RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Second cervical vertebrae (C2) fractures are a common traumatic spinal injury in the elderly population. Surgical fusion and nonoperative bracing are two primary treatments for cervical instability, but the former is often withheld in the elderly due to concerns for poor postoperative outcomes arising from patient frailty. This study sought to evaluate the in-hospital differences in mortality, outcomes, and discharge disposition in elderly patients with C2 fractures undergoing surgical intervention compared with conservative therapy. METHODS: The National Trauma Data Bank was queried from 2017 to 2019 for all patients aged ≥ 65 years with C2 fractures undergoing either surgical stabilization or conservative therapy. Propensity score matching was performed using k-nearest neighbors with replacement based on patient demographics, comorbidities, insurance type, injury severity, and fracture type. Group differences were compared using Student t-tests and Pearson's chi-square tests with Benjamini-Hochberg multiple comparisons correction. Subgroup analyses were performed in the 65-74, 75-79, and 80+ year age subgroups. RESULTS: Six thousand forty-nine patients were identified, of whom 2156 underwent surgery and 3893 received conservative treatment. Following matching, the surgery group had significantly lower mortality rates (5.52% vs 9.6%, p < 0.001), a longer mean hospital length of stay (LOS; 12.64 vs 7.49 days p < 0.001), and slightly higher rates of several complications (< 3% difference), as well as lower rates of discharge home (14.56% vs 23.52%, p < 0.001) and to hospice (1.07% vs 2.09%, p = 0.02) and a higher rate of discharge to intermediate care (68.83% vs 48.28%, p < 0.001). Similar trends in mortality and LOS were noted in all 3 subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: In elderly patients with C2 fractures, surgical stabilization confers a small survival advantage with a slightly higher in-hospital complication rate compared to conservative therapy. The increased rate of discharge to rehabilitation may represent better long-term prognosis following surgery. The increased risk of short-term complications is present but relatively small, thus surgery should not be withheld in patients with good long-term prognosis.
RESUMEN
STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective case-control study using 8 years of data from a nationwide database of surgical outcomes in the United States. PURPOSE: This study aimed to improve our understanding of the risk factors associated with a length of stay (LOS) >1 day and aid in reducing postoperative hospitalization and complications. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Despite the proven safety of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), some patients face prolonged postoperative hospitalization. METHODS: Data were collected from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program dataset from 2011 to 2018. The cohort was divided into patients with LOS up to 1 day (LOS ≤1 day), defined as same day or next-morning discharge, and patients with LOS >1 day (LOS >1 day). Univariable and multivariable regression analyses were performed to evaluate predictors of LOS >1 day. Propensity-score matching was performed to compare pre- and postdischarge complication rates. RESULTS: A total of 12,664 eligible patients with TLIF were identified, of which 14.8% had LOS ≤1 day and 85.2% had LOS >1 day. LOS >1 day was positively associated with female sex, Hispanic ethnicity, diagnosis of spondylolisthesis, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification 3, and operation length of >150 minutes. Patients with LOS >1 day were more likely to undergo intraoperative/postoperative blood transfusion (0.3% vs. 4.5%, p<0.001) and reoperation (0.1% vs. 0.6%, p=0.004). No significant differences in the rates of postdischarge complications were found between the matched groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with worsened preoperative status, preoperative diagnosis of spondylolisthesis, and prolonged operative time are more likely to require prolonged hospitalization and blood transfusions and undergo unplanned reoperation. To reduce the risk of prolonged hospitalization and associated complications, patients indicated for TLIF should be carefully selected.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Central cord syndrome (CCS) is a traumatic cervical spine injury that is treated with surgical decompression. In octogenarians (80-89), surgeons often opt for conservative management instead due to fears of postoperative complications and prolonged recovery times. This study aims to assess the in-hospital complications and outcomes in octogenarians undergoing surgery compared to those undergoing nonsurgical management for CCS. METHODS: The National Trauma Data Bank was queried from 2017 to 2019 for octogenarians with CCS. Patients who received surgical fusion or decompression were divided into the surgery group and the remaining into the nonsurgical group. The surgery group was sampled and propensity score matched with the non-surgery group. Student t tests and Pearson χ2 tests were used to test for group differences. RESULTS: A total of 759 octogenarians with CCS were identified. Following sampling and propensity score matching, 225 patients were identified in each group. The surgery group experienced longer intensive care unit (6.8 days vs. 3.21 days, P < 0.001) and hospital (13.79 days vs. 7.8 days, P < 0.001) lengths of stay and higher rates of deep vein thrombosis (4.89% vs. 0.44%, P = 0.02) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (4% vs. 0%, P = 0.02). Patients did not otherwise differ in mortality rate, other hospital complications, and discharge disposition. CONCLUSIONS: Octogenarians undergoing surgery for CCS experience longer length of stay and complications consistent with prolonged hospitalization but otherwise have similar mortality, hospital complications, and discharge disposition compared to non-surgical treatment. Given the relative lack of short-term drawbacks, surgery should be considered first-line management when the long-term benefits are substantive.
Asunto(s)
Síndrome del Cordón Central , Traumatismos Vertebrales , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Humanos , Octogenarios , Puntaje de Propensión , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tiempo de InternaciónRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: It is not clear whether there is an additive effect of social factors in keeping patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) from achieving both a minimum clinically important difference (MCID) in outcomes and satisfaction after surgery. The aim of this study was to explore the effect of multiple social factors on postoperative outcomes and satisfaction. METHODS: This was a multiinstitutional, retrospective study of the prospective Quality Outcomes Database (QOD) CSM cohort, which included patients aged 18 years or older who were diagnosed with primary CSM and underwent operative management. Social factors included race (White vs non-White), education (high school or below vs above), employment (employed vs not), and insurance (private vs nonprivate). Patients were considered to have improved from surgery if the following criteria were met: 1) they reported a score of 1 or 2 on the North American Spine Society index, and 2) they met the MCID in patient-reported outcomes (i.e., visual analog scale [VAS] neck and arm pain, Neck Disability Index [NDI], and EuroQol-5D [EQ-5D]). RESULTS: Of the 1141 patients included in the study, 205 (18.0%) had 0, 347 (30.4%) had 1, 334 (29.3%) had 2, and 255 (22.3%) had 3 social factors. The 24-month follow-up rate was > 80% for all patient-reported outcomes. After adjusting for all relevant covariates (p < 0.02), patients with 1 or more social factors were less likely to improve from surgery in all measured outcomes including VAS neck pain (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.83-0.99) and arm pain (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.80-0.96); NDI (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.83-0.98); and EQ-5D (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.83-0.97) (all p < 0.05) compared to those without any social factors. Patients with 2 social factors (outcomes: neck pain OR 0.86, arm pain OR 0.81, NDI OR 0.84, EQ-5D OR 0.81; all p < 0.05) or 3 social factors (outcomes: neck pain OR 0.84, arm pain OR 0.84, NDI OR 0.84, EQ-5D OR 0.84; all p < 0.05) were more likely to fare worse in all outcomes compared to those with only 1 social factor. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to those without any social factors, patients who had at least 1 social factor were less likely to achieve MCID and feel satisfied after surgery. The effect of social factors is additive in that patients with a higher number of factors are less likely to improve compared to those with only 1 social factor.
Asunto(s)
Dolor de Cuello , Enfermedades de la Médula Espinal , Humanos , Dolor de Cuello/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Factores Sociales , Satisfacción del Paciente , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios Prospectivos , Vértebras Cervicales/cirugía , Enfermedades de la Médula Espinal/cirugía , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Satisfacción PersonalRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to explore the preoperative patient characteristics that affect surgical decision-making when selecting an anterior or posterior operative approach in patients diagnosed with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). METHODS: This was a multi-institutional, retrospective study of the prospective Quality Outcomes Database (QOD) Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy module. Patients aged 18 years or older diagnosed with primary CSM who underwent multilevel (≥ 2-level) elective surgery were included. Demographics and baseline clinical characteristics were collected. RESULTS: Of the 841 patients with CSM in the database, 492 (58.5%) underwent multilevel anterior surgery and 349 (41.5%) underwent multilevel posterior surgery. Surgeons more often performed a posterior surgical approach in older patients (mean 64.8 ± 10.6 vs 58.5 ± 11.1 years, p < 0.001) and those with a higher American Society of Anesthesiologists class (class III or IV: 52.4% vs 46.3%, p = 0.003), a higher rate of motor deficit (67.0% vs 58.7%, p = 0.014), worse myelopathy (mean modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association score 11.4 ± 3.1 vs 12.4 ± 2.6, p < 0.001), and more levels treated (4.3 ± 1.3 vs 2.4 ± 0.6, p < 0.001). On the other hand, surgeons more frequently performed an anterior surgical approach when patients were employed (47.2% vs 23.2%, p < 0.001) and had intervertebral disc herniation as an underlying pathology (30.7% vs 9.2%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The selection of approach for patients with CSM depends on patient demographics and symptomology. Posterior surgery was performed in patients who were older and had worse systemic disease, increased myelopathy, and greater levels of stenosis. Anterior surgery was more often performed in patients who were employed and had intervertebral disc herniation.
Asunto(s)
Desplazamiento del Disco Intervertebral , Enfermedades de la Médula Espinal , Fusión Vertebral , Espondilosis , Humanos , Anciano , Resultado del Tratamiento , Desplazamiento del Disco Intervertebral/cirugía , Espondilosis/cirugía , Fusión Vertebral/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios Prospectivos , Enfermedades de la Médula Espinal/cirugía , Enfermedades de la Médula Espinal/etiología , Vértebras Cervicales/cirugía , Descompresión QuirúrgicaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: There is increasing interest in performing awake spinal fusion under spinal anesthesia (SA). Evidence supporting SA has been positive, albeit limited. The authors set out to investigate the effects of SA versus general anesthesia (GA) for spinal fusion procedures on length of stay (LOS), opioid use, time to ambulation (TTA), and procedure duration. METHODS: The authors performed a retrospective review of a single surgeon's patients who underwent lumbar fusions under SA versus GA from June of 2020 to June of 2022. SA patients were compared to demographically matched GA counterparts undergoing comparable procedures. Analyzed outcomes include operative time, opioid usage in morphine milligram equivalents, TTA, and LOS. RESULTS: Ten SA patients were matched to 10 GA counterparts. The cohort had a mean age of 66.77, a mean body mass index of 27.73 kg/m2, and a median American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Score of 3.00. LOS was lower in SA versus GA patients (12.87 vs. 50.79 hours, P = 0.001). Opioid utilization was reduced in SA versus GA patients (10.76 vs. 31.43 morphine milligram equivalents, P = 0.006). TTA was reduced in SA versus GA patients (7.22 vs. 29.87 hours, P = 0.022). Procedure duration was not significantly reduced in SA patients compared to GA patients (139.3 vs. 188.2 minutes, P = 0.089). CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary retrospective results suggest the use of SA rather than GA for lumbar fusions is associated with reduced hospital LOS, reduced opioid utilization, and reduced TTA. Future randomized prospective studies are warranted to determine if SA usage truly leads to these beneficial outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Anestesia Raquidea , Fusión Vertebral , Humanos , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tiempo de Internación , Vigilia , Anestesia General , Caminata , Derivados de la MorfinaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Annually, hundreds of thousands of patients undergo surgery for degenerative spine disease (DSD). This represents only a fraction of patients that present for surgical consideration. Procedures are often avoided due to comorbidities that make patients poor candidates for general anesthesia (GA) and its associated risks. With increasing interest in awake surgery under spinal anesthesia (SA), the authors have observed that SA may facilitate spine surgery in patients with relative contraindications to GA. With this in mind, the authors set out to summarize the outcomes of a series of highly comorbid patients who received surgery under SA. METHODS: Case logs of a single surgeon were reviewed, and patients undergoing spine surgery under SA were identified. Within this group, patients were identified with relative contraindications to GA, such as advanced age and medical comorbidities. For these patients, for whom surgery was facilitated by SA, the medical records were consulted to report demographic information and patient outcomes. RESULTS: Ten highly comorbid patients were identified who received lumbar spine surgery for DSD under SA. Comorbidities included octogenarian status, obesity, and chronic health conditions such as heart disease. The cohort had a mean age of 75.5 and a mean American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA-PS) score of 3.1. The patients were predicted to have a 2.74-fold increase of serious complications compared to the average patient. There were no adverse events. CONCLUSION: For patients with symptomatic, refractory DSD and relative contraindications to GA, SA may facilitate safe surgical intervention with excellent outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Anestesia Raquidea , Neoplasias Encefálicas , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Humanos , Anciano , Anestesia Raquidea/efectos adversos , Anestesia Raquidea/métodos , Vigilia , Anestesia General/efectos adversos , Anestesia General/métodos , Columna Vertebral/cirugía , Vértebras LumbaresRESUMEN
