RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Limited high-quality studies have compared robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) vs open retropubic radical prostatectomy. We sought to compare their postoperative outcomes in a randomized setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a single center, 354 men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer were assessed for eligibility; 342 were randomized (1:1). The primary outcome was 90-day complication rates. Functional outcomes and quality of life were assessed over 18 months, and oncological outcomes, biochemical recurrence-free survival, and additional treatment over 36 months. RESULTS: From 2014 to 18, 327 patients underwent surgery (retropubic radical prostatectomy = 156, RALP = 171). Complications occurred in 27 (17.3%) vs 19 (11.1%; P = .107). Patients undergoing RALP experienced lower median bleeding (250.0 vs 719.5 mL; P < .001) and shorter hospitalization time. Urinary EPIC (Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite) median scores were better for RALP over 18 months, with higher continence rate at 3 months (80.5% vs 64.7%; P = .002), 6 months (90.1% vs 81.6%; P = .036) and 18 months (95.4% vs 78.8%; P < .001). Sexual EPIC and Sexual Health Inventory for Men median scores were higher with RALP up to 12 months, while the potency rate was superior at 3 months (23.9% vs 5.3%; P = .001) and 6 months (30.6% vs 6.9%; P < .001). Quality of life over the 18 months and oncological outcomes over 36 months were not significantly different between arms. CONCLUSIONS: Complications at 90 days were similar. RALP showed superior sexual outcomes at 1 year, improved urinary outcomes at 18 months, and comparable oncological outcomes at 36 months. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Prospective Analysis of Robot-Assisted Surgery; NCT02292914. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02292914?cond=NCT02292914&draw=2&rank=1.
Asunto(s)
Laparoscopía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Prostatectomía , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Calidad de Vida , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Humanos , Masculino , Prostatectomía/métodos , Prostatectomía/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Laparoscopía/métodos , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Non-metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) is an important clinical stage of prostate cancer, prior to morbidity and mortality from clinical metastases. In particular, the introduction of novel androgen-receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSi) has changed the therapeutic landscape in nmCRPC. Given recent developments in this field, we update our recommendations for the management of nmCRPC. METHODS: A panel of 51 invited medical oncologists and urologists convened in May of 2021 with the aim of discussing and providing recommendations regarding the most relevant issues concerning staging methods, antineoplastic therapy, osteoclast-targeted therapy, and patient follow-up in nmCRPC. Panel members considered the available evidence and their practical experience to address the 73 multiple-choice questions presented. RESULTS: Key recommendations and findings include the reliance on prostate-specific antigen doubling time for treatment decisions, the absence of a clear preference between conventional and novel (i.e., positron-emission tomography-based) imaging techniques, the increasing role of ARSis in various settings, the general view that ARSis have similar efficacy. Panelists highlighted the slight preference for darolutamide, when safety is of greater concern, and a continued need to develop high-level evidence to guide the intensity of follow-up in this subset of prostate cancer. DISCUSSION: Despite the limitations associated with a consensus panel, the topics addressed are relevant in current practice, and the recommendations can help practicing clinicians to provide state-of-the-art treatment to patients with nmCRPC in Brazil and other countries with similar healthcare settings.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Próstata Resistentes a la Castración/terapia , Humanos , Masculino , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Antagonistas de Receptores Androgénicos/uso terapéutico , Consenso , Brasil , OsteoclastosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The HoLERBT (Holmium Laser En-bloc Resection of Bladder Tumors) has emerged as an alternative to classical TURBT (Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor). Recent randomized trial and meta-analysis corroborate with the benefits in pathological analysis, perioperative and long-term oncological outcomes.1-3 However, the treatment of large tumors and the technique of extraction from the bladder is a problem to be overcome.1,4 OBJECTIVE: To describe the laser resection of bladder tumors and demonstrate the feasibility of this procedure even for large tumors throughout a series of cases. It is also discussed the quality of the histopathological analysis. METHODS: A series of 8 cases randomized selected to be the pilot for a trial comparing TURBT and HoLERBT in large tumors (>3 cm) in progress was analyzed (Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials number RBR-67npwrk). The perioperative data and 1-year outcomes were assessed and the quality of histopathological analysis after morcellation was evaluated in terms of histopathology, grade, and stage. The entire procedure of one case is shown in a step-by-step video. RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 12.6 months. The mean age was 59.6 (42-85) years, and the mean tumor size was 4.7 (4-8) cm. All the resections were En-bloc. There were 2 cases of NMIBC, 4 cases of MIBC, 1 paraganglioma, and 1 adenocarcinoma. The histopathological analysis confirmed the presence of detrusor muscle layer and accurate diagnosis and staging in all cases (100%). There were no perioperative Clavien-Dindo > 1 complications, no blood transfusion, and no bladder perforations. The histopathology analysis reveals excellent quality without artifacts of fulguration. CONCLUSION: The holmium laser resection followed by morcellation of large bladder tumors is a feasible procedure. No complications occurred in our series of cases and all cases provided excellent material for histopathological analysis.
