Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF)-B Blockade with CSL346 in Diabetic Kidney Disease: A Phase 2A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Increased vascular endothelial growth factor B (VEGF-B) expression in patients with diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is associated with increased lipid deposition in glomerular podocytes. Reducing VEGF-B activity in animal models of DKD using an anti-VEGF-B antibody improved histological evidence of glomerular injury and reduced albuminuria; effects attributed to prevention of ectopic lipid deposition in the kidney. CSL346 is a novel humanized monoclonal antibody that binds VEGF-B with high affinity. Targeting VEGF-B in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus may improve DKD progression markers. METHODS: An international, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2a study (NCT04419467) assessed CSL346 (8 mg/kg or 16 mg/kg subcutaneously every 4 weeks for 12 weeks) in participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus and a urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) ≥150 mg/g (17.0 mg/mmol), and eGFR >20 mL/min/1.73m2. Efficacy, safety/tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of CSL346 were evaluated. The primary analysis compared the change from baseline in log-transformed UACR between the two CSL346 dose groups combined versus placebo at Week 16. RESULTS: In total, 114 participants were randomized. CSL346 did not significantly reduce UACR compared with placebo at Week 16 (combined CSL346 group difference from placebo 95% confidence interval]: 4.0% [-14.7, 26.8]). Furthermore, no effect was seen in participant subgroups (degree of kidney impairment or sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 [SGLT2] inhibitor use) or on urinary biomarkers reflecting proximal tubular injury. CSL346 was generally well tolerated; however, diastolic blood pressure was significantly higher with CSL346 16 mg/kg versus placebo from Week 2 onwards, with differences ranging from +3.8 to +5.3 mmHg (P = 0.002 at Week 16). CONCLUSIONS: CSL346 did not reduce UACR compared with placebo at 16 weeks in participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus and DKD, and was associated with an increase in diastolic blood pressure.

Effects of Once-Weekly Semaglutide on Kidney Disease Outcomes by KDIGO Risk Category in the SUSTAIN 6 Trial.

Introduction: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) are recommended by Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) as risk-based treatment for hyperglycemia, weight management, and cardiovascular (CV) risk reduction in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and chronic kidney disease (CKD). The aim of this post hoc analysis was to assess treatment effects of once weekly semaglutide on kidney disease outcomes by KDIGO risk category and on changes in KDIGO risk category, compared with placebo. Methods: Participants with T2D and established CV disease or at high CV risk treated with once weekly semaglutide or placebo in SUSTAIN 6 (NCT01720446) were stratified by baseline KDIGO risk category (low [n = 1596], moderate [n = 831], high [n = 445], very high [n = 366]). Treatment effect was analyzed for a kidney disease composite end point (macroalbuminuria, serum creatinine doubling and estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] < 45 ml/min per 1.73 m2, kidney replacement therapy, or death due to kidney disease) from baseline to 2 years. Results: The treatment effect of semaglutide versus placebo was consistent across KDIGO categories for the kidney disease composite end point (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval (CI)]: 0.35 [0.07-1.72], 0.42 [0.25-0.72], 0.87 [0.45-1.71], and 0.72 [0.42-1.23] for low, moderate, high, and very high risk categories, respectively; P interaction = 0.28). Participants receiving semaglutide were more likely to move to a lower KDIGO risk category (odds ratio: 1.69; 95% CI: [1.32-2.16]) and less likely to move to a higher KDIGO risk category versus placebo (odds ratio: 0.71; 95% CI: [0.59-0.86]). Conclusion: Once weekly semaglutide versus placebo reduced risks of kidney disease end points and improved risk categories irrespective of baseline KDIGO risk.

