Performance status at the time of lung retransplant predicts long-term function.

BACKGROUND: Lung retransplantation is offered to select patients with chronic allograft dysfunction. Given the increased risk of morbidity and mortality conferred by retransplantation, post-transplant function should be considered in the decision of who and when to list. The aim of this study is to identify predictors of post-operative disability in patients undergoing lung retransplantation. METHODS: Data were collected from the UNOS national dataset and included all patients who underwent lung retransplant from May 2005-March 2023. Pre- and post-operative function was reported by the Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) and patients were stratified based on their needs. Cumulative link mixed effects models identified associations between pre-transplant variables and post-transplant function. RESULTS: A total of 1275 lung retransplant patients were included. After adjusting for between-group differences, pre-operative functional status was predictive of post-transplant function; patients requiring Total Assistance ( n = 740) were 74% more likely than No/Some Assistance patients (n = 535) to require more assistance in follow-up (OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.13-2.68, p = .012). Estimated one year survival of Total Assistance patients is lower than No/Some Assistance Recipients (72% vs. 82%, CI 69%-75%; 79%-86%) but similar to overall re-transplant survival (76%, CI 74%-79%). CONCLUSION: Both survival and regain of function in patients requiring Total Assistance prior to retransplant may be higher than previously reported. Pre-operative functional status is predictive of post-operative function and should weigh in the selection, timing and post-operative care of patients considered for lung retransplantation.

Outcomes following minimally invasive approaches vs. open extended lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer: a propensity-matched analysis of the National Cancer Database.

Background: Traditional thoracotomy, an invasive surgical procedure, has been the standard approach for extended lobectomy in treating non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has gained traction with advancements in surgical techniques. Despite this, the outcomes of extended lobectomy via a minimally invasive approach remain largely uncharted. Using the comprehensive National Cancer Database (NCDB), our research aimed to clarify the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of minimally invasive extended lobectomy in patients diagnosed with NSCLC. Methods: Our study encompassed a selection of patients with NSCLC who underwent extended lobectomy (defined as lobectomy or bilobectomy with chest wall, diaphragm or pericardial resection) between 2010 and 2014. Through propensity score matching (PSM), we ensured a balanced comparison between patients who underwent MIS and those who opted for the traditional open extended lobectomy. Both univariate and multivariate analyses were employed to discern whether the surgical approach had any significant impact on the prognosis of patients undergoing this specific procedure. Results: Before PSM, our dataset included 3,934 patients. After 1:2 PSM, the MIS group included 683 cases, while the open group included 1,317 cases. One notable finding was the reduced average postoperative hospital stay for the MIS group at 7.15 days compared to the open group at 8.40 days (P<0.001). Furthermore, the 5-year survival rate was similar, with the MIS group at 53.1% and the open group at 51.3% (P=0.683). Conclusions: The results of our study suggest that MIS for extended lobectomy not only is safe and feasible but also is oncologically effective. However, it is imperative to note that these encouraging findings necessitate further validation through prospective studies to ascertain the full scope of benefits and potential risks associated with MIS.

Lung transplantation in HIV seropositive recipients: An analysis of the UNOS registry.

BACKGROUND: Experience with lung transplantation (LT) in patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is limited. Many studies have demonstrated the success of kidney and liver transplantation in HIV-seropositive (HIV+) patients. Our objective was to conduct a national registry analysis comparing LT outcomes in HIV+ to HIV-seronegative (HIV-) recipients. METHODS: The United Network for Organ Sharing database was queried to identify LTs performed in adult HIV+ patients between 2016 and 2023. Patients with unknown HIV status, multiorgan transplants, and redo transplants were excluded. The primary endpoints were mortality and graft rejection. Survival time was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: The study included 17 487 patients, 67 of whom were HIV+. HIV+ recipients were younger (59 vs. 62 years, p = .02), had higher pulmonary arterial pressure (28 vs. 25 mm Hg, p = .04), and higher lung allocation scores (47 vs. 41, p = .01) relative to HIV- recipients. There were no differences in graft/recipient survival time between groups. HIV+ recipients had higher rates of post-transplant dialysis (18% vs. 8.4%, p = .01), but otherwise had similar post-transplant outcomes to HIV-recipients. CONCLUSIONS: This national registry analysis suggests LT outcomes in HIV+ patients are not inferior to outcomes in HIV- patients and that well-selected HIV+ recipients can achieve comparable patient and graft survival rates relative to HIV- recipients.

Immediate Postoperative COVID-19 Infection after Lung Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Case Series.

BACKGROUND: With new variants challenging the effectiveness of preventive measures, we are beginning to recognize the reality that COVID-19 will continue to pose an endemic threat. The manifestations of COVID-19 in lung transplant recipients during index admission are poorly understood with very few cases reported in recent lung transplant recipients. Optimal management of immunosuppression and antiviral therapy in recent transplant recipients is challenging. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis identifying lung transplant recipients at our institution who contracted COVID-19 in the immediate postoperative period (within index admission). In addition, we performed a systematic review from January 2020 to August 2023 identifying all publications on the PUBMED database regarding COVID-19 infection in lung transplant recipients during index admission. RESULTS: We report four cases of COVID-19 pneumonia in lung transplant recipients in the immediate postoperative period and we describe the clinical course, treatment options, and immunosuppression changes to manage this unique clinical problem. All patients made a full recovery and were eventually discharged home. Within our review of the literature, the most prevalent presenting symptoms were cough, dyspnea, and fatigue. Six (75%) patients decreased or held their antimetabolite. The two most common treatments were monoclonal antibodies (38%) and remdesivir (63%). CONCLUSION: Although previous literature demonstrates that COVID-19 can be deadly in recent lung transplant recipients, rapid treatment with anti-viral therapy/immunotherapy, deescalating immunosuppression, and treatment of respiratory decompensation with Decadron was effective in our patients.

Impact of gastro-jejunostomy tube in lung transplant patients: a propensity-matched analysis.

OBJECTIVES: During the postoperative phase of lung transplantation, the surgical creation of a gastro-jejunostomy (GJ) may be deemed necessary for patients with severe oesophageal dysmotility, prolonged oral intake difficulties stemming from use of a ventilator or marked malnutrition. We explored the effects of postoperative GJ tube on survival and bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome in lung transplant recipients. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all lung transplants performed at our institution between 2011 and 2022. Propensity score matching was performed to match patients who required a GJ tube with control patients on a 1:1 ratio. The preoperative, operative and postoperative outcomes of the patients were evaluated. RESULTS: After propensity score matching, 193 patients with GJ were compared to 193 patients without GJ. Patients with GJ had significantly higher rates of delayed chest closure (P = 0.007), and postoperative dialysis (P = 0.016), longer intensive care unit stays (P < 0.001), longer ventilator duration (P < 0.001), higher rates of pneumonia (P = 0.035) and higher rates of being treated for acute cellular rejection within 1 year of transplant (P = 0.008). Overall survival and freedom from bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome were not found to be significantly different between the matched groups (P = 0.09 and P = 0.3). CONCLUSIONS: GJ tube placement during the postoperative phase of lung transplantation did not compromise patient survival or freedom from bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome although the results reflect more difficult and complicated cases. This study indicates that the GJ tube may be a useful option for enteral feeding.

A novel scoring system to predict survival in cirrhotic patients undergoing isolated lung transplantation: The PENS-CEPT score.

Cirrhosis is usually regarded as a contraindication to isolated lung transplantation (ILT). We sought to determine which patients with cirrhosis could safely undergo ILT. Based on a retrospective analysis of patients with cirrhosis who underwent ILT at our center between 2007 and 2020, we developed an exclusionary algorithm (PENS-CEPT: Pittsburgh ExclusioN Score in Cirrhotics Evaluated for Pulmonary Transplant) to help determine which patients can undergo ILT with minimal incurred risk from their underlying liver disease. The score utilizes a combination of readily available clinical data and the presence (or absence) of spontaneous portosystemic shunts on preoperative cross-sectional imaging. Sixteen patients underwent ILT with a diagnosis of cirrhosis: nine with cystic fibrosis. On univariate analysis, only our model was able to predict 1 year survival. Of the nine patients that would have been approved using our model, there was only one short term death. Of the seven patients that would have been rejected by the model, all but one died within the first year with six dying of complications from liver failure. We are proposing a simple score utilizing routine clinical parameters and pre-operative imaging to determine the safety of ILT in cirrhotic patients. Further studies are required to validate this scoring system with the goal of safely increasing the opportunity for cirrhotic patients who would otherwise be rejected for ILT.

