RESUMEN
Objective: To explore the application value of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in the treatment of adhesive intestinal obstruction (AIO) by nasogastric tube (NGT). Methods: Between December 2020 and December 2022, AIO patients who received NGT treatment at The Fourth Hospital of Changsha were selected, including 43 cases receiving ERAS nursing (observation group) and 35 cases receiving routine care (control group). The two groups were compared in terms of postoperative rehabilitation, as well as their psychology, pain, and quality of life which were evaluated using Self-Rating Anxiety/Depression Scale (SAS/SDS), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and Short-Form 36 Item Health Survey (SF-36), respectively. During treatment, the adverse reactions were recorded. Results: In the observation group, the abdominal pain and distension relief time, time to first post-treatment flatus and defecation, abdominal circumference reduction 48 hours after admission, bowel sound recovery, first oral food intake, and extubation time were shorter than those of the control group (P < .05), and the SAS and SDS scores were also lower than those of the control group after treatment (P < .05). At 6-24 hours after treatment, the VAS of the observation group was lower than that of the control group, while the SF-36 score was higher (P < .05). Finally, a lower adverse reaction rate was determined in the observation group compared to the control group (P < .05). Conclusions: ERAS care promotes the recovery of AIO patients after NGT treatment, improves their pain and negative emotions, improves their quality of life, and is extremely valuable for clinical application.
RESUMEN
To assess the impact of a stoma on surgical site wound infection in colorectal cancer, we conducted a meta-analysis. A thorough review of the literature up to September 2022 revealed that 3223 participants had colorectal cancer at the start of the investigations; 258 of them had a stoma, while 2965 did not have a stoma. Using dichotomous or contentious methods and a random or fixed-effect model, odds ratios (OR) and mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated to evaluate the impact of a stoma on surgical site wound infection in colorectal cancer. The stoma present had significantly higher surgical site wound infections (OR, 4.37; 95% CI, 3.08-6.21; P < 0.001) with no heterogeneity (I2 = 12%) compared to stoma absent in colorectal cancer. The stoma present had significantly higher surgical site wound infections compared to the stoma absent in colorectal cancer. The low number of selected studies in the meta-analysis calls for care when analysing the results.
