and TIG (95.0% inhibited at ≤2 µg/mL; ACB only). The following carbapenemases were detected: VIM-1 (2 countries); IMP-1 (1 from T); KPC-2 or -3 (2 countries); VIM-4 (1 from PO), NDM-1 (2 in RO; 2 centers); and OXA-48 or -162 (5 from T; 2 centers). European surveillance sampling demonstrates a wide array of resistant isolates, less prevalent among Gram-positive cocci that remain inhibited by several available agents. However, beta-lactamase-mediated mechanisms have spread widely among Gram-negative bacilli, especially across the Eastern and Southern European nations, severely limiting infection chemotherapy and necessitating escalated antimicrobial stewardship.


Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Epidemiological Monitoring , Gram-Negative Bacteria/drug effects , Gram-Positive Bacteria/drug effects , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Bacterial Infections/epidemiology , Europe/epidemiology , Gram-Negative Bacteria/isolation & purification , Gram-Positive Bacteria/isolation & purification , Humans , Microbial Sensitivity Tests
5.
Braz. j. infect. dis ; 17(6): 672-681, Nov.-Dec. 2013. tab
Article En | LILACS | ID: lil-696969

OBJECTIVE: To establish a resistance (R) surveillance program monitoring antimicrobial susceptibility patterns in Latin America (LATAM; Argentina [ARG], Brazil [BRA], Chile, Colombia [CBA], Costa Rica, Ecuador [ECU], Guatemala [GUA], Mexico [MEX], Panama [PAN], Peru, and Venezuela [VEN]). METHODS: In 2011, 4979 organisms were collected from 11 nations (20 laboratories) for susceptibility testing in a central laboratory design. Antimicrobials were tested by CLSI methods and results interpreted by CLSI and EUCAST breakpoints. Most common Gram-positive (Staphylococcus aureus [SA, 921], other staphylococci [CoNS; 299], enterococci [218], Streptococcus pneumoniae [SPN; 182], β-haemolytic streptococci [115]) and Gram-negative (E. coli [EC; 644], Klebsiella spp. [KSP; 517], Enterobacters [272], Pseudomonas aeruginosa [PSA; 586], Acinetobacters [ACB; 494]) pathogens were analyzed against linezolid (LZD), vancomycin (VAN), tigecycline (TIG), colistin (COL), cefoperazone/sulbactam (C/S), and amikacin (AMK). RESULTS: MRSA rates varied from 29% (CBA, BRA) to 79% (Peru); but LZD (MIC90, 2 mg/L), TIG (MIC90, 0.12mg/L) and VAN (MIC90, 1mg/L) covered all strains. Enterococci showed a 14% VRE rate, highest in BRA and MEX; all inhibited by TIG and daptomycin, but not LZD (three non-susceptible with G2576T mutations or cfr). Penicillin-R among SPN and viridans streptococci was 51.6 and 41.1%, respectively. LZD overall R against Gram-positives was 0.3%. High ESBL rates were observed in EC (54-71%) and KSP (>50%) from GUA, MEX and Peru, and six nations, respectively. Carbapenem-R in KSP was 9%, highest rates associated with KPC in BRA, CBA, ECU, PAN and VEN; also a NDM-1 in KSP from CBA. AMK, TIG, C/S and carbapenems were the broadest-spectrum agents tested against Enterobacteriaceae. Only COL inhibited >90% of PSA; COL and TIG (<2 mg/L) covered >85% of ACB. CONCLUSIONS: LATAM nations demonstrated variable levels of antimicrobial R especially among Enterobacteriaceae (β-lactamase-mediated), PSA and ACB. MRSA (48%), VRE (14%) and multidrug-R SPN were also regional therapeutic challenges.


