Total Synthesis and Antibacterial Evaluation of Lupinifolin and Its Natural Analogues.

In this study, lupinifolin (1) and its natural analogues, mundulin (2), minimiorin (3), khonklonginol H (4), flemichin D (5), and eriosemaone A (27), were obtained by chemical synthesis for the first time. Key steps involved an electrocyclization to build the linear pyran rings and a Claisen/Cope rearrangement to install the 8-prenyl substituents. All compounds were assessed for their in vitro antimicrobial activities against clinically relevant human pathogens, including one Gram-negative bacterial strain (E. coli ATCC 25922) and four Gram-positive bacterial strains (S. aureus ATCC 29213, E. faecalis ATCC 29212, MRSA21-5, and VRE ATCC 51299). The result indicated that eriosemaone A (27) was the most potent one against Gram-positive bacteria, with minimum inhibitory concentrations in the range of 0.25-0.5 µg/mL. Mechanistic studies indicated that 27 has good membrane-targeting ability to bacterial inner membranes and can bind to phosphatidylglycerol and cardiolipin in bacterial membranes, thereby disrupting the bacterial cell membranes and causing bacterial death.

Total syntheses and antibacterial evaluations of cudraflavones A-C and related Flavones.

The total syntheses of the natural prenylated flavones cudraflavones A-C (1-3), artoheterophyllin D (28) and artelasticin (29) are reported, along with the evaluations of their antibacterial activities. The key steps of the synthesis involved a Baker-Venkataraman rearrangement and an intramolecular cyclization for the construction of the flavone core and the regioselective formation of the pyran and isopentenyl scaffolds. The tested natural flavones 1-3 and 27-29 exhibited potent activity against S. aureus ATCC 29213, S. epidermidis ATCC 14990, E. faecalis ATCC 29212 and B. subtilis ATCC 6633 with MIC values ranging from 0.125 µg/mL to 16 µg/mL. Compound 3 displayed the strongest potency, with MIC values in the range between 0.125 and 1 µg/mL, as a potential candidate to combat G+ bacterial infections. Preliminary mechanism of action studies suggested that this compound killed bacteria by disrupting bacterial membrane integrity.