An appraisal of neostigmine versus sugammadex for neuromuscular blockade reversal in patients with a prior heart transplant.

INTRODUCTION: Heart transplant recipients present unique perioperative challenges for surgery. Specifically, autonomic system denervation has significant implications for commonly used perioperative drugs. This study investigates neuromuscular blocking antagonists in this population when undergoing subsequent non-cardiac surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective review was performed for the period 2015-2019 across our health care enterprise. Patients with previous orthotopic heart transplant and subsequent non-cardiac surgery were identified. A total of 185 patients were found, 67 receiving neostigmine (NEO) and 118 receiving sugammadex (SGX). Information of patient characteristics, prior heart transplant, and subsequent non-cardiac surgery was collected. Our primary outcome was the incidence of bradycardia (heart rate < 60 bpm) and/or hypotension (mean blood pressure (MAP) < 65 mmHg) following neuromuscular blockade reversal. Secondary outcomes included need of intra-operative inotropic agents, arrhythmia, cardiac arrest, hospital length of stay (hLOS), ICU admission, and death within 30 postoperative days. RESULTS: In unadjusted analysis, no significant differences were found between the two groups in change in heart rate [0 (-26, 14) vs. 1 (-19, 10), P = 0.59], change in MAP [0 (-22, 28) vs. 0 (-40, 47), P = 0.96], hLOS [2 days (1, 72) vs. 2 (0, 161), P = 0.92], or intraoperative hypotension [4 (6.0%) vs. 5 (4.2%), OR = 0.70, P = 0.60] for NEO and SGX respectively. After multivariable analysis, the results were similar for change in heart rate ( P = 0.59) and MAP ( P = 0.90). CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences in the incidence of bradycardia and hypotension were found in the NEO versus SGX groups. NEO and SGX may have similar safety profiles in patients with prior heart transplant undergoing non-cardiac surgery.

Comparison of onset of neuromuscular blockade with electromyographic and acceleromyographic monitoring: a prospective clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Reliable devices that quantitatively monitor the level of neuromuscular blockade after neuromuscular blocking agents' administration are crucial. Electromyography and acceleromyography are two monitoring modalities commonly used in clinical practice. The primary outcome of this study is to compare the onset of neuromuscular blockade, defined as a Train-Of-Four Count (TOFC) equal to 0, as measured by an electromyography-based device (TetraGraph) and an acceleromyography-based device (TOFscan). The secondary outcome was to compare intubating conditions when one of these two devices reached a TOFC equal to 0. METHODS: One hundred adult patients scheduled for elective surgery requiring neuromuscular blockade were enrolled. Prior to induction of anesthesia, TetraGraph electrodes were placed over the forearm of patients' dominant/non-dominant hand based on randomization and TOFscan electrodes placed on the contralateral forearm. Intraoperative neuromuscular blocking agent dose was standardized to 0.5 mg.kg-1 of rocuronium. After baseline values were obtained, objective measurements were recorded every 20 seconds and intubation was performed using video laryngoscopy once either device displayed a TOFC = 0. The anesthesia provider was then surveyed about intubating conditions. RESULTS: Baseline TetraGraph train-of-four ratios were higher than those obtained with TOFscan (Median: 1.02 [0.88, 1.20] vs. 1.00 [0.64, 1.01], respectively, p < 0.001). The time to reach a TOFC = 0 was significantly longer when measured with TetraGraph compared to TOFscan (Median: 160 [40, 900] vs. 120 [60, 300] seconds, respectively, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in intubating conditions when either device was used to determine the timing of endotracheal intubation. CONCLUSIONS: The onset of neuromuscular blockade was longer when measured with TetraGraph than TOFscan, and a train-of-four count of zero in either device was a useful indicator for adequate intubating conditions. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER AND REGISTRY: URL NCT05120999, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05120999.