Asunto(s)
Láseres de Estado Sólido , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria , Cistectomía/métodos , Estudios de Factibilidad , Holmio , Humanos , Láseres de Estado Sólido/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/patología , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/cirugíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in muscle-invasive urothelial bladder cancer (MIBC) has been adopted as a standard of care related to better survival outcomes. However, there is a considerable number of patients who do not respond, experiencing toxicity and delay in the surgical treatment. Our aim is to find biomarkers of response that could be easily adopted in the clinical practice. METHODS: Between January 2009 and July 2016, 52 patients with MIBC were submitted to radical cystectomy after NAC. A tissue microarray containing 25 cases, who met the inclusion criteria was built for immunohistochemical analysis of Cytokeratins 5/6, 7, and 20, GATA3, Her2, EGFR, p63, p53, Carbonic-anhydrase IX (CAIX), MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2. The surgery was performed in a mean time of 58.7 (± 21) days after the end of the NAC. Fisher's exact test was used to analyze the relationship between response (≤pT1) and histopathological and immunohistochemical results and Kaplan-Meier curves were designed for survival analysis. RESULTS: Ten (40.0%) patients presented response to NAC. Histological variants of the urothelial carcinoma characterized by squamous, sarcomatous/rhabdoid, plasmacytoid, and micropapillary was present in 36.0% and none responded to NAC (P = .002). CAIX was expressed by 53.3% and none responded to NAC (P= .005). Lymph-node metastasis, divergent differentiation, and expression of cytokeratin 5/6 were related to short cancer specific survival. CONCLUSION: Histological variants and CAIX immune-expression are biomarkers of nonresponse to NAC of MIBC, and might be easily used in the clinical practice to select patients to be submitted to surgery upfront.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Transicionales , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/cirugía , Cistectomía/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Invasividad Neoplásica , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/patología , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/cirugía , Urotelio/patologíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To generate and present the survey results on critical issues relevant to screening, diagnosis, and staging tools for prostate cancer (PCa) focused on developing countries. METHODS: A total of 36 of 300 questions concern the main areas of interest of this paper: (1) screening, (2) diagnosis, and (3) staging for various risk levels of PCa in developing countries. A panel of 99 international multidisciplinary cancer experts voted on these questions to create recommendations for screening, diagnosing, and staging tools for PCa in areas of limited resources discussed in this manuscript. RESULTS: The panel voted publicly but anonymously on the predefined questions. Each question was deemed consensus if 75% or more of the full panel had selected a particular answer. These answers are based on panelist opinion not a literature review or meta-analysis. For questions that refer to an area of limited resources, the recommendations consider cost-effectiveness and the possible therapies with easier and greater access. Each question had five to seven relevant answers including two nonanswers. The results were tabulated in real time. CONCLUSION: The voting results and recommendations presented in this document can be used by physicians to support the screening, diagnosis, and staging of PCa in areas of limited resources. Individual clinical decision making should be supported by available data; however, as guidelines for screening, diagnosis, and staging of PCa in developing countries have not been developed, this document will serve as a point of reference when confronted with this disease.
