RESUMEN
BACKGROUND/AIM: This retrospective study was designed to investigate the efficacy and safety of concurrent lenvatinib and proton beam therapy (PBT) in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty HCC patients were identified, including Child-Pugh classification A in 16 patients and B (7) in four patients. Sixteen patients had macrovascular invasion, including four with main portal vein thrombosis (Vp4). The dose of lenvatinib depends on body weight; the median PBT dose was 72.6 Gy. RESULTS: The median progression-fee survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of the entire population were 8.3 months and 18.4 months, respectively. For PBT targeting intrahepatic lesions and great vessels, the objective response rate (ORR) showed a complete response and partial response (PR) of 20% and 65%, respectively. In the analysis of concurrent lenvatinib and PBT, the ORR included PR of 55% and stable disease of 25%, with disease control rate of 80%. For patients without distant metastasis upon treatment initiation, the time to local control failure (including proton in-field and out-field) was 14.3 months and distant metastasis-free survival was 17.7 months. There was no statistical difference in the analysis of PFS and OS in patients with or without portal vein thrombosis. The severity of most adverse events was grades 1-2, wherein most patients tolerated the toxicities. CONCLUSION: Our study confirmed the efficacy and safety of concurrent lenvatinib and PBT. Thus, this combination therapy may be a reasonable treatment option for selected patients with advanced HCC in clinical practice.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Terapia de Protones , Humanos , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/radioterapia , Terapia de Protones/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/radioterapiaRESUMEN
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with bile duct invasion is a rare and notorious subtype of HCC. This study included patients that had unresectable HCC with bile duct invasion and proton beam therapy between November 2015 and February 2021. Twenty patients fit the inclusion criteria. The median tumor size was 6.3 cm. Nine patients (45.0%) had major vascular invasions. All included patients received the radiation dose of 72.6 gray relative biological effectiveness due to the proximity of porta hepatis and tumor. The median follow-up time was 19.9 months. The median overall survival was 19.9 months among deceased patients. The 1-year cumulative local recurrence rates were 5.3%, with only two patients developing in-field failure. The 1-year and 2-year overall survival rates were 79.4% and 53.3%. The 1-year progression-free survival was 58.9%. Four patients developed radiation-induced liver disease. The 1-year cholangitis-free survival was 55.0%. Skin toxicity was the most common acute toxicity and rarely severe. Eight patients developed ≤ grade 3 gastrointestinal ulcers. Proton beam therapy offers desirable survival outcomes for unresectable HCC patients with bile duct invasion. Optimal local tumor control could also be obtained within acceptable toxicities.
RESUMEN
Background: Oral mucositis (OM) is a common side effect of radiotherapy (RT) that can have severe implications in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC). Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) formula is widely applied in treating OM, but little substantial evidence exists to clarify it effects. The study intends to determine whether the TCM-based prescription in treating HNC with RT can improve the OM when compared with RT alone. Methods: A single-center, randomized, two-arm parallel-group, open-label controlled clinical trial will be conducted to determine whether the Zi-Yin-Liang-Ge-San (ZYLGS), which contains Rx. Scutellariae, Rx. Glycyrrhizae, Hb. Dendrobii, Rx. Ophiopogonis, and Hb. Menthae Haplocalycis, combined with RT can improve the incidence and severity of OM. Two hundred participants will randomly 1:1 to receive at least 6 weeks of RT plus ZYLGS powder or control. The primary outcome measures are onset, gradation of OM (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0), and oral pain (visual analogue scale). The secondary outcome measures include nutritional status, the EORTC Quality of Life Core Questionnaire and head and neck module. The Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, serious adverse events, and blood and biochemical analysis will be recorded to evaluate the safety. Visits will be performed for each week during the RT treatment period and then 2 weeks in the follow-up period. Discussion: The study's result will provide a high-level evidence for TCM-based formulation for HNC patients with RT on the effect of OM prevention and management.
RESUMEN
Outcomes and prognostic factors among patients with brain metastases (BM) have been widely studied, but seldom for the non-elderly. Heart rate variability (HRV) is a physiological phenomenon and has been shown as a survival prognostic factor in cancer patients. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes and prognosis among non-elderly BM patients with the incorporation of HRV analysis. Forty non-elderly BM patients treated using whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) were studied from January 2010 prospectively with 5-min electrocardiography (ECG) recordings. Individualized HRV was generated by the ECG, and the time domain HRV index SDNN was chosen for survival analysis. The median overall survival (OS) for the entire group was 6.21 months. Univariate analysis revealed that a KPS < 80 (p = 0.019) and an SDNN < 10 ms (p = 0.007) demonstrated statistical significance for OS; multivariate analysis confirmed that a KPS < 80 (p = 0.004; HR = 3.060, CI = 1.437-6.517) and an SDNN < 10 ms (p = 0.010; HR = 2.664, CI = 1.262-5.624) were independent prognostic factors. Prospective studies for risk stratification among non-elderly BM patients based on our results are warranted to validate our findings.