Comparison of visual and electromyographic assessments with train-of-four stimulation of the ulnar nerve: a prospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: The use of a peripheral nerve stimulator to assess the level of neuromuscular blockade tasks the anesthesia clinician with subjectively assessing the response to neurostimulation. In contrast, objective neuromuscular monitors provide quantitative information. The purpose of this study was to compare subjective evaluations from a peripheral nerve stimulator with objective measurements of neurostimulation responses from a quantitative monitor. METHODS: Patients were enrolled preoperatively, and intraoperative neuromuscular blockade management was at the discretion of the anesthesiologist. Electromyography electrodes were placed over the dominant or nondominant arm in a randomized fashion. Following onset of nondepolarizing neuromuscular blockade, the ulnar nerve was stimulated, the response was measured with electromyography, and anesthesia clinicians, who were blinded to the objective measurements, subjectively (visually) evaluated the response to neurostimulation. RESULTS: Fifty patients were enrolled and 666 neurostimulations were performed at 333 different time points. Anesthesia clinicians subjectively overestimated the response of the adductor pollicis muscle following neurostimulation of the ulnar nerve 155/333 (47%) of the time when compared with objective electromyographic measurements. When subjective evaluations and objective measurements differed to any degree, subjective evaluations were higher than objective measurements 155/166 (92%) of the time (95% CI, 87 to 95; P < 0.001), representing significant evidence that subjective evaluation overestimates the response to train-of-four stimulation. CONCLUSIONS: Subjective observations of a "twitch" do not consistently correspond to objective measurements of neuromuscular blockade with electromyography. Subjective evaluation overestimates the response to neurostimulation and may be unreliable for determining the depth of block or confirming adequate recovery.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: Lors de l'utilisation d'un stimulateur nerveux périphérique pour évaluer le niveau de bloc neuromusculaire, le clinicien en anesthésie doit évaluer de manière subjective la réponse à la neurostimulation. Les moniteurs neuromusculaires objectifs fournissent quant à eux des informations quantitatives. L'objectif de cette étude était de comparer les évaluations subjectives d'un stimulateur nerveux périphérique avec des mesures objectives des réponses de neurostimulation provenant d'un moniteur quantitatif. MéTHODE: Les patients ont été recrutés avant leur opération, et la gestion du bloc neuromusculaire peropératoire était à la discrétion de l'anesthésiologiste. Des électrodes d'électromyographie ont été placées sur le bras dominant ou non dominant de manière aléatoire. Après l'amorce du bloc neuromusculaire non dépolarisant, le nerf cubital a été stimulé, la réponse a été mesurée par électromyographie, et les cliniciens en anesthésie, qui n'avaient pas accès aux mesures objectives, ont évalué subjectivement (visuellement) la réponse à la neurostimulation. RéSULTATS: Cinquante patients ont été recrutés et 666 neurostimulations ont été réalisées à 333 moments différents. Les cliniciens en anesthésie ont subjectivement surestimé la réponse du muscle adducteur du pouce après neurostimulation du nerf cubital 155/333 (47 %) fois par rapport aux mesures électromyographiques objectives. Lorsque les évaluations subjectives et les mesures objectives différaient à quelque degré que ce soit, les évaluations subjectives étaient plus élevées que les mesures objectives 155/166 (92 %) du temps (IC 95 %, 87 à 95; P < 0,001), ce qui représente une preuve significative que l'évaluation subjective surestime la réponse à la stimulation par train-de-quatre. CONCLUSION: Les observations subjectives d'une « contraction ¼ ne correspondent pas systématiquement aux mesures objectives d'un bloc neuromusculaire telles qu'obtenues par électromyographie. L'évaluation subjective surestime la réponse à la neurostimulation et pourrait ne pas être fiable pour déterminer la profondeur du bloc ou confirmer une récupération adéquate.

Aortic Stenosis Associated with an Increase in Mortality in Surgical Hip Fracture Patients.

OBJECTIVES: The majority of hip fracture patients in the United States are older adult patients with multiple comorbidities. Aortic stenosis (AS) in older adult patients with traumatic hip fracture is not uncommon. This study investigated the association between AS and postoperative mortality and serious complications. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, a chart review was performed of patients with AS who underwent hip fracture surgical repair between January 2011 and December 2019 within one health system. A control group of hip fracture patients without AS was identified and matched based on body mass index, age, sex, date of surgery and Charlson Comorbidity Index. The primary outcome of interest was 90-day mortality; secondary outcomes included 30-day postoperative complications, intensive care unit admission (ICU), and hospital length of stay. RESULTS: In total, 146 hip fracture patients with AS and 146 without AS were identified. In the AS group, there was an increased odds of 90-day mortality (odds ratio 2.64, 95% confidence interval 1.32-5.28, P = 0.005), and an increased odds of ICU admission (odds ratio 3.00, 95% confidence interval 1.36-6.68, P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of AS was independently associated with an increase in 90-day mortality and postoperative ICU stay in patients undergoing surgical repair of a hip fracture.