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: Spinal chordomas are rare primary malignant neoplasms of the primitive notochord. They are slow growing but locally aggressive lesions that have high rates of recurrence and metastasis after treatment. Gold standard treatment remains en-bloc surgical resection with questionable efficacy of adjuvant therapies such as radiation and chemotherapy. Here we provide a comprehensive analysis of prognostic factors, treatment modalities, and survival outcomes in patients with spinal chordoma. METHODS: Patients with diagnosis codes specific for chordoma of spine, sacrum, and coccyx were queried from the National Cancer Database (NCDB) during the years 2004-2016. Outcomes were investigated using Cox univariate and multivariate regression analyses, and survival curves were generated for comparative visualization. RESULTS: 1,548 individuals were identified with a diagnosis of chordoma, 60.9% of which were at the sacrum or coccyx and 39.1% at the spine. The mean overall survival of patients in our cohort was 8.2 years. Increased age, larger tumor size, and presence of metastases were associated with worsened overall survival. 71.2% of patients received surgical intervention and both partial and radical resection were associated with significantly improved overall survival (P < 0.001). Neither radiotherapy nor chemotherapy administration improved overall survival; however, amongst patients who received radiation, those who received proton-based radiation had significantly improved overall survival compared to traditional radiation. CONCLUSION: Surgical resection significantly improves overall survival in patients with spinal chordoma. In those patients receiving radiation, those who receive proton-based modalities have improved overall survival. Further studies into proton radiotherapy doses are required.
RESUMEN
Background: C7 instrumentation during posterior cervicothoracic fusion can be challenging because it requires additional work of either placing side connectors to a single rod or placing two rods. Our clinical observations suggested that skipping instrumentation at C7 in a multi-level posterior cervicothoracic fusion will result in minimal intraoperative complications and decreased blood-loss while still maintaining sagittal balance parameters of cervical fusion. The objective of this study is to determine the clinical and radiographic outcomes of skipping C7 instrumentation compared to instrumenting the C7 vertebra in posterior cervicothoracic fusion. Methods: This is a retrospective chart review of 314 consecutive patients who underwent multilevel posterior cervical fusion (PCF) at our institution. Out of 314 patients, 19 were instrumented at C7 serving as the control group, while the remaining 295 patients were not. Evaluation of efficacy was based on intraoperative complications, operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), significant long-term complications, and radiographic evidence of fusion. Results: Skipping the C7 level resulted in a significant reduction in EBL (488±576 vs. 822±1,137; P=0.007); however, operative time was similar between groups (174±95 vs. 184±86 minutes; P=0.844). Complications were minimal in both groups and not statistically significant. Radiographic analysis revealed C7 bridge patients had a significantly increased postoperative sagittal vertical axis (SVA) (29.3±13.1 vs. 20.2±3.1 mm; P=0.008); however, there was no significant difference between groups in SVA correction (-0.3±16.2 vs. -16.1±16.0 mm; P=0.867), T1 slope correction (3.4°±9.9° vs. 3.2°±5.5°; P=0.127), or cervical cobb angle correction (-5.7°±14.2° vs. -7.0°±12.2°; P=0.519). There were no significant long-term complications in either group. Conclusions: Skipping instrumentation at C7 in a multilevel posterior cervicothoracic fusion is associated with significantly reduced operative blood loss without loss of radiographic correction. This study demonstrates the clinical benefits of skipping C7 instrumentation in posterior cervicothoracic fusion with maintenance of radiographic correction parameters.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Stereotactic intraoperative computer-assisted navigation has been shown to improve pedicle screw accuracy in spinal fusion surgery, but evidence of impact of navigation on clinical outcomes is lacking. The aim of this study is to compare rates of perioperative complications between navigated and nonnavigated procedures for deformity correction. METHODS: An administrative database was queried for adult patients undergoing thoracolumbar fusion procedures for deformity. Nonelective cases and those involving malignancy, infection, or trauma were excluded. Individuals were divided into 2 cohorts based on the use of stereotactic intraoperative navigation and paired 1:1 for comparison based on a propensity score matching algorithm. Rates of unplanned reoperation and other perioperative complications were compared between matched groups. A multivariable Cox regression model was constructed to identify the impact of navigation on specific subgroups. RESULTS: A total of 6150 patients met eligibility criteria for the study; after propensity score matching, 456 patients who underwent conventional fusion were matched to 456 patients receiving intraoperative navigation. Navigated cases took an average of 30 minutes longer than nonnavigated cases. There were no significant differences in rates of complications between cohorts. A subgroup analysis revealed that use of navigation was associated with decreased hazard for reoperation in individuals undergoing interbody fusion. CONCLUSIONS: Despite increased surgical duration, the use of navigation does not seem to significantly impact rates of perioperative complications outside of procedures involving interbody fusion. Surgeons should elect to use navigation in cases expected to be of high operative complexity at their own discretion.
Asunto(s)
Tornillos Pediculares , Fusión Vertebral , Cirugía Asistida por Computador , Adulto , Humanos , Tempo Operativo , Reoperación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fusión Vertebral/efectos adversos , Fusión Vertebral/métodosRESUMEN
Background: The optimal timing of ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) and gastrostomy placement, relative to the safety of simultaneous versus staged surgery, has not been clearly delineated in the literature.Objective: To study the optimal inter-procedural timing relative to distal VPS infection and pertinent reoperation.Methods: A fifteen-year, retrospective, single-center study was conducted on adults undergoing VPS and gastrostomy within 30-days. Patients were grouped according to inter-procedural interval: 0-24 hr (immediate), 24 hr-7 days (early), and 7-30 days (delayed). The primary endpoint of the study was VPS infection and distal shunt complications requiring reoperation. Potential predictors of the primary end point (baseline cohort characteristics, procedural factors) were examined with standard statistical methods.Results: A total of 188 patients met inclusion criteria. The average interval between procedures was 7 ± 6 days, with 43.1% undergoing VPS prior to gastrostomy. Primary endpoint was encountered in 5 patients (2.7%): 1 (5.9%) of 17 patients undergoing immediate placement, 3 (2.8%) of 107 with early placement, and 1 (1.6%) of 64 with delayed placement. Although not statistically significant, 3.7% of patients undergoing VPS first had the primary endpoint, compared to 1.9% of those with gastrostomy. There were no statistically significant associations between the primary outcome and peri-operative CSF counts, gastrostomy modality, hydrocephalus etiology, chronic steroid use, or extended antibiotic administration.Conclusion: Although the low overall event rate in this cohort precludes definitive determination regarding differential safety, the data generally support a practice of performing the procedures >24-hours apart, with placement of gastrostomy prior to VPS.
Asunto(s)
Gastrostomía/efectos adversos , Gastrostomía/métodos , Derivación Ventriculoperitoneal/efectos adversos , Derivación Ventriculoperitoneal/métodos , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Reoperación , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Computer-assisted navigation (CAN) has been shown to improve accuracy of screw placement in procedures involving the posterior cervical spine, but whether the addition of CAN affects complication rates, neurologic or otherwise, is presently unknown. The objective of this study is to determine the effect of spinal CAN on short-term clinical outcomes following posterior cervical fusion. METHODS: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried from 2011 to 2018. Patients receiving posterior cervical fusion were identified and separated into CAN and non-CAN cohorts on the basis of a propensity score matching algorithm to select similar patients for comparison. Rates of 30-day unplanned readmission, reoperation, and other complications were evaluated. A separate matching algorithm was used to generate a subgroup of patients undergoing C1-C2 or occiput-C2 fusion for comparison of the same outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 12,578 patients met inclusion criteria, of which 689 received CAN and 11,889 did not. After adjusting for baseline differences, patients receiving CAN experienced longer operations and had higher total relative value units associated with care. There were no significant differences in 30-day complication, readmission, or revision rates. At the occipitocervical junction, there were more hardware revisions in the non-CAN group, but this effect did not reach statistical significance (2 vs. 0; P = 0.155). CONCLUSIONS: Surgeons should embrace navigation in the cervical spine at their own discretion, as use of CAN does not appear to be associated with increased rates of surgical complications or readmissions despite longer operative time.