Efficacy and safety of SGLT2 inhibitors with and without glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists: a SMART-C collaborative meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists both improve cardiovascular and kidney outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. We sought to evaluate whether the benefits of SGLT2 inhibitors are consistent in patients receiving and not receiving GLP-1 receptor agonists. METHODS: We conducted a collaborative meta-analysis of trials included in the SGLT2 Inhibitor Meta-Analysis Cardio-Renal Trialists' Consortium, restricted to participants with diabetes. Treatment effects from individual trials were obtained from Cox regression models and pooled using inverse variance weighted meta-analysis. The two main cardiovascular outcomes assessed included major adverse cardiovascular events (nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or cardiovascular death), and hospitalisation for heart failure or cardiovascular death. The main kidney outcomes assessed were chronic kidney disease progression (≥40% decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR], kidney failure [eGFR <15 mL/min/1·73 m2, chronic dialysis, or kidney transplantation], or death due to kidney failure), and the rate of change in eGFR over time. Safety outcomes were also assessed. FINDINGS: Across 12 randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials, 3065 (4·2%) of 73 238 participants with diabetes were using GLP-1 receptor agonists at baseline. SGLT2 inhibitors reduced the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events in participants both receiving and not receiving GLP-1 receptor agonists (hazard ratio [HR] 0·81, 95% CI 0·63-1·03 vs 0·90, 0·86-0·94; p-heterogeneity=0·31). Effects on hospitalisation for heart failure or cardiovascular death (0·76, 0·57-1·01 vs 0·78, 0·74-0·82; p-heterogeneity=0·90) and chronic kidney disease progression (0·65, 0·46-0·94 vs 0·67, 0·62-0·72; p-heterogeneity=0·81) were also consistent regardless of GLP-1 receptor agonist use, as was the effect on the chronic rate of change in eGFR over time (heterogeneity=0·92). Fewer serious adverse events occurred with SGLT2 inhibitors compared with placebo, irrespective of GLP-1 receptor agonist use (relative risk 0·87, 95% CI 0·79-0·96 vs 0·91, 0·89-0·93; p-heterogeneity=0·41). INTERPRETATION: The effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on cardiovascular and kidney outcomes are consistent regardless of the background use of GLP-1 receptor agonists. These findings suggest independent effects of these evidence-based therapies and support clinical practice guidelines recommending the use of these agents in combination to improve cardiovascular and kidney metabolic outcomes. FUNDING: National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia and the Ramaciotti Foundation.

Effect of hyperglycemia and empagliflozin on markers of cardiorenal injury and inflammation in patients with type 1 diabetes.

AIMS: To investigate the effect of hyperglycemia and empagliflozin on cardiorenal injury and inflammation in patients with uncomplicated type 1 diabetes (T1D). METHODS: Serum cardiac (sST2, Gal-3, cTnT), kidney injury (KIM-1, NGAL), inflammatory (sTNFR1, sTNFR2), and hemodynamic (NT-proBNP, EPO) markers were assessed post-hoc in two separate T1D cohorts. The glycemic clamp trial (NCT02344602) evaluated 49 adults with T1D and 27 controls under euglycemic and acute hyperglycemic conditions. The crossover BETWEEN trial (NCT02632747) investigated empagliflozin 25 mg plus ramipril for 4 weeks compared to placebo-ramipril for 4 weeks in 30 adults with T1D. RESULTS: In the glycemic clamp study, hyperglycemia acutely increased levels of NT-proBNP (p = 0.0003) and sTNFR2 (p = 0.003). BETWEEN participants treated with empagliflozin exhibited a paradoxical subacute rise in NT-proBNP (p = 0.0147) compared to placebo, independent of hematocrit. Individuals with higher baseline levels of sST2 and sTNFR1 had greater empagliflozin-associated reductions in systolic blood pressure and greater activation of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) mediators, whereas those with higher baseline levels of KIM-1 and sTNFR1 had greater glomerular filtration rate (GFR) dip. CONCLUSION: The protective mechanisms of SGLT2 inhibition on blood pressure, RAAS activation, and renal hemodynamics are apparent in the subset of people with uncomplicated T1D with adverse cardiorenal and inflammatory markers.

Prognostic Implications of Diabetic Ketoacidosis in Adults on Long-term Mortality and Diabetes-related Complications.