Comparison of onset of neuromuscular blockade with electromyographic and acceleromyographic monitoring: a prospective clinical trial

Abstract Background Reliable devices that quantitatively monitor the level of neuromuscular blockade after neuromuscular blocking agents' administration are crucial. Electromyography and acceleromyography are two monitoring modalities commonly used in clinical practice. The primary outcome of this study is to compare the onset of neuromuscular blockade, defined as a Train-Of-Four Count (TOFC) equal to 0, as measured by an electromyography-based device (TetraGraph) and an acceleromyography-based device (TOFscan). The secondary outcome was to compare intubating conditions when one of these two devices reached a TOFC equal to 0. Methods One hundred adult patients scheduled for elective surgery requiring neuromuscular blockade were enrolled. Prior to induction of anesthesia, TetraGraph electrodes were placed over the forearm of patients' dominant/non-dominant hand based on randomization and TOFscan electrodes placed on the contralateral forearm. Intraoperative neuromuscular blocking agent dose was standardized to 0.5 mg.kg−1 of rocuronium. After baseline values were obtained, objective measurements were recorded every 20 seconds and intubation was performed using video laryngoscopy once either device displayed a TOFC = 0. The anesthesia provider was then surveyed about intubating conditions. Results Baseline TetraGraph train-of-four ratios were higher than those obtained with TOFscan (Median: 1.02 [0.88, 1.20] vs. 1.00 [0.64, 1.01], respectively, p < 0.001). The time to reach a TOFC = 0 was significantly longer when measured with TetraGraph compared to TOFscan (Median: 160 [40, 900] vs. 120 [60, 300] seconds, respectively, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in intubating conditions when either device was used to determine the timing of endotracheal intubation. Conclusions The onset of neuromuscular blockade was longer when measured with TetraGraph than TOFscan, and a train-of-four count of zero in either device was a useful indicator for adequate intubating conditions. Clinical trial number and registry URL NCT05120999, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05120999.

Comparison of mortality and serious complications in lower extremity total joint arthroplasty patients with aortic stenosis receiving spinal versus general anesthesia.

INTRODUCTION: Aortic stenosis (AS) is a cardiac valvular lesion that can cause sudden death. Spinal anesthesia (SA) has been considered a relative contraindication in patients with AS. We sought to compare outcomes in patients with AS undergoing SA versus general anesthesia (GA) for lower extremity total joint arthroplasty (TJA). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted of elective, primary TJA cases between January 1, 2011, and November 30, 2017, at three tertiary care academic medical centers. Participants included 89 patients with AS undergoing TJA with SA, and 74 with AS undergoing TJA with GA. Primary endpoints included 90-day mortality, blood transfusion, hospital length of stay (LOS), and the 90-day incidence of deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction, and stroke. Propensity score matching was utilized to assess differences in outcomes between patients receiving GA vs. SA. RESULTS: After matching, there were no significant differences in mortality (GA 0% vs. SA 1%; OR: 1.01 [0.98, 1.05]; P = 0.498), serious complications GA 2.2% vs. SA 0%; OR: 1.00 [0.95, 1.05]; P = 0.233), blood transfusion (GA 12.4% vs. 9% SA; OR: 1.01 [0.86, 1.19]; P = 0.751) within 90 days in the GA vs. SA groups, nor hospital LOS (GA mean 3.0 vs. SA mean 2.9,  0.3 [-0.11, 0.70]; P = 0.153). CONCLUSIONS: There were no differences in the incidence of mortality or serious complications in matched patients with AS undergoing elective primary lower extremity TJA under SA versus GA.

Neuromuscular blockade management in patients with COVID-19.

This narrative review evaluates the evidence for using neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBA) in patients being treated for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). While large prospective randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) are lacking at this point in time, smaller observational studies and case series are reviewed to ascertain the indications and utility of NMBAs. Additionally, large RCTs that address similar clinical scenarios are reviewed and the authors translate these findings to patients with COVID-19. Specifically, NMBAs can be helpful during endotracheal intubation to minimize the risk of patient coughing and possibly infecting healthcare personnel. NMBAs can also be used in patients to promote patient-ventilator synchrony while reducing the driving pressure needed with mechanical ventilation (MV), particularly in patients with the severe clinical presentation (Type H phenotype). Prone positioning has also become a cornerstone in managing refractory hypoxemia in patients with SARS-CoV-2 acute respiratory distress syndrome, and NMBAs can be useful in facilitating this maneuver. In the perioperative setting, deep levels of neuromuscular blockade can improve patient outcomes during laparoscopic operations and may theoretically reduce the risk of aerosolization as lower insufflation pressures may be utilized. Regardless of the indication, quantitative neuromuscular monitoring remains the only reliable method to confirm adequate recovery following cessation of neuromuscular blockade. Such monitors may serve a unique purpose in patients with COVID-19 as automation of measurements can reduce healthcare personnel-patient contact that would occur during periodic subjective evaluation with a peripheral nerve stimulator.