Lutein and Zeaxanthin Supplementation Improves Dynamic Visual and Cognitive Performance in Children: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel, Placebo-Controlled Study.

INTRODUCTION: Supplementation with dietary neuro-pigments lutein (L) and zeaxanthin (Z) has been shown to improve many aspects of visual and cognitive function in adults. In this study, we tested whether a similar intervention could improve such outcomes in preadolescent children. METHODS: Sixty children (age range 5-12 years) were randomized in a 2:1 ratio in this double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Subjects were supplemented with gummies containing either a combination of 10 mg lutein and 2 mg zeaxanthin (LZ) or placebo for 180 days. Macular pigment optical density (MPOD) was the primary endpoint. The secondary endpoints included serum levels of L and Z, and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), critical flicker fusion (CFF), eye strain and fatigue using visual analogue scales (VAS), Children's Sleep Habits Questionnaire-Abbreviated (CSHQ-A), and Creyos Health cognitive domains like attention, focus/concentration, episodic memory and learning, visuospatial working memory, and visuospatial processing speed. Safety was assessed throughout the study on the basis of physical examination, vital signs, clinical laboratory tests, and monitoring of adverse events. RESULTS: The LZ group showed significant increases in MPOD at all visits post-supplementation, with significant increases as early as day 42 compared to placebo. The LZ group showed significant increases in serum lutein levels, reduced eye strain and fatigue, and improved cognitive performance (focus, episodic memory and learning, visuospatial working memory) at days 90 and 180 compared to placebo. Further, the LZ group showed significant increases in processing speed (CFF), attention, visuospatial processing, and serum Z and BDNF levels on day 180 compared to placebo. No safety concerns were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Supplementing LZ resulted in increased MPOD levels, along with increased serum levels of L, Z, and BDNF. These changes were associated with improved visual and cognitive performances and reduction in eye strain and eye fatigue in the children receiving LZ gummies. The investigational product was safe and well tolerated. TRIAL REGISTRATION: http://ctri.nic.in/ Identifier CTRI/2022/05/042364.

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a novel oral bioadhesive formulation for the treatment of nonerosive reflux disease-related symptoms.

OBJECTIVE: The use of antisecretory drugs can provide symptomatic relief in 70-80% of patients suffering from gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD), although this benefit is reduced by 20-30% in the case of nonerosive reflux disease (NERD). The current study evaluates the efficacy and safety of a patented oral formulation (liquid sachets containing hyaluronic acid, a mixture of amino acids including proline, hydroxyl-proline and glutamine, and rice extract dispersed in a bioadhesive polymer matrix) for relieving the symptoms of NERD. METHODS: A single-centre, randomized, double-blind, parallel group, placebo-controlled clinical study was performed. Patients who experienced at least three episodes of moderate-severity heartburn during the 7-day run-in period were included and treated with three liquid sachets per day for 14 days. The primary objective was to evaluate the proportion of patients with at least a three-point reduction in the total symptom score (TSS). RESULTS: Overall, 20 patients were randomized to receive the investigational product and 20 to receive the placebo. At the end of treatment, a three-point reduction in the TSS was achieved by 95% of patients treated with the investigational product and by 20% of patients treated with placebo (P < 0.0001). No adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION: The investigational product showed a statistically significant superiority to the placebo in relieving common symptoms in patients with NERD. Future studies will be aimed at clarifying the hypothesis that this symptomatic benefit is related to the strengthening of the oesophageal barrier against the damage induced by gastric contents.

Comparative Bioavailability of Two Diosmin Formulations after Oral Administration to Healthy Volunteers.

Diosmin is a flavonoid commonly found in citrus fruits, largely used as adjuvant treatment for circulatory disorders, including chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) and hemorrhoids. Following oral administration, diosmin is not directly absorbed but must first be hydrolyzed into its aglycone, diosmetin, which is then absorbed into the systemic circulation. The aim of the current cross-over clinical study was to assess the pharmacokinetic profile of µSmin® Plus, a micronized diosmin flavonoid complex standardized in diosmin and formulated with a buffering agent (tested formulation). The study compared this to unformulated micronized diosmin (reference), in 16 healthy volunteers. Plasma samples were analyzed by HPLC-MS and plasma diosmetin concentration was measured after deconjugation with ß-glucuronidase. For the tested formulation area under the curve (AUC0-t), and maximum plasma and time concentration (Cmax; tmax) were found to be 298.4 ± 163.7, 50.3 ± 22.6 and 2.2 ± 2.9, respectively. AUC0-t and Cmax of the reference were 31.9 ± 100.4 and 2.4 ± 1.9, respectively. The tested formulation showed higher plasmatic concentrations of diosmetin in comparison to those obtained after the administration of unformulated micronized diosmin. The relative bioavailability was 9.4 greater for the tested formulation than in micronized diosmin. In conclusion, our data indicate that µSmin® Plus was rapidly and well absorbed into systemic circulation and may therefore be ideally suitable to deliver diosmin in human interventional trials.