Asunto(s)
Países en Desarrollo , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Consenso , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Humanos , Masculino , Tamizaje Masivo , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnósticoRESUMEN
Radical prostatectomy is a commonly adopted treatment for localized/locally advanced prostate cancer in men with a life expectancy of ten years or more. Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is comparable to open radical prostatectomy on cancer control and complication rates; however, new evidence suggests that RARP may have better functional outcomes, especially with respect to urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction. Some of the surgical steps of RARP are not adequately described in published literature and, as such, may have an impact on the final outcomes of the procedure. We organized a Brazilian experts' panel to evaluate best practices in RARP. The confection of the recommendations broadly involved: selection of the experts; establishment of working groups; systematic review of the literature and elaboration of a questionnaire; and construction of the final text with the approval of all participants. The participants reviewed the publications in English from December 2019 to February 2020. A one-round Delphi technique was employed in 188 questions. Five reviewers worked on the final recommendations using consensual and non-consensual questions. We found 59.9% of questions with greater than 70% agreement that were considered consensual. Non-consensual questions were reported according to the responses. The recommendations were based on evidence-based literature and individual perceptions adapted to the Brazilian reality, although some issues remain controversial. We believe that these recommendations may help urologists involved in RARP and hope that future discussions on this surgical procedure may evolve over the ensuing years.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Próstata , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Consenso , Humanos , Masculino , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Próstata , Prostatectomía , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
The objective of this study is to report the first multicentric Brazilian series and learning curve of robotic radical cystectomy (RARC) with related intra- and postoperative outcomes. We retrospectively analyzed 37 RARC prospectively collected at four different centers in Brazil, from 2013 to 2019. We analyzed the patient's demographics, pathological tumor, and nodal status, as well as intra- and postoperative outcomes. Statistical analysis was performed with the IBM (SPSS version 25) software. Overall, 86% were male, and the median age was 69 years. 83% had muscle-invasive bladder cancer, and 17% a high-grade, recurrent non-muscle-invasive tumor. The median operative time was 420 min with 300 min as console time. Median blood loss was 350 ml and transfusion rate was 10%. In 68% of the cases, we performed an intracorporeal Bricker urinary diversion, 24% intracorporeal neobladder, and 8% ureterostomy. Six patients (16%) had a Clavien 1-2, 8% had Clavien 3, 2.5% had a Clavien 4, and 5% had Clavien 5. The median length of hospital stay was 7 days. The final pathological exam pointed out pT0 in 16%, pT1 in 8%, pT2 in 32%, ≥ pT3 in 27%, and 16% pTis. 95% had negative surgical margins. The survival at 30, 90, and 180 days was 98%, 95%, and 95%, respectively. To our knowledge, this is the first multicentric series of RARC reporting the learning curve in Brazil; even if still representing a challenging procedure, RARC could be safely and effectively faced by experienced surgeons at centers with high volumes of robotic surgery.
Asunto(s)
Cistectomía/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/cirugía , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica/estadística & datos numéricos , Brasil , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Tempo Operativo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/patologíaAsunto(s)
Neoplasias del Pene/terapia , Humanos , Masculino , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/complicaciones , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/prevención & control , Vacunas contra Papillomavirus/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias del Pene/patología , Neoplasias del Pene/prevención & control , Neoplasias del Pene/virologíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The objective of the current article is to promote a literature revision of the relationship between the prevention of intraepithelial neoplasms (PeIN) and invasive penile cancer, and human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination, aiming to enumerate the pros and cons of immunization. RECENT FINDINGS: The immunization against the HPV is sufficiently safe and many countries have incorporated the vaccine to their immunization calendar. Compared with men, the sampling size and the evidence quality of scientific researches among the female population are more robust. Some randomized and nonrandomized studies suggest that vaccination reduces the incidence of genital warts and no PeIN and penile cancer cases were developed in the vaccinal group. However, 70% of patients can evolve with the neoplasia despite having been immunized and even among HPV infected patients, only 1% will develop cancer. SUMMARY: The studies about vaccination against HPV and prevention on penile cancer are conflicting and the main academic urology societies still have not incorporated vaccination of men in their guidelines. Future studies are necessary to confirm the efficiency and cost-benefit of the vaccine in men to prevent intraepithelial neoplasms and invasive penile cancer.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma in Situ/prevención & control , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/prevención & control , Vacunas contra Papillomavirus/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias del Pene/prevención & control , Carcinoma in Situ/virología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/complicaciones , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/virología , Neoplasias del Pene/virología , VacunaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of 2 bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) strains, BCG-Tice and BCG-Moreau, in the treatment of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed clinical data from patients treated with BCG for NMIBC at 3 academic centers. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW)-adjusted Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were used to compare recurrence-free (RFS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of patients in the 2 treatment groups. In addition, we performed exploratory analyses of treatment effect according to the receipt of adequate BCG treatment, high-risk disease, age, gender, smoking status, pathologic stage, and pathologic grade. RESULTS: A total of 321 (48.6%) patients were treated with BCG-Tice and 339 (51.4%) with BCG-Moreau. IPTW-adjusted Cox proportional hazard regression analysis did not show a difference in RFS (hazard ratio, 0.88; 95% confidence interval, 0.56-1.38; P = .58) or PFS (hazard ratio, 0.55; 95% confidence interval, 0.25-1.21, P = .14) between BCG-Tice and BCG-Moreau. On subgroup analyses, we could not identify an association of BCG strain with outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in RFS and PFS between BCG-Tice and BCG-Moreau strains in the adjuvant treatment of NMIBC. However, we confirmed the importance of maintenance therapy for achieving a sustainable response in patients with intermediate- and high-risk NMIBC.