RESUMEN
Intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) with the vertebral artery (VA)-sparing technique has been initially proposed in our institution. This pilot study was conducted to compare the dose to VAs between IMPT and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). A total of six patients with NPC treated by IMPT were enrolled in the study. Target volumes and organs at risk (OARs) were delineated, including 12 samples of right and left VAs, respectively, for each patient. Treatment planning by IMPT and dual-arc VMAT was carried out for comparison. The IMPT plan significantly reduced VA mean dose, V10, V20, V30, V40, and V50, compared to the VMAT plan in all 12 samples (p < 0.001). The average mean dose to VAs for IMPT was 35.2% (23.4-46.9%), which was less compared to VMAT (p < 0.001). Adequate dose coverage was achieved with both IMPT and VMAT plans for three different dose levels of target volumes for all patients. IMPT significantly reduces VA dose while maintaining adequate dose coverage of all target volumes. For patients with head and neck cancer who seek to preserve their blood flow to the brain in order to decrease late vascular and neurologic sequelae, IMPT should be considered. A prospective study with longer follow-up is ongoing to confirm our preliminary results.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Evidence is lacking concerning the benefit of the combination of sorafenib and radiotherapy to treat advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). To date, no publication has reported the outcomes of radiotherapy alone versus concurrent therapy. We aimed to compare the effectiveness of radiotherapy alone versus concurrent radiotherapy and sorafenib for locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a propensity score matching (PSM) cohort study comparing the effectiveness of the concurrent use of sorafenib and external beam radiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage B or C, nonsurgically managed, nonmetastatic patients with HCC. Two subpopulations were matched based on baseline characteristics. Stratified analysis was also performed to assess the heterogeneous effects of the two arms. Overall survival (OS) was compared. Radiation-induced liver disease (RILD) and overt gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding events were also recorded. RESULTS: Seven hundred thirty-one BCLC stage B or C nonmetastatic HCC patients were identified from 2007 to 2017. Of these, 347 patients met the inclusion criteria (Radiotherapy alone: 269 patients; concurrent therapy: 78 patients). Propensity score matching yielded 73 patients each in the radiotherapy and concurrent groups. The median OS was 9.6 months in the radiotherapy-alone group and 9.9 months in the concurrent group (hazard ratio (HR): 1.12; 95% CI=0.78-1.62; p=0.544). Posttreatment toxicities, including radiation-induced liver disease and overt gastrointestinal bleeding, showed no significant differences between the groups. CONCLUSION: In our study, the concurrent use of sorafenib and conventional external beam radiotherapy shows no survival benefit over radiotherapy alone for locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Proton radiotherapy has a dosimetric advantage over photon radiotherapy. Many retrospective studies have shown promising results with proton radiotherapy in treating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, clinical evidence demonstrating the benefit of protons over photons is still limited. We therefore compared the clinical outcomes of the two modalities using medical research databases from our medical foundation. METHODS: We conducted a propensity score-matched cohort study based on our multi-institution medical organization research database. From January 2007 to January 2018, a total of 413 patients (photon: 349; proton: 64) who were diagnosed with HCC and primarily treated with radiotherapy with curative intent were enrolled. Overall survival (OS) and radiation-induced liver disease (RILD) were assessed. Stratified analysis was also performed to evaluate the heterogeneous effects of the two arms. RESULTS: A total of 110 patients (photon: 55; proton: 55) were analyzed in the propensity-matched series. The matched groups were balanced for baseline tumor risk factors. Cox regression analysis revealed a significant survival benefit in the proton group (p = 0.032, HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.33-0.96). The median overall survival in the proton group was not reached and that in the photon group was 17.4 months. The biological equivalent dose of radiotherapy was significantly higher in the proton group than in the photon group (median, 96.56 Gray [relative biological effectiveness] vs. 62.5 Gray, p < 0.001). The risk of RILD was significantly lower in the proton group (11.8% vs. 36%, p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Proton radiotherapy could deliver a higher radiation dose than photon radiotherapy without increasing the risk of RILD and result in a better overall survival rate for those diagnosed with HCC and treated with radiotherapy with curative intent.