Asunto(s)
Neuronavegación/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Fusión Vertebral/efectos adversos , Fusión Vertebral/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Vértebras Cervicales/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tempo Operativo , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Puntaje de Propensión , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Chondrosarcomas of the skull base are rare intracranial tumors of chondroid origin. The rarity of these lesions has made it difficult to form a consensus on optimal treatment regimens. The aim of this study was to provide a comprehensive analysis of prognostic factors, treatment modalities, and survival outcomes in patients with chondrosarcoma of the skull base. METHODS: Patients with diagnosis codes for chondrosarcoma of the skull base were queried from the National Cancer Database for the years 2004-2016. Outcomes were investigated using Cox univariate and multivariate regression analyses, and survival curves were generated for comparative visualization. RESULTS: A total of 718 patients with chondrosarcoma of the skull base were identified. Mean overall survival (OS) in these patients was 10.7 years. Older age and presence of metastases were associated with worsened OS. Of patients, 83.3% received surgical intervention, and both partial resection and radical resection were associated with significantly improved OS (P < 0.001). Neither radiotherapy nor chemotherapy improved OS; however, patients who received proton-based radiation and patients who received high-dose radiation (≥6000 cGy) had significantly improved OS compared with patients who received traditional radiation. CONCLUSIONS: In the largest study to our knowledge of skull base chondrosarcoma to date, both partial resection and radical resection significantly improved OS, thus supporting the goal of maximal safe resection to preserve vital neurovascular structures without sacrificing outcome. In patients who received radiotherapy, proton-based modalities and high-dose radiation were associated with increased OS.
Asunto(s)
Condrosarcoma/diagnóstico , Condrosarcoma/terapia , Neoplasias de la Base del Cráneo/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Base del Cráneo/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Spinal hemangiomas are common primary tumors of the vertebrae. Although these tumors are most frequently benign and asymptomatic, they can rarely exhibit aggressive growth and invasion into neighboring structures. Treatment for these aggressive variants is controversial, often involving surgery, chemotherapy, and/or radiotherapy. This study sought to investigate current trends affecting overall survival (OS) using the National Cancer Database (NCDB) and to formulate treatment recommendations. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was queried for spinal hemangiomas between 2004 and 2016. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to perform multivariate regression analysis of survival. Survival curves for comparative visualization of demographic and treatment factors were generated using a semiparametric Cox approach. RESULTS: A cohort of 102 patients with histologically confirmed spinal hemangiomas was identified in the database. Mean OS was 1.94 years. Administered treatments included partial surgical resection (n = 17), radical resection (n = 14), chemotherapy (n = 34), and radiotherapy (n = 56). Multivariate analysis revealed associations between decreased OS and advanced age (>65 years) and presence of metastasis. Cox survival analysis further revealed improved OS in patients who received surgical treatment and higher radiation dose. CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective analysis finding that treatment with surgical resection and/or radiotherapy is associated with increased OS constitutes the largest cohort of patients with aggressive vertebral hemangiomas to date. Given that the mean OS of the study cohort was 1.94 years, our findings suggest that the optimal treatment regimen to maximize survival should consist of early surgical resection with adjuvant high-dose radiotherapy.
Asunto(s)
Hemangioma/terapia , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Quimioradioterapia , Estudios de Cohortes , Terapia Combinada , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Hemangioma/tratamiento farmacológico , Hemangioma/cirugía , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Dosis de Radiación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/cirugía , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Primary intracranial leiomyoma is a rare smooth muscle tumor often associated with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), with <30 cases reported worldwide. These tumors commonly occur in patients with immunocompromised status, especially those with human immunodeficiency virus. In the present report, we have described the case of an EBV-associated leiomyoma at the cerebellopontine angle. The patient had presented with trigeminal neuralgia, which, to the best of our knowledge, is the first reported anatomical location and presentation for this tumor type. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 41-year-old male patient had presented with right-sided facial pain in the V1 and V2 dermatomes and previous workup and imaging studies. The patient had undergone treatment of a presumed right-side cerebellopontine angle meningioma as determined by the magnetic resonance imaging characteristics (no biopsy). The patient subsequently underwent right-sided retrosigmoid craniotomy and gross total resection of the tumor. The postoperative period was uneventful with resolution of the trigeminal neuralgia. Histopathologic examination revealed spindle cell neoplasm with histopathologic and immunohistochemical features consistent with leiomyoma. The tumor cells were positive for smooth muscle actin and desmin and were negative for S100, SOX-10, epithelial membrane antigen, glial fibrillary acidic protein, progesterone receptor, CD31, CD34, and E-cadherin. CONCLUSIONS: Primary intracranial leiomyomas are rare tumors associated with EBV infection that occur in immunocompromised patients. These lesions should be considered in the differential diagnosis for patients with known immunocompromised status (e.g., human immunodeficiency virus), and tissue biopsy should be considered.