Asunto(s)
Adyuvantes Inmunológicos/administración & dosificación , Vacuna BCG/administración & dosificación , Cistectomía , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/terapia , Administración Intravesical , Anciano , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/métodos , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/estadística & datos numéricos , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Retrospectivos , Vejiga Urinaria/patología , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/patología , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/cirugíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Serum cholinesterase (ChE) a serine hydrolase that catalyses the hydrolysis of esters of choline, is involved in cellular proliferation and differentiation, therefore affecting carcinogenesis. The aim of this study was to understand the prognostic role of preoperative serum ChE in patients with radiation-recurrent prostate cancer (CaP) treated with salvage radical prostatectomy (SRP). MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 214 patients with radiation-recurrent CaP treated with SRP from January 2007 to December 2015 at 5 academic centers. Patients were considered with abnormal/decreased ChE levels if <5 kU/l. Biochemical recurrence-free and metastases-free (MFS) survival analyses were performed. RESULTS: Median serum ChE level was 6.9 (interquartile range) 6-7.7) kU/l. Serum ChE level (<5 kU/l) was decreased in 25 (11.7%) patients. Decreased serum ChE level was associated with lower body mass index (P = 0.006) and metastasis to lymph nodes (P = 0.004). In multivariable analysis, continuous ChE was an independent predictor of MFS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.48, confidence interval [CI] 0.33-0.71, P < 0.001), overall survival (HR 0.68, CI 0.48-0.96, P = 0.03) and cancer-specific survival (HR 0.41, CI 0.2-0.84, P = 0.01). Serum ChE improved the C-index (by 2.54%) to 87.8% for prediction of overall survival and (by 3%) to 92% for prediction of MFS. CONCLUSION: Preoperative serum ChE is associated with the development of metastasis in patients with radiation-recurrent CaP who underwent SRP. The biological underpinning of this association with the biological and clinical aggressiveness of CaP needs to be further elucidated.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/secundario , Colinesterasas/sangre , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Prostatectomía/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Terapia Recuperativa , Adenocarcinoma/sangre , Adenocarcinoma/enzimología , Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Anciano , Biomarcadores de Tumor , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Metástasis Linfática , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/sangre , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/enzimología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/cirugía , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/enzimología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Factores de Riesgo , Tasa de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The purpose of the present study was to investigate the association of smoking with biochemical recurrence (BCR) and metastasis in radiation-recurrent prostate cancer (PCa) patients undergoing salvage radical prostatectomy (SRP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 214 patients treated with SRP for radiation-recurrent PCa in 5 tertiary referral centers were included from January 2007 to December 2015. Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to assess the time to BCR and metastasis. Pre- and postoperative multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression models were fitted. RESULTS: Overall, 120 (56.1%), 49 (22.9%), and 45 (21%) patients were never, former, and current smokers, respectively. Low-, medium-, and high-cumulative smoking exposure was registered in 59.8%, 16.4%, and 23.8% of cases, respectively. Patients with high cumulative smoking exposure had a significantly greater rate of a pathologic Gleason score of ≥ 8 (P = .01) and extracapsular extension (P = .004). Smoking status, cumulative smoking exposure, intensity, and duration were significantly associated with BCR-free survival (P < .001 for all). Smoking status, cumulative smoking exposure, and smoking intensity were significantly associated with metastasis-free survival (P = .03 for all). High cumulative smoking exposure was independently associated with BCR in both pre- (hazard ratio, 2.23; P = .001) and postoperative (hazard ratio, 1.64; P = .04) multivariable models adjusted for the effects of established clinicopathologic features. Smoking cessation did not affect either BCR- or metastasis-free survival (P = .56 and P = .40, respectively). CONCLUSION: High cumulative smoking exposure was associated with the biologic and clinical aggressiveness of PCa in patients treated with SRP for radiation-recurrent disease. Smoking is a modifiable risk factor that detrimentally affected the outcomes, even in patients with advanced PCa.