OBJECTIVES: Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) occurring after diabetes diagnosis is often associated with risk factors for other diabetes-related complications. In this study we aimed to determine the prognostic implications of DKA on all-cause mortality and complications in type 1 diabetes (T1D). METHODS: Previously collected data from the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (DCCT/EDIC) study were obtained through the the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Central Repository. Using Cox proportional hazards models with time-dependent covariates, we examined age- and sex-adjusted, glycated hemoglobin-adjusted, and fully adjusted associations of DKA with all-cause mortality, cardiovascular disease, microvascular, and acute complications over 34 years. RESULTS: Of the 1,441 study participants, 297 had 488 DKA events. Prior DKA was associated with a higher risk of age- and sex-adjusted all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 8.28, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.74 to 18.32, p<0.001), major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) (HR 2.05, 95% CI 1.34 to 3.13, p<0.001), and all advanced microvascular and acute complications compared with no prior DKA. Most associations except retinopathy were significant even after adjustment for covariates. In our fully adjusted analysis, prior DKA was associated with a significantly higher risk of subsequent all-cause mortality (HR 9.13, 95% CI 3.87 to 21.50, p<0.001), MACEs (HR 1.66, 95% CI 1.07 to 2.59, p=0.03), advanced kidney disease (HR 2.10, 95% CI 1.00 to 4.22, p=0.049), advanced neuropathy (HR 1.49, 95% CI 1.05 to 2.13, p=0.03), severe hypoglycemia (HR 1.53, 95% CI 1.28 to 1.81, p<0.001), and recurrent DKA (HR 3.24, 95% CI 2.41 to 4.36, p<0.001) compared with person-time without DKA. CONCLUSIONS: DKA is a prognostic marker for diabetes complications, including excess all-cause mortality. Intensified clinical interventions, such as cardiovascular prevention strategies, may be warranted after diagnosis of DKA.

Effect of semaglutide on kidney function across different levels of baseline HbA1c, blood pressure, body weight and albuminuria in SUSTAIN 6 and PIONEER 6.

BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS: This post-hoc analysis explored the semaglutide effects on eGFR slope by baseline glycemic control, blood pressure (BP), body mass index (BMI), and albuminuria status in people with type 2 diabetes and high cardiovascular risk. METHODS: Pooled SUSTAIN 6 and PIONEER 6 data were analyzed for change in estimated glomerular filtration (eGFR) slope by baseline HbA1c (<8%/≥8%; <64 mmol/mol/≥64 mmol/mol), systolic BP (<140/90 mmHg/≥140/90 mmHg), and BMI (<30 kg/m2/≥30 kg/m2). SUSTAIN 6 data were analyzed by baseline urinary albumin: creatinine ratio (UACR; <30/30 - 300/>300 mg/g). RESULTS: The estimated absolute treatment differences (ETD) overall in eGFR slope [95% confidence intervals] favored semaglutide versus placebo in the pooled analysis (0.59 [0.29;0.89] mL/min/1.73m2/year) and in SUSTAIN 6 (0.60 [0.24;0.96] mL/min/1.73m2/year); the absolute benefit was consistent across all HbA1c, BP, BMI, and UACR subgroups (all p-interaction > 0.5). CONCLUSION: A clinically meaningful reduction in risk of chronic kidney disease progression was observed with semaglutide versus placebo regardless of HbA1c, BP, BMI, and UACR levels.

Design and baseline characteristics of the Finerenone, in addition to standard of care, on the progression of kidney disease in patients with Non-Diabetic Chronic Kidney Disease (FIND-CKD) randomized trial.

BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS: Finerenone, a non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, improved kidney, and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with CKD and T2D in two Phase 3 outcome trials. The FIND-CKD study investigates the effect of finerenone in adults with CKD without diabetes. METHODS: FIND-CKD (NCT05047263 and EU CT 2023-506897-11-00) is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 3 trial in patients with CKD of non-diabetic aetiology. Adults with a urinary albumin-creatinine ratio (UACR) of ≥ 200 to ≤3500 mg/g and eGFR ≥ 25 to <90 mL/min/1.73 m2 receiving a maximum tolerated dose of a renin-angiotensin-system (RAS) inhibitor were randomized 1:1 to once daily placebo or finerenone 10 or 20 mg depending on eGFR above or below 60 mL/min/1.73 m2. The primary efficacy outcome is total eGFR slope, defined as the mean annual rate of change in eGFR from baseline to Month 32. Secondary efficacy outcomes include a combined cardiorenal composite outcome comprising time to kidney failure, sustained ≥57% decrease in eGFR, hospitalization for heart failure, or cardiovascular death, as well as separate kidney and cardiovascular composite outcomes. Adverse events are recorded to assess tolerability and safety. RESULTS: Across 24 countries, 3231 patients were screened and 1584 were randomized to study treatment. The most common causes of CKD were chronic glomerulonephritis (57.0%) and hypertensive/ischaemic nephropathy (29.0%). Immunoglobulin A nephropathy was the most common glomerulonephritis (26.3% of the total population). At baseline, mean eGFR and median UACR were 46.7 mL/min/1.73 m2 and 818.9 mg/g, respectively. Diuretics were used by 282 participants (17.8%), statins by 851 (53.7%), and calcium channel blockers by 794 (50.1%). SGLT2 inhibitors were used in 16.9% of patients; these individuals had a similar mean eGFR (45.6 vs 46.8 mL/min/1.73 m2) and slightly higher median UACR (871.9 vs 808.3 mg/g) compared to those not using SGLT2 inhibitors at baseline. CONCLUSIONS: FIND-CKD is the first Phase 3 trial of finerenone in patients with CKD of non-diabetic aetiology.