Humans , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Gram-Negative Bacteria/drug effects , Gram-Positive Bacteria/drug effects , Population Surveillance , Gram-Negative Bacteria/classification , Gram-Positive Bacteria/classification , Latin America , Microbial Sensitivity Tests
6.
Braz J Infect Dis ; 17(6): 672-81, 2013.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24120834

OBJECTIVE: To establish a resistance (R) surveillance program monitoring antimicrobial susceptibility patterns in Latin America (LATAM; Argentina [ARG], Brazil [BRA], Chile, Colombia [CBA], Costa Rica, Ecuador [ECU], Guatemala [GUA], Mexico [MEX], Panama [PAN], Peru, and Venezuela [VEN]). METHODS: In 2011, 4979 organisms were collected from 11 nations (20 laboratories) for susceptibility testing in a central laboratory design. Antimicrobials were tested by CLSI methods and results interpreted by CLSI and EUCAST breakpoints. Most common Gram-positive (Staphylococcus aureus [SA, 921], other staphylococci [CoNS; 299], enterococci [218], Streptococcus pneumoniae [SPN; 182], ß-haemolytic streptococci [115]) and Gram-negative (E. coli [EC; 644], Klebsiella spp. [KSP; 517], Enterobacters [272], Pseudomonas aeruginosa [PSA; 586], Acinetobacters [ACB; 494]) pathogens were analyzed against linezolid (LZD), vancomycin (VAN), tigecycline (TIG), colistin (COL), cefoperazone/sulbactam (C/S), and amikacin (AMK). RESULTS: MRSA rates varied from 29% (CBA, BRA) to 79% (Peru); but LZD (MIC90, 2mg/L), TIG (MIC90, 0.12mg/L) and VAN (MIC90, 1mg/L) covered all strains. Enterococci showed a 14% VRE rate, highest in BRA and MEX; all inhibited by TIG and daptomycin, but not LZD (three non-susceptible with G2576T mutations or cfr). Penicillin-R among SPN and viridans streptococci was 51.6 and 41.1%, respectively. LZD overall R against Gram-positives was 0.3%. High ESBL rates were observed in EC (54-71%) and KSP (≥50%) from GUA, MEX and Peru, and six nations, respectively. Carbapenem-R in KSP was 9%, highest rates associated with KPC in BRA, CBA, ECU, PAN and VEN; also a NDM-1 in KSP from CBA. AMK, TIG, C/S and carbapenems were the broadest-spectrum agents tested against Enterobacteriaceae. Only COL inhibited >90% of PSA; COL and TIG (≤2mg/L) covered ≥85% of ACB. CONCLUSIONS: LATAM nations demonstrated variable levels of antimicrobial R especially among Enterobacteriaceae (ß-lactamase-mediated), PSA and ACB. MRSA (48%), VRE (14%) and multidrug-R SPN were also regional therapeutic challenges.


Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Gram-Negative Bacteria/drug effects , Gram-Positive Bacteria/drug effects , Population Surveillance , Gram-Negative Bacteria/classification , Gram-Positive Bacteria/classification , Humans , Latin America , Microbial Sensitivity Tests
7.
J Infect Dis ; 185(11): 1567-77, 2002 Jun 01.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12023762

The effects of a soluble trimeric CD40 ligand (CD40L) agonist on the expression of CD4 and CCR5 and on human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type 1 entry into and replication in human macrophages were investigated. CD40L increased the number of CD4 and CCR5 antibody-binding sites and the percentage of CD4- and CCR5-expressing cells. Infection of CD40L-stimulated macrophages with HIV-1 resulted in a marked increase of viral DNA with respect to controls, as demonstrated by polymerase chain reaction assay. HIV-1 p24 antigen analysis showed that peak viral production did not differ between CD40L-stimulated macrophages and controls. However, because of a prolonged life span, overall viral output was increased in CD40L-stimulated cultures. In addition, CD40L down-regulated the antiviral efficacy of compounds that inhibit HIV-1 reverse transcriptase. In conclusion, CD40L stimulation of macrophages can contribute to plasma virus load and favor the establishment of a pool of latently infected macrophages that can be reactivated to release virus.


CD4 Antigens/metabolism , CD40 Ligand/pharmacology , HIV-1/pathogenicity , Macrophages/virology , Receptors, CCR5/metabolism , CD40 Ligand/physiology , Cells, Cultured , Flow Cytometry , HIV Infections/virology , HIV-1/genetics , HIV-1/physiology , Humans , Macrophages/immunology , Recombinant Proteins/pharmacology , Virus Replication
...