Asunto(s)
Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Terapia Recuperativa/métodos , Fumar/epidemiología , Anciano , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/etiología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/metabolismo , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/radioterapia , Antígeno Prostático Específico/metabolismo , Prostatectomía , Neoplasias de la Próstata/genética , Neoplasias de la Próstata/metabolismo , Neoplasias de la Próstata/radioterapia , Factores de Riesgo , Fumar/efectos adversosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES:: This study sought to determine the clinical and pathological factors associated with perioperative morbidity, mortality and oncological outcomes after multivisceral en bloc resection in patients with colorectal cancer. METHODS:: Between January 2009 and February 2014, 105 patients with primary colorectal cancer selected for multivisceral resection were identified from a prospective database. Clinical and pathological factors, perioperative morbidity and mortality and outcomes were obtained from medical records. Estimated local recurrence and overall survival were compared using the log-rank method, and Cox regression analysis was used to determine the independence of the studied parameters. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02859155. RESULTS:: The median age of the patients was 60 (range 23-86) years, 66.7% were female, 80% of tumors were located in the rectum, 11.4% had stage-IV disease, and 54.3% received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. The organs most frequently resected were ovaries and annexes (37%). Additionally, 30.5% of patients received abdominoperineal resection. Invasion of other organs was confirmed histologically in 53.5% of patients, and R0 resection was obtained in 72% of patients. The overall morbidity rate of patients in this study was 37.1%. Ureter resection and intraoperative blood transfusion were independently associated with an increased number of complications. The 30-day postoperative mortality rate was 1.9%. After 27 (range 5-57) months of follow-up, the mortality and local recurrence rates were 23% and 15%, respectively. Positive margins were associated with a higher recurrence rate. Positive margins, lymph node involvement, stage III/IV disease, and stage IV disease alone were associated with lower overall survival rates. On multivariate analysis, the only factor associated with reduced survival was lymph node involvement. CONCLUSIONS:: Multivisceral en bloc resection for primary colorectal cancer can be performed with acceptable rates of morbidity and mortality and may lead to favorable oncological outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Morbilidad , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Invasividad Neoplásica , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Vísceras/patología , Vísceras/cirugía , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine the clinical and pathological factors associated with perioperative morbidity, mortality and oncological outcomes after multivisceral en bloc resection in patients with colorectal cancer. METHODS: Between January 2009 and February 2014, 105 patients with primary colorectal cancer selected for multivisceral resection were identified from a prospective database. Clinical and pathological factors, perioperative morbidity and mortality and outcomes were obtained from medical records. Estimated local recurrence and overall survival were compared using the log-rank method, and Cox regression analysis was used to determine the independence of the studied parameters. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02859155. RESULTS: The median age of the patients was 60 (range 23-86) years, 66.7% were female, 80% of tumors were located in the rectum, 11.4% had stage-IV disease, and 54.3% received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. The organs most frequently resected were ovaries and annexes (37%). Additionally, 30.5% of patients received abdominoperineal resection. Invasion of other organs was confirmed histologically in 53.5% of patients, and R0 resection was obtained in 72% of patients. The overall morbidity rate of patients in this study was 37.1%. Ureter resection and intraoperative blood transfusion were independently associated with an increased number of complications. The 30-day postoperative mortality rate was 1.9%. After 27 (range 5-57) months of follow-up, the mortality and local recurrence rates were 23% and 15%, respectively. Positive margins were associated with a higher recurrence rate. Positive margins, lymph node involvement, stage III/IV disease, and stage IV disease alone were associated with lower overall survival rates. On multivariate analysis, the only factor associated with reduced survival was lymph node involvement. CONCLUSIONS: Multivisceral en bloc resection for primary colorectal cancer can be performed with acceptable rates of morbidity