Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 11556, 2024 05 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38773184

RESUMEN

Racial and ethnic health disparities in the incidence and severity of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) have been observed globally and in the United States. Research has focused on transmission, hospitalization, and mortality among racial and ethnic minorities, but Long COVID-19 health disparities research is limited. This study retrospectively evaluated 195 adults who survived COVID-19 associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (C-ARDS) in New York City from March-April 2020. Among survivors, 54% met the criteria for Long COVID syndrome. Hispanic/Latinx patients, were more likely to be uninsured (p = 0.027) and were less frequently discharged to rehabilitation facilities (p < 0.001). A cross-sectional telephone survey and interview were conducted with a subset of survivors (n = 69). Among these, 11% reported a lack of follow-up primary care post-discharge and 38% had subsequent emergency room visits. Notably, 38% reported poor treatment within the health care system, with 67% attributing this to racial or ethnic bias. Thematic analysis of interviews identified four perceived challenges: decline in functional status, discrimination during hospitalization, healthcare system inequities, and non-healthcare-related structural barriers. Sources of resilience included survivorship, faith, and family support. This study highlights structural and healthcare-related barriers rooted in perceived racism and poverty as factors impacting post-COVID-19 care.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Hospitalización , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria , Sobrevivientes , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/terapia , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Adulto , Estudios Retrospectivos , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/terapia , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Transversales , Ciudad de Nueva York/epidemiología , SARS-CoV-2 , Minorías Étnicas y Raciales , Hispánicos o Latinos/estadística & datos numéricos
2.
J Clin Tuberc Other Mycobact Dis ; 35: 100406, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38380432

RESUMEN

Virtual modes of tuberculosis (TB) treatment monitoring have become increasingly relevant in the last decade with the advancements and increasing accessibility of technology. We conducted a systematic review comparing people with TB's perceptions of standard directly observed therapy (DOT) versus video directly observed therapy (vDOT). Studies were obtained from MEDLINE and EMBASE between January 1, 1974 and February 4, 2021. Of the 22 articles reviewed, a qualitative thematic analysis was performed, drawing on common themes from people with TB's perception of their care. 21 studies showed relative preference for and acceptance of vDOT over DOT. Factors that increased acceptability toward vDOT included cost and time saving, personal sense of empowerment, convenience, and privacy. Studies also showed greater adherence to treatment and subsequent improved health outcomes. vDOT has the potential to be an empowering, person-centered treatment modality for TB therapy. The role of social determinants such as place of residence, access to technology, and patient-provider communication requires further exploration.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA