Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 121(1): 24-6, 2005 Jul 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15961214

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare maternal and neonatal morbidity associated with two methods to extract the impacted fetal head during Cesarean delivery. STUDY DESIGN: We retrospectively analyzed cases with difficult extraction of the impacted fetal head during Cesarean section. We compared maternal and neonatal outcomes between cases that were delivered by head extraction following pushing through the vagina ('push' method) and those that were delivered by the reverse breech technique ('pull' method). RESULTS: We reviewed 3105 Cesarean section reports. Difficult extraction necessitating the 'push' or 'pull' methods was noted in 48 (1.5%) instances. Women that were delivered by the 'pull' method had significantly lower rate of postpartum fever (5% versus 46%; odds ratios, 0.06; 95% confidence intervals, 0.007-0.51) and extensions of the uterine incision (15% versus 50%; odds ratio, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.04-0.74) compared to those that were delivered by the 'push' method. Neonatal outcomes were good in all cases. CONCLUSIONS: In cases with difficult extraction of the impacted fetal head during Cesarean section, 'pull' method may result in lower maternal morbidity compared to the traditional 'push' method.


Asunto(s)
Presentación de Nalgas , Cesárea/métodos , Cabeza , Complicaciones del Trabajo de Parto/prevención & control , Adulto , Intervalos de Confianza , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Edad Gestacional , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Presentación en Trabajo de Parto , Oportunidad Relativa , Embarazo , Resultado del Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Versión Fetal
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...