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular/radioterapia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/radioterapia , Fotones/uso terapéutico , Terapia de Protones , Anciano , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/mortalidad , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Hígado/efectos de la radiación , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fotones/efectos adversos , Puntaje de Propensión , Terapia de Protones/efectos adversos , Traumatismos por Radiación/epidemiología , Dosificación RadioterapéuticaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage C (BCLC C) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) includes a heterogeneous population for which sorafeninb is one of the recommended therapies. We aim to evaluate the real world clinical treatment and survival of BCLC stage C patients in an Asian cohort. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study that enrolled 427 consecutive BCLC stage C patients diagnosed between 2011 and 2017 by using the HCC registry data for our hospital. All patients were managed via a multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach. RESULTS: Hepatitis B surface antigen positive was noted in 50.6% of the patients. The patients were classified as performance status (PS)1 alone (n = 83; 19.4%), PS2 alone (n = 23; 5.4%), or macrovascular invasion (MVI) or extrahepatic spread (EHS) (n = 321; 75.2%). The median overall survival (OS) was 11.0 months in the whole cohort. The most frequent treatments were transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) in the PS1 (45.8%) and PS2 patients (52.2%) and sorafenib (32.4%) in the MVI or EHS patients. The independent prognostic factors were the PS, Child-Pugh class, MVI or EHS, alpha fetoprotein levels, and treatment type. CONCLUSIONS: We reported the real world management in BCLC stage C patients in an Asian cohort through the use of personalized management via a MDT approach.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/terapia , Embolización Terapéutica , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/mortalidad , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/patología , Femenino , Antígenos de Superficie de la Hepatitis B/sangre , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Sorafenib/uso terapéutico , Análisis de Supervivencia , Neoplasias Vasculares/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Vasculares/secundario , alfa-Fetoproteínas/análisisRESUMEN
To evaluate clinical outcomes and to identify prognostic factors in isolated para-aortic lymph node (PALN) recurrence, we retrospectively reviewed 65 patients who developed PALN recurrence as the first site of tumor progression from a total of 1521 patients who were treated with curative pelvic radiation therapy (RT) for uterine cervical carcinoma between May 1993 and January 2017. Forty-five of the 65 patients received salvage therapy. The median salvage PALN radiation dose was 54 Gy (range: 18 to 62 Gy). Prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) and distant metastases (DMs) were analyzed with univariate and multivariate Cox regression. The median follow-up period for surviving patients was 61 months (4-202 months). The median OS was 27.7 months (0.3-202 months). The highest level of PALN metastases at or above the L1 spinal level (hazard ratio [HR] 9.88, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.44-28.38, P<0.001) and the presence of leg edema and/or back pain at recurrence (HR 3.25, 95% CI 1.57-6.75, P=0.002) were significantly associated with worse OS. A significantly higher incidence of DMs (HR 5.97, 95% CI 2.05-17.35, P=0.001) was found in the patients with a high level (≥L1) of PALN metastases. Salvage RT (HR 0.35, 95% CI 0.17-0.71, P=0.004) and restaging with positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) (HR 0.2, 95% CI 0.04-0.93, P=0.039) were independent predictors of a better OS. In conclusion, a high level (≥L1) of PALN metastases predicts poor survival and a high rate of DMs. Periodic surveillance for early detection and restaging by PET/CT imaging to identify the optimal treatment at recurrence is recommended.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To compare the dose distributions of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) using the simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) technique with that of the traditional midline block (MB) technique for boosting the parametrium in patients with cervical cancer. METHODS: Treatment plans using VMAT or IMRT with the SIB technique (VMAT-SIB and IMRT-SIB) and IMRT followed by the MB technique (IMRT-MB) were generated for each of the 10 patients with cervical cancer. For the SIB plans, 45-Gy and 50-Gy dose levels in 25 equal fractions were set for the pelvis planning target volume 45 (PTV45) and the parametrial boost volume (PTV50), respectively. For the IMRT-MB plans, the parametrium was sequentially boosted with the MB technique (5.4 Gy in three fractions) after pelvic IMRT (PTV45). RESULTS: Volume receiving 100% of the prescribed dose or more coverage of the PTV50 was significantly better for VMAT-SIB and IMRT-SIB than that for IMRT-MB (99.08 and 99.31% compared with 91.79%, respectively; p < 0.05). VMAT-SIB and IMRT-SIB both generated significantly greater doses to the organs at risk (OARs) except for the volume receiving 50 Gy or more doses, which were significantly lower for the bladder and bowel. Comparable results were achieved with VMAT-SIB and IMRT-SIB. CONCLUSION: The VMAT-SIB and IMRT-SIB techniques are promising in terms of dose distributions and tumour coverage, although these approaches might result in slightly higher doses of radiation to the OARs. Advances in knowledge: This is the first study to examine the feasibility of the SIB technique using IMRT or VMAT to boost the parametrium. The techniques dosimetrically produced better target coverage but resulted in slightly higher doses to the OARs.