Lung Transplantation Outcomes in Recipients Aged 70 Years or Older and the Impact of Center Volume.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate trends and outcomes of lung transplants (LTx) in recipients ≥ 70 years. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of the UNOS database identifying all patients undergoing LTx (May 2005-December 2022). Baseline characteristics and postoperative outcomes were compared by age (<70 years, ≥70 years) and center volume. Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed with pairwise comparisons between subgroups. RESULTS: 34,957 patients underwent LTx, of which 3236 (9.3%) were ≥70 years. The rate of LTx in recipients ≥ 70 has increased over time, particularly in low-volume centers (LVCs); consequently, high-volume centers (HVCs) and LVCs perform similar rates of LTx for recipients ≥ 70. Recipients ≥ 70 had higher rates of receiving from donor after circulatory death lungs and of extended donor criteria. Recipients ≥ 70 were more likely to die of cardiovascular diseases or malignancy, while recipients < 70 of chronic primary graft failure. Survival time was shorter for recipients ≥ 70 compared to recipients < 70 old (hazard ratio (HR): 1.36, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.28-1.44, p < 0.001). HVCs were associated with a survival advantage in recipients < 70 (HR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.88-0.94, p < 0.001); however, in recipients ≥ 70, survival was similar between HVCs and LVCs (HR: 1.11, 95% CI: 0.99-1.25, p < 0.08). HVCs were more likely to perform a bilateral LTx (BLT) for obstructive lung diseases compared to LVCs, but there was no difference in BLT and single LTx likelihood for restrictive lung diseases. CONCLUSIONS: Careful consideration is needed for recipient ≥ 70 selection, donor assessment, and post-transplant care to improve outcomes. Further research should explore strategies that advance perioperative care in centers with low long-term survival for recipients ≥ 70.

Postoperative Acute Kidney Injury and Long-Term Outcomes After Lung Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: This study sought to characterize perioperative risk factors of acute kidney injury (AKI) and report outcomes associated with its development in the immediate postoperative setting after lung transplantation. METHODS: Study investigator performed a retrospective analysis of all adult patients undergoing primary lung transplantation at a single institution from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2021 AKI was defined using Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria after lung transplantation and was stratified on the basis of whether patients required renal replacement therapy (RRT; AKI-no RRT vs AKI-RRT). RESULTS: Of the 754 patients included, 369 (48.9%) any AKI developed in the postoperative period (252 AKI-no RRT vs 117 AKI-RRT). Risk factors for postoperative AKI included higher preoperative creatinine levels (odds ratio [OR], 5.15; P < .001), lower preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (OR, 0.99; P < 0.018), delayed chest closure (OR, 2.72; P < .001), and higher volumes of postoperative blood products (OR, 1.09; P < .001) in the multivariable analysis. On univariate analysis, both AKI groups were also associated with higher rates of pneumonia (P < .001), reintubation (P < .001), mortality on index admission (P < 0.001), longer ventilator duration (P < .001), longer intensive care unit length of stay (P < .001), and longer hospital length of stay (P < .001), with the highest rates in the AKI-RRT group. In a multivariable survival analysis, postoperative AKI-no RRT (hazard ratio [HR], 1.50; P = .006) and AKI-RRT (HR, 2.70; P < .001) were associated with significantly worse survival independent of severe grade 3 primary graft dysfunction at 72 hours (HR, 1.45; P = .038). CONCLUSIONS: The development of postoperative AKI was associated with numerous preoperative and intraoperative factors. Postoperative AKI remained significantly associated with poorer posttransplantation survival. Severe cases of AKI necessitating RRT portended the worst survival after lung transplantation.

Waitlist Mortality and Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Bridge to Lung Transplant.

BACKGROUND: Use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) as bridge to lung transplant has increased. However, little is known about patients placed on ECMO who die while on the waiting list. Using a national lung transplant data set, we investigated variables associated with waitlist mortality of patients bridged to lung transplant. METHODS: All patients supported on ECMO at time of listing were identified using the United Network for Organ Sharing database. Univariable analyses were performed using bias-reduced logistic regression. Cause-specific hazard models were used to determine the effect of variables of interest on hazard of outcomes. RESULTS: From April 2016 to December 2021, 634 patients met inclusion criteria. Of these, 445 (70%) were successfully bridged to transplant, 148 (23%) died on the waitlist, and 41 (6.5%) were removed for other reasons. Univariable analysis found associations between waitlist mortality and blood group, age, body mass index, serum creatinine, lung allocation score, days on waitlist, United Network for Organ Sharing region, and being listed at a lower-volume center. Cause-specific hazard models demonstrated that patients at high-volume centers were 24% more likely to survive to transplant and 44% less likely to die on the waitlist. Among patients who were successfully bridged to transplant, there was no difference in survival between low- and high-volume centers. CONCLUSIONS: ECMO is an appropriate strategy to bridge selected high-risk patients to lung transplant. Of those placed on ECMO with intent to transplant, about one quarter may not survive to transplantation. High-risk patients requiring advanced support strategies may be more likely to survive to transplant when bridged at a high-volume center.

Risk Factors and Outcomes of Postoperative Hepatic Dysfunction After Lung Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Hepatic dysfunction is a morbid complication of lung transplantation. Little is known about risk factors for postoperative hepatic dysfunction or its impact on survival after lung transplantation. METHODS: This retrospective analysis of 1406 adult lung transplant recipients was performed at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania between January 1, 2007 and December 1, 2019. Patients were excluded for redo lung transplantation, concomitant cardiac surgery, or concurrent solid organ transplantation. Postoperative liver dysfunction was classified as either ischemic liver injury or nonischemic dysfunction (transaminitis, hyperbilirubinemia). RESULTS: Among the 1155 primary lung transplant recipients included, postoperative hepatic dysfunction developed in 96 (8.3%) after lung transplantation. A history of liver disease was the greatest predictor of postoperative hepatic dysfunction (odds ratio, 6.19; CI, 2.13-17.4; P < .001). Patients with postoperative hepatic dysfunction had a greater need for intraoperative blood products (ischemic, 12 U [range, 6-21 U]; nonischemic, 10 U [range, 4-28 U]; vs none, 4 U [range, 1-12 U]; P < .001) and an increased need for postoperative circulatory support (ischemic, 16 [76%]; nonischemic, 25 [33%]; none, 117 [11%]; P < .001). Both ischemic liver injury and nonischemic dysfunction were associated with diminished 1-, 3-, and 5-year term survival (ischemic, 27.5%, 16.5%, and 0%, respectively; nonischemic, 60%, 49.6%, and 46.9%, respectively; none, 87.3%, 72.3%, and 59.5%, respectively; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Hepatic dysfunction after lung transplantation is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. A history of liver disease was the best positive predictor for postoperative dysfunction. Additional studies are necessary to identify the best treatment algorithm to avoid hepatic dysfunction more effectively in the postoperative setting after lung transplantation.

Utilization of machine learning to model the effect of blood product transfusion on short-term lung transplant outcomes.

The objective of this study was to identify the relationship between blood product transfusion and short-term morbidity and mortality following lung transplantation utilizing machine learning. Preoperative recipient characterstics, procedural variables, perioperative blood product transfusions, and donor charactersitics were included in the model. The primary composite outcome was occurrence on any of the following six endpoints: mortality during index hospitalization; primary graft dysfunction at 72 h post-transplant or the need for postoperative circulatory support; neurological complications (seizure, stroke, or major encephalopathy); perioperative acute coronary syndrome or cardiac arrest; and renal dysfunction requiring renal replacement therapy. The cohort included 369 patients, with the composite outcome occurring in 125 cases (33.9%). Elastic net regression analysis identified 11 significant predictors of composite morbidity: higher packed red blood cell, platelet, cryoprecipitate and plasma volume from the critical period, preoperative functional dependence, any preoperative blood transfusion, VV ECMO bridge to transplant, and antifibrinolytic therapy were associated with higher risk of morbidity. Preoperative steroids, taller height, and primary chest closure were protective against composite morbidity.