DCRM 2.0: Multispecialty practice recommendations for the management of diabetes, cardiorenal, and metabolic diseases.

The spectrum of cardiorenal and metabolic diseases comprises many disorders, including obesity, type 2 diabetes (T2D), chronic kidney disease (CKD), atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), heart failure (HF), dyslipidemias, hypertension, and associated comorbidities such as pulmonary diseases and metabolism dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease and metabolism dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASLD and MASH, respectively, formerly known as nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis [NAFLD and NASH]). Because cardiorenal and metabolic diseases share pathophysiologic pathways, two or more are often present in the same individual. Findings from recent outcome trials have demonstrated benefits of various treatments across a range of conditions, suggesting a need for practice recommendations that will guide clinicians to better manage complex conditions involving diabetes, cardiorenal, and/or metabolic (DCRM) diseases. To meet this need, we formed an international volunteer task force comprising leading cardiologists, nephrologists, endocrinologists, and primary care physicians to develop the DCRM 2.0 Practice Recommendations, an updated and expanded revision of a previously published multispecialty consensus on the comprehensive management of persons living with DCRM. The recommendations are presented as 22 separate graphics covering the essentials of management to improve general health, control cardiorenal risk factors, and manage cardiorenal and metabolic comorbidities, leading to improved patient outcomes.

Evaluation of glomerular hemodynamic changes by sodium-glucose-transporter 2 inhibition in type 2 diabetic rats using in vivo imaging.

The mechanisms responsible for glomerular hemodynamic regulation with sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors in kidney disease due to type 2 diabetes remain unclear. Therefore, we investigated changes in glomerular hemodynamic function using an animal model of type 2 diabetes, treated with an SGLT2 inhibitor alone or in combination with a renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitor using male Zucker lean (ZL) and Zucker diabetic fatty (ZDF) rats. Afferent and efferent arteriolar diameter and single-nephron glomerular filtration rate (SNGFR) were evaluated in ZDF rats measured at 0, 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes after the administration of a SGLT2 inhibitor (luseogliflozin). Additionally, we assessed these changes under the administration of the adenosine A1 receptor (A1aR) antagonist (8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine), along with coadministration of luseogliflozin and an angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB), telmisartan. ZDF rats had significantly increased SNGFR, and afferent and efferent arteriolar diameters compared to ZL rats, indicating glomerular hyperfiltration. Administration of luseogliflozin significantly reduced afferent vasodilatation and glomerular hyperfiltration, with no impact on efferent arteriolar diameter. Urinary adenosine levels were increased significantly in the SGLT2 inhibitor group compared to the vehicle group. A1aR antagonism blocked the effect of luseogliflozin on kidney function. Co-administration of the SGLT2 inhibitor and ARB decreased the abnormal expansion of glomerular afferent arterioles, whereas the efferent arteriolar diameter was not affected. Thus, regulation of afferent arteriolar vascular tone via the A1aR pathway is associated with glomerular hyperfiltration in type 2 diabetic kidney disease.

Volenrelaxin (LY3540378) increases Renal Plasma Flow: A Randomized Phase 1 Trial.

BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS: Volenrelaxin, is a half-life-extended recombinant human relaxin protein developed for improving kidney perfusion and cardiorenal function. This study assessed the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) of volenrelaxin following single- and multiple-ascending doses (SAD and MAD) administration. METHODS: In this Phase 1, 4-part, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled SAD and MAD study in healthy participants, SAD participants (n = 56) received an intravenous (IV) or subcutaneous (SC) dose of volenrelaxin or placebo in a dose-ascending manner. MAD participants (n = 77) received volenrelaxin or placebo SC once weekly for 5 weeks. Effective renal plasma flow (ERPF) and measured glomerular filtration rate (mGFR) were determined by para-aminohippurate and iohexol clearance, respectively. RESULTS: Volenrelaxin demonstrated an extended half-life and increased acute and chronic placebo-adjusted ERPF change from baseline by 50% and 44%, respectively (p < 0.0001). Measured GFR was unchanged, while filtration fraction and afferent/efferent renal arteriolar resistances were reduced. Systolic and diastolic blood pressures decreased, and pulse rate increased with increasing volenrelaxin exposures, demonstrating maximal model-derived placebo-adjusted changes (90% confidence interval) of -6.16 (-8.04, -4.28) mmHg, -6.10 (-7.61, -4.58) mmHg, and + 4.39 (3.38, 5.39) bpm, respectively. Adverse events were mild, with no difference in orthostatic hypotension between volenrelaxin and placebo. CONCLUSION: Volenrelaxin was well-tolerated, safe and suitable for weekly SC dosing. Volenrelaxin showed a sustained improvement in kidney perfusion upon repeated dosing, supporting further clinical development in chronic kidney disease and chronic heart failure. Clinical trial registration: NCT04768855.

Combination therapy for kidney disease in people with diabetes mellitus.

Diabetic kidney disease (DKD), defined as co-existing diabetes and chronic kidney disease in the absence of other clear causes of kidney injury, occurs in approximately 20-40% of patients with diabetes mellitus. As the global prevalence of diabetes has increased, DKD has become highly prevalent and a leading cause of kidney failure, accelerated cardiovascular disease, premature mortality and global health care expenditure. Multiple pathophysiological mechanisms contribute to DKD, and single lifestyle or pharmacological interventions have shown limited efficacy at preserving kidney function. For nearly two decades, renin-angiotensin system inhibitors were the only available kidney-protective drugs. However, several new drug classes, including sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors, a non-steroidal mineralocorticoid antagonist and a selective endothelin receptor antagonist, have now been demonstrated to improve kidney outcomes in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. In addition, emerging preclinical and clinical evidence of the kidney-protective effects of glucagon-like-peptide-1 receptor agonists has led to the prospective testing of these agents for DKD. Research and clinical efforts are geared towards using therapies with potentially complementary efficacy in combination to safely halt kidney disease progression. As more kidney-protective drugs become available, the outlook for people living with DKD should improve in the next few decades.

Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors and Major Adverse Cardiovascular Outcomes: A SMART-C Collaborative Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) consistently improve heart failure and kidney-related outcomes; however, effects on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) across different patient populations are less clear. METHODS: This was a collaborative trial-level meta-analysis from the SGLT2i Meta-analysis Cardio-Renal Trialists Consortium, which includes all phase 3, placebo-controlled, outcomes trials of SGLT2i across 3 patient populations (patients with diabetes at high risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, heart failure [HF], or chronic kidney disease). The outcomes of interest were MACE (composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction , or stroke), individual components of MACE (inclusive of fatal and nonfatal events), all-cause mortality, and death subtypes. Effect estimates for SGLT2i versus placebo were meta-analyzed across trials and examined across key subgroups (established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, previous myocardial infarction, diabetes, previous HF, albuminuria, chronic kidney disease stages, and risk groups). RESULTS: A total of 78 607 patients across 11 trials were included: 42 568 (54.2%), 20 725 (26.4%), and 15 314 (19.5%) were included from trials of patients with diabetes at high risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, HF, or chronic kidney disease, respectively. SGLT2i reduced the rate of MACE by 9% (hazard ration [HR], 0.91 [95% CI, 0.87-0.96], P<0.0001) with a consistent effect across all 3 patient populations (I2=0%) and across all key subgroups. This effect was primarily driven by a reduction in cardiovascular death (HR, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.81-0.92], P<0.0001), with no significant effect for myocardial infarction in the overall population (HR, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.87-1.04], P=0.29), and no effect on stroke (HR, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.91-1.07], P=0.77). The benefit for cardiovascular death was driven primarily by reductions in HF death and sudden cardiac death (HR, 0.68 [95% CI, 0.46-1.02] and HR, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.78-0.95], respectively) and was generally consistent across subgroups, with the possible exception of being more apparent in those with albuminuria (Pinteraction=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: SGLT2i reduce the risk of MACE across a broad range of patients irrespective of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, diabetes, kidney function, or other major clinical characteristics at baseline. This effect is driven primarily by a reduction of cardiovascular death, particularly HF death and sudden cardiac death, without a significant effect on myocardial infarction in the overall population, and no effect on stroke. These data may help inform selection for SGLT2i therapies across the spectrum of cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic disease.

