RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The French Society of Spinal Surgery (SFCR) offered guidelines during the COVID pandemic. The objective of this work was to report the organization and activity in spinal surgery during the first month of confinement across 6 centers in France. The secondary objective was to monitor the adequacy of our practices within the SFCR guidelines. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This prospective multicenter observational study reported spinal surgery activity in each institution from March 16 to April 16, 2020, as well as the organizational changes applied. Surgical activity was compared to that of the same period in 2019 in each center and evaluated according to the SFCR guidelines, in order to control the adequacy of our practices during a pandemic period. RESULTS: During the peak of the epidemic, 246 patients including 6 COVID-positive patients were treated surgically. The most significant drops in activity were found in Strasbourg (-81.5%) and Paris (-65%), regions in which the health situation was the most critical, but also in Bordeaux (-75%) despite less viral circulation. Operating rooms functioned at 20 to 50% of their normal capacity. There was a significant reduction in procedures for degenerative spine conditions or deformities, in line with the SFCR guidelines. CONCLUSION: Maintaining spinal surgery is possible and desirable, even in times of health crisis. The indications must be considered according to the emergency criteria developed by learned societies and adapted to health developments and to the technical possibilities of treatment, by center. LEVEL OF PROOF: IV.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Humanos , Pandemias , Estudios Prospectivos , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos , Columna VertebralRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can induce adverse neurological effects. Due to its rarity as an adverse effect, meningitis has been poorly described. Therefore, meningitis diagnosis and management can be challenging for specialists. Moreover, meningitis can be an obstacle to resuming immunotherapy. Given the lack of alternatives, the possibility of reintroducing immunotherapy should be discussed on an individual basis. Here, we present a comprehensive systematic review of meningitis related to ICIs. REVIEW: We performed a search for articles regarding immune-related meningitis published in PubMed up to November 2021 with the MeSH terms "meningitis" and "immune checkpoint" using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) method. We summarized the studies not only by category but also based on whether it was a primary article or case report to provide a systematic overview of the subject. We reviewed a total of 38 studies and herein report the clinical experiences, pharmacovigilance data and group knowledge from these studies. CONCLUSION: This review summarizes the existing information on immune-related meningitis and the possibility of reintroducing immunotherapy after the development of central neurological side effects. To the best of our knowledge, there is little information in the literature to guide clinicians on decisions regarding whether immunotherapy should be continued after a neurological adverse event occurs, especially meningeal events. This review emphasizes the necessity of systematic examinations, steroid treatment (as a cornerstone of management) and the need for further exploratory studies to obtain a clearer understanding of how to better manage patients who experience these side effects. The findings summarized in this review can help provide guidance to practitioners who face this clinical situation.
Asunto(s)
Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos , Meningitis Aséptica , Meningitis , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/etiología , Humanos , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/efectos adversos , Inmunoterapia/efectos adversos , Meningitis/etiología , Meningitis/terapia , Meningitis Aséptica/inducido químicamente , Meningitis Aséptica/terapiaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: A 12-year long, prospective, single center study was conducted, comparing two frameless systems for brain biopsies: ROSA robotic-assisted stereotaxy and BrainLab Varioguide image-guided stereotaxy (Image Guided Surgery, IGS). METHOD: All consecutive adult and pediatric patients undergoing frameless brain biopsies were included. Successfully achieving diagnosis was the primary endpoint, analysis of all periprocedural complications was the secondary endpoint, and the tertiary endpoint was the length of the procedure, with the aim of assessing of the learning curve for each operator over time. The results for the ROSA robot and the Varioguide system were compared and benchmarked to data from the literature. RESULTS: We performed 526 on 516 patients, 314 with the ROSA robot (Group A) and 212 with the IGS Varioguide (Group B). Histological diagnosis was achieved in 97.4% of cases in Group A, versus 93.3% in Group B (p < 0.05). No statistically significant difference was found for secondary and tertiary endpoints. The complication rate appeared similar between the 2 frameless systems, with a hemorrhagic complications rate of 3.5% in Group A and 4.7% in Group B. Permanent neurological deterioration was only recorded in 0.8% of cases from Group B. Mortality was recorded in 0.3% in Group A and 0.4% in Group B. CONCLUSION: This study provides evidence to confirm that robotic surgery lives up to its promises of increased safety, accuracy, and reliability.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Robótica , Cirugía Asistida por Computador , Adulto , Biopsia , Neoplasias Encefálicas/cirugía , Niño , Humanos , Neuronavegación , Estudios Prospectivos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Técnicas EstereotáxicasRESUMEN
Odontoid fractures constitute the most common cervical fractures in elderly. External immobilization is the treatment of choice for Type I and III; there is still no wide consensus about the best management of Type II fractures. Observational multicenter study was conducted on a prospectively built database on elderly patients (> 75 years) with Type II odontoid fracture managed conservatively during the last 10 years. All patients underwent CT scan on admission and at 3 months; if indicated, selected patient had CT scan at 6 and 12 months. All patients were clinically evaluated by Neck Disability Index (NDI), Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), and American Society of Anaesthesiologists classification (ASA) on admission; NDI was assessed also at 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months; furthermore, a quality of life (QoL) assessment with the SF-12 form was performed at 3 and 12 months. Among the 260 patients enrolled, 177 (68%) were women and 83 (32%) men, with a median age of 83 years. Patients were followed up for a minimum of 24 months: 247 (95%) showed an excellent functional outcome within 6 weeks, among them 117 (45%) showed a good bony healing, whereas 130 (50%) healed in pseudo-arthrosis. The residual 5% were still variably symptomatic at 12 weeks; however, only 5 out of 13 (2% of the total cohort) required delayed surgery. This study showed that a conservative approach to odontoid Type II fracture in elderly is an effective and valid option, resulting in an excellent functional outcome (regardless of bony fusion) in the majority of cases. Failure of conservative treatment can be safely addressed with surgical fixation at a later stage.