and mortality and may lead to favorable oncological outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Adulto Joven , Neoplasias Colorrectales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Morbilidad , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Invasividad Neoplásica , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Vísceras/patología , Vísceras/cirugíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Upper-tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a relatively uncommon disease with limited available evidence on specific topics. The purpose of this article was to review the previous literature to summarize the current knowledge about UTUC epidemiology, diagnosis, preoperative evaluation and prognostic assessment. METHODS: Using MEDLINE, a non-systematic review was performed including articles between January 2000 and February 2016. English language original articles, reviews and editorials were selected based on their clinical relevance. RESULTS: UTUC accounts for 5-10 % of all urothelial cancers, with an increasing incidence. UTUC and bladder cancer share some common risk factors, even if they are two different entities regarding practical, biological and clinical characteristics. Aristolochic acid plays an important role in UTUC pathogenesis in certain regions. It is further estimated that approximately 10 % of UTUC are part of the hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer spectrum disease. UTUC diagnosis remains mainly based on imaging and endoscopy, but development of new technologies is rapidly changing the diagnosis algorithm. To help the decision-making process regarding surgical treatment, extent of lymphadenectomy and selection of neoadjuvant systemic therapies, predictive tools based on preoperative patient and tumor characteristics have been developed. CONCLUSIONS: Awareness regarding epidemiology, diagnosis, preoperative evaluation and prognostic assessment changes is essential to correctly diagnose and manage UTUC patients, thereby potentially improving their outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/epidemiología , Neoplasias Colorrectales Hereditarias sin Poliposis/epidemiología , Neoplasias Renales/epidemiología , Neoplasias Ureterales/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/epidemiología , Ácidos Aristolóquicos/metabolismo , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/diagnóstico por imagen , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/patología , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/cirugía , Humanos , Neoplasias Renales/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Neoplasias Renales/cirugía , Pelvis Renal/diagnóstico por imagen , Pelvis Renal/patología , Pelvis Renal/cirugía , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Cuidados Preoperatorios , Pronóstico , Factores de Riesgo , Neoplasias Ureterales/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Ureterales/patología , Neoplasias Ureterales/cirugía , UreteroscopíaRESUMEN
Introdução: Classificações de risco baseadas em fatores preditivos de recorrência e progressão são essenciais para condutas no câncer de bexiga. Tabelas de risco combinam essas variáveis para uso clínico. As tabelas de risco da Organização Europeia para Pesquisa e Tratamento do Câncer (EORTC) são aceitas para esse propósito, mas nunca foram validadas no Brasil. Objetivos: Validar as tabelas de risco EORTC e criar uma classificação de risco baseada na população de pacientes acompanhados em um centro terciário de câncer. Métodos: Estudo retrospectivo de 561 pacientes submetidos a ressecção transuretral (RTU) de câncer de bexiga superficial de fevereiro de 2005 a junho de 2011. As variáveis analisadas foram as mesmas das tabelas de risco EORTC. A regressão logística foi realizada usando SPSS. A análise da curva COR determinou o limite de tamanho do tumor. Resultados: As tabelas de risco EORTC não conseguiram prever recorrência nem progressão. Na análise para prever recorrência isoladamente, estadio T e tamanho do tumor previram o desfecho. O limite de tamanho do tumor foi definido em <4cm vs ≥4cm (AUC=0,61; p=0,001). Criamos uma classificação: Ta/CIS=0 pontos, T1=4 pontos, tamanho do tumor=0 ou 3 pontos. A classificação de risco foi obtida somando os pontos. A taxa de recorrência em 2 anos foi: escore 0=11,2%; escore 3=20,7%; escore 4=29,2%; escore 7=37,9%. Para prever recorrência e progressão, estadio T e tamanho do tumor previram significativamente o desfecho. A classificação em escores foi: Ta/CIS=0 pontos, T1=2 pontos, tamanho do tumor = 0 ou 2 pontos. A classificação de risco foi obtida somando os pontos. A taxa de recorrência em 2 anos foi: escore 0=17%; escore 2=28,6%; escore 4=40,7%. Conclusões: Constatamos que as tabelas de risco EORTC não conseguiram prever recorrência ou progressão do câncer de bexiga na nossa população. Portanto, desenvolvemos uma classificação de risco para auxiliar urologistas a individualizar as condutas por paciente.
