Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Dermatol Pract Concept ; 12(4): e2022174, 2022 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36534562

RESUMEN

Introduction: Non-invasive imaging techniques offer the possibility to optimize the first approach to melanoma. Reflectance Confocal Microscopy (RCM) has a promising role in predicting the main prognostic events in the dermo-epidermal and papillary dermis. Objectives: To identify pre-surgical criteria that can predict the main prognostic features of melanoma. Methods: A retrospective cohort-study evaluated dermoscopic, confocal and histopathological characteristics of consecutively diagnosed sporadic melanomas. RCM-melanoma patterns classified into 1) dendritic-cell, 2) round-cell, 3) dermal nest and 4) combined type. Acral, facial and mucosal locations were excluded. Results: Ninety-two primary melanomas were included: 44 males and 48 females (mean age 60.4 years, standard deviation [SD] 16.2) with a mean Breslow of 1.43 mm (SD 1.6). The most frequent dermoscopic presentation was the multicomponent pattern, the predominant confocal pattern was dendritic-cell type (44.6%). The presence of pigmented network on dermoscopy was related to lower Breslow and mitotic rates (both P = 0.002); in contrast to the presence of visible vessels, which was related to higher Breslow and mitotic indexes (both P = 0.001). Confocal observation of dermal nests or atypical cells in the papillary dermis was related to a higher mitotic rate (P = 0.006 and P = 0.03, respectively). Similarly, diffuse inflammatory infiltrates visible in the superficial dermis was associated with higher Breslow (P = 0.04) and mitotic index (P = 0.04). Conclusions: Dermoscopic and RCM in vivo findings on primary melanoma correlate with histopathologic Breslow index, mitotic rate and tumor infiltrating lymphocytes. The architecture and cytology of primary melanoma can be estimated by combining dermoscopy and RCM prior to excision.

2.
Acta Derm Venereol ; 102: adv00751, 2022 Jul 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35535641

RESUMEN

Electrical impedance spectroscopy has clinical relevance in diagnosing malignancy in melanocytic lesions. Sixty-eight lesions with changes during digital follow-up of patients at very high risk of developing melanoma were prospectively included in this study from February to December 2016. Electrical impedance spectroscopy and reflectance confocal microscopy were performed to evaluate their performance in this subset of difficult lesions. Forty-six lesions were considered suspicious on reflectance confocal microscopy and were excised, of these, 19 were diagnosed as melanoma. Fifteen melanomas were detected by electrical impedance spectroscopy, while 4 received a score lower than 4, which suggested no malignancy. The addition of reflectance confocal microscopy improves accuracy while maintaining the same sensitivity. In the case of electrical impedance spectroscopy scores <4, lesions exhibiting changes in follow-up may need short-term monitoring or excision if dermoscopy shows criteria for melanoma. Results of electrical impedance spectroscopy in this subset of very early lesions should be carefully considered due to the risk of false negatives.


Asunto(s)
Melanoma , Neoplasias Cutáneas , Dermoscopía/métodos , Espectroscopía Dieléctrica/métodos , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Melanoma/patología , Microscopía Confocal/métodos , Neoplasias Cutáneas/patología , Síndrome
3.
Acta Derm Venereol ; 100(8): adv00106, 2020 Apr 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32110813

RESUMEN

Numerous dermoscopic structures for the early detection of melanoma have been described. The aim of this study was to illustrate the characteristics of dermoscopic structures that are similar to blotches, but smaller (termed microblotches), and to evaluate their association with other well-known dermoscopic structures. A cross-sectional study design, including 165 dermoscopic images of melanoma was used to define microblotches, and 241 consecutive images of naevi from the HAM10000 database, were studied to evaluate the prevalence of this criterion in both groups. Microblotches were defined as sharply demarcated structures ≤1 mm, with geographical borders visible only with dermoscopy. Microblotches were present in 38.7% of the melanomas and 6.7% of the naevi. Moreover, microblotches were associated with an odds ratio (OR) of malignancy of 5.79, and were more frequent in invasive melanoma than in the in-situ subtype (OR 2.92). Histologically, they correspond to hyperpigmented parakeratosis or epidermal consumption. In conclusion, microblotches are related to melanomas. This finding could help dermatologists to differentiate between naevi and melanomas.