Asunto(s)
Encéfalo/virología , Ángulo Pontocerebeloso/cirugía , Infecciones por Virus de Epstein-Barr/cirugía , Leiomioma/virología , Neuralgia del Trigémino/cirugía , Adulto , Encéfalo/cirugía , Ángulo Pontocerebeloso/virología , Craneotomía/métodos , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Infecciones por Virus de Epstein-Barr/complicaciones , Infecciones por Virus de Epstein-Barr/diagnóstico , Humanos , Leiomioma/diagnóstico , Leiomioma/cirugía , Masculino , Neuroma Acústico/cirugía , Neuralgia del Trigémino/virologíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Analyze the clinical presentation, microbiology, outcomes, and medical and surgical treatment strategies of intracranial extension of sinogenic infection in pediatric patients. METHODS: A retrospective, single-center study of patients < 18 years of age, presenting with intracranial extension of bacterial sinogenic infections requiring surgical intervention over a 5-year period, was conducted. Electronic medical records were reviewed for age, sex, primary symptoms, duration of symptoms, presence of sinusitis at initial presentation, microorganisms isolated, mode of surgery, timing of surgery, length of stay, and neurologic sequelae. RESULTS: Seventeen patients were identified; mean age was 10 years with 82.3% male predominance. Average duration of illness prior to presentation was 9.8 days, with 64.7% of patients displaying disease progression while on oral antibiotics prior to presentation. Sinusitis and intracranial extension were present in all patients upon admission. Simultaneous endoscopic endonasal drainage and craniotomy were performed on 70.5% of the patients, with the remaining 29.5% undergoing endonasal drainage only. Of the patients who underwent simultaneous endoscopic endonasal drainage and craniotomy, 17.6% required repeat craniotomy and 5.8% required repeat sinus surgery. The most commonly isolated organisms were S. intermedius (52.9%), S. anginosus (23.5%), and S. pyogenes (17.6%). All patients were treated postoperatively antibiotic on average 4-6 weeks. Frequently occurring long-lasting complications included seizures (29.4%) and focal motor deficits (17.6%); learning disability, anxiety disorders, impaired cognition, and sensory deficits occurred less frequently. CONCLUSION: In the case of intracranial extension of bacterial sinogenic infection, early identification and surgical treatment are crucial to avoid neurological sequelae.
Asunto(s)
Sinusitis , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Niño , Craneotomía , Drenaje , Endoscopía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Spinal arteriovenous malformations (SAVMs) are a very rare and complex spinal cord pathology that require high clinical acumen to diagnose and treat. Management includes both nonoperative and operative paradigms. A review of the literature yields a paucity of data regarding the surgical outcomes of SAVMs, with the majority of data limited to single-center outcomes and/or small sample sizes. The purpose of this study was to use a multi-institutional international database to study the natural history of SAVMs. METHODS: We used the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database to select patients that underwent laminectomy for surgical excision of a SAVM between 2008 and 2017. RESULTS: The data from 196 patients were studied (65.8% male, 34.2% female). A majority of cases were in the thoracic region (53.6%), followed by thoracolumbar (31.6%) and cervical (14.8%) regions. The mean age was 57.4 years and 52.5% patients were graded ASA class 3-5 before the operation. The mean operation time was 215 minutes, with a significantly lower operative time for thoracic arteriovenous malformations (195.6 minutes) when compared with cervical (266.6 minutes) and thoracolumbar (223.7 minutes). The mean length of hospital stay was 6.4 days. Patients had a 6.6% readmission rate and a 4.6% reoperation rate within 30 days. CONCLUSIONS: This study presents the largest analysis of patients undergoing surgery for SAVMs and 30-day postoperative outcomes. Operative time differed based on SAVM location. The three most frequent complications (deep vein thrombosis, wound infection, and UTI) occurred at rates of 3.6% or less.