Introduction: Risk classification based on predictive factors of bladder cancer recurrence and progression is essential for management decision. Risk tables combine these variables for clinical practice use. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) risk tables are widely accepted for this purpose, however they were never validated in Brazil. Our aim was to validate the EORTC risk tables and create a risk classification based on our population. Methods: Retrospective study of 561 patients who underwent transurethral resection of superficial bladder from February 2005 to June 2011. Variables analyzed were the same as EORTC risk tables. Logistic regression was performed using SPSS. ROC curve analysis was used for determining the cut-off for tumor size. Results: EORTC risk tables were not able to predict neither disease recurrence nor progression. In our analysis for predicting bladder cancer recurrence alone, we found that T stage and tumor size predicted outcome. Tumor size cut-off was defined as < 4 cm vs ≥ 4 (AUC=0.61; p=0.001). We created a scoring classification: Ta/CIS=0 points, T1=4 points, tumor size=0 or 3 points. Risk classification was obtained by adding the points accordingly and the following recurrence rate at 2 yrs by group: score 0=11.2%; score 3=20.7%; score 4=29.2%; score 7=37.9%. The statistical model for bladder cancer recurrence or progression found that T stage and tumor size predicted the outcome. The scoring classification was: Ta/CIS=0 points, T1=2 points, tumor size=0 or 2 points. Risk classification was obtained by adding the points accordingly and the following recurrence rate at 2 yrs by group: score 0=17%; score 2=28.6%; score 4=40.7%. Conclusions: We found that EORTC risk tables could not predict bladder cancer recurrence or progression in our patient population, possibly due to differences in patient characteristics. Therefore, we developed a new risk classification to aid urologists to individualize the management decision per patient.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Anciano , Instituciones Oncológicas , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/clasificación , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria , Estudio de Validación , Brasil/epidemiología , Progresión de la Enfermedad , RecurrenciaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To identify factors associated with survival after palliative urinary diversion (UD) for patients with malignant ureteric obstruction (MUO) and create a risk-stratification model for treatment decisions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We prospectively collected clinical and laboratory data for patients who underwent palliative UD by ureteric stenting or percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) between 1 January 2009 and 1 November 2011 in two tertiary care university hospitals, with a minimum 6-month follow-up. Inclusion criteria were age >18 years and MUO confirmed by computed tomography, ultrasonography or magnetic resonance imaging. Factors related to poor prognosis were identified by Cox univariable and multivariable regression analyses, and a risk stratification model was created by Kaplan-Meier survival estimates at 1, 6 and 12 months, and log-rank tests. RESULTS: The median (range) survival was 144 (0-1084) days for the 208 patients included after UD (58 ureteric stenting, 150 PCN); 164 patients died, 44 (21.2%) during hospitalisation. Overall survival did not differ by UD type (P = 0.216). The number of events related to malignancy (≥4) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) index (≥2) were associated with short survival on multivariable analysis. These two risk factors were used to divide patients into three groups by survival type: favourable (no factors), intermediate (one factor) and unfavourable (two factors). The median survival at 1, 6, and 12 months was 94.4%, 57.3% and 44.9% in the favourable group; 78.0%, 36.3%, and 15.5% in the intermediate group; and 46.4%, 14.3%, and 7.1% in the unfavourable group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our stratification model may be useful to determine whether UD is indicated for patients with MUO.
Asunto(s)
Nefrostomía Percutánea/métodos , Neoplasias Ureterales/mortalidad , Obstrucción Ureteral/cirugía , Derivación Urinaria/métodos , Anciano , Brasil/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nefrostomía Percutánea/mortalidad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida , Stents , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Neoplasias Ureterales/complicaciones , Neoplasias Ureterales/patología , Obstrucción Ureteral/etiología , Obstrucción Ureteral/mortalidad , Derivación Urinaria/mortalidadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) is the standard of care for adjuvant intravesical instillation therapy for intermediate- and high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) after complete transurethral resection. Increasing evidence suggests that there are marked differences in outcomes according to BCG substrains. BCG-Moreau was recently introduced to the European market to cover the issue of BCG shortage, but there are little data regarding the oncologic efficacy. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 295 consecutive patients, who received adjuvant intravesical instillation therapy with BCG-Moreau for intermediate- and high-risk NMIBC between October 2007 and April 2013 at a single institution. The end points of this study were time to first recurrence and progression to muscle-invasive disease. RESULTS: Median age was 66 years (interquartile range 59-74, mean 65.9 years). According to the EAU risk group, 76 patients presented with intermediate-risk and 219 patients with high-risk NMIBC. The 5-year recurrence-free survival and progression-free survival rate was 64.8% (95% CI 52.8-74.4) and 81.4% (95% CI 65.2-90.2), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: BCG-Moreau is an effective substrain for adjuvant instillation therapies of NMIBC, and outcomes appear to be comparable to series using other substrains. During worldwide shortage of BCG-TICE, Connaught and RIVM, BCG-Moreau may serve as an equally effective alternative.