Asunto(s)
Apófisis Odontoides , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Objetivos , Humanos , Masculino , Apófisis Odontoides/diagnóstico por imagen , Apófisis Odontoides/lesiones , Apófisis Odontoides/cirugía , Calidad de Vida , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/cirugía , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The treatment strategy for thoracolumbar burst fractures is still debated. The aim of this study is to evaluate clinical and radiologic outcomes of a 2-stage strategy with immediate posterior percutaneous instrumentation and delayed anterolateral fusion (group A) versus a single-stage open posterior instrumented fusion (group B). METHODS: Demographics and clinical and surgical data of patients operated for AO Spine A3 and A4 fractures were prospectively collected. Vertebral height and deformity were evaluated before and after surgery. Visual analog scale score for back pain, Oswestry Disability Index, and 12-Item Short Form Health Survey results for quality-of-life assessment were collected during follow-up. RESULTS: Among the 110 patients enrolled, 66 were allocated to group A and 44 to group B; the most common fractured level was T12 (34%). Postoperative complications were higher in group B, especially the wound infection rate (18% vs. 3%), and pseudomeningocele (14% vs. 0%). The 2-stage approach allowed an average long-term gain of 15.8° at the local kyphosis of fractured vertebra and 5.8° at the regional level (Cobb angle), versus 15.4° and 5.5° in group B. At 2 years follow-up, both groups showed significant functional improvements; however, the visual analog scale and Oswestry Disability Index metrics seemed more favorable for group A patients (P < 0.0001 vs. P < 0.003). A complete fusion rate was obtained in 100% of group A vs. 65% of group B. CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates that percutaneous instrumentation and anterior fusion or an expandable cage lead to excellent long-term clinical and radiologic outcomes with a lower complication rate and higher fusion rate than those of open posterior approaches.
Asunto(s)
Fijación Interna de Fracturas/métodos , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/cirugía , Fusión Vertebral/métodos , Adulto , Femenino , Fijación Interna de Fracturas/efectos adversos , Humanos , Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Fusión Vertebral/efectos adversos , Vértebras Torácicas/cirugíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Secondary cranioplasty (CP) plays a key role in restoring cranial vault anatomy and normal brain function following decompressive craniectomy (DC). The scientific literature provides only fragmentary information regarding the best timing and material for CP, making a direct comparison of different materials difficult. OBJECT: To identify and report according to STROBE guidelines local trends in choice of materials for CP, complications rate and surgical outcomes. METHODS: We conducted an audit on secondary CP covering the last 20 years of surgical practice at our Institution. Custom-made CP used over the years were made of: porous hydroxyapatite (PHA), polymetylmethacrylate (PMMA), polyetheretherketone (PEEK), acrylic and titanium. The primary endpoint of this study was the incidence of postoperative complications, such as: implant infection, fracture and dislocation. Secondary endpoints were the followings: patients satisfaction with cosmetic result, rate of implant integration, and long-term neurological outcome. RESULTS: A total of 218 patients were included, given the predominance of PHA (Group A) or PMMA (Group B) CP, a direct comparison was made only between those two groups. Overall reoperation rate was 6.5% versus 28%; implants' osseointegration rate was of 69% versus 24%; satisfaction rate was 66% versus 44%, in Group A and B respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This single-centre study provides Level 3 evidence that PHA yields better outcomes than PMMA CP. Designing a management algorithm for planning and executing CP is difficult for clinical and organizational reasons; till a widespread consensus is reached, neurosurgeons with subspecialty interest in neurotrauma should favor pragmatism and patient safety over costs.
Asunto(s)
Durapatita/normas , Cetonas/normas , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/métodos , Polietilenglicoles/normas , Prótesis e Implantes , Adulto , Benzofenonas , Craniectomía Descompresiva/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oseointegración , Satisfacción del Paciente , Polímeros , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Reoperación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Cráneo/cirugía , TitanioRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Intracranial solitary fibrous tumors (ISFTs) are rare mesenchymal neoplasms originating in the meninges and characterized by very different biologic and clinical behaviors. Benign histotypes, such as hemangiopericytomas, are now considered a cellular phenotypic variant of this heterogeneous group of rare spindle-cell tumors. Owing to their rarity and resemblance to other, more common brain tumors, ISFTs are often poorly recognized and remain a diagnostic challenge. METHODS: We describe a surgical series of 29 patients treated for ISFTs confirmed histologically and through immunohistochemistry. We attempt to provide a focus on the natural history of these pathologies and the need for tailored management. RESULTS: This was a retrospective consecutive series of 29 patients with either solitary fibrous tumor (n = 14) or hemangiopericytoma (n = 15) over a 10-year period. Mean follow-up time was 37.71 months. Recurrence rate was 42.9% for solitary fibrous tumors versus 26.7% for hemangiopericytomas. STAT6 expression was 66.7% in hemangiopericytomas versus 42.9% in SFTs. CONCLUSIONS: Histopathology and immunohistochemical staining (characterized by positive expression of mainly STAT6 but also CD34, Bcl-2 protein, and vimentin) are key in diagnosis and management of ISFTs. Although ISFTs are still considered benign lesions with very rare aggressive evolution, their clinical behavior is largely unpredictable. This study highlights the importance of relying on immunohistochemistry for a thorough definition of the management strategy.