An update review of post-transplant diabetes mellitus: Concept, risk factors, clinical implications and management.

OBJECTIVE: Kidney transplantation is the gold standard therapeutic alternative for patients with end-stage renal disease; nevertheless, it is not without potential complications leading to considerable morbidity and mortality such as post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM). This narrative review aims to comprehensively evaluate PTDM in terms of its diagnostic approach, underlying pathophysiological pathways, epidemiological data, and management strategies. METHODS: Articles were retrieved from electronic databases using predefined search terms. Inclusion criteria encompassed studies investigating PTDM diagnosis, pathophysiology, epidemiology, and management strategies. RESULTS: PTDM emerges as a significant complication following kidney transplantation, influenced by various pathophysiological factors including peripheral insulin resistance, immunosuppressive medications, infections, and proinflammatory pathways. Despite discrepancies in prevalence estimates, PTDM poses substantial challenges to transplant. Diagnostic approaches, including traditional criteria such as fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and HbA1c, are limited in their ability to capture early PTDM manifestations. Oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) emerges as a valuable tool, particularly in the early post-transplant period. Management strategies for PTDM remain unclear, within sufficient evidence from large-scale randomized clinical trials to guide optimal interventions. Nevertheless, glucose-lowering agents and life style modifications constitute primary modalities for managing hyperglycemia in transplant recipients. DISCUSSION: The complex interplay between PTDM and the transplant process necessitates individualized diagnostic and management approaches. While early recognition and intervention are paramount, modifications to maintenance immunosuppressive regimens based solely on PTDM risk are not warranted, given the potential adverse consequences such as increased rejection risk. Further research is essential to refine management strategies and enhance outcomes for transplant recipients.

Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.

Volume overload represents a hallmark clinical feature linked to the development and progression of heart failure (HF). Alleviating signs and symptoms of volume overload represents a foundational HF treatment target that is achieved using loop diuretics in the acute and chronic setting. Recent work has provided evidence to support guideline-directed medical therapies, such as sodium glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) antagonists, as important adjunct diuretics that may act synergistically when used with background loop diuretics in people with chronic HF. Furthermore, there is growing interest in understanding the role of SGLT2 inhibitors, carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, thiazide diuretics, and MR antagonists in treating volume overload in patients hospitalized for acute HF, particularly in the setting of loop diuretic resistance. Thus, the current review demonstrates that: 1) SGLT2 inhibitors and MR antagonists confer long-term cardioprotection in chronic HF patients but it is unclear if natriuresis or diuresis represents the primary mechanisms for this benefit, 2) SGLT2 inhibitors, carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, and thiazide diuretics increase natriuresis in the acute HF setting, but implications on long-term outcomes remain unclear and warrants further investigation, and 3) a multi-nephron segment approach, using agents that act on distinct segments of the nephron, potentiate diuresis to alleviate signs and symptoms of volume overload in acute HF.

Obesity and the kidney: mechanistic links and therapeutic advances.

Obesity is strongly associated with the development of diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease (CKD), but there is evidence for a bidirectional relationship wherein the kidney also acts as a key regulator of body weight. In this Review, we highlight the mechanisms implicated in obesity-related CKD, and outline how the kidney might modulate feeding and body weight through a growth differentiation factor 15-dependent kidney-brain axis. The favourable effects of bariatric surgery on kidney function are discussed, and medical therapies designed for the treatment of diabetes mellitus that lower body weight and preserve kidney function independent of glycaemic lowering, including sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, incretin-based therapies and metformin, are also reviewed. In summary, we propose that kidney function and body weight are related in a bidirectional fashion, and that this interrelationship affects human health and disease.

Sotagliflozin and Kidney Outcomes, Kidney Function, and Albuminuria in Type 2 Diabetes and CKD: A Secondary Analysis of the SCORED Trial.