Asunto(s)
Vacuna BCG/provisión & distribución , Vacuna BCG/uso terapéutico , Sustitución de Medicamentos , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/cirugía , Administración Intravesical , Anciano , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Terapia Combinada , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Invasividad Neoplásica , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Statins are cholesterol lowering agents used to prevent cardiovascular disease. Evidence suggests a dichotomous effect of statins with cancer inhibiting and promoting properties. To our knowledge the effect of statins on the prognosis of muscle invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder remains uninvestigated to date. We tested the hypothesis that statin use impacts oncological outcomes in patients treated with radical cystectomy for urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the records of 1,502 patients treated with radical cystectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy without neoadjuvant therapy at a total of 4 institutions. Cox regression models were used to determine the association of statins with disease recurrence and cancer specific mortality. RESULTS: A total of 642 patients (42.7%) were on statins. At a median followup of 34 months 509 patients (33.9%) experienced disease recurrence and 402 (26.8%) had died of urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Statin users were older (p = 0.003), had a higher body mass index (median 32 vs 28 kg/m(2), p <0.001) and were more likely to have positive soft tissue surgical margins (9% vs 4%, p <0.001). On univariable Cox regression analysis statins, female gender, advanced age, higher body mass index, smoking status, tumor stage, tumor grade, soft tissue surgical margin status, lymphovascular invasion, lymph node metastasis and adjuvant chemotherapy were associated with disease recurrence (p ≤ 0.05) and cancer specific mortality (p ≤ 0.02). On multivariable Cox regression analysis statin use was not associated with either outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Statin users were at higher risk for disease recurrence and cancer specific mortality on univariable but not multivariable analysis. These data do not support modification of statin use in patients with high risk urothelial carcinoma of the bladder who will be treated with radical cystectomy.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/cirugía , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/cirugía , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Índice de Masa Corporal , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/mortalidad , Cistectomía/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático , Metástasis Linfática , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Clasificación del Tumor , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Sexuales , Fumar/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/mortalidadRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Subclassification of nodal stage may have prognostic value in men with lymph node metastasis at radical prostatectomy. We explored the role of extranodal extension, size of the largest metastatic lymph node and the largest metastasis, and lymph node density as predictors of biochemical recurrence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed pathological material from 261 patients with node positive prostate cancer. We examined the predictive value when adding the additional pathology findings to a base model including extraprostatic extension, seminal vesicle invasion, radical prostatectomy Gleason score, prostate specific antigen and number of positive lymph nodes using the Cox proportional hazards regression and Harrell concordance index. RESULTS: The median number of lymph nodes removed was 14 (IQR 9, 20) and the median number of positive lymph nodes was 1 (IQR 1, 2). At a median followup of 4.6 years (IQR 3.2, 6.0) 155 of 261 patients experienced biochemical recurrence. The mean 5-year biochemical recurrence-free survival rate was 39% (95% CI 33-46). Median diameter of the largest metastatic lymph node was 9 mm (IQR 5, 16). On Cox regression radical prostatectomy specimen Gleason score (greater than 7 vs 7 or less), number of positive lymph nodes (3 or greater vs 1 or 2), seminal vesicle invasion and prostate specific antigen were associated with significantly increased risks of biochemical recurrence. On subset analysis metastasis size significantly improved model discrimination (base model Harrell concordance index 0.700 vs 0.655, p = 0.032). CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms that the number of positive lymph nodes is a predictor of biochemical recurrence in men with node positive disease. The improvement in prognostic value of measuring the metastatic focus warrants further investigation.