BACKGROUND: Osteoarthritis is a chronic, progressive, and degenerative condition with limited therapy options. Recently, biologic therapies have been an evolving option for the management of osteoarthritis. PURPOSE: To assess whether allogenic mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) have the potential to improve functional parameters and induce cartilage regeneration in patients with osteoarthritis. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. METHODS: A total of 146 patients with grade 2 and 3 osteoarthritis were randomized to either an MSC group or placebo group with a ratio of 1:1. There were 73 patients per group who received either a single intra-articular injection of bone marrow-derived MSCs (BMMSCs; 25 million cells) or placebo, followed by 20 mg per 2 mL of hyaluronic acid under ultrasound guidance. The primary endpoint was the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) total score. The secondary endpoints were WOMAC subscores for pain, stiffness, and physical function; the visual analog scale score for pain; and magnetic resonance imaging findings using T2 mapping and cartilage volume. RESULTS: Overall, 65 patients from the BMMSC group and 68 patients from the placebo group completed 12-month follow-up. The BMMSC group showed significant improvements in the WOMAC total score compared with the placebo group at 6 and 12 months (percentage change: -23.64% [95% CI, -32.88 to -14.40] at 6 months and -45.60% [95% CI, -55.97 to -35.23] at 12 months P < .001; percentage change, -44.3%). BMMSCs significantly improved WOMAC pain, stiffness, and physical function subscores as well as visual analog scale scores at 6 and 12 months (P < .001). T2 mapping showed that there was no worsening of deep cartilage in the medial femorotibial compartment of the knee in the BMMSC group at 12-month follow-up, whereas in the placebo group, there was significant and gradual worsening of cartilage (P < .001). Cartilage volume did not change significantly in the BMMSC group. There were 5 adverse events that were possibly/probably related to the study drug and consisted of injection-site swelling and pain, which improved within a few days. CONCLUSION: In this small randomized trial, BMMSCs proved to be safe and effective for the treatment of grade 2 and 3 osteoarthritis. The intervention was simple and easy to administer, provided sustained relief of pain and stiffness, improved physical function, and prevented worsening of cartilage quality for ≥12 months. REGISTRATION: CTRI/2018/09/015785 (National Institutes of Health and Clinical Trials Registry-India).
Osteoarthritis, Knee , Humans , Treatment Outcome , Knee Joint , Knee , Pain , Double-Blind Method , Injections, Intra-Articular
INTRODUCTION: The role of perioperative cultures to identify infection in open fractures has been doubtful. The method of sampling for cultures in open fractures includes swab or tissue collection. However, the efficacy of either of these two techniques has not been compared in the setting of an acute open fracture. We conducted a study to compare the bacteriological culture results between the two techniques. METHODOLOGY: A pilot study was done at our institution, where all type 2, 3A, and 3B open fractures admitted in the emergency and operated for debridement and stabilization were included in the study. Intraoperatively, after debridement of the wound, swab and tissue specimens were collected and sent to the same laboratory. The results of the cultures were then collected for comparison after the necessary incubation period. Follow-up of outpatient records was also done to see its clinical significance. RESULTS: A total of 30 samples of swab and tissue cultures collected post-debridement of acute open fractures in the operation theater were studied. Only 13 samples grew an organism either in swab/tissue culture or both. Nine tissue samples and eight swab samples showed growth. In four cases, both swab and tissue showed growth, but the same organism grew in only one instance. The other three cases showing growth in both tissue and swab had different organisms. Statistically, the kappa coefficient was found to be 0.26 and the agreement between swab and tissue culture was found fair. However, the kappa did not account for the species of the organisms. Tissue samples showed more number of specific organism growing in them, compared to swab culture samples. CONCLUSION: The ideal technique of taking samples for culture in acute open fractures is uncertain. Tissue culture may be better in isolating specific organisms in an acute open fracture wound. However, it is uncertain if the same organism may cause infection.
INTRODUCTION: Acute concomitant rupture of both anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and patellar tendon is a rare injury. The diagnosis of either of the injuries may be missed on clinical examination in the emergency room. A high index of suspicion is necessary when active extension is absent, and necessary investigations like ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) should be done to confirm the diagnosis. There are no fixed treatment protocols in these injuries. The options include immediate repair of patellar tendon with either simultaneous or delayed reconstruction of ACL. CASE REPORT: We present a case of 30-year-old man with simultaneous ACL and patellar tendon injury sustained in a RTA, riding pillion on a bike. The mechanism of injury was a direct blow on his flexed right knee followed by landing on the ground, on his foot with a twisting valgus thrust. Following clinical examination and radiographs, MRI was done which showed complete patellar tendon mid substance rupture and ACL tear. A staged procedure was planned, and the patient was taken up for immediate patellar tendon repair. This was followed by 5 weeks of cast immobilization. After 6 weeks, the knee was mobilized and ACL reconstruction was done using hamstring graft. At last, follow-up, the patient regained full knee extension and flexion up to 120° with normal gait. CONCLUSION: High-velocity knee injuries have to be carefully evaluated for such concomitant tears, as they may be missed. If suspected, an immediate ultrasound scan or MRI should be done to confirm the injuries, especially that of the patellar tendon. As of now, a staged procedure comprising immediate patellar tendon repair followed by ACL reconstruction at a later date seems to be the better option of treatment.
BACKGROUND: Post-surgical lumbar instability is an established complication but there is limited evidence in the literature regarding the incidence of lumbar instability following fenestration and discectomy. We analyzed our results following fenestration discectomy with a special focus on instability. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-three patients between the age of 17 and 52 years who had undergone fenestration discectomy for a single-level lumbar intervertebral disc prolapse were followed-up for a period of 1-5 years. The criteria for instability included "instability catch,", "painful catch," and "apprehension." The working capacity of the patient and the outcome score of the surgery were assessed by means of the Oswestry disability score and the Prolo economic and functional outcome score. Flexion-extension lateral radiographs were taken and analyzed for abnormal tilt and translation. RESULTS: Of the 83 patients included, 70 were men and 13 were women, with an average age of 37.35 years (17-52 years) at 5 years follow-up. Clinical instability was seen in 10 (12.04%) patients. Radiological instability was noted in 29 (34.9%) patients. Only six (60%) of the 10 patients who demonstrated clinical instability had radiological evidence of instability. Twenty (68.96%) patients with radiological instability were asymptomatic. Three (10.34%) patients with only radiological instability had unsatisfactory outcome. The Oswestry scoring showed an average score of 19.8%. Mild disability was noted in 59 (71.08%) patients and moderate disability was seen in 24 (28.91%) patients. None of the patients had severe disability. These outcomes were compared with the outcomes in other studies in the literature for microdiscectomy and the results were found to be comparable. CONCLUSION: The favorable outcome of this study is in good agreement with other studies on microdiscectomy. Clinical instability in 12.04% of the patients is in agreement with other studies. Radiological signs of instability are seen even in asymptomatic patients and so are not as reliable as clinical signs of instability. Standard fenestration discectomy does not destabilize the spine more than microdiscectomy.