Asunto(s)
Melanoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Nevo/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Cutáneas/diagnóstico por imagen , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios Transversales , Dermoscopía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Melanoma/patología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nevo/patología , Neoplasias Cutáneas/patología
4.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 83(4): 1057-1063, 2020 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31202873

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) allows accurate, noninvasive, in vivo diagnosis for skin cancer. However, its impact on physicians' diagnostic confidence and management is unknown. OBJECTIVES: We sought to assess the physicians' diagnostic confidence and management before and after RCM of equivocal skin lesions. METHODS: Prospective, 2-center, observational study. During clinical practice, 7 dermatologists recorded their diagnostic confidence level (measured in a scale from 0 to 10), diagnosis, and management before and after RCM of clinically/dermoscopically equivocal lesions that raised concern for skin cancer. We also evaluated the diagnostic accuracy before and after RCM. RESULTS: We included 272 consecutive lesions from 226 individuals (mean age, 53.5 years). Diagnostic confidence increased from 6.2 to 8.1 after RCM (P < .001) when RCM confirmed or changed the diagnosis. Lesion management changed in 33.5% cases after RCM (to observation in 51 cases and to biopsy/excision in 31 cases). After RCM, the number needed to excise was 1.2. Sensitivity for malignancy before and after RCM was 78.2% and 85.1%, respectively. Specificity before and after RCM was 78.8% and 80%, respectively. LIMITATIONS: Small sample size, real-life environment, and different levels of expertise among RCM users. CONCLUSION: Physicians' diagnostic confidence and accuracy increased after RCM when evaluating equivocal tumors, frequently resulting in management changes while maintaining high diagnostic accuracy.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Basocelular/diagnóstico por imagen , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/diagnóstico por imagen , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Síndrome del Nevo Displásico/diagnóstico por imagen , Melanoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Cutáneas/diagnóstico por imagen , Biopsia , Carcinoma Basocelular/patología , Carcinoma Basocelular/terapia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/terapia , Dermoscopía , Síndrome del Nevo Displásico/patología , Síndrome del Nevo Displásico/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Melanoma/patología , Melanoma/terapia , Microscopía Confocal/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nevo Pigmentado/diagnóstico por imagen , Nevo Pigmentado/patología , Nevo Pigmentado/terapia , Estudios Prospectivos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Piel/patología , Neoplasias Cutáneas/patología , Neoplasias Cutáneas/terapia , Espera Vigilante
6.
Dermatology ; 231(3): 217-21, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26278556

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Xeroderma pigmentosum (XP) is a genodermatosis caused by abnormal DNA repair. XP complementation group C (XPC) is the most frequent type in Mediterranean countries. We describe a case with a novel mutation in the XPC gene. CASE: A healthy Caucasian male patient was diagnosed with multiple primary melanomas. Digital follow-up and molecular studies were carried out. RESULTS: During digital follow-up 8 more additional melanomas were diagnosed. Molecular studies did not identify mutations in CDKN2A, CDK4 or MITF genes. Two heterozygous mutations in the XPC gene were detected: c.2287delC (p.Leu763Cysfs*4) frameshift and c.2212A>G (p.Thr738Ala) missense mutations. CONCLUSION: The p.Thr738Ala missense mutation has not been previously described. Missense mutations in the XPC gene may allow partial functionality that could explain this unusual late onset XP. Atypical clinical presentation of XPC could be misdiagnosed when genetic aberrations allow partial DNA repair capacity.


Asunto(s)
ADN de Neoplasias/genética , Proteínas de Unión al ADN/genética , Mutación Missense , Xerodermia Pigmentosa/genética , Adulto , Análisis Mutacional de ADN , Proteínas de Unión al ADN/metabolismo , Dermoscopía , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Microscopía Confocal , Xerodermia Pigmentosa/diagnóstico , Xerodermia Pigmentosa/metabolismo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...