Intraoperative Red Blood Cell Transfusion and Primary Graft Dysfunction After Lung Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: In this international, multicenter study of patients undergoing lung transplantation (LT), we explored the association between the amount of intraoperative packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusion and occurrence of primary graft dysfunction (PGD) and associated outcomes. METHODS: The Extracorporeal Life Support in LT Registry includes data on LT recipients from 9 high-volume (>40 transplants/y) transplant centers (2 from Europe, 7 from the United States). Adult patients who underwent bilateral orthotopic lung transplant from January 2016 to January 2020 were included. The primary outcome of interest was the occurrence of grade 3 PGD in the first 72 h after LT. RESULTS: We included 729 patients who underwent bilateral orthotopic lung transplant between January 2016 and November 2020. LT recipient population tertiles based on the amount of intraoperative PRBC transfusion (0, 1-4, and >4 units) were significantly different in terms of diagnosis, age, gender, body mass index, mean pulmonary artery pressure, lung allocation score, hemoglobin, prior chest surgery, preoperative hospitalization, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation requirement. Inverse probability treatment weighting logistic regression showed that intraoperative PRBC transfusion of >4 units was significantly ( P < 0.001) associated with grade 3 PGD within 72 h (odds ratio [95% confidence interval], 2.2 [1.6-3.1]). Inverse probability treatment weighting analysis excluding patients with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support produced similar findings (odds ratio [95% confidence interval], 2.4 [1.7-3.4], P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this multicenter, international registry study of LT patients, intraoperative transfusion of >4 units of PRBCs was associated with an increased risk of grade 3 PGD within 72 h. Efforts to improve post-LT outcomes should include perioperative blood conservation measures.

Effects of Intraoperative Support Strategies on Endothelial Injury and Clinical Lung Transplant Outcomes.

In lung transplantation, postoperative outcomes favor intraoperative use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) over cardiopulmonary bypass (CBP). We investigated the effect of intraoperative support strategies on endothelial injury biomarkers and short-term posttransplant outcomes. Adults undergoing bilateral lung transplantation with No-Support, venoarterial (V-A) ECMO, or CPB were included. Plasma samples pre- and post-transplant were collected for Luminex assay to measure endothelial injury biomarkers including syndecan-1 (SYN-1), intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), and matrix metalloprotease-9. Fifty five patients were included for analysis. The plasma level of SYN-1 at arrival in the intensive care unit was significantly higher with CPB compared to V-A ECMO and No-Support (P < 0.01). The rate of primary graft dysfunction grade 3 (PGD3) at 72 hours was 60.0% in CPB, 40.1% in V-A ECMO, and 15% in No-Support (P = 0.01). Postoperative plasma levels of SYN-1 and ICAM-1 were significantly higher in recipients who developed PGD3 at 72 hours. SYN-1 levels were also significantly higher in patients who developed acute kidney injury and hepatic dysfunction after transplant. Postoperative, SYN-1 upon intensive care arrival was found to be a significant predictive biomarker of PGD3, acute kidney injury, and hepatic dysfunction following lung transplantation. CPB is associated with higher plasma concentrations of SYN-1, a marker of endothelial glycocalyx degradation, upon arrival to the intensive care unit. Higher levels of SYN-1 are predictive of end-organ dysfunction following lung transplantation. Our data suggests that intraoperative strategies aimed at modulating endothelial injury will help improve lung transplantation outcomes.

Single-center experience of ex vivo lung perfusion and subsequent lung transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The safety of lung transplantation using ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) has been confirmed in multiple clinical studies; however, limited evidence is currently available regarding the potential effects of EVLP on posttransplant graft complications and survival with mid- to long-term follow-up. In this study, we reviewed our institutional data to better understand the impact of EVLP. METHODS: Lungs placed on EVLP from 2014 through 2020 and transplant outcomes were retrospectively analyzed. Data were compared between lungs transplanted and declined after EVLP, between patients with severe primary graft dysfunction (PGD3) and no PGD3 after EVLP, and between matched patients with lungs transplanted with and without EVLP. RESULTS: In total, 98 EVLP cases were performed. Changes in metabolic indicators during EVLP were correlated with graft quality and transplantability, but not changes in physiological parameters. Among 58 transplanted lungs after EVLP, PGD3 at 72 h occurred in 36.9% and was associated with preservation time, mechanical support prior to transplant, and intraoperative transfusion volume. Compared with patients without EVLP, patients who received lungs screened with EVLP had a higher incidence of PGD3 and longer ICU and hospital stays. Lung grafts placed on EVLP exhibited a significantly higher chance of developing airway anastomotic ischemic injury by 30 days posttransplant. Acute and chronic graft rejection, pulmonary function, and posttransplant survival were not different between patients with lungs screened on EVLP versus lungs with no EVLP. CONCLUSION: EVLP use is associated with an increase of early posttransplant adverse events, but graft functional outcomes and patient survival are preserved.

