IGL CDR3 Hydropathy and Antigen Chemical Complementarity Associated with Greater Disease-Free Survival in Lung Adenocarcinoma: Implications for Gender Disparities.

With lung cancer remaining a challenging disease, new approaches to biomarker discovery and therapy development are needed. Recent immunogenomics, adaptive immune receptor approaches have indicated that it is very likely that B cells play an important role in mediating better overall outcomes. As such, we assessed physicochemical features of lung adenocarcinoma resident IGL complementarity determining region-3 (CDR3) amino acid (AA) sequences and determined that hydrophobic CDR3 AA sequences were associated with a better disease-free survival (DFS) probability. Further, using a recently developed chemical complementarity scoring algorithm particularly suitable for the evaluation of large patient datasets, we determined that IGL CDR3 chemical complementarity with certain cancer testis antigens was associated with better DFS. Chemical complementarity scores for IGL CDR3-MAGEC1 represented a gender bias, with an overrepresentation of males among the higher IGL-CDR3-CTA complementarity scores that were in turn associated with better DFS (logrank p < 0.065). Overall, this study pointed towards potential biomarkers for prognoses that, in some cases are likely gender-specific; and towards biomarkers for guiding therapy, e.g., IGL-based opportunities for antigen targeting in the lung cancer setting.

A Retrospective Analysis of Vitamin D Levels in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients With Suspected Pulmonary Embolism.

Introduction Despite using anti-coagulation therapy in hospitalized coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients, they have high rates of pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT). The main objective of this study was to evaluate the association between vitamin D deficiency and thrombotic events (defined as the occurrence of a new PE or DVT) in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Materials and Methods This was a retrospective, cross-sectional study of 208 hospitalized COVID-19 patients who received a computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA) based on clinical suspicion of PE between January 1, 2020, and February 5, 2021. A <20 ng/mL serum vitamin D level was used to categorize vitamin D deficiency. Nonparametric tests and multivariate binary logistic regression were used to evaluate the association between serum vitamin D levels and clinical outcomes. Results The mean vitamin D level was 26.7±13.0 ng/mL (n=208), and approximately one-third of patients were vitamin D deficient (n=68, 32.7%). No association was found between vitamin D deficiency and the occurrence of thrombotic events. The incidence of PE was 19.1% in vitamin D deficient patients compared to 11.4% in vitamin D sufficient patients (p=0.13). Vitamin D deficiency was positively associated with ICU admission (OR 3.047, 95%CI 1.57-5.91, p=0.001) and mortality (OR 3.76, 95%CI 1.29-11.01, p=0.016). Conclusions This study found no association between vitamin D deficiency and the occurrence of a new PE or DVT in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Patients with vitamin D deficiency were more likely to be admitted to the ICU and had increased overall mortality.

Comparative Benefits and Risks Associated with Currently Authorized COVID-19 Vaccines.

This article provides a systematic assessment of the efficacy, risks, and methodological quality of evidence from five major publicly available vaccine trials. Results from Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA, Moderna-US NIH mRN-1273, AstraZeneca-Oxford ChAdOx1 nCov-19, Gamaleya GamCovidVac (Sputnik V), and Ad26.COV2.S Johnson & Johnson vaccines were included. Extracted benefits and risks data from each trial were summarized using the GRADE approach denoting the overall certainty of evidence along with relative and absolute effects. Relative risk reduction across all five vaccine trials ranged from 45% to 96%. Absolute risk reduction in symptomatic COVID-19 ranged from 6 to 17 per 1000 across trials. None of the vaccines were associated with a significant increase in serious adverse events compared to placebo. The overall certainty of evidence varied from low to moderate. All five vaccines are effective and safe, but suggest room for improvement in the conduct of large-scale vaccine trials. Certainty of evidence was downrated due to risk of bias, which can be mitigated by improving transparency and thoroughness in conduct and reporting of outcomes.