Asunto(s)
Malformaciones Arteriovenosas/cirugía , Malformaciones Vasculares del Sistema Nervioso Central/cirugía , Enfermedades de la Médula Espinal/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Malformaciones Arteriovenosas/patología , Malformaciones Vasculares del Sistema Nervioso Central/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades de la Médula Espinal/patologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Management of pediatric skull defects after decompressive craniectomy (DC) poses unique problems, particularly in children younger than 24 months. These problems include complications such as resorption and infection as well as difficulties with plagiocephaly and reconstruction. The goal of this study was to evaluate bone resorption complications after cranioplasty in patients <24 months. METHODS: A single-center retrospective case study was performed of all patients younger than 24 months who underwent cranioplasty after DC between 2011 and 2018. The following variables were assessed: injury cause, age at craniotomy, time to cranioplasty, craniectomy size, mode of fixation, drain use, shunt use, subdural fluid collection, resorption, need for synthetic graft revision, and plagiocephaly. RESULTS: A total of 10 patients were identified who met inclusion criteria; 3 patients were excluded for insufficient follow-up. Ages ranged from <1 day to 19 months, with a mean of 10.7 months. Overall rate of cranioplasty resorption was 85.7%, 57.1% of which required revision with synthetic graft. There were univariate trends toward more frequent implant resorption with subdural fluid collection (P = 0.1071) and without shunt placement (P = 0.1429). These effects persisted through multivariable analysis and even reached statistical significance in the case of subdural collection when controlling for operative and demographic characteristics (P = 0.01138, P = 0.0694). In addition, univariate analysis showed a trend toward more frequent neurologic complications with greater craniotomy-to-cranioplasty intervals (P = 0.1043), which reached significance on multivariable analysis (P = 0.00518). CONCLUSIONS: In patients younger than 24 months undergoing cranioplasty subdural collection, a lack of shunt placement and increased time to cranioplasty were associated with increased rates of resorption.
Asunto(s)
Craniectomía Descompresiva/efectos adversos , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Resorción Ósea/etiología , Sustitutos de Huesos/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Reoperación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Pneumoperitoneum after surgical manipulation of the abdomen implies a perforation. Rare cases of nonoperated cancer patients, largely with gastrointestinal or genitourinary cancers, have been noted to have radiologic findings of pneumatosis intestinalis and/or pneumoperitoneum as a complication of molecular-targeted therapy (MTT) without confounding factors for perforation. We present a patient with a cranial malignancy treated with bevacizumab who subsequently manifested with pneumatosis intestinalis. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 67-year-old man with metastatic melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer, and recurrent cerebellar subependymoma was initiated on bevacizumab treatment for subependymoma recurrence. He subsequently underwent an uncomplicated ventriculoperitoneal shunt for progressive obstructive hydrocephalus, confirmed by a normal postoperative abdominal radiograph. One week later, he returned with worsening lethargy and a computed tomography consistent with pneumomediastinum and pneumoperitoneum. Due to concern for bowel perforation, the patient underwent diagnostic laparoscopy and removal of ventriculoperitoneal shunt. Focal sigmoid pneumatosis was identified without any signs of bowel perforation or ischemia. Bevacizumab was discontinued, and the patient's radiologic and clinical findings improved. CONCLUSIONS: With increasing utilization of MTTs in brain tumor management, we raise MTT as a potential cause for pneumoperitoneum in neurosurgical patients. Pneumoperitoneum after extracranial procedures still requires workup and management for potential bowel perforation, but alternative causes such as bevacizumab should also be considered. Pneumatosis intestinalis patients on MTT can have benign physical examinations and will resolve, in the majority of cases, on discontinuation of the drug.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/efectos adversos , Bevacizumab/efectos adversos , Terapia Molecular Dirigida/efectos adversos , Neumatosis Cistoide Intestinal/inducido químicamente , Neumatosis Cistoide Intestinal/diagnóstico por imagen , Anciano , Neoplasias Encefálicas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Encefálicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/diagnóstico por imagen , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Masculino , Melanoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Melanoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Melanoma/secundario , Terapia Molecular Dirigida/métodosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Posterior cerebral artery aneurysms can frequently present with an ipsilateral cranial nerve III palsy. CASE DESCRIPTION: We report the first case of a posterior cerebral artery aneurysm associated with a contralateral cranial nerve III palsy. A 64-year-old male presented with acute subarachnoid hemorrhage, Hunt and Hess grade 3, and a left-sided fixed and dilated pupil. Computed tomography scan showed hemorrhage, mainly within the left basal cisterns. Digital subtraction angiography revealed a right-sided P1-P2 junction aneurysm. CONCLUSIONS: This case demonstrates that, although the neurological exam can help pinpoint the location of a lesion, false localizing signs should be recognized.