Intraoperative Support for Primary Bilateral Lung Transplantation: A Propensity-Matched Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Single-center studies support benefits of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) as a method of intraoperative support. Propensity-matched data from a large cohort, however, are currently lacking. Therefore, our goal was to compare outcomes of intraoperative VA-ECMO and cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) during bilateral lung transplantation (LTx) with a propensity analysis. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 795 consecutive primary adult LTx patients (June 1, 2011-December 26, 2020) using no intraoperative support (n = 210), VA-ECMO (n = 150), or CPB (n = 197). Exclusion criteria included LTx on venovenous-ECMO, single/redo LTx, ex vivo lung perfusion, and concomitant solid-organ transplantation or cardiac procedure. Propensity analysis was performed comparing patients who underwent intraoperative CPB or VA-ECMO. RESULTS: The propensity CPB group required more blood products at 72 hours (P = .02) and longer intensive care unit length of stay (P < .001) and ventilator dependence days (P < .001). There were no differences in cerebrovascular accident (P = 1), reintubation (P = .4), dialysis (P = .068), in-hospital mortality (P = .33), and 1-year (P = .67) and 3-year (P = .32) survival. The CPB group had a higher incidence of grade 3 primary graft dysfunction at 72 hours (P < .001). Neither support strategy was a predictor of 1- and 3-year mortality in our multivariable model (VA-ECMO, P = .72 and P = .57; CPB, P = .45 and P = .91, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative VA-ECMO during lung transplantation was associated with fewer postoperative blood transfusions, shorter length of mechanical ventilation, and lower incidence of a grade 3 primary graft dysfunction at 72 hours. Although there were some differences in the postoperative course between the VA-ECMO and CPB groups, support type was not associated with differences in survival.

Expanding Donor Options for Lung Transplant: Extended Criteria, Donation After Circulatory Death, ABO Incompatibility, and Evolution of Ex Vivo Lung Perfusion.

Only using brain-dead donors with standard criteria, the existing donor shortage has never improved in lung transplantation. Currently, clinical efforts have sought the means to use cohorts of untapped donors, such as extended criteria donors, donation after circulatory death, and donors that are ABO blood group incompatible, and establish the evidence for their potential contribution to the lung transplant needs. Also, technical maturation for using those lungs may eliminate immediate concerns about the early posttransplant course, such as primary graft dysfunction or hyperacute rejection. In addition, recent clinical and preclinical advances in ex vivo lung perfusion techniques have allowed the safer use of lungs from high-risk donors and graft modification to match grafts to recipients and may improve posttransplant outcomes. This review summarizes recent trends and accomplishments and future applications for expanding the donor pool in lung transplantation.

Lung transplantation from donation after circulatory death, evolution, and current status in the United States.

BACKGROUND: The number of lung transplants from donors after circulatory death has increased over the last decade. This study aimed to describe the evolution and outcomes following lung transplantation donation after circulatory death (DCD) and report the practices and outcomes of ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) in this donor population. METHODS: This was a retrospective study using a prospectively collected national registry. The United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database was queried to identify adult patients who underwent lung transplantation between May 1, 2005, and December 31, 2021. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Weibull regression were used to compare survival in four cohorts (donation after brain death [DBD] with or without EVLP, and DCD with or without EVLP). The primary outcome of interest was patient survival. RESULTS: Of the 21 356 recipients who underwent lung transplantation, 20 380 (95.4%) were from brain death donors and 976 (4.6%) from donors after circulatory death. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no difference in the survival time between the two groups. In a multivariable analysis that controlled for baseline differences in donor and recipient characteristics, recipients who received lungs from cardiac death donors after EVLP had 28% shorter survival time relative to donor lungs after brain death without EVLP (hazard ratio [HR] 1.53, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.10-2.15, p = .01). CONCLUSIONS: The early survival differences observed after lung transplants from donors after circulatory death in lungs evaluated with EVLP deserves further investigation.

Double lung transplantation in patients with lung atelectasis and complete mediastinal shift.

Mediastinal shift and chest wall retraction limit the indication of a double lung transplant in patients with complete destruction of lung parenchyma. We report outcomes as well as preoperative and operative management in two patients with significant lung volume reduction and mediastinal shift due to bronchiectasis of the right lung.