BACKGROUND: In the initial analysis of the Effect of Sotagliflozin on Cardiovascular and Renal Events in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Moderate Renal Impairment Who Are at Cardiovascular Risk (SCORED) trial, because of early trial termination and suspension of adjudication, reconciliation of eGFR laboratory data and case report forms had not been completed. This resulted in a small number of kidney composite events and a nominal effect of sotagliflozin versus placebo on this outcome. This exploratory analysis uses laboratory eGFR data, regardless of case report form completion, to assess the effects of sotagliflozin on the predefined kidney composite end point in the SCORED trial and additional cardiorenal composite end points. METHODS: SCORED was a multicenter, randomized trial evaluating cardiorenal outcomes with sotagliflozin versus placebo in 10,584 patients with type 2 diabetes and CKD. This exploratory analysis used laboratory data to derive the eGFR components and case report form data for the non-laboratory-defined components that together made up the kidney and cardiorenal composites. AKI was also assessed in this dataset. RESULTS: Using laboratory data, 223 events were identified, and sotagliflozin reduced the risk of the composite of first event of sustained ≥50% decline in eGFR, eGFR <15 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 , dialysis, or kidney transplant with 87 events (1.6%) in the sotagliflozin group and 136 events (2.6%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval], 0.62 [0.48 to 0.82]), P < 0.001). Sotagliflozin reduced the risk of a cardiorenal composite end point defined as the abovementioned composite plus cardiovascular or kidney death with 239 events (4.5%) in the sotagliflozin group and 306 events (5.7%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval], 0.77 [0.65 to 0.91], P = 0.0023). The results were consistent when using different eGFR decline thresholds and when only including kidney death in composites (all P < 0.01). The incidence of AKI was similar between treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this exploratory analysis using the complete laboratory dataset, sotagliflozin reduced the risk of kidney and cardiorenal composite end points in patients with type 2 diabetes and CKD. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY NAME AND REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03315143 .

Minireview: Understanding and targeting inflammatory, hemodynamic and injury markers for cardiorenal protection in type 1 diabetes.

The coexistence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is common in people with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and is strongly associated with an increased risk of morbidity and mortality. Hence, it is imperative to explore robust tools that can accurately reflect the development and progression of cardiorenal complications. Several cardiovascular and kidney biomarkers have been identified to detect at-risk individuals with T1D. The primary aim of this review is to highlight biomarkers of injury, inflammation, or renal hemodynamic changes that may influence T1D susceptibility to CVD and DKD. We will also examine the impact of approved pharmacotherapies for type 2 diabetes, including renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors, sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) on candidate biomarkers for cardiorenal complications in people with T1D and discuss how these changes may potentially mediate kidney and cardiovascular protection. Identifying predictive and prognostic biomarkers for DKD and CVD may highlight potential drug targets to attenuate cardiorenal disease progression, implement novel risk stratification measures in clinical trials, and improve the assessment, diagnosis, and treatment of at-risk individuals with T1D.

Virtual Pharmacy: An Integrated Collaborative Redesign Targeting Medication-Related Problems in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease.

INTRODUCTION: Collaborative management of kidney disease relies on coordinated and effective partnerships between multiple providers. Siloed traditional health systems often result in delays, barriers to treatment access, and inefficient monitoring. METHODS: We conducted a 1-year observational mixed-methods study. We included all consecutive referrals except for patients without telephone access. We assessed 4 domains of outcomes: (1) patient and caregiver experience, (2) provider experience (e.g., physicians and pharmacists), (3) clinical outcomes specific to medication-related outcomes (e.g., adherence, adverse drug events [ADEs]), and (4) value and efficiency (i.e., medication access, defined as time to treatment and resolution of medication reimbursement issues). RESULTS: Sixty-five patients were referred to the integrated virtual pharmacy (iVRx) model. Most (72%) patients were male. Patients had a median (min, max) age of 60 (27, 85) years and were taking 8 (4, 13) medications. Compared with traditional care delivery models, medication access improved for 56% of participants. Direct home delivery of medication resulted in 91% of patients receiving prescriptions within 2 days of a nephrologist visit. During more than 2,000 pharmacist-patient encounters, 208 ADEs were identified that required clinician intervention to prevent patient harm. When these ADEs were classified by severity, 53% were mild, 45% were moderate (e.g., delaying dose titration in patients initiated on glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) agonists due to intolerable gastrointestinal side effects), and the remaining 2% of ADEs were severe, meaning clinical intervention was required to prevent a serious outcome (e.g., uncontrolled blood pressure, prevention of acute kidney injury). Nephrologists reported high satisfaction with iVRx, citing efficiency, timely response, and collaboration with pharmacists as key facilitators. Of the 65 patient participants, 98% reported being extremely satisfied. CONCLUSIONS: The iVRx is an acceptable and feasible clinical strategy. Our pilot program was associated with improved kidney care by increasing medication access for patients and avoiding potential harms associated with ADEs.