Introduction Both osteoporosis and osteopenia are prevalent public health concerns worldwide and can lead to debilitating bone fractures. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of Asthiposhak® Tablets in individuals with Asthikshaya (osteopenia) by measuring changes in the bone mineral density (BMD) score before and after the intervention, specifically between visit 1 (baseline) and visit 8 (after 180 days of treatment). Methods The single-arm study involved the screening of participants for Asthikshaya (osteopenia) using baseline investigations, which included a bone mineral density (BMD) assessment through a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scan. A total of 36 participants were enrolled in the study, who took two Asthiposhak Tablets three times a day with lukewarm water, for a period of 180 days. Safety assessments, along with evaluations of BMD (DEXA Scan), Ayurvedic Symptom Score, and serum biochemical markers, were conducted through blood investigations. Efficacy and safety data were analyzed using 'intention-to-treat' analysis. Descriptive statistics were used to express data in percentages, mean ± SD, or median (IQR). Data at different intervals were compared using paired t-tests or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Bonferroni correction tested the significance between visits for the Ayurvedic Symptom Score, and Friedman's two-way analysis of variance by ranks measured differences in vital parameters. The significance level used was p<0.05. Results Out of the initially recruited 36 participants, 30 successfully completed the study, consisting of 12 males and 18 females, with an age range of 40 to 70 years and a mean age of 51.33 years. After 180 days of treatment with Asthiposhak Tablets, a statistically significant (p<0.05) improvement in hip and spine BMD (T-score) was observed. Additionally, significant reductions in the mean Total Ayurvedic Symptom Score were noted at both 90 and 180 days of treatment compared to day 0. Moreover, the levels of bone-specific alkaline phosphatase and osteocalcin, serum bone markers, showed statistically significant (p<0.05) reduction after 180 days of treatment compared to day 0. Importantly, all safety variables, including laboratory investigations, remained within the normal range following the 180-day treatment with Asthiposhak Tablets. Conclusion Asthiposhak Tablets exhibited significant efficacy in enhancing both BMD (T-score) and Ayurvedic Symptom Score, thereby substantiating their osteoprotective potential in individuals with Asthikshaya (osteopenia). Furthermore, the tablets were found to reduce the levels of biochemical markers, such as serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase and osteocalcin, suggesting their anti-resorptive action.
Introduction Anal fissures are tears in the anal canal that cause pain, bleeding, and spasms. They can be treated with non-operative options such as sitz baths, local anesthetics, topical nitrates, oral fiber, and calcium channel blockers, but some patients require surgery. Topical nitrates have side effects such as severe headaches, while topical calcium channel blockers can cause itching. There is a need to explore alternative treatments with fewer side effects. This proof-of-concept pilot study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of a combination of Arsha Hita™ tablets and ointment (Shree Dhootapapeshwar Limited, Mumbai Maharastra, India) (test treatment) with a combination of lidocaine 1.5% w/w + nifedipine 0.3% w/w cream for local application and Isabgol powder (6 g) orally as an active comparator (standard treatment), which is the standard treatment of anal fissures as per the Association of Colon and Rectal Surgeons of India (ACRSI) guidelines. Methodology This study was a single-center, prospective, randomized-controlled study conducted in Karnataka, India. Participants were screened for anal fissures and randomized to receive either standard treatment (Group A) or test treatment (Group B) for 14 days, and were re-evaluated after two, four, and six weeks. The study assessed signs and symptoms related to anal fissures, such as pain post-defecation on Visual Analog Scale (VAS), bleeding per anus grading, wound healing grade, stool consistency, and stool frequency. Compliance, inter-current illness, and concomitant therapy were noted at each visit. The study used independent sample t-tests to compare variables at baseline and chi-square or Fisher's exact tests to compare the number/proportion of participants achieving primary and secondary endpoints. Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare median composite scores at baseline and Visit 4, and Friedman's two-way analysis of variance was used to compare median composite scores across the four visits (p < 0.05 was considered significant). Descriptive analysis was used to assess VAS, bleeding, and healing grades. Results The study included 53 participants with anal fissures, of which 25 out of 27 allocated in Group A (two drop-outs) received standard treatment, and all 26 allocated in Group B received Arsha Hita treatment. At the end of the study, 11 participants in Group B achieved a 90% reduction in composite scores compared to only three patients in Group A (p<0.05). Both groups showed improvement in pain on defecation, severity of bleeding, healing of anal fissure wound, and participant's and physician's global impression score. Group B had significantly better results in terms of VAS score, resolution of per-anal bleeding, and physician's global impression score (p<0.05). There were no adverse events in either group during the six-week treatment period. Conclusion The pilot study provides evidence that the combination of Arsha Hita tablets and Arsha Hita ointment may be more effective and safer for treating anal fissures than the standard treatment. The test treatment group experienced greater pain relief, complete resolution of per-anal bleeding, and better global impression scores than the standard treatment group. These findings suggest the need for further research through larger, randomized controlled trials to determine the efficacy and safety of Arsha Hita in treating anal fissures.
BACKGROUND: Endoscopic gastritis is associated with symptoms of gastritis, along with endoscopic findings. Amlapitta Mishran has multiple active components that act via various mechanisms in patients with gastritis symptoms. We planned to conduct this study to find out the efficacy and safety of Amlapitta Mishran in patients with endoscopic gastritis. OBJECTIVES: To find out efficacy of Amlapitta Mishran in patient with endoscopic gastritis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was an open-label, prospective, single-center study. Thirty participants were recruited, and Amlapitta Mishran Suspension was given for 30 days. Blood investigations for safety were performed at baseline (Visit 1), on Visit 3 and Visit 4. Endoscopy was performed at baseline and Visit 4, and stomach erosion score was recorded. Amlapitta Symptom Rating Scale score, Postprandial Distress Syndrome (PPDS) score, and Epigastric Pain Syndrome (EPS) score were efficacy endpoints. RESULTS: Out of the 30 participants recruited, 28 participants completed the study. The median age of participants in the study was 26.50 years. A statistically significant (P<0.05) reduction was seen in endoscopy score at Visit 4 as compared to baseline (Visit 1) by Wilcoxon Signed Rank test. Amlapitta Symptom Rating Scale score, PPDS score, EPS score also exhibited significant reduction (P < 0.05) at Visit 3 and Visit 4 as compared to baseline by Friedman's test with post hoc analysis. No statistically significant reduction was seen in these scores from Visit 3 to Visit 4, except for the EPS score. At the end of Visit 4, 18 (64%) participants had an endoscopy score of 1 (no erosions). At the end of Visit 4, ≥ 50% improvement was seen in Amlapitta Symptom Rating Scale score in 27 (96%) participants, PPDS score improved by ≥ 50% in 25 (89%) participants, and EPS score improved by ≥ 50% in 26 (93%) participants. All safety variables including laboratory investigation were within the normal range in all visits. CONCLUSION: Amlapitta Mishran Suspension effectively reduced endoscopic gastritis scores in the participants and reduced the symptoms of gastritis measured by the Amlapitta Symptom Rating Scale, PPDS, and EPS scores with no adverse events.
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1007/s40200-022-01012-4.].
Purpose: Ayurvedic system, a traditional medicinal system has mentioned a preparation Bruhat Vata Chintamani Rasa (Suvarnayukta) for management of heart diseases. Hrudroga Chintamani Rasa (HCR) is a formulation containing Bruhat Vata Chintamani Rasa and a few additional ingredients having beneficial effects in heart diseases. The present study was designed to investigate the cardioprotective activity of the Hrudroga Chintamani Rasa in isoproterenol (ISO)-induced myocardial infarction in rats. Methods: Male Sprague Dawley rats were treated with HCR at a dose of 56.16 and 112.32 mg/kg for 30 days. Animals received ISO (85 mg/kg. s.c.) on 28th and 29th day at an interval of 24 h. Result: Disease control animals treated with HCR at a dose of 56.16 mg/kg and 112.32 mg/kg to rats showed a significant reduction in elevated levels of aspartate aminotransferase (AST), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and creatine phosphokinase MB (CK-MB), and prevented loss of depleted antioxidant enzymes from the cardiac tissue. ISO-altered electrocardiogram pattern and haemodynamic parameters were also brought about to normal by treatment with HCR. HCR treatment also improved the levels of 5' adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK) and Silent information regulator 1 (SIRT1) which have potent role in antioxidant defence mechanism. Histopathological findings also showed HCR treatment prevented cardiac tissue from damage. Conclusion: HCR treatment showed a significant cardioprotective effect in ISO-induced cardiotoxicity in rats probably because of the potent antioxidant activity. Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40200-022-01012-4.
BACKGROUND: Shwaskas Chintamani Rasa (SKC) and Kas Shwas Hari Rasa (KSH) are the Ayurvedic herbo-mineral formulations. These Ayurvedic formulations contain heavy metals which is the reason of concern and might bring up the safety issue. OBJECTIVE: This research article is aimed to study chronic toxicity of SKC and KSH for safety aspect in Wistar rats. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A study group of 220 healthy rats were divided into six groups. These rats were administered with SKC and KSH formulations where both the formulations were administered for 180 consecutive days. SKC was administered at doses of 58 mg/kg (equivalent to therapeutic dose i.e. TD), 145 mg/kg (2.5 TD), 290 mg/kg (5 TD) and KSH was administered at dose of 58 mg/kg (TD). According to OECD guideline 452, the effect of these formulations was examined on hematology, serum biochemistry and histopathology of various organs. RESULTS: Both the formulations did not produce any signs or symptoms of treatment related toxicity in both male and female Wistar rats at therapeutic dose (TD), 2.5 times TD and 5 times TD. CONCLUSION: Based on these findings, the NOAEL (No observed adverse effect level) for test formulations SKC and KSH tablets in male and female wistar rats concluded to be preclinically safe.
Objectives: This study aimed to assess the adverse effects of Rasaraj Rasa tablets after repeated oral administration for 180 days in Wistar rats. Methods: Wistar rats were divided into five groups, of which three were treated with 54, 162, and 270 mg/kg body weight of Rasaraj Rasa, respectively, which correspond to one, three, and five times the proposed human therapeutic dose, for 180 days consecutively. The fifth group (satellite) also received 270 mg/kg body weight of Rasaraj Rasa for 180 days. Body weight and food intake were measured weekly. At the end of the study, all rats were sacrificed, and their blood, serum, and organs were collected and examined using hematology, serum biochemistry, gross pathology, and histopathology tests. In contrast, the satellite group was kept for 4 weeks after treatment. Results: No significant treatment-related toxicological findings were observed in the clinical features, body weight, laboratory findings, and pathological findings of the high-dose treated groups, when compared to those of the control group. Conclusion: The no-observed-adverse-effect-level for Rasaraj Rasa in Wistar rats is set at 270 mg/kg body weight.
BACKGROUND: The medical management of hemorrhoids should include an integrated approach. This integrated approach can be achieved by polyherbal formulations containing anti-inflammatory, styptics, analgesics, and laxative effect which reduce inflammation, pain, and bleeding, and increase gastro-intestinal motility and soften stools. One such polyherbal kit is "Arshkeyt™, a 7 day kit," which consists of oral tablets and powder along with topical cream. OBJECTIVE: Efficacy and safety of Arshkeyt™, a 7 day kit, a marketed polyherbal formulation was evaluated in comparison with conventional therapy practiced in surgery outpatient departments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients (n = 90) with hemorrhoids were randomly allocated to receive either Arshkeyt™ or standard therapy (combination of oral Isabgul powder and 2% lidocaine gel) for 14 days. Assessment on the basis of rectal symptoms and proctoscopic examination was done on day 0, 7, and 14 to derive a "composite score" which ranged from 0 to 25 by a blinded evaluator. The primary endpoint was number of patients achieving composite score 0 at the end of therapy (day 14). Inter-group analysis was done using Chi-square test. RESULTS: On day 14, the composite score of 0 was achieved in 15 patients of Arshkeyt™ group versus 6 patients receiving standard therapy. The symptoms and signs which showed significant improvement in Arshkeyt™ group compared to standard treatment group were the tenesmus (visual analog score) score (P = 0.047), anal sphincter spasm (P = 0.0495) and a decrease in the grade of hemorrhoids (P = 0.0205) on day 14. Arshkeyt™ was also more beneficial in case of bleeding hemorrhoids as compared to nonbleeding hemorrhoids (P < 0.05). The incidence of adverse drug reactions in both groups was comparable and no patient required any treatment for the same. CONCLUSION: "Arshkeyt™, a 7 day kit," was effective in the treatment of hemorrhoids